[QUOTE="Liquid_"]I see you're jealous you can't play halo 4lol killzone 2 beating xbox's top exclusive. so mad
rilpas
i could just play halo 1..there's not really a difference
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I see you're jealous you can't play halo 4[QUOTE="rilpas"][QUOTE="Liquid_"]
lol killzone 2 beating xbox's top exclusive. so mad
Liquid_
i could just play halo 1..there's not really a difference
well, according to metacritic halo 1 is better then every PS3 game, so it's not such a bad idea
So in what part i compare last gen games vs this one.? Halo 4 and all games i mention are this gen games Halo CE is completely irrelevant nice try.[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="PAL360"]Yep. Since standards don't exist in your books, Halo CE >>> allPAL360
Hmm...no no no. You are trying to claim ownage over Halo 4 using metacritic scores, despite how old the games are.
I say Halo 4 may be one of the best shooters this gen, because it managed to score high this late in the generation. You, on the other hand, say Halo CE is better than any PS3 exclusives because you have no clue what standards mean!
So basically the PS3's library is WAY better according to metacritic because it has roughly the same amount of high scoring games but a way more recent library and the 360 library is pretty much mostly from 2005-2007. Correct? Standards and all, that's how it works right? A bunch of AAA's from late in the generation >>>>> the same amount of AAA's from early in the generation?[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="tormentos"] So in what part i compare last gen games vs this one.? Halo 4 and all games i mention are this gen games Halo CE is completely irrelevant nice try.Eddie-Vedder
Hmm...no no no. You are trying to claim ownage over Halo 4 using metacritic scores, despite how old the games are.
I say Halo 4 may be one of the best shooters this gen, because it managed to score high this late in the generation. You, on the other hand, say Halo CE is better than any PS3 exclusives because you have no clue what standards mean!
So basically the PS3's library is WAY better according to metacritic because it has roughly the same amount of high scoring games but a way more recent library and the 360 library is pretty much mostly from 2005-2007. Correct? Standards and all, that's how it works right? A bunch of AAA's from late in the generation >>>>> the same amount of AAA's from early in the generation?to be fair, the PS3 library is pretty much 2008-2011
so it's not much better :P
So in what part i compare last gen games vs this one.? Halo 4 and all games i mention are this gen games Halo CE is completely irrelevant nice try.[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="PAL360"]Yep. Since standards don't exist in your books, Halo CE >>> allPAL360
Hmm...no no no. You are trying to claim ownage over Halo 4 using metacritic scores, despite how old the games are.
I say Halo 4 may be one of the best shooters this gen, because it managed to score high this late in the generation. You, on the other hand, say Halo CE is better than any PS3 exclusives because you have no clue what standards mean!
I am using this generation games period,please pack your hypocrisy argument,you your self use old ass 2005 xbox 360 games to prove the xbox 360 has more games than the PS3 you and Delta as well how many times have you.? How many times i have quoted you telling you that the xbox 360 has more games if you use 2005,2006 games than the xbox got before the PS3 was even here.? And they count in your books right.? So drop the charade is this gen vs this gen,the fact that you hide on Halo CE show how desperate you are so Halo 4 doesn't cut it vs old PS3 games time to bring last gen games..lol[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="tormentos"] So in what part i compare last gen games vs this one.? Halo 4 and all games i mention are this gen games Halo CE is completely irrelevant nice try.tormentos
Hmm...no no no. You are trying to claim ownage over Halo 4 using metacritic scores, despite how old the games are.
I say Halo 4 may be one of the best shooters this gen, because it managed to score high this late in the generation. You, on the other hand, say Halo CE is better than any PS3 exclusives because you have no clue what standards mean!
I am using this generation games period,please pack your hypocrisy argument,you your self use old ass 2005 xbox 360 games to prove the xbox 360 has more games than the PS3 you and Delta as well how many times have you.? How many times i have quoted you telling you that the xbox 360 has more games if you use 2005,2006 games than the xbox got before the PS3 was even here.? And they count in your books right.? So drop the charade is this gen vs this gen,the fact that you hide on Halo CE show how desperate you are so Halo 4 doesn't cut it vs old PS3 games time to bring last gen games..lol If PS4 launches before Nextbox you'll be using those games. Hypocritce cvnt ;)[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="tormentos"] So in what part i compare last gen games vs this one.? Halo 4 and all games i mention are this gen games Halo CE is completely irrelevant nice try.Eddie-Vedder
Hmm...no no no. You are trying to claim ownage over Halo 4 using metacritic scores, despite how old the games are.
I say Halo 4 may be one of the best shooters this gen, because it managed to score high this late in the generation. You, on the other hand, say Halo CE is better than any PS3 exclusives because you have no clue what standards mean!
So basically the PS3's library is WAY better according to metacritic because it has roughly the same amount of high scoring games but a way more recent library and the 360 library is pretty much mostly from 2005-2007. Correct? Standards and all, that's how it works right? A bunch of AAA's from late in the generation >>>>> the same amount of AAA's from early in the generation?Lol what are you talking about? 360 library not only has more quality games, it also have been getting more good exclusives this year. Actually, 360 has yet to have a year without at least a retail AAAE.
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="tormentos"] So in what part i compare last gen games vs this one.? Halo 4 and all games i mention are this gen games Halo CE is completely irrelevant nice try.tormentos
Hmm...no no no. You are trying to claim ownage over Halo 4 using metacritic scores, despite how old the games are.
I say Halo 4 may be one of the best shooters this gen, because it managed to score high this late in the generation. You, on the other hand, say Halo CE is better than any PS3 exclusives because you have no clue what standards mean!
I am using this generation games period,please pack your hypocrisy argument,you your self use old ass 2005 xbox 360 games to prove the xbox 360 has more games than the PS3 you and Delta as well how many times have you.? How many times i have quoted you telling you that the xbox 360 has more games if you use 2005,2006 games than the xbox got before the PS3 was even here.? And they count in your books right.? So drop the charade is this gen vs this gen,the fact that you hide on Halo CE show how desperate you are so Halo 4 doesn't cut it vs old PS3 games time to bring last gen games..lolI use 2005 exclusives games as ownage? When did i do that? :o
The fact 360 has more games than PS3 has little to do with it's head start year. I really doubt 360 got 160 A+ games on it's first year alone. It has simply been more consistant all gen.
I use 2005 exclusives games as ownage? When did i do that? :oEvery time you use 2005,2006 game release on xbox 360 to prove the xbox 360 has more games,stop plying dumb,how many times i have told you that the xbox 360 has more games because of 2005 and 2006 games the xbox got before the PS3 was even launch,how many times you and several other still say that it doesn't matter that they count.. Once again the fact that you hide on Halo CE a 2001 game says it all,hell a remake was release on xbox 360 and didn't even reach 85% on Meta.. Here this is what Halo CE is by today's standards... http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary A 82% game oh and that is because the game has now multiplayer online something the first one did not even have.. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/critic-reviews http://www.gamespot.com/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/reviews/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary-review-6346217/?tag=games%253Bgame_title%253B3 Second link if you want confirmation,Halo CE is nothing by today standards..The fact 360 has more games than PS3 has little to do with it's head start year. I really doubt 360 got 160 A+ games on it's first year alone. It has simply been more consistant all gen.
PAL360
Tormy in this thread now stating we can't use early gen games officially makes it go full circle into how delluded the Cows really are. So I guess you finally agree by your logic that the standards of Killzone 2 are now officially lowered because of age and the MC argument is meaningless...
Killzone 2 is a 2009 game,hell Uncharted 3 is a 2011 game and is also higher rated than Halo 4... Old games.? I wonder which is really old Killzone 2 or Halo Ce.. 1 has 3 years the other 11...Tormy in this thread now stating we can't use early gen games officially makes it go full circle into how delluded the Cows really are. So I guess you finally agree by your logic that the standards of Killzone 2 are now officially lowered because of age and the MC argument is meaningless...
