The problem here is that one game is already out and the other we are all guessing on how good its going to look. From what i have played and seen i think, IMO Gears looks better. And pics from my game not pics from gamespot.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
^^^ Did you just use the 2005 CGI trailer screens. And gears will be almost 3 years when Killzone 2 comes out. silentobiKillzone 2 is coming out this September. Gears of War came out Nov. 06, which is not even a 2 year difference. I don't know where you got you 3 year figure from. Must be ignorance on your part.
[QUOTE="silentobi"]^^^ Did you just use the 2005 CGI trailer screens. And gears will be almost 3 years when Killzone 2 comes out. C_BozkurT_CKillzone 2 is coming out this September. Gears of War came out Nov. 06, which is not even a 2 year difference. I don't know where you got you 3 year figure from. Must be ignorance on your part.
yeah i dont know where he came with the 3 year thing, but a 2 year diference between games is still a lot, heck even one year is considered a lot (1 year and 10 months is by all means a 2 year diference
[QUOTE="silentobi"]^^^ Did you just use the 2005 CGI trailer screens. And gears will be almost 3 years when Killzone 2 comes out. C_BozkurT_CKillzone 2 is coming out this September. Gears of War came out Nov. 06, which is not even a 2 year difference. I don't know where you got you 3 year figure from. Must be ignorance on your part. Whoops my bad I was totally thinking about something else.
Killzone 2 is coming out this September. Gears of War came out Nov. 06, which is not even a 2 year difference. I don't know where you got you 3 year figure from. Must be ignorance on your part.[QUOTE="C_BozkurT_C"][QUOTE="silentobi"]^^^ Did you just use the 2005 CGI trailer screens. And gears will be almost 3 years when Killzone 2 comes out. st1ka
yeah i dont know where he came with the 3 year thing, but a 2 year diference between games is still a lot, heck even one year is considered a lot (1 year and 10 months is by all means a 2 year diference
I was thinking about something else my bad. :PKillzone 2 looks better.
Gears of War 2 will still look better than it though.
(Though I'm worried when the only thing Epic said is going to be better is Physics and Lighting, what about animations..textures etc? :|)
thrones
Ah,the textures in Gears of War are great. Especially some parallax maping.
All they need to do is fix the damn lightining and that lame depth of field effect.
Gear of War 1 is looks much more demanding technically than any other Ps3 game.
Killzone 2 looks better, despite the textures. However, this is an unfair comparison since you're comparing a 2008 (or later) game to a 2006 game. For a better comparison, lets see what Gears of War 2 will offer in the graphics department. leviathan91
2nd. Anyone who thinks GeoW1 will look better needs to realize the time span between release dates.
The problem here is that one game is already out and the other we are all guessing on how good its going to look. From what i have played and seen i think, IMO Gears looks better. And pics from my game not pics from gamespot.
stjuart
easily a much better comparison, i finsihsed gears at a friends place and these definately represent it alot better. KZ2 still looks better but this does narrow the gap. bit unfair in the comparison thought the Gears pics looked crappy.
[QUOTE="stjuart"]The problem here is that one game is already out and the other we are all guessing on how good its going to look. From what i have played and seen i think, IMO Gears looks better. And pics from my game not pics from gamespot.
htotheo
easily a much better comparison, i finsihsed gears at a friends place and these definately represent it alot better. KZ2 still looks better but this does narrow the gap. bit unfair in the comparison thought the Gears pics looked crappy.
I was going to say the same thing...
The gears pictures the TC posted look nothin like the game does when your playing it, your pics are about wright.....
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment