Killzone 3 NEW GRAPHICS KING and in ALPHA code too

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Innovazero2000
Innovazero2000

3159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#101 Innovazero2000
Member since 2006 • 3159 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="yugioh3ds"]

especially on the 360.....alan wake, halo reach, splinter cell conviction

yugioh3ds

just so you know halo reach still has better textures, backdrops and facial animations and explosions and character moodels on enemys :)

YES and Halo Reach is also.....

-sub HD

-extremely dumn enemy AI

-2d bullets/ explosions

-inferior facial models

You just lost all credibility? 2d bullets and explosions? Do you have any idea how much alpha effects the explosions are using, and several layers to boot. I have NEVER seen a game on consoles that can shove the amount of independent light sources this game does and still keep ticking. The ps3 may be ever so slightly more powerful, but bungie used the bandwidth on the EDRAM to full expense and it shows with the stupid amounts of frame buffer sapping effects.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

Killzone 3: Now has brown, orange, black, AND WHITE!

Looks good, maybe even console graphics king...but not THE king. Crysis still holds that crown (and while Metro 2033 sits as his right-hand man :P)

ChubbyGuy40

I don't get it...The color looks fine to me. Does it need to look like Mario Galaxy or something?

I'd rather have real world color. Sorry the setting is cloudy.

Avatar image for justsayin117
justsayin117

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 justsayin117
Member since 2010 • 186 Posts

[QUOTE="yugioh3ds"][QUOTE="worknow222"] LMAO!! you have never played reach have you? sub HD yes, Bad Ai? NO!!extremely Good AI ( you not that bright in spelling are you? it's *Dumb*) 2d bullets umm NO!!! there bullets that are clearly 3d when looking at them in theater, inferior facial models again you played reach?

worknow222

And you are the1000th lemming silly enough to hype Halo Reach as console graphics king? Even Lemmings will laugh at lemmings trying to hype a gameplay king as graphics king

I am not hyping reach just saying reach has qualities that are better looking than Killzone 3 un the end killzone 3 will look better in environments and Gun models but it will have inferior qualities to reach in one way or another, Again not hyping reachs graphics dont jump to such a BS consumption.

Uhhh :?. KZ3 looks much better than HR in every single category possible. Character models? KZ3 Post processing? KZ3 Lighting? KZ3 Animation? KZ3 Weapon models? KZ3 Particle effects? KZ3 etc,etc

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Looks very nice. The only FPS I will enjoy after i'm done with Reach for quite some time I imagine.

I wouldnt call it Graphics King, just asI wouldnt call KZ2 Graphics King. They both have tons of dog ugly flat nasty textures.

Avatar image for justsayin117
justsayin117

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 justsayin117
Member since 2010 • 186 Posts
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

Looks very nice. The only FPS I will enjoy after i'm done with Reach for quite some time I imagine.

I wouldnt call it Graphics King, just asI wouldnt call KZ2 Graphics King. They both have tons of dog ugly flat nasty textures.

... ;/. KZ2/3 have the best texturing on consoles, save U2, and GOW3
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="yugioh3ds"] And you are the1000th lemming silly enough to hype Halo Reach as console graphics king? Even Lemmings will laugh at lemmings trying to hype a gameplay king as graphics kingjustsayin117

I am not hyping reach just saying reach has qualities that are better looking than Killzone 3 un the end killzone 3 will look better in environments and Gun models but it will have inferior qualities to reach in one way or another, Again not hyping reachs graphics dont jump to such a BS consumption.

Uhhh :?. KZ3 looks much better than HR in every single category possible. Character models? KZ3 Post processing? KZ3 Lighting? KZ3 Animation? KZ3 Weapon models? KZ3 Particle effects? KZ3 etc,etc

Character Models, Gun models and Lighting is where Reach Excells. I wouldnt say KZ3 has it beat in either of them aspects.

The lighting Halo uses may not appeal to you(Causeit's not ridiculously overdone) but it's technically more impressive then KZ2's, and im sure KZ3's

Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts
[QUOTE="justsayin117"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

Looks very nice. The only FPS I will enjoy after i'm done with Reach for quite some time I imagine.

I wouldnt call it Graphics King, just asI wouldnt call KZ2 Graphics King. They both have tons of dog ugly flat nasty textures.

