Killzone 3? more like Killzone 2.3

am i the only one here who thinks Killzone3 doesnt warrant a full £40 price tag? from what we have seen so far (multiplayer wise) it all looks the damn same with new multiplayer maps and mechs, they could have added this as DLC!

if Bungie could make Halo Reach that good with all these forge thingys and character creation online (i must admit i am jelous that its 360 exclusive), why cant Guerilla games do this, they have sony behind their backs, heres hopeing GG show somthing good before its febuary luanch :) anyone agree ;)

iMojo786_PSN

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

theres a new campaign in the sequel:o astonishing!! thats not really a new feature to you is it?

LucidJubilation

It's the one thing that really matters for something to be considered a sequel.:?

lmao, WHAT? so every new campaign and sequel is a completely new feature to you two? a new campaign isnt a new feature...its a new campaign. features are within the campaign or game. like new guns or mechanics within campaign or added multiplayer options.

so you're saying a game could come out with no multiplayer, no co-op, and an array of weapons...then sequel comes out but still doesnt have any multiplayer, co-op, and the same array of guns. that'd you'd consider the campaign in that game the feature added?

Stay on topic. I never said anything about new features. You acted like having a whole new campaign has nothing to do with a game qualifying as a sequel, hence KZ3 instead of KZ2.3, which is what the topic was all about. You even claimed earlier that it's "still basically the same game" which can't be true if there's a whole new campaign.

[QUOTE="deniiiii21"]

Karatechop obviously you havents seen that Ice level, it stomps KZ2.

LucidJubilation

what, with the water...big whoop. it still basically the same game. they just ripped off the jetpacks from Reach...which wasnt too orignal to begin with.

For reference.

i dont care if its killzone 2.00001. as long as they fixed teh controls and a plus they implemented move controls im happy. i can finally be able to play killzone and admire the game. kilzlone 2's controls literally killed the game for me.

[QUOTE="GreyFoXX4"][QUOTE="vaderhater"]

Well TC you know its using the same engine that KZ2 was built on and thats how old now? Oh well.

vaderhater

Gears of War 3? More like Gears of War 2.2!

:lol:

LegatoSkyheart

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

[QUOTE="deniiiii21"]

Karatechop obviously you havents seen that Ice level, it stomps KZ2.

tubbyc

what, with the water...big whoop. it still basically the same game. they just ripped off the jetpacks from Reach...which wasnt too orignal to begin with.

Uhm...Jetpacks were in Killzone long before Reach. (Killzone Liberation)

So Reach ripped off jetpacks from Killzone...

it's sad that kz3 doesn't look any better than kz2. :(

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

It's the one thing that really matters for something to be considered a sequel.:?

tubbyc

lmao, WHAT? so every new campaign and sequel is a completely new feature to you two? a new campaign isnt a new feature...its a new campaign. features are within the campaign or game. like new guns or mechanics within campaign or added multiplayer options.

so you're saying a game could come out with no multiplayer, no co-op, and an array of weapons...then sequel comes out but still doesnt have any multiplayer, co-op, and the same array of guns. that'd you'd consider the campaign in that game the feature added?

Stay on topic. I never said anything about new features. You acted like having a whole new campaign has nothing to do with a game qualifying as a sequel, hence KZ3 instead of KZ2.3, which is what the topic was all about. You even claimed earlier that it's "still basically the same game" which can't be true if there's a whole new campaign.

uh huh....ok.nice talking to yah.

From what I've seen there looks to be nothing new in Kz3 other than a shoddy 3D if you still have a job and can afford a television that is compatible. KZ3 looks to be much the same as KZ2 so I am looking forward to KZ3. KZ2 was almost perfect other than the lag, so if they fixed that then I'll be in heaven for about 6 months. As for saying 2.3 that is funny. Devs loved the idea of DLC and look where its getting them. It's going to literally drain the resources out of the gaming world to support new games that require a 60 dollar price tag when it should be 10 dollar dlc at best. I do agree with the tc. I want bang for my buck and not some expensive rehash of another rehash that has been rehashed over another rehash. Yes I'm looking at you bungie, and I can see KZ doing the same, but its not that bad yet. Getting pissed at the Devs who make crap that is over priced. I want more downloadable games like 1943 seeing how the game cost me 10 dollars and is still better than most of the games I payed 60 bucks for.

Killzone 3 looks identical to Killzone 2 to me.

[QUOTE="iMojo786_PSN"]

am i the only one here who thinks Killzone3 doesnt warrant a full £40 price tag? from what we have seen so far (multiplayer wise) it all looks the damn same with new multiplayer maps and mechs, they could have added this as DLC!

if Bungie could make Halo Reach that good with all these forge thingys and character creation online (i must admit i am jelous that its 360 exclusive), why cant Guerilla games do this, they have sony behind their backs, heres hopeing GG show somthing good before its febuary luanch :) anyone agree ;)

mijkil

I absolutley agree, great to finally see some unbiased and intellignet comment in Sytem wars.

You guys do knwo there's 6 months before the game hits retail, right....?

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

[QUOTE="deniiiii21"]

Karatechop obviously you havents seen that Ice level, it stomps KZ2.

dah_master

what, with the water...big whoop. it still basically the same game. they just ripped off the jetpacks from Reach...which wasnt too orignal to begin with.

Uhm...Jetpacks were in Killzone long before Reach. (Killzone Liberation)

So Reach ripped off jetpacks from Killzone...