Bruce_Benzing
[QUOTE="PAL360"]I use 2005 exclusives games as ownage? When did i do that? :oEvery time you use 2005,2006 game release on xbox 360 to prove the xbox 360 has more games,stop plying dumb,how many times i have told you that the xbox 360 has more games because of 2005 and 2006 games the xbox got before the PS3 was even launch,how many times you and several other still say that it doesn't matter that they count.. Once again the fact that you hide on Halo CE a 2001 game says it all,hell a remake was release on xbox 360 and didn't even reach 85% on Meta.. Here this is what Halo CE is by today's standards... http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary A 82% game oh and that is because the game has now multiplayer online something the first one did not even have.. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/critic-reviews http://www.gamespot.com/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/reviews/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary-review-6346217/?tag=games%253Bgame_title%253B3 Second link if you want confirmation,Halo CE is nothing by today standards..The fact 360 has more games than PS3 has little to do with it's head start year. I really doubt 360 got 160 A+ games on it's first year alone. It has simply been more consistant all gen.
tormentos
:lol: You seem confused! You were the one saying standards didn't change with time, on the Killzone 2 vs Halo 4 thread. I just said that 'by your logic' Halo CE would be better than any PS3 exclusive.
And then again, i never used a 2005 360 game to claim ownage. In fact, that's not needed! 360 got more games at the start of the gen, and it has been getting more games when it comes to an end. It's called consistency!
Every time you use 2005,2006 game release on xbox 360 to prove the xbox 360 has more games,stop plying dumb,how many times i have told you that the xbox 360 has more games because of 2005 and 2006 games the xbox got before the PS3 was even launch,how many times you and several other still say that it doesn't matter that they count.. Once again the fact that you hide on Halo CE a 2001 game says it all,hell a remake was release on xbox 360 and didn't even reach 85% on Meta.. Here this is what Halo CE is by today's standards... http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary A 82% game oh and that is because the game has now multiplayer online something the first one did not even have.. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/critic-reviews http://www.gamespot.com/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/reviews/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary-review-6346217/?tag=games%253Bgame_title%253B3 Second link if you want confirmation,Halo CE is nothing by today standards..[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="PAL360"]I use 2005 exclusives games as ownage? When did i do that? :o
The fact 360 has more games than PS3 has little to do with it's head start year. I really doubt 360 got 160 A+ games on it's first year alone. It has simply been more consistant all gen.
PAL360
:lol: You seem confused! You were the one saying standards didn't change with time, on the Killzone 2 vs Halo 4 thread. I just said that 'by your logic' Halo CE would be better than any PS3 exclusive.
And then again, i never used a 2005 360 game to claim ownage. In fact, that's not needed! 360 got more games at the start of the gen, and it has been getting more games when it comes to an end. It's called consistency!
If only it was a cow but hey, it will have to do - nicely done. :)And Halo 3 >>> All of them.
I fail to see a reason to care.
But whatever. One of the year's best exclusives is coming out tomorrow. Can't wait to play it!
Have fun playing scores, Cows! :)
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]What? Halo Anniversary came with Halo Reach multiplayer maps, it wasn't Halo CE Multiplayer...tormentosWhich is better because Halo CE multiplayer was offline,not online.. The fact is that a remake was done and by today's standards is meh..I wasn't aware AA is "meh."
Sorry to spoil the party consolites, but Crysis still reigns over!:D
zeeshanhaider
Come on, I'm not even a "consolite" but Crysis is...well...old.
[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]
Sorry to spoil the party consolites, but Crysis still reigns over!:D
ClassicRockFTW
Come on, I'm not even a "consolite" but Crysis is...well...old.
Its only a year older than R2.
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]What? Halo Anniversary came with Halo Reach multiplayer maps, it wasn't Halo CE Multiplayer...Stevo_the_gamerWhich is better because Halo CE multiplayer was offline,not online.. The fact is that a remake was done and by today's standards is meh..I wasn't aware AA is "meh." mentos only plays AAA games
[QUOTE="Vatusus"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: .mems_1224
Your butthurt is showing...
:cool:
:lol: no butthurt, i dont have to settle for generic fps games with terrible controls. i have real fps games :lol:>Console FPS
>Real FPS
:lol: loooooooooooooooooooooooooool No such thing, buddy.
[QUOTE="PAL360"]
[QUOTE="tormentos"] Every time you use 2005,2006 game release on xbox 360 to prove the xbox 360 has more games,stop plying dumb,how many times i have told you that the xbox 360 has more games because of 2005 and 2006 games the xbox got before the PS3 was even launch,how many times you and several other still say that it doesn't matter that they count.. Once again the fact that you hide on Halo CE a 2001 game says it all,hell a remake was release on xbox 360 and didn't even reach 85% on Meta.. Here this is what Halo CE is by today's standards... http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary A 82% game oh and that is because the game has now multiplayer online something the first one did not even have.. http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/critic-reviews http://www.gamespot.com/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary/reviews/halo-combat-evolved-anniversary-review-6346217/?tag=games%253Bgame_title%253B3 Second link if you want confirmation,Halo CE is nothing by today standards..SecretPolice
:lol: You seem confused! You were the one saying standards didn't change with time, on the Killzone 2 vs Halo 4 thread. I just said that 'by your logic' Halo CE would be better than any PS3 exclusive.
And then again, i never used a 2005 360 game to claim ownage. In fact, that's not needed! 360 got more games at the start of the gen, and it has been getting more games when it comes to an end. It's called consistency!
If only it was a cow but hey, it will have to do - nicely done. :)Hahaha....nice gif :P
What you said in another thread: [QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="ninjapirate2000"] Cows only care about sales when it's in their favor... Pretty much. They bash Forza for not selling as much as GT but they won't acknowledge that nobody buys Killzone games. Ironic....Halo 4 will sell triple than those games combined :lol:
JohnnyCageMK
[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"] What you said in another thread: [QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="ninjapirate2000"] Cows only care about sales when it's in their favor... hoosier7Pretty much. They bash Forza for not selling as much as GT but they won't acknowledge that nobody buys Killzone games. Ironic....
Looks like you're mad cause PS3 has nothing to compete with those Halo sales brah
Ironic....[QUOTE="hoosier7"][QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"] Pretty much. They bash Forza for not selling as much as GT but they won't acknowledge that nobody buys Killzone games.JohnnyCageMK
Looks like you're mad cause PS3 has nothing to compete with those Halo sales brah
You know the more you talk about sales, the more you're just proving my point?[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="hoosier7"] Ironic....hoosier7
Looks like you're mad cause PS3 has nothing to compete with those Halo sales brah
You know the more you talk about sales, the more you're just proving my point?I wasn't the one that started about sales but if cows want to use them over GT5 then this thread is as good as dead. Halo slaughters everything PS3 has in sales.
resistance 2 and halo 4 both have the same score[QUOTE="rilpas"]
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Hey TC you should change it now to KZ2 > Resistance 2 > Halo 4 lolLiquid_
thats embarassing..lol
Halo is actually two points higher now. Would be even more if it wasn't for that one troll review that gave it a 20. No idea how metacritic takes that seriously,
[QUOTE="Liquid_"]
[QUOTE="rilpas"]
I see you're still jelly
rilpas
I see that you are still delusional..take off the fanboy glasses little guy
so much jelly, it's alright, maybe you can play it on a friend's house
i'd repeat myself if I was getting verbally destroyed too
[QUOTE="rilpas"]
[QUOTE="Liquid_"]
I see that you are still delusional..take off the fanboy glasses little guy
Liquid_
so much jelly, it's alright, maybe you can play it on a friend's house
i'd repeat myself if I was getting verbally destroyed too
hey, it's alright, maybe next year sony will give you more then one PSN game.
must be tough having only on PSN game to play for a whiole year, ouch
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment