[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"]lol gamepro is so pro Sony it isn't even funny. I would never listen to what they have to say.lbjkurono23
really what about the R2 GOW 2 comparison wich Gears 2 won whit ease . where were you back then ?the posters are hypocrits, if halo won they wouldnt have brought up they would say that game pro isnt bias, but since killzone 2 won they are pro sony
Ive played both killzone 2 is better sorry halo fanboys, maybe there will be a halo 4?
Everything I've read about KZs single player game slates it yet they rate it as the best thing ever.
However, worse than that, Halo 3's Forge looses to KillZone2's nothing yep that's right they rates the extra nothingness in KZ2 higher than Forge in H3. How much baised bullcrud can you dishout in one serving.
Sorry but that comparison is just awful and I haven't played either game yet.
Everything I've read about KZs single player game slates it yet they rate it as the best thing ever.
However, worse than that, Halo 3's Forge looses to KillZone2's nothing yep that's right they rates the extra nothingness in KZ2 higher than Forge in H3. How much baised bullcrud can you dishout in one serving.
Sorry but that comparison is just awful and I haven't played either game yet.
Nomad0404
the single player of killzone 2 beats halo's theater forge and single player modes all together. just one phase of killzone 2 trumps all of halo's features.
Very surprising.. Didn't expect that, well good for Killzone 2.. One thing is for sure.. Both are great console FPS's.. I will have to say one thing.. Who cares about the forge, when playing with my friends for the few months we were addicted to the game.. We rarely used that PoS forge ability.. IT is entirely too simplistic and weak, the original HL1 had a 10 times better map editor.. I will say that I prefer the matchmaking service of Halo 3 way more than Killzones one.. It felt way more competitive.
Everything I've read about KZs single player game slates it yet they rate it as the best thing ever.
However, worse than that, Halo 3's Forge looses to KillZone2's nothing yep that's right they rates the extra nothingness in KZ2 higher than Forge in H3. How much baised bullcrud can you dishout in one serving.
Sorry but that comparison is just awful and I haven't played either game yet.
bytgames
the single player of killzone 2 beats halo's theater forge and single player modes all together. just one phase of killzone 2 trumps all of halo's features.
Even though its only 7 hours long? Tsk tsk...doubtfull.
That's interesting as Gamespot thought Halo 3 was better than KZ2 9.5 > 9.0Erik_Lensherr
You can't really go by just the scores because Halo is an older game and as time goes on expectations for games and their quality goes up. I'm not saying Halo3 isn't deserving of a 9.5 I'm just saying it might not receive the same score now. As far as the article goes I pretty much agree with them on all points, minus the replayability because Halo has Forge and that does add to it. Although I will say I'm having a lot of fun with KZ2 right now and the multiplayer is awesome on KZ2.
[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"]lol gamepro is so pro Sony it isn't even funny. I would never listen to what they have to say.lbjkurono23
really what about the R2 vs GOW 2 comparison wich Gears 2 won with ease . where were you back then ? Um I don't care about anything they say. They are pro Sony. They made way to many stupid articles that just didin't make sense. It is a poor magazine. I have been saying this for a long time.
[QUOTE="lbjkurono23"][QUOTE="too_much_eslim"]lol gamepro is so pro Sony it isn't even funny. I would never listen to what they have to say.bytgames
really what about the R2 GOW 2 comparison wich Gears 2 won whit ease . where were you back then ?the posters are hypocrits, if halo won they wouldnt have brought up they would say that game pro isnt bias, but since killzone 2 won they are pro sony
Ive played both killzone 2 is better sorry halo fanboys, maybe there will be a halo 4?
I have been calling them pro Sony for a long time so it has nothing to do with today events. If halo had won I would have been shock because they are Pro Sony.
I like how they left out all of the online features Halo 3 has, and how it has co-op story mode play. And c'mon. Helghast are better than grunts? >.> Shame.
I think I'll go with the game that has more features.
Maybe I just missed it, but they didn't seem to mention Theatre or co-op or the near-infinite customizability of multiplayer. Hmmm.
VoodooHak
You missed it; but it was ever so vaguely mentioned that it's evident just to how slipshod of a comparison it is. I expected an in-depth comparison, instead, we got a few sentences which contained no specifics.
kz2 wins features....with nothing? kz2 wins multiplayer with "customizable" characters when halo 3 still clock 300k people every day, have tournaments, more game modes, extreme depth, variety in game mods?
