This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yet Killzone as well as everyother PS3 gamewill have something no 360 game can have: a blu-ray disc. I feel bad that many 360 games have to be held back in terms of powerbecause of that 9 GB DVD. I bet you many Cows wouldn't even bash Halo 3 b/c its not as graphicallyamazing as the first and second. Who wouldn't admit 360 games would be amazing if they had an extra couple of gigs and more horsepower under that engine.
Killzone 2 plans on using a full blu-ray disc and has already used 2 GB on one level plus the fact that it's in its Alpha stages.
Yet Killzone as well as everyother PS3 gamewill have something no 360 game can have: a blu-ray disc. I feel bad that many 360 games have to be held back in terms of powerbecause of that 9 GB DVD. I bet you many Cows wouldn't even bash Halo 3 b/c its not as graphicallyamazing as the first and second. Who wouldn't admit 360 games would be amazing if they had an extra couple of gigs and more horsepower under that engine.
Killzone 2 plans on using a full blu-ray disc and has already used 2 GB on one level plus the fact that it's in its Alpha stages.
robbv1122
If a blu-ray disc magically made every PS3 game better than any Xbox games then multiplatform titles would look better on the PS3. No exception. All exclusives would look better on the PS3. No exception there either. Obviously this isn't the case.
Two things, if space doesn't get used it can hardly be considered an advantage. Depending on the type of game the content could always get compressed to run on the 360 even then you could just use two discs.
Graphically, Blu-ray does nothing to help game development other than provide more storage. No point in putting amazingly high resolution textures that take up massive amounts of space if they can't be used.
But what did you mean... "Bash Halo 3 because it's not as graphically amazing as the first and second"? I hope you're not implying what I think.
[QUOTE="inertk"]I know the point was to call out cows, but it ended up with people trashing Killzone+PS3 for the same reason people did the 360 in a battle of technical superiority.
LosDaddie
Who is trashing KZ2 & PS3 in this thread?
First page?
not one person asked the TC for the link, rofl.
this is not good people, not good.
Chetnik07
its in the ign article. who cares it looks effin amazing.
[QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]Confirmed.. Ouch after all the halo 3 bashing for it being 30fpsLosDaddie
Actually the bashing stemmed from X360 fanboys saying 30 FPS was trash. Everyone bashing Halo3 was just pointing out that it too was 30 FPS so it must be trash according to X360 fanboys.
Lems never bashed 30FPS, especially since the GotY Gears of War ran at 30FPS
halo3 was trashed cuz the frame rate was hitting the single digits in some of the gameplay videos.
[QUOTE="Chetnik07"]not one person asked the TC for the link, rofl.
this is not good people, not good.
anshuk20002
its in the ign article. who cares it looks effin amazing.
constant 30fps can be very good, and i know it will be for KZ2. As for halo3, i have seen the gameplay footage and i can swear that the frame rate drops from 30 to 9.
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]Confirmed.. Ouch after all the halo 3 bashing for it being 30fpsChetnik07
Actually the bashing stemmed from X360 fanboys saying 30 FPS was trash. Everyone bashing Halo3 was just pointing out that it too was 30 FPS so it must be trash according to X360 fanboys.
Lems never bashed 30FPS, especially since the GotY Gears of War ran at 30FPS
halo3 was trashed cuz the frame rate was hitting the single digits in some of the gameplay videos.
When did that happen? I suppose I'm going to have to ask you for a link now.
[QUOTE="Chetnik07"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="darthogre"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]Confirmed.. Ouch after all the halo 3 bashing for it being 30fpsinertk
Actually the bashing stemmed from X360 fanboys saying 30 FPS was trash. Everyone bashing Halo3 was just pointing out that it too was 30 FPS so it must be trash according to X360 fanboys.
Lems never bashed 30FPS, especially since the GotY Gears of War ran at 30FPS
halo3 was trashed cuz the frame rate was hitting the single digits in some of the gameplay videos.
When did that happen? I suppose I'm going to have to ask you for a link now.
just go watch any halo3 gameplay footage and if you have good eyes you will spot major frame rate issues.
just go watch any halo3 gameplay footage and if you have good eyes you will spot major frame rate issues.
Chetnik07
I've seen 3 of the recent videos and there hasn't been a framerate drop in any of them. The framerate in Halo games have always been constant, even during the beta there were no problems.
But since I haven't come across any would you kindly direct me to it? Clearly I haven't got eyes as good as you.
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"][QUOTE="inertk"]I know the point was to call out cows, but it ended up with people trashing Killzone+PS3 for the same reason people did the 360 in a battle of technical superiority.
inertk
Who is trashing KZ2 & PS3 in this thread?
First page?
I saw nothing on the first page other than calling out Sony & cows for the BS hype, which is what this thread is all about
So now we're going to bash Killzone 2 for running at the same resolution+framerate as Halo 3....
inertk
halo runs at 1080 p
KZ2 is still like 6 months from completion, halo 3 looked like halo 2.5 6 months ago and now it looks very good, imagine what kz2 will look liketherealmcc0y
and yet look at how much cows bashed it. Even though they did not play the beta and only watch crappy vids on youtube.
these past few days have been ownage for cows..hopefully they learn their lesson and stop acting like elitist. That tag is reserved for PC gamers.Pro_wrestlerIt goes back and fourth. Cows just appear more into it because they still have to justify $600. The lemms can now ride the wave of games, and sheep appear to be happy with the wii. I think cows are the most upset in these forums. I also think they look for ownage the most and in turn get owned the most.
That is a very weak arguement. Halo 3 runs at that resolution for its final game. We don't know what the final will be for Killzone 2.Cedmln
30 FPS Isn't bad for a pre-pre-pre-pre-pre (Sarcasm)alpha stage(According to cows,and devs). Hopefully at the end it's at 120 FPS maybe even 5D(That's another thing PS3 can do, it's soo powerful:roll: )
Yeah, the Alpha could be 720p, 30FPS, but it's not final yet.Albanian_Killa
Confirmed.. Ouch after all the halo 3 bashing for it being 30fpsDoctorBunny
he did say thats what its going to be, but it might change in the final, the problem is they pretty much used the entire disc
I don't know why people bash console games at 30 fps. Unless it uses a mouse and keyboard there is no need for anything higher. Skip the high frame rate and add some more effects, that is what I say
They only do that if they have a high frame right of like 100 or more?
It also good to have 60 frames per second thusno major slow down
why did you bump this 2 year old thread?I don't know why people bash console games at 30 fps. Unless it uses a mouse and keyboard there is no need for anything higher. Skip the high frame rate and add some more effects, that is what I say
They only do that if they have a high frame right of like 100 or more?
It also good to have 60 frames per second thusno major slow down
SragentThom
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment