Killzone 2 graphics are overhyped... all fanboys are welcome!

  • 121 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Nice.. pick out some low quality pics, and some multiplayer pics, and some old beta pics.crazy-player
Not only did he do that but also look how rediculous the characters look in Gears2 oversided and they like turtle armor i guess. KZ2 characters look human.
Avatar image for robobie
robobie

2172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#102 robobie
Member since 2007 • 2172 Posts

[QUOTE="robobie"]I personally can't wait for this game. It will prove all the haters wrong. I can't wait to see what they will say when it scores an average of 9 upwardsGeneralmojo

If it does get highly rated

the same thing will happen just like when mgs4 got reviewed

1 week of silence

I'm looking forward to it.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#103 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts
KZ2 has superior effects and more action going onDivergeUnify
No...Gears2 has a lot more action going on. Sometimes you have hundreds of enemies on screen! But i agree that Killzone2 has better effects ;)
Avatar image for desyple
desyple

1725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#104 desyple
Member since 2008 • 1725 Posts
[QUOTE="Generalmojo"]

[QUOTE="robobie"]I personally can't wait for this game. It will prove all the haters wrong. I can't wait to see what they will say when it scores an average of 9 upwardsrobobie

If it does get highly rated

the same thing will happen just like when mgs4 got reviewed

1 week of silence

I'm looking forward to it.

same here
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts
[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]KZ2 has superior effects and more action going onPAL360
No...Gears2 has a lot more action going on. Sometimes you have hundreds of enemies on screen! But i agree that Killzone2 has better effects ;)

Show me gameplay of actually being able to shoot and kill 100's of enemies in Gears2 please. Not that shot of the guys running around in the back drop or the ones running toward them while there in the room with the turrent. Those are no more than just visual effects and not actual interactive characters on the screen. Think of SCIV level with the horses running in the back ground lol, that is what Gears 2 has and no more. Heck most actual levels in Gears 2 isn't big enough to hold a 100 enemies. But if you show me gameplay of you or someone else in the midst of 100 enemies fighing your way through them then I'll log off of GS to never return :)
Avatar image for one_on_one
one_on_one

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 208

User Lists: 0

#106 one_on_one
Member since 2008 • 2368 Posts
Yeah that's true, I also believe every thing about Killzone 2 is overhyped in every way possible. I believe the same happened to the first one, and look how that turned out. Anyway, I think Killzone 2 will be a good game. Just a month away.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

Here you go.

Beta multiplayer and Preview build Single player beat the final version of Gears 2's single player by a considerable margin.

urdead18


It looks much better in motion (the animations are way better than Gears of War 2's), but I never understood why people think that gif is impressive. Cheap lighting effects don't substitute for real dynamic lighting. :?
Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#108 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="DivergeUnify"]KZ2 has superior effects and more action going onGreyFoXX4
No...Gears2 has a lot more action going on. Sometimes you have hundreds of enemies on screen! But i agree that Killzone2 has better effects ;)

Show me gameplay of actually being able to shoot and kill 100's of enemies in Gears2 please. Not that shot of the guys running around in the back drop or the ones running toward them while there in the room with the turrent. Those are no more than just visual effects and not actual interactive characters on the screen. Think of SCIV level with the horses running in the back ground lol, that is what Gears 2 has and no more. Heck most actual levels in Gears 2 isn't big enough to hold a 100 enemies. But if you show me gameplay of you or someone else in the midst of 100 enemies fighing your way through them then I'll log off of GS to never return :)

Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"][QUOTE="PAL360"] No...Gears2 has a lot more action going on. Sometimes you have hundreds of enemies on screen! But i agree that Killzone2 has better effects ;)sargentbotk
Show me gameplay of actually being able to shoot and kill 100's of enemies in Gears2 please. Not that shot of the guys running around in the back drop or the ones running toward them while there in the room with the turrent. Those are no more than just visual effects and not actual interactive characters on the screen. Think of SCIV level with the horses running in the back ground lol, that is what Gears 2 has and no more. Heck most actual levels in Gears 2 isn't big enough to hold a 100 enemies. But if you show me gameplay of you or someone else in the midst of 100 enemies fighing your way through them then I'll log off of GS to never return :)

Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.

In the gameplay footage I've seen its no more than duck hunt, point and click their dead. Tell me when encountering enemies that they die as easily as that part in the room with the turrent. And if were actually interactive heck jump out of that window to fighem as their coming down that path then lol. I know smoke and mirrors magic trick when I see one lol.

I can't play gears 2 cause I took back the 360 I bought when reaching chapter 4 in the first gears to feel disappointed, and had no reason to play part 2 or keep the 360 after a week of having it lol. But yea your right, I can't play gears2.

Avatar image for c1o2d3y
c1o2d3y

470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 c1o2d3y
Member since 2006 • 470 Posts
I have played through gears of war 2 and I don't remember there ever being hundreds of enemies on the screen at once
Avatar image for dgsag
dgsag

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 93

User Lists: 0

#111 dgsag
Member since 2005 • 6760 Posts
[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"][QUOTE="PAL360"] No...Gears2 has a lot more action going on. Sometimes you have hundreds of enemies on screen! But i agree that Killzone2 has better effects ;)sargentbotk
Show me gameplay of actually being able to shoot and kill 100's of enemies in Gears2 please. Not that shot of the guys running around in the back drop or the ones running toward them while there in the room with the turrent. Those are no more than just visual effects and not actual interactive characters on the screen. Think of SCIV level with the horses running in the back ground lol, that is what Gears 2 has and no more. Heck most actual levels in Gears 2 isn't big enough to hold a 100 enemies. But if you show me gameplay of you or someone else in the midst of 100 enemies fighing your way through them then I'll log off of GS to never return :)

Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.

Those are AI-less bots that are "Deactivated" after minimal damage. IF you had actually walked up to them, I doubt you would even be killed by a horde of them.
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

Think the only game that KZ2 has got to show whos the boss to is MGS4 actually. Didn't it win Best graphics of 08 awards here on GS? So proof is in the pudding and the pudding is Mgs4 and KZ2 going head to head to see who will prevail in the graphics department.

Move along now lemmings nothing here for yall to comment on any longer lol.

Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts

[QUOTE="sargentbotk"][QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]Show me gameplay of actually being able to shoot and kill 100's of enemies in Gears2 please. Not that shot of the guys running around in the back drop or the ones running toward them while there in the room with the turrent. Those are no more than just visual effects and not actual interactive characters on the screen. Think of SCIV level with the horses running in the back ground lol, that is what Gears 2 has and no more. Heck most actual levels in Gears 2 isn't big enough to hold a 100 enemies. But if you show me gameplay of you or someone else in the midst of 100 enemies fighing your way through them then I'll log off of GS to never return :)GreyFoXX4

Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.

In the gameplay footage I've seen its no more than duck hunt, point and click their dead. Tell me when encountering enemies that they die as easily as that part in the room with the turrent. And if were actually interactive heck jump out of that window to fighem as their coming down that path then lol. I know smoke and mirrors magic trick when I see one lol.

I can't play gears 2 cause I took back the 360 I bought when reaching chapter 4 in the first gears to feel disappointed, and had no reason to play part 2 or keep the 360 after a week of having it lol. But yea your right, I can't play gears2.

Yes they do die as easily at that level...you only stay in that house for 2 minutes before it crumbles down and you encounter the Brumak staring through the window. Since you obviously don't know what you're talking about, it's best not to talk about things you can't play...

Though in the end...those are still hundreds of enemies on screen and you could still kill them, but I doubt they would be as hard as the ones that you could actually walk up to.

Hopefully you won't do so next time, for your sake.

Avatar image for c1o2d3y
c1o2d3y

470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 c1o2d3y
Member since 2006 • 470 Posts
[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"]

[QUOTE="sargentbotk"]Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.sargentbotk

In the gameplay footage I've seen its no more than duck hunt, point and click their dead. Tell me when encountering enemies that they die as easily as that part in the room with the turrent. And if were actually interactive heck jump out of that window to fighem as their coming down that path then lol. I know smoke and mirrors magic trick when I see one lol.

I can't play gears 2 cause I took back the 360 I bought when reaching chapter 4 in the first gears to feel disappointed, and had no reason to play part 2 or keep the 360 after a week of having it lol. But yea your right, I can't play gears2.

Yes they do die as easily at that level...you only stay in that house for 2 minutes before it crumbles down and you encounter the Brumak staring through the window. Since you obviously don't know what you're talking about, it's best not to talk about things you can't play...Hopefully you won't do so next time, for your sake.

When do you fight hundreads of enemies at once?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#115 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts
I won't care for the gameplay but the game looks amazing...:shock:
Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts
[QUOTE="sargentbotk"][QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"] Show me gameplay of actually being able to shoot and kill 100's of enemies in Gears2 please. Not that shot of the guys running around in the back drop or the ones running toward them while there in the room with the turrent. Those are no more than just visual effects and not actual interactive characters on the screen. Think of SCIV level with the horses running in the back ground lol, that is what Gears 2 has and no more. Heck most actual levels in Gears 2 isn't big enough to hold a 100 enemies. But if you show me gameplay of you or someone else in the midst of 100 enemies fighing your way through them then I'll log off of GS to never return :)dgsag
Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.

Those are AI-less bots that are "Deactivated" after minimal damage. IF you had actually walked up to them, I doubt you would even be killed by a horde of them.

Still doesn't prove the GreyFoXX's statement about not being able to kill them and that part just being visual effects. When a bullet hits them, they die and that kill is counted towards Seriously 2.0.
Avatar image for naruto7777
naruto7777

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 naruto7777
Member since 2007 • 8059 Posts
Gears 2 is better and killzone 2 wont touch Gears 2 in sales
Avatar image for GreyFoXX4
GreyFoXX4

3612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 GreyFoXX4
Member since 2008 • 3612 Posts

ONce again no more than Duck hunt, what your talking about isn't taxing on the system by any means. IF THERE WAS ACTUALLY 100's of interactive enemies on the screen then you can brag about it, but there actually isn't 100 or more enemies on screen sorry. Once again smoke and mirrors.

And once again the king of graphics is down to mgs4 and KZ2. All others are no more than could've would've games.

Avatar image for dgsag
dgsag

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 93

User Lists: 0

#119 dgsag
Member since 2005 • 6760 Posts
[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="sargentbotk"]Why do you fail so much? Have you ever played the game? You CAN kill them. How do I know this? Because I can see them falling over when they're killed and their deaths are counted for the Seriously 2.0 achievement. Critisize what you can play.sargentbotk
Those are AI-less bots that are "Deactivated" after minimal damage. IF you had actually walked up to them, I doubt you would even be killed by a horde of them.

Still doesn't prove the GreyFoXX's statement about not being able to kill them and that part just being visual effects. When a bullet hits them, they die and that kill is counted towards Seriously 2.0.

You're still not engaging hundreds of actual AI-equipped enemies. Epic could have just as easily planted 100 trees that moved about in random directions and taxed the system as much.
Avatar image for dgsag
dgsag

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 93

User Lists: 0

#120 dgsag
Member since 2005 • 6760 Posts
And once again the king of graphics is down to mgs4 and KZ2. All others are no more than could've would've games.GreyFoXX4
On consoles, yes. :P
Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts
[QUOTE="sargentbotk"][QUOTE="dgsag"] Those are AI-less bots that are "Deactivated" after minimal damage. IF you had actually walked up to them, I doubt you would even be killed by a horde of them.dgsag
Still doesn't prove the GreyFoXX's statement about not being able to kill them and that part just being visual effects. When a bullet hits them, they die and that kill is counted towards Seriously 2.0.

You're still not engaging hundreds of actual AI-equipped enemies. Epic could have just as easily planted 100 trees that moved about in random directions and taxed the system as much.

I'm not saying anything or trying to back-up anything other than the fact that you can kill them and they are counted towards achieving Seriously 2.0.