Killzone 2 Graphics Thread - 6 New Videos - Best Looking Game On Consoles

That's not innovative. Have you ever played Time Splitters for the PS2? It was a launch title, with not just a map editor, but a full blown level creator. You could make your levels from scratch, and it's a FRICKEN LAUNCH TITLE FOR THE PS2!! Halo didn't do anything innovative.

dream431ca

I actually didn't know that! I've never really been into Time Splitters though. 

[QUOTE="MasterC5"][QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

 

Yes it does lol. I think you're a fakeboy, but you're doing a good job promoting KZ2 in a way.

Episode_Eve

I have to ask regarding your sig, how is that Ironic?

Maybe you haven't been in SW long enough. My sig is a product of the history and relationship between the two games (both installments) and the subsequent outcome. Resistance has always been ridiculed and deemed a failure and mediocre and considered (by Lemmings in the least) to not even be a competitor for AAA a shooter.

In no way do I believe R2 is a better game than Gears 2 and vice versa (both have pros and cons over the other though). I own both games and enjoy them equally (I played Gears 1 more than R1 because of its MP).

So to finally anwer your question, it's ironic that R2, a franchise with no concievable chance of standing up to the quality of a game like Gears 2, has scored the same. It's rather ironic I believe. Though I think the sig would be more impactful if R2 scored higher :P.

Should have thought of that before, than again I'm wasted beyond belief by now so I'll forgive my idiocy for once.

[QUOTE="xX0LDSCH00LXx"][QUOTE="BobRea"]

 

 

Couple things...

-Why do you want aim assist?

-Delayed animations have been fixed for release according to devs

- Replays? Who cares.

-What's wrong with just a few hits or a head shot for a kill? Ever play COD4?

-Halo didn't do anything innovative, yet it's a great game.

-Maps are confusing? No, they're really not, I'm in the beta.

-No chainsaw gun? ...Do I even need to say anything here?

-Linear single player. Most games have a linear single player. But how can you say this? They haven't released much single player footage to make that judgement.

-Can't jump super high/no dual-wielding. They're going for a realistic feel for this game.

-Only 8 maps. This is one thing I actually agree with, the number is low. They said they're going to be releasing more via DLC though.

-Class system is unfair... seems fine to me...once again I'm in the beta.

-Team killing is abundant. Luckily there's this awesome option to turn off friendly fire.

-Helghast are easy targets. Devs have said tha upon final release the ISA soldiers will have a glowing blue light on them equally as bright as Helghast, and both faction's lights fade at a distance.

-Grendade/rocket launcher spammers. Any game with those weapons could potentially have this problem, and I haven't experienced this much at all with my time with the beta.

-No map editor. This is a prefrence thing.

-Can't zip around the map/feel like you're wearing armor. Well you are a soldier and therefore you ARE carrying a lot of gear...

 

If you'd like to try and find any other way to belittle this game, please feel free. :)

 

In other news, I'm in the beta and this game is awesome!

dream431ca

That's not innovative. Have you ever played Time Splitters for the PS2? It was a launch title, with not just a map editor, but a full blown level creator. You could make your levels from scratch, and it's a FRICKEN LAUNCH TITLE FOR THE PS2!! Halo didn't do anything innovative.

Thank you for finally pointing that out! The map editor was one of the reasons why I loved Timesplitters 1 & 2. Halo did advance it tenfold by being on much more powerful hardware, but Bungie wasn't the first to do it.

I can understand if your a lemming or cow arguing on games that have already been released and have been scored already, but for anyone to bash on Killzone 2 in its current state is absolutely absurd. Your either deaf, dumb or blind because the visuals right now are the the best on consoles period. The irony behind that is the game still has 2-3 more months of dev time left! Lemmings you need to open your eyes and just admit that Sony FOR ONCE has delivered.

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"][QUOTE="MasterC5"]

 

I have to ask regarding your sig, how is that Ironic?

MasterC5

Maybe you haven't been in SW long enough. My sig is a product of the history and relationship between the two games (both installments) and the subsequent outcome. Resistance has always been ridiculed and deemed a failure and mediocre and considered (by Lemmings in the least) to not even be a competitor for AAA a shooter.

In no way do I believe R2 is a better game than Gears 2 and vice versa (both have pros and cons over the other though). I own both games and enjoy them equally (I played Gears 1 more than R1 because of its MP).

So to finally anwer your question, it's ironic that R2, a franchise with no concievable chance of standing up to the quality of a game like Gears 2, has scored the same. It's rather ironic I believe. Though I think the sig would be more impactful if R2 scored higher :P.

Should have thought of that before, than again I'm wasted beyond belief by now so I'll forgive my idiocy for once.

Oh, nothing about your post was idiotic :). Its understandable to ask the question.

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ?
• too gray
• maps are confusing
• class system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor
• no replays
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody - just a headshot or a few hits to the body
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic
• no knife for melee
• look suffers from shiny overload
• borrows too many features form other games - identity crisis

This game is a mess.

Stay with Unreal Tournamet, and let gamers play this game.

Nike_Air

[QUOTE="BobRea"][QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ?
• too gray
• maps are confusing
• class system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor
• no replays
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody - just a headshot or a few hits to the body
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic
• no knife for melee
• look suffers from shiny overload
• borrows too many features form other games - identity crisis

This game is a mess.

 

 

 

 

xX0LDSCH00LXx

Couple things...

-Why do you want aim assist?

-Delayed animations have been fixed for release according to devs

- Replays? Who cares.

-What's wrong with just a few hits or a head shot for a kill? Ever play COD4?

-Halo didn't do anything innovative, yet it's a great game.

-Maps are confusing? No, they're really not, I'm in the beta.

-No chainsaw gun? ...Do I even need to say anything here?

-Linear single player. Most games have a linear single player. But how can you say this? They haven't released much single player footage to make that judgement.

-Can't jump super high/no dual-wielding. They're going for a realistic feel for this game.

-Only 8 maps. This is one thing I actually agree with, the number is low. They said they're going to be releasing more via DLC though.

-Class system is unfair... seems fine to me...once again I'm in the beta.

-Team killing is abundant. Luckily there's this awesome option to turn off friendly fire.

-Helghast are easy targets. Devs have said tha upon final release the ISA soldiers will have a glowing blue light on them equally as bright as Helghast, and both faction's lights fade at a distance.

-Grendade/rocket launcher spammers. Any game with those weapons could potentially have this problem, and I haven't experienced this much at all with my time with the beta.

-No map editor. This is a prefrence thing.

-Can't zip around the map/feel like you're wearing armor. Well you are a soldier and therefore you ARE carrying a lot of gear...

If you'd like to try and find any other way to belittle this game, please feel free. :)

In other news, I'm in the beta and this game is awesome!

Yes, but there have been level editors before Halo's, Halo was not the first to introduce this. 

i'm in beta, those vids make it look better than it is in person imo. definitely not the best looking game i've seen on consoles. it suffers from Kameo shiny overload - Drake's did too, similar problem.3picuri3

OMG, you have a PS3? lol, I'm shock you even have played any PS3 games. Please don't confuse yourself with Perfect Dark Zero and Uncharted. 

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping Yeah, I too would like to super high jump in real life while wearing heavy armor :lol:
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic weak argument
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op developers are aiming for a single player experience kid
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns If you want chainsaws, play Doom or Gears, not every shooter needs chainsaws kido
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ? Is this suppose to be an argument?
• too gray WTF? So is Gears
• maps are confusing A double WTF?
• ****system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor Uhhhh you ARE wearing armor OMG!
• no replays You cant be serious!
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody- just a headshot or a few hits to the body I guess in real life people do take 15 hits to die right? :roll:
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic And this is bad because?
• no knife for melee I'm sure if your in the middle of gunfire the best thing to do is pull out your knife right?
• look suffers from shiny overload Gears says hello, even has shiney grass and trees
• borrows too many features form other games - identity crisis So now its a bad thing to borrow the best elements from a shooter and implement it into another shooter now? :roll:

This game is a mess. 

 

 

 

 

Nike_Air

Your thinking is a mess

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ?
• too gray
• maps are confusing
• class system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor
• no replays
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody - just a headshot or a few hits to the body
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic

This game is a mess.

 

 

 

 

micky4889

You do know this is from a 6 MONTH OLD BETA !!

you do know he was being sarcastic?

EDIT: LOL at the people who think he's being serious.

[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ?
• too gray
• maps are confusing
• class system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor
• no replays
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody - just a headshot or a few hits to the body
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic

This game is a mess.

 

 

 

 

joopyme

You do know this is from a 6 MONTH OLD BETA !!

you do know he was being sarcastic?

erm...i hope he was :) 

[QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

 

You do know this is from a 6 MONTH OLD BETA !!

Al3x_n90

you do know he was being sarcastic?

erm...i hope he was :) 

then again, i DO hope he was. :D

lol i cant believe someone marked down aim assist in a first person shooter being good.

