REally, the most people are expecting from this game is mid AA, i don't think it will dis-appoint. And even if gets a low score, plenty of great games have gotten that type of score. LOZ: TP, MGS1, to name a few.
Think about it, if the first game was garbage , what makes you think the second one will be any better?
papa_smurf_23
The first Killzone could have been better. It had some gameplay problems and average graphics which could have been fixed, and thats really all I can think of what was bad about that game. The reason Cows think Killzone 2 could be better, is because Guerilla has been getting better and better with each game theymake. Not to mention SCE sent over a bunch of people to help with the game, and having a budget in the $50 (?) millions. Also, keeping the game super top secret is a good way to build up hype, so it's only natural.
I like how people are so quick to shoot down this game we call killzone. Biggest the game had on PS2 was hardware limitations which made it suck. Now they have all the power they can get. They can finally make the game they have always dreamed of in the killzone universe. With 20 millions dollars. I dont think it will be to hard. Well we only have until july 10 to find out if this game is for real or not.
So using ur logic..killzone wont get good til killzone 3 is out...
no that means past crap games cant confirm future failures...
It's not a proven franchise yet, not even a proven AA franchise yet. So people have enough evidence to doubt it, people can even doubt halo 3, which people do because it isn't a proven AAA franchise yet either.
and on top of that...Guerilla has not proven itself to be a AAA developer.
Some of the logic in here doesnt work. Take a team like crytek for instance. It had no games under its belt and only had 20 people working on it. So just beause they havent had an AAA title means the first game will suck. No, look what happened.FarCry got a 9.2 here a pretty good AAA for PC. That jsut proves you dont need other titles inder your belt to make an awesome game.
Some of the logic in here doesnt work. Take a team like crytek for instance. It had no games under its belt and only had 20 people working on it. So just beause they havent had an AAA title means the first game will suck. No, look what happened.FarCry got a 9.2 here a pretty good AAA for PC. That jsut proves you dont need other titles inder your belt to make an awesome game.Killfox
True... But Guerilla does have a title under their belt. A *bad* one.
Just because the first one was kinda crappy does'nt mean the second one will suck, especially on a new console. However I do agree that i'm not sure that was actual gameplay footage. only time will tell If it's overhyped or not just like all big games.
[QUOTE="Killfox"]Some of the logic in here doesnt work. Take a team like crytek for instance. It had no games under its belt and only had 20 people working on it. So just beause they havent had an AAA title means the first game will suck. No, look what happened.FarCry got a 9.2 here a pretty good AAA for PC. That jsut proves you dont need other titles inder your belt to make an awesome game.AfterShafter
True... But Guerilla does have a title under their belt. A *bad* one.
[QUOTE="AfterShafter"][QUOTE="Killfox"]Some of the logic in here doesnt work. Take a team like crytek for instance. It had no games under its belt and only had 20 people working on it. So just beause they havent had an AAA title means the first game will suck. No, look what happened.FarCry got a 9.2 here a pretty good AAA for PC. That jsut proves you dont need other titles inder your belt to make an awesome game.Not-A-Stalker
True... But Guerilla does have a title under their belt. A *bad* one.
And they also have a good one.
Killzone is like crysis in the way it being made. Both teams got around 20 millions dollars to work. Both team are putting crazy physics, graphics, everything. The only difference it that killzone has been kept in the dark the hole time. Which isnt a bad thing. They want to show the game in one of its highest forms. To show they werent off with what they were trying to achieve. If they showed it to early they wouldnt be able to shut up the critics. With the man power they have now. I think it should be a pretty decent if they do it right.
Log in to comment