... ;/. KZ2/3 have the best texturing on consoles, save U2, and GOW3

u2 had good texturing? console gamers are easily fooled.
Avatar image for yugioh3ds
yugioh3ds

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 yugioh3ds
Member since 2010 • 456 Posts

[QUOTE="yugioh3ds"][QUOTE="worknow222"] LMAO!! you have never played reach have you? sub HD yes, Bad Ai? NO!!extremely Good AI ( you not that bright in spelling are you? it's *Dumb*) 2d bullets umm NO!!! there bullets that are clearly 3d when looking at them in theater, inferior facial models again you played reach?

worknow222

And you are the1000th lemming silly enough to hype Halo Reach as console graphics king? Even Lemmings will laugh at lemmings trying to hype a gameplay king as graphics king

I am not hyping reach just saying reach has qualities that are better looking than Killzone 3 un the end killzone 3 will look better in environments and Gun models but it will have inferior qualities to reach in one way or another, Again not hyping reachs graphics dont jump to such a BS consumption.

Not even gonna argue....

The snow particle effects in KZ3 just face palms any Halo Reach particle effects. I'm not even gonna go into the explosions and dust/ smoke effects etc

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

Looks very nice. The only FPS I will enjoy after i'm done with Reach for quite some time I imagine.

I wouldnt call it Graphics King, just asI wouldnt call KZ2 Graphics King. They both have tons of dog ugly flat nasty textures.

justsayin117

... ;/. KZ2/3 have the best texturing on consoles, save U2, and GOW3

It has a lot of excellent textures. Then you spot a mountain of completely flat grabage and feel like youre playing MGS4.

Avatar image for justsayin117
justsayin117

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 justsayin117
Member since 2010 • 186 Posts

[QUOTE="justsayin117"]

[QUOTE="worknow222"] I am not hyping reach just saying reach has qualities that are better looking than Killzone 3 un the end killzone 3 will look better in environments and Gun models but it will have inferior qualities to reach in one way or another, Again not hyping reachs graphics dont jump to such a BS consumption.-Snooze-

Uhhh :?. KZ3 looks much better than HR in every single category possible. Character models? KZ3 Post processing? KZ3 Lighting? KZ3 Animation? KZ3 Weapon models? KZ3 Particle effects? KZ3 etc,etc

Character Models, Gun models and Lighting is where Reach Excells. I wouldnt say KZ3 has it beat in either of them aspects.

The lighting Halo uses may not appeal to you(Causeit's not ridiculously overdone) but it's technically more impressive then KZ2's, and im sure KZ3's

Uhhh, those aspects espicially are where KZ2/3 destroy reach graphically

In-game renders

Avatar image for worknow222
worknow222

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 worknow222
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="yugioh3ds"] And you are the1000th lemming silly enough to hype Halo Reach as console graphics king? Even Lemmings will laugh at lemmings trying to hype a gameplay king as graphics kingjustsayin117

I am not hyping reach just saying reach has qualities that are better looking than Killzone 3 un the end killzone 3 will look better in environments and Gun models but it will have inferior qualities to reach in one way or another, Again not hyping reachs graphics dont jump to such a BS consumption.

Uhhh :?. KZ3 looks much better than HR in every single category possible. Character models? KZ3 Post processing? KZ3 Lighting? KZ3 Animation? KZ3 Weapon models? KZ3 Particle effects? KZ3 etc,etc

all i have to say have you played reach? have you explored to and looked for those parts that are mindblowing in graphics? go to killzone 2 and zoom into a dead enemy then go to reach kill and elite and zoom in to see it's incredible detail, look at the fantastic facial models, go to night of solace and look at the detailed as hell textures. and if you do this i just controlled you :P but yeah killzone 3 will have better looking effects and all that but so does reach.
Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

[QUOTE="justsayin117"] Uhhh :?. KZ3 looks much better than HR in every single category possible. Character models? KZ3 Post processing? KZ3 Lighting? KZ3 Animation? KZ3 Weapon models? KZ3 Particle effects? KZ3 etc,etc

justsayin117

Character Models, Gun models and Lighting is where Reach Excells. I wouldnt say KZ3 has it beat in either of them aspects.