Maybe I just missed it, but they didn't seem to mention Theatre or co-op or the near-infinite customizability of multiplayer. Hmmm.
You missed it; but it was ever so vaguely mentioned that it's evident just to how slipshod of a comparison it is. I expected an in-depth comparison, instead, we got a few sentences which no specifics.Really wow.
I like how they left out all of the online features Halo 3 has, and how it has co-op story mode play. And c'mon. Helghast are better than grunts? >.> Shame.
I think I'll go with the game that has more features.
[QUOTE="Erik_Lensherr"]That's interesting as Gamespot thought Halo 3 was better than KZ2 9.5 > 9.0EmperorSupreme
You can't really go by just the scores because Halo is an older game and as time goes on expectations for games and their quality goes up. I'm not saying Halo3 isn't deserving of a 9.5 I'm just saying it might not receive the same score now. As far as the article goes I pretty much agree with them on all points, minus the replayability because Halo has Forge and that does add to it. Although I will say I'm having a lot of fun with KZ2 right now and the multiplayer is awesome on KZ2. Unfortunately it does not work that way. The argument can be made that since it took longer to make, it had more opportunities to raise is score.
I like how they left out all of the online features Halo 3 has, and how it has co-op story mode play. And c'mon. Helghast are better than grunts? >.> Shame.
I think I'll go with the game that has more features.
lbjkurono23
shame real gamers will go with both games
No, it's a shame that they think helghast are better than grunts :P Grunts are funny
kz2 wins features....with nothing? kz2 wins multiplayer with "customizable" characters when halo 3 still clock 300k people every day, have tournaments, more game modes, extreme depth, variety in game mods?
BS.
Cyberfairy
what does having 300 k people playing online has to do with features? besides you're only gonna play with 16.
Everything I've read about KZs single player game slates it yet they rate it as the best thing ever.
However, worse than that, Halo 3's Forge looses to KillZone2's nothing yep that's right they rates the extra nothingness in KZ2 higher than Forge in H3. How much baised bullcrud can you dishout in one serving.
Sorry but that comparison is just awful and I haven't played either game yet.
Cybiotik
the single player of killzone 2 beats halo's theater forge and single player modes all together. just one phase of killzone 2 trumps all of halo's features.
Even though its only 7 hours long? Tsk tsk...doubtfull.
10 hrs long ;)
Killzone 2 is just better. I have played Halo 3 already and still think this. (49/49 achievements)
I like how they left out all of the online features Halo 3 has, and how it has co-op story mode play. And c'mon. Helghast are better than grunts? >.> Shame.
I think I'll go with the game that has more features.
treedoor
shame real gamers will go with both games
No, it's a shame that they think helghast are better than grunts :P Grunts are funny
XD they're indeed funny. but don't you feel bad when killing them ?
kz2 wins features....with nothing? kz2 wins multiplayer with "customizable" characters when halo 3 still clock 300k people every day, have tournaments, more game modes, extreme depth, variety in game mods?
BS.
lbjkurono23
what does having 300 k people playing online has to do with features? besides you're only gonna play with 16.Perhaps the argument could be made that with more players, that would dictate shorter times for getting into matches and playing games?
The joke is their comparing a game that came out in 2007 to a game that came out in 2009.
One billion trillion pounds no ones comparing killzone 2 with another shooter in 2011 it just doesn't have the lasting power, the multiplayer, features and options simply aren't deep enough. The fact Halo 2 is still played to this day says it all.
I like how they left out all of the online features Halo 3 has, and how it has co-op story mode play. And c'mon. Helghast are better than grunts? >.> Shame.
I think I'll go with the game that has more features.
treedoor
shame real gamers will go with both games
No, it's a shame that they think helghast are better than grunts :P Grunts are funny
Higgs are even better than Brutes. but the ATACs > All.
That's interesting as Gamespot thought Halo 3 was better than KZ2 9.5 > 9.0Erik_Lensherr
They thought 50 Cent > Halo Wars. Oh and Haze, Conan, Full Auto, Mobile Suit Gundam, Dynasty Warriors > Too Human. Seriously though as much as I love KZ2, something would be amiss if it didn't beat Halo. Halo came out in 2007.
Log in to comment