There should be a rule....preventing developers from adding noob auto aim and aim assist to video games....get some skills people.impattack420

get some mods here people!

bandodger on the prowl! :D

immediate gratification all everyone wants...i have always hated auto aim and aim assist even with games that have it i always disable that crap i believe in playing legit and i hate that crap with a passion what kind of gamer needs the game to aim for them? that's pathetic just stop playing games if you cant deal with alittle learning curve.

halo is a joke of a fps...it forces people to play with aim assist.

Sorry i like aiming all by myself.

halo is a joke of a fps...it forces people to play with aim assist.

Sorry i like aiming all by myself.

impattack420

[QUOTE="impattack420"]

halo is a joke of a fps...it forces people to play with aim assist.

Sorry i like aiming all by myself.

BIOWAREISKING

haha halo 3 definitely has aim assist with no option to turn it off.

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="impattack420"]

halo is a joke of a fps...it forces people to play with aim assist.

Sorry i like aiming all by myself.

impattack420

haha halo 3 definitely has aim assist with no option to turn it off.

halo has the fun vehicles...the the core shooting mechanics suck bigtime.impattack420

I think it would be a better idea to wait, and see how this game is when it comes out next year, provided it's not delayed again.

Remember: Cows hyped Killzone to be the best looking console game, before it came out on the PS2. They even called it the "Halo Killer". We all know how that turned out.

I will say one thing: KZ2 looks nothing like the CG video Sony showed 3 years ago. But, what's new?

[QUOTE="impattack420"]halo has the fun vehicles...the the core shooting mechanics suck bigtime.BIOWAREISKING

oh so TOO TOO many to count. :?

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="impattack420"]halo has the fun vehicles...the the core shooting mechanics suck bigtime.joopyme

oh so TOO TOO many to count. :?

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ?
• too gray
• maps are confusing
• class system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor
• no replays
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody - just a headshot or a few hits to the body
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic
• no knife for melee
• look suffers from shiny overload
• borrows too many features form other games - identity crisis

This game is a mess.

 

 

 

 

Nike_Air

You forgot one: Its never going to be on the 360.

[QUOTE="joopyme"]

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]compared to what other shooters.BIOWAREISKING

oh so TOO TOO many to count. :?

you're not worth my time, man.

play other games than that halo3 of yours, and you'll see.

[QUOTE="impattack420"]halo has the fun vehicles...the the core shooting mechanics suck bigtime.BIOWAREISKING

quake 2

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="joopyme"]

 

oh so TOO TOO many to count. :?

joopyme

you're not worth my time, man.

play other games than that halo3 of yours, and you'll see.

im sorry you cant back up your claims kid.

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="impattack420"]halo has the fun vehicles...the the core shooting mechanics suck bigtime.impattack420

quake 2

[QUOTE="joopyme"][QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]like ?BIOWAREISKING

you're not worth my time, man.

play other games than that halo3 of yours, and you'll see.

im sorry you cant back up your claims kid.

Gears of War 1/2

Resistance 2

Stalker 

Fallout 3

Call of Duty 2/4 are better than Halo 3

Far Cry2

Crysis

Half-Life 2

Bioshock

DeadSpace, among others.

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="joopyme"]

 

you're not worth my time, man.

play other games than that halo3 of yours, and you'll see.

 

joopyme

im sorry you cant back up your claims kid.

Gears of War 1/2 this must be a joke comparing a 3rd person shooter to a fps's gunplay

Resistance 2  please stop with the jokes

Stalkeronly got good after the oblivion mod

Fallout 3 you dont no jack about shooters. please never enter another thread about them

Call of Duty 2/4 are better than Halo 3 pacific assualt> cod2/4

Far Cry2 gun play is like a standard shooter minus the lack of recoil and lack of kick on snipers

Crysis same with fc2

Half-Life 2 has some of the worst gunplay around

Bioshock same as hl2

DeadSpace, among others. another joke

did you even play these shooters or did you just pick the top rated shooters.

the lack of f.e.a.r. and pacific assualt in your post proves this.

hl2  good gunplay :lol:

[QUOTE="impattack420"]

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]compared to what other shooters.BIOWAREISKING

quake 2

i guess you never played quake 2 are you a joke?

first of all you can rocket jump in quake 2

you can strafe jump in halo you cant.

you can time the hand grenades halo you cant

quake 2 supports 64 players online default can be set higher.

you have a jetpack in quake 2

quake 2 doesnt have noob aim assist.

quake 2 has better weapons

i think halos a joke.

although i rarely play quake. i've always preferred arena and i find it :lol: worthy comparing a console shooter to a pc shooter.

a little desperate are we;)

although i rarely play quake. i've always preferred arena and i find it :lol: worthy comparing a console shooter to a pc shooter.

a little desperate are we;)

BIOWAREISKING

umm?

the gameplay could be better on halo.

quake 2 isnt arena game.

alot of the quake 2 multiplayer maps are based on the single player levels.

they took the single player maps and used them for deathmatch maps that owns.

but they did release a few multiplayer only maps like the edge in a few patches.

i miss that in new games multiplayer maps based on single player levels.

arena levels are more boring less detailed.

on doom3 and quake 2 if you hold forward/run key press left and right strafe buttons/keys press the jump button fast and steer with the mouse that's called strafe jumping you start bunnyhoping but ur strafing also this gains you speed.

no other games have this...halos jumping sucks.

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]

although i rarely play quake. i've always preferred arena and i find it :lol: worthy comparing a console shooter to a pc shooter.

a little desperate are we;)

impattack420

umm?

the gameplay could be better on halo.

quake 2 isnt arena game.

alot of the quake 2 multiplayer maps are based on the single player levels.

they took the single player maps and used them for deathmatch maps that owns.

but they did release a few multiplayer only maps like the edge in a few patches.

i miss that in new games multiplayer maps based on single player levels.

arena levels are more boring less detailed.

pc shooters always have better gunplay than consoles.

look what they did to fc2.:cry: no prone, lean or recoil perfect for the console kids.

[QUOTE="impattack420"][QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"]

although i rarely play quake. i've always preferred arena and i find it :lol: worthy comparing a console shooter to a pc shooter.

a little desperate are we;)

BIOWAREISKING

umm?

the gameplay could be better on halo.

quake 2 isnt arena game.

alot of the quake 2 multiplayer maps are based on the single player levels.

they took the single player maps and used them for deathmatch maps that owns.

but they did release a few multiplayer only maps like the edge in a few patches.

i miss that in new games multiplayer maps based on single player levels.

arena levels are more boring less detailed.

pc shooters always have better gunplay than consoles.

look what they did to fc2.:cry: no prone, lean or recoil perfect for the console kids.

you cant prone crawl in far cry 2 for pc or lean either i have it lol.

far cry 2 sucks pretty much...there's absolutely barly any physics in the multiplayer actually none even on max.

quake 2 is so old 1997 there is no physics...well actually there is kinda...you can push barrells but you cant knock them over or anything.

the gameplay is better than halo.

you can grenade jump in quake 2.

you can thrown down a grenade catch air off the one grenade and shoot a rocket at the ground and make ur character go even higher.

[QUOTE="BIOWAREISKING"][QUOTE="impattack420"]

 

umm?

the gameplay could be better on halo.

quake 2 isnt arena game.

 

alot of the quake 2 multiplayer maps are based on the single player levels.

they took the single player maps and used them for deathmatch maps that owns.

but they did release a few multiplayer only maps like the edge in a few patches.

i miss that in new games multiplayer maps based on single player levels.

 

arena levels are more boring less detailed.

impattack420

pc shooters always have better gunplay than consoles.

look what they did to fc2.:cry: no prone, lean or recoil perfect for the console kids.

you cant prone crawl in far cry 2 for pc or lean either i have it lol.

far cry 2 sucks pretty much...there's absolutely barly any physics in the multiplayer actually none even on max.

i shot a bunch of boxes with a rpg and none of them moved an inch. the physics in that game is laughable

halo you can grenade jump kinda...with the mortar launcher gun crap.

but you dont go anywhere as high as quake.

lol quake 2 owned because the single player based deathmatch levels had so many platforms you could chill up on attack people.

rocket jumping helped you get to all kinds of places...everyday you found a new place to hide on a level lol.

[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

I think I'll pass on this game

• no super high jumping
• no cover mechanics in multiplayer
• destructibility is only cosmetic
• no vehicles in mutliplayer
• no regular deathmatch
• no co-op
• only 8 maps
• no dual-weilding
• linear single player
• A.I looks weak
• no chainsaw guns
• multiplayer counts are too high - 32 ? wt ?
• too gray
• maps are confusing
• class system progression is unfair
• team killing is abundant
• grenade/rocket launcher spammers
• you can't zip around the map , you feel weighted down like you are wearing armor
• no replays
• delayed animations
• no forge/map editor
• doesn't take much to kill anybody - just a headshot or a few hits to the body
• no aim-assist
• Helghast are easy targets with their glowing eyes
• run of the mill , no innovation , standard , safe , archaic

This game is a mess.

 

 

 

 

joopyme

Translation: This isn't on 360, and even though my argument is weak I must bash every potential PS3 exclusive.

DANG i have to say WOOOWWW grate graphics i seenacsam12304

The graphics are very good. The lighting is amazing. I also love the motion blur. When I watch the videos it looks like CGI. It's so amazing.