John Carmack: Rage To Look Worse On Xbox360

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for superjim42
superjim42

3588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 superjim42
Member since 2005 • 3588 Posts

http://ps3.qj.net/Carmack-Rage-to-look-worse-on-Xbox-360-than-PS3-PC-Mac-versions/pg/49/aid/122805

wow who would have thought? and this is coming from one of the senior/best game developers.

blu-ray has the capacity and so does pc and mac for the game. where as xbox360 will require heavy compression which will comprimise quality.

so what do ppl say now?

so blu-ray still not needed?

or maybe john carmack doesnt matter anymore... :|

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#2 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50163 Posts

A topic such as this has already been posted - and it's even on the first page. :roll:

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26518681

Avatar image for IgorVitaly
IgorVitaly

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 IgorVitaly
Member since 2008 • 1135 Posts
Wait, wasnt it the PS3 fanboys who bashed Carmack for saying the xbox360 had more powerful hardware as total? Has the tunes changed? Nedless to say more space == better.
Avatar image for superjim42
superjim42

3588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 superjim42
Member since 2005 • 3588 Posts

Wait, wasnt it the PS3 fanboys who bashed Carmack for saying the xbox360 had more powerful hardware as total? Has the tunes changed? Nedless to say more space == better.IgorVitaly

well i for one never said such thing. anyway ye more space = better.

ppl need to realise this sooner or later tha blu-ray WILL be needed for future games. and this is an exmaple of that

Avatar image for 1xcalibur1
1xcalibur1

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 1xcalibur1
Member since 2008 • 442 Posts

Wait, wasnt it the PS3 fanboys who bashed Carmack for saying the xbox360 had more powerful hardware as total? Has the tunes changed? Nedless to say more space == better.IgorVitaly

They've never really changed.

http://www.xbox365.com/news.cgi?id=GGririiirr05121649

Avatar image for campbell1874
campbell1874

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 campbell1874
Member since 2006 • 1920 Posts

http://ps3.qj.net/Carmack-Rage-to-look-worse-on-Xbox-360-than-PS3-PC-Mac-versions/pg/49/aid/122805

wow who would have thought? and this is coming from one of the senior/best game developers.

blu-ray has the capacity and so does pc and mac for the game. where as xbox360 will require heavy compression which will comprimise quality.

so what do ppl say now?

so blu-ray still not needed?

or maybe john carmack doesnt matter anymore... :|

superjim42

John Carmack also said: -

By contrast, all of Rage's content will fit onto just one of the high-capacity Blu-Ray discs used by the PlayStation 3. However, Carmack shut down many Sony loyalists' blooming braggadocio by saying that while the Blu-Ray disc is clearly his preferred medium, the 360 is a superior piece of hardware for developers.

So would you agree with John Carmack (one of the senior/best game developers) that the 360 is a superior piece of hardware for gaming deveopers or does he not matter anymore?

The graphic difference might just end up being minor difference.

Untill at least 20% of games require Blu-ray disks then i would say Blu-ray is still not needed yet this gen. There is only a hand full of games that can't be done on one DVD and most of the rest could be done on multiple DVD.

Avatar image for haemorrhagiae
haemorrhagiae

617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 haemorrhagiae
Member since 2008 • 617 Posts

Thats common sense

Cell=FTW!

Avatar image for crunchUK
crunchUK

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 crunchUK
Member since 2007 • 3050 Posts

Thats common sense

Cell=FTW!

haemorrhagiae

you didn't read it at all did you?

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
It's because of compression.
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

Thats common sense

Cell=FTW!

haemorrhagiae
Cell =/= Graphics unlesss their using the advance tools Sony has to make Cell to help the RSX which i'm pretty sure are not being used in this game.
Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts
well then use multi DVDs
Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts
[QUOTE="superjim42"]

http://ps3.qj.net/Carmack-Rage-to-look-worse-on-Xbox-360-than-PS3-PC-Mac-versions/pg/49/aid/122805

wow who would have thought? and this is coming from one of the senior/best game developers.

blu-ray has the capacity and so does pc and mac for the game. where as xbox360 will require heavy compression which will comprimise quality.

so what do ppl say now?

so blu-ray still not needed?

or maybe john carmack doesnt matter anymore... :|

campbell1874

John Carmack also said: -

By contrast, all of Rage's content will fit onto just one of the high-capacity Blu-Ray discs used by the PlayStation 3. However, Carmack shut down many Sony loyalists' blooming braggadocio by saying that while the Blu-Ray disc is clearly his preferred medium, the 360 is a superior piece of hardware for developers.

So would you agree with John Carmack (one of the senior/best game developers) that the 360 is a superior piece of hardware for gaming deveopers or does he not matter anymore?

The graphic difference might just end up being minor difference.

Untill at least 20% of games require Blu-ray disks then i would say Blu-ray is still not needed yet this gen. There is only a hand full of games that can't be done on one DVD and most of the rest could be done on multiple DVD.

Well, the 360 will soon have an installable feature for the 360, perhaps he can use that? Knowing John Tarmatt, it'll probably take 100M of disk space to install the game. :P

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
Why would shipping on 3 DVDs vs 2 make production costs soar? That makes very little sense to me, TBH.
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Wait, wasnt it the PS3 fanboys who bashed Carmack for saying the xbox360 had more powerful hardware as total? Has the tunes changed? Nedless to say more space == better.superjim42

well i for one never said such thing. anyway ye more space = better.

ppl need to realise this sooner or later tha blu-ray WILL be needed for future games. and this is an exmaple of that

Just not till next gen. Keep trying to justifiy your blu-ray player mate. One game doesn't mean you can ignore every other game that looks near identical on both platforms.

Avatar image for Trelaf_TheWise
Trelaf_TheWise

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Trelaf_TheWise
Member since 2008 • 651 Posts
Trelaf_TheWise: Rage will suck ass
Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts

Why would shipping on 3 DVDs vs 2 make production costs soar? That makes very little sense to me, TBH.SpruceCaboose

That was my thought, something about paying royalties to MS though..

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#17 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]Why would shipping on 3 DVDs vs 2 make production costs soar? That makes very little sense to me, TBH.EmperorSupreme

That was my thought, something about paying royalties to MS though..

Yeah, I am sure that the fees are a killer. I mean, LO and Blue Dragon didn't get past 1 disc because of them....

Avatar image for Pelon208
Pelon208

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Pelon208
Member since 2005 • 3375 Posts
I'm really surprise that carmack said that he prefers the blu-ray, and that he has to downgrade the graphics for the 360 version. He is the master developer for the 360, and i even more surprise that he can't use 3 DVD's. I was going to buy this game for the 360, now im not to sure, i'll wait to the reviews to see which console version will be the best
Avatar image for GARRYTH
GARRYTH

6870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 GARRYTH
Member since 2005 • 6870 Posts

with games getting bigger you will see it happen more often. justt like last gen ps 2 games started on cd then transfer to dvd because the games got bigger. i mean if they were having a hard time fitting first year games gears for one was compressed the crap out of it to fit. mgs 4 50 gig disc. resistance 1 was 15 gig. resistance 2 is going to be twice that.

blu-ray is needed this gen for less compression alone. it takes the dev time to figure out how they need to compress the data in the game.

if the 360 had a bigger format the dev's this gen could have consintrated on the games more instead of compression.

Avatar image for AtrumRegina
AtrumRegina

1584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 AtrumRegina
Member since 2008 • 1584 Posts

with games getting bigger you will see it happen more often. justt like last gen ps 2 games started on cd then transfer to dvd because the games got bigger. i mean if they were having a hard time fitting first year games gears for one was compressed the crap out of it to fit. mgs 4 50 gig disc. resistance 1 was 15 gig. resistance 2 is going to be twice that.

blu-ray is needed this gen for less compression alone. it takes the dev time to figure out how they need to compress the data in the game.

if the 360 had a bigger format the dev's this gen could have consintrated on the games more instead of compression.

GARRYTH

those PS3 games didn't even use compression.

Avatar image for KinkInDaLink
KinkInDaLink

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 KinkInDaLink
Member since 2008 • 307 Posts
gears was like 5 gig. It was hardly pushing dvd to the limit.
Avatar image for superjim42
superjim42

3588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 superjim42
Member since 2005 • 3588 Posts
[QUOTE="superjim42"]

[QUOTE="IgorVitaly"]Wait, wasnt it the PS3 fanboys who bashed Carmack for saying the xbox360 had more powerful hardware as total? Has the tunes changed? Nedless to say more space == better.CreepyBacon

well i for one never said such thing. anyway ye more space = better.

ppl need to realise this sooner or later tha blu-ray WILL be needed for future games. and this is an exmaple of that

Just not till next gen. Keep trying to justifiy your blu-ray player mate. One game doesn't mean you can ignore every other game that looks near identical on both platforms.

do some research on the game RAGE before posting 'mate'. their engine is pushing megatextures which is not your run of the mill normal textures you get in games. these require more space for storage.

pretty much explains the reason for why xbox360 version will require 2 dvd's.

justification made\

Avatar image for Arnalion
Arnalion

3316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Arnalion
Member since 2006 • 3316 Posts

Why would shipping on 3 DVDs vs 2 make production costs soar? That makes very little sense to me, TBH.SpruceCaboose

DVD:s costs money...
Example: $1 more in production cost can easily end up like $10 for the customer.

Avatar image for Pelon208
Pelon208

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Pelon208
Member since 2005 • 3375 Posts

gears was like 5 gig. It was hardly pushing dvd to the limit.KinkInDaLink

Only 5? so GeOW2 its going to be like 8 gb

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Thats common sense

Cell=FTW!

haemorrhagiae

Well done on reading. :| He said it was because of the dvd, and even specifically said last week that the cell processor had limited the engine. :|

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

[QUOTE="KinkInDaLink"]gears was like 5 gig. It was hardly pushing dvd to the limit.Pelon208

Only 5? so GeOW2 its going to be like 8 gb

Don't see why it would need much more space than the first one.
Avatar image for Pelon208
Pelon208

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Pelon208
Member since 2005 • 3375 Posts
[QUOTE="Pelon208"]

[QUOTE="KinkInDaLink"]gears was like 5 gig. It was hardly pushing dvd to the limit.angelkimne

Only 5? so GeOW2 its going to be like 8 gb

Don't see why it would need much more space than the first one.

Of course it Will, it will have better textures, bigger environments, more enemy's, more weapons, more... more.... more....