The lighting Halo uses may not appeal to you(Causeit's not ridiculously overdone) but it's technically more impressive then KZ2's, and im sure KZ3's

Uhhh, those aspects espicially are where KZ2/3 destroy reach graphically

In-game renders

No offence, but i'm not even going to consider your opinion 'cause i very much doubt you've played Reach.

I'm not argying Reach is better looking then either Killzone 2 or 3, but when it comes to character/ gun models and lighting, Reach rivals if not surpasses them

Avatar image for Strider_91
Strider_91

6570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#114 Strider_91
Member since 2007 • 6570 Posts
Uncharted 2 and Gears 3 look better to me than KZ3navyguy21
Glad you chose one from each console to not bait any fanboys :P And i totally agree with you..
Avatar image for johny300
johny300

12496

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 johny300
Member since 2010 • 12496 Posts
Looks really good damn can't wait.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

For 3 years games have been hyped as graphics king, for three years they have all failed.

KZ3 will be no different

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

You left out console.

mitu123

this isn't console wars.

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

[QUOTE="yugioh3ds"]

[QUOTE="worknow222"] just so you know halo reach still has better textures, backdrops and facial animations and explosions and character moodels on enemys :) Innovazero2000

YES and Halo Reach is also.....

-sub HD

-extremely dumn enemy AI

-2d bullets/ explosions

-inferior facial models

You just lost all credibility? 2d bullets and explosions? Do you have any idea how much alpha effects the explosions are using, and several layers to boot. I have NEVER seen a game on consoles that can shove the amount of independent light sources this game does and still keep ticking. The ps3 may be ever so slightly more powerful, but bungie used the bandwidth on the EDRAM to full expense and it shows with the stupid amounts of frame buffer sapping effects.

AGREED.My man...knows what is talking about.If Reach does ANYTHING better than any other its alpha effects such as explosion.Full res ftw!

Avatar image for faithnomor3
faithnomor3

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 faithnomor3
Member since 2010 • 146 Posts

[QUOTE="worknow222"][QUOTE="yugioh3ds"] And you are the1000th lemming silly enough to hype Halo Reach as console graphics king? Even Lemmings will laugh at lemmings trying to hype a gameplay king as graphics kingjustsayin117

I am not hyping reach just saying reach has qualities that are better looking than Killzone 3 un the end killzone 3 will look better in environments and Gun models but it will have inferior qualities to reach in one way or another, Again not hyping reachs graphics dont jump to such a BS consumption.

Uhhh :?. KZ3 looks much better than HR in every single category possible. Character models? KZ3 Post processing? KZ3 Lighting? KZ3 Animation? KZ3 Weapon models? KZ3 Particle effects? KZ3 etc,etc

it sure is. and I bet Killzone's draw distances are much better as well?:lol:

oh wait. that's a 2d Background, you don't go anywhere but forward anyways:lol:

Avatar image for AiurProtoss
AiurProtoss

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 AiurProtoss
Member since 2010 • 1080 Posts

[QUOTE="AiurProtoss"]oh look more corridors.justsayin117
uhhh, those "corridors" in kz2/3 MP are much larger than any HR map (Excpet forge world...if that somehow counts :/ )

then you have never played Halo then. gunplay easy and boring not fast paced, no oddball no win. No griffball no win, it will be jsut like Killzone 2 hyped to **** but only a million sales and 50,000 players playing on it less than one year down the road. Campaign will be awesome if garbage qualifies as such, cant say much for the multiplayer, considering its limited to PSplus users which doesn't test their server strength, or wait they aren't anticipating that many people actually playing this game. o well i guess.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

And for the 1 millionth time, no a PS3 exclusive will not look better than other PC titles. :P

Avatar image for Comduter
Comduter

2316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#122 Comduter
Member since 2004 • 2316 Posts

How could Killzone 3 be the best looking game out there judging by that video? It looks like countless other FPS games. It looks good but not great. The graphics for Unreal Tornament 3 impressed me more than KZ3 has so far.

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#123 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Why all cows always come posting here like X games is Graphics King. No game on the ps3 or the 360 will ever beat a game like Crysis because consoles are outdated.
Avatar image for Impress3
Impress3

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 Impress3
Member since 2008 • 234 Posts

people on here hallucinating...

are they seriously comparing Halo Reach and Unreal tournament to KZ3 in terms of graphics?

HAAHAHAHAHAhahahaha...

Killzone 3 laughs at the weak

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
In reference your claim, it is absolutely not the graphics king. Now that that is out of the way it will be interesting to see the improvements they have made over 2, kz2 used a deferred rendering system but because they wanted hardware AA they used a traditional forward renderer over their deferred rendering, this extra cost was probably what caused them to use a bunch of static lights on a deferred system. But now that they have access to mlaa that as a post process AA can work on deferred rendering systems eliminating the need for KZ3 to use a forward renderer on top, freeing up alot of power to do other things. From videos the graphical fidelity has improved a bit but not too much, i see some SSAO in there, so im guessing they are going to use the extra power to make the bigger levels they were talking about or possibly eliminate prebaked lighting altogether which could make for some more interesting interaction with the environment.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#126 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts

people on here hallucinating...

are they seriously comparing Halo Reach and Unreal tournament to KZ3 in terms of graphics?

HAAHAHAHAHAhahahaha...

Killzone 3 laughs at the weak

Impress3
But in terms of gameplay and replay value Halo or Unreal laughs at Killzone.
Avatar image for faithnomor3
faithnomor3

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 faithnomor3
Member since 2010 • 146 Posts

people on here hallucinating...

are they seriously comparing Halo Reach and Unreal tournament to KZ3 in terms of graphics?

HAAHAHAHAHAhahahaha...

Killzone 3 laughs at the weak

Impress3

that's ok. even though Reach matches many things, and does it's own things. very well.

it gets the last laugh, along with UT for being a completely respectable franchise. ;)

Avatar image for Sw33tChilLi
Sw33tChilLi

328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Sw33tChilLi
Member since 2009 • 328 Posts

God damn, so much butt hurtedness from non PS3 owners, its like you can't bring yourself to admit that Killzone 3 is a gorgeous game, REGARDLESS of whether its king...

Oh, and for those saying Gears 3 and Rage look better, care to upload some DIRECT FEED NON BULLSHOTS of them like I did to compare?? Or are you basing your ignorant assumptions on bullshots and 720p streamed videos? (lol)

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

God damn, so much butt hurtedness from non PS3 owners, its like you can't bring yourself to admit that Killzone 3 is a gorgeous game, REGARDLESS of whether its king...

Oh, and for those saying Gears 3 and Rage look better, care to upload some DIRECT FEED NON BULLSHOTS of them like I did to compare?? Or are you basing your ignorant assumptions on bullshots and 720p streamed videos? (lol)

Sw33tChilLi

Who's saying KZ3 isn't a good looking game? No one in this thread, maybe you're confused?

All the video's we've seen of Gears look better fhen the crappy screenshots shown to us in this thread ...

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#130 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

meh, you guys arent sick of the same exact gameplay in all console shooters?

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

Killzone 3 is a good looking game.......for consoles.

Not sure why people like to use horrible youtube videos to judge graphics.

Avatar image for Weird_Jerk
Weird_Jerk

646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#132 Weird_Jerk
Member since 2010 • 646 Posts

AGREED.My man...knows what is talking about.If Reach does ANYTHING better than any other its alpha effects such as explosion.Full res ftw!

Bus-A-Bus

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

AGREED.My man...knows what is talking about.If Reach does ANYTHING better than any other its alpha effects such as explosion.Full res ftw!

Weird_Jerk

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

LOL no.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL-UJksVtlA

.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEYkQ5ZKrjY

Avatar image for Sw33tChilLi
Sw33tChilLi

328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Sw33tChilLi
Member since 2009 • 328 Posts

[QUOTE="Sw33tChilLi"]

Who's saying KZ3 isn't a good looking game? No one in this thread, maybe you're confused?

All the video's we've seen of Gears look better then the crappy screenshots shown to us in this thread ...

-Snooze-

Can I detect some irony?

And the people saying it isn't a good looking game ?

all i see is brown and horrible textures Blaze Agent

oh look more corridors. AiurProtoss

Avatar image for Bus-A-Bus
Bus-A-Bus

5089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Bus-A-Bus
Member since 2009 • 5089 Posts

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

AGREED.My man...knows what is talking about.If Reach does ANYTHING better than any other its alpha effects such as explosion.Full res ftw!

Weird_Jerk

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

I am talking purely on quality side...effect by it self is not so great IMO in Reach but those particles that go out are higher res than in KZ3,probably 4 times higher.That does not mean much since its artstyle,purple pink and red particles dont really look all that convincing :)

Avatar image for Ragingbear505
Ragingbear505

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#136 Ragingbear505
Member since 2008 • 819 Posts

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

AGREED.My man...knows what is talking about.If Reach does ANYTHING better than any other its alpha effects such as explosion.Full res ftw!

Hakkai007

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

LOL no.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL-UJksVtlA

.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEYkQ5ZKrjY



I'm seriously starting to wonder when anything is going to dethrone Crysis.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#137 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

Ragingbear505

LOL no.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL-UJksVtlA

.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEYkQ5ZKrjY



I'm seriously starting to wonder when anything is going to dethrone Crysis.

Modded crysis 2.

Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="Blaze-Agent"] sorry those photos look ugly. Does not help your argument at all.. Maybe its just your PC justsayin117
These screens > KZ3, the style in Clear Sky is better, plus higher rez(16x10), bigger maps, more IA, Lighting in Clear Sky > KZ3, higher FPS (60+ in my case), day/night cycle, etc. Overall Clear Sky is a better lokking game, while being bigger and more complex.

Artstlye is subjective, it has higher res textures (I.E. PC games are 1080p compared to console games that are 720p), but KZ3's textures are much more detailed. Im not sure how many A.I. were on screen in Stalker, but KZ2 had, at one time, 20+ (With KZ2/3's A.I. being much smarter than Stalkers). KZ3's lighting uses deffered rendering, and global illumination with nearly all of its light sources being dynamic and it can output 350+ dynamic light sources with its engine. KZ2/3 weapon model's are leagues ahead of Stalker's graphically (Both in poly and texture detail), with post processing being easily better in KZ2/3, etc, etc

STALKER has dynamic lights, and shadows, nothing is prebaked, it has more AI, and its AI is in no way inferior to KZ, post processing is not better than that in Clear Sky in DX10, Character models and gun models are inferior but that is about all. Clear Sky renders a lot more detail on screen, and the engine keeps track of AI that you don't see. I have yet to see people post KZ3 shots that are better than the ones I provided heres a presentation of DX10 features in Clear Sky. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qxg9rK086SU
Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

Ragingbear505

LOL no.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL-UJksVtlA

.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEYkQ5ZKrjY



I'm seriously starting to wonder when anything is going to dethrone Crysis.

it will be a bit, crysis didnt sell nearly as well as it could have. All they needed to do was make a spiritual successor to far cry with good graphics. Instead they made a game nobody could run.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#140 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="justsayin117"][QUOTE="muscleserge"] These screens > KZ3, the style in Clear Sky is better, plus higher rez(16x10), bigger maps, more IA, Lighting in Clear Sky > KZ3, higher FPS (60+ in my case), day/night cycle, etc. Overall Clear Sky is a better lokking game, while being bigger and more complex.muscleserge
Artstlye is subjective, it has higher res textures (I.E. PC games are 1080p compared to console games that are 720p), but KZ3's textures are much more detailed. Im not sure how many A.I. were on screen in Stalker, but KZ2 had, at one time, 20+ (With KZ2/3's A.I. being much smarter than Stalkers). KZ3's lighting uses deffered rendering, and global illumination with nearly all of its light sources being dynamic and it can output 350+ dynamic light sources with its engine. KZ2/3 weapon model's are leagues ahead of Stalker's graphically (Both in poly and texture detail), with post processing being easily better in KZ2/3, etc, etc

STALKER has dynamic lights, and shadows, nothing is prebaked, it has more AI, and its AI is in no way inferior to KZ, post processing is not better than that in Clear Sky in DX10, Character models and gun models are inferior but that is about all. Clear Sky renders a lot more detail on screen, and the engine keeps track of AI that you don't see. I have yet to see people post KZ3 shots that are better than the ones I provided heres a presentation of DX10 features in Clear Sky. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qxg9rK086SU

STALkER actually has a deferred lighting engine and global illumination like he was bragging about kz3 having, STALKER did it before and they also did it much Better
Avatar image for Hakkai007
Hakkai007

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Hakkai007
Member since 2005 • 4905 Posts

it will be a bit, crysis didnt sell nearly as well as it could have. All they needed to do was make a spiritual successor to far cry with good graphics. Instead they made a game nobody could run.

