Jagged Alliance 3 > Fallout 3 (For staying true to it's roots)

And now lets look at this from a business side. Fallout 3 = multiplatform and very action oriented and well sell extremely well, Jagged Alliance 3 = staying true to its roots and wont sell for crap.

Why do you all think that Fallout 3 went the way it did? All because of sales. When games cost 10+ million to make, you need to make sure they are going to sell. I don't care how awesome the first 2 fallout games were, the fact is a game just like those wouldn't sell for crap in todays market. Welcome to next gen gameing.

This is one of the only cases in SW where sales can be used to explain anything.

the matrix is lame. mediocre cyberpunk,a poor man's neuromancer.

i think its funny how for the longest time Todd Howard and his merry bunch of bethsoft asswipe devs went on and on about "isometric being dead",...and "first person/real time is soo much more immersive" ,then blizzard comes around and owns them by announcing diablo 3 as well as keeping the series in it's isometric roots.

[QUOTE="Bulova"]You can't exactly say fallout 3 didnt stay true to its roots until you play it.Tony-Harrison

It doesn't stay true to it's roots.

Greedy developers & 'tards who buy dumbed down s*** like Oblivion with Guns are destroying gaming.

HenriH-42

That's awfully PATHETIC & ELITIST of you to state that as if you are superior to me.

Unless you're joking...