TerrorRizzing

My 2007 pc runs crysis on high a 1680x1050 just fine.

With a modified config I can run it on settings that look like very high just fine.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#142 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
well, KZ3 definitely looks better than KZ2. AA is better, textures are overall better, lighting is more refined, animations seem a bit smoother, effects have been refined etc. Gameplay wise, the MP has been completely reworked, and aiming has been refined and looks to be much better than KZ2.
Avatar image for ProjectNatalFan
ProjectNatalFan

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 ProjectNatalFan
Member since 2010 • 2471 Posts

i think that is bland, reach better, and Gears blows that away more virsirousity in Gears... sorry.

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

Can I detect some irony?

And the people saying it isn't a good looking game ?

Sw33tChilLi

I said the screenshots looked crap, which they do. If you're trying to tell me these poor screenshots ofALPHA gameplay are indictive of the final game (Im sure you're not ...) Then yes, I do think the game looks crap, and i was wrong in what i said.

Also, it's ok to express a negative opinion about a certain aspect of a games visuals and still think it's a good looking game. Maybe you should stop crying and enjoy it yourself.

Avatar image for Weird_Jerk
Weird_Jerk

646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#145 Weird_Jerk
Member since 2010 • 646 Posts

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

AGREED.My man...knows what is talking about.If Reach does ANYTHING better than any other its alpha effects such as explosion.Full res ftw!

Bus-A-Bus

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

I am talking purely on quality side...effect by it self is not so great IMO in Reach but those particles that go out are higher res than in KZ3,probably 4 times higher.That does not mean much since its artstyle,purple pink and red particles dont really look all that convincing :)

Ah, sorry; I thought you were talking on a technical side. Technically, as I said before, I have no doubt that Halo Reach's models are better than KZ2's, but the explosions and such are technically superior in Killzone 2. Halo Reach, however, does have extremely beautiful explosions. The shock wave that goes out when you fire a rocket launcher is pretty awesome.

Avatar image for gugler990
gugler990

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 gugler990
Member since 2010 • 2009 Posts

Pre-release games are always the new graphics king.

Mystic-G

This

Avatar image for Sw33tChilLi
Sw33tChilLi

328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Sw33tChilLi
Member since 2009 • 328 Posts

I said the screenshots looked crap, which they do. If you're trying to tell me these poor screenshots ofALPHA gameplay are indictive of the final game (Im sure you're not ...) Then yes, I do think the game looks crap, and i was wrong in what i said

-Snooze-

Wow, someone has high standards, I'd bet you'd walk up straight up to the main director of GG and tell him that his game looked crap, right? So much arrogance. And the screenshots are VERY indicative of how the game will look (at least in multiplayer), the game is nearing completion and is unlikely to undergo many more drastic changes after the HUD etc. If you think they look crap, all I can say is WOW.

EDIT: "Also, it's ok to express a negative opinion about a certain aspect of a games visuals and still think it's a good looking game. Maybe you should stop crying and enjoy it yourself."

Of course its ok, but to say that the game in general looks crappy and then following up with saying that its a "good looking game".... I dont geddit

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
lbjkurono23

12544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 lbjkurono23
Member since 2007 • 12544 Posts

This threads never go out of style...

Avatar image for Innovazero2000
Innovazero2000

3159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#149 Innovazero2000
Member since 2006 • 3159 Posts

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Weird_Jerk"]

Erm, no. Killzone 2 and Crysis still have the best explosions I've ever seen; I'll give Reach the character models, but the gun models in KZ2 probably and arguably look better than Crysis's, and as quite a few critics have expressed before, the explosions in KZ2 are maybe the best in any game.

Weird_Jerk

I am talking purely on quality side...effect by it self is not so great IMO in Reach but those particles that go out are higher res than in KZ3,probably 4 times higher.That does not mean much since its artstyle,purple pink and red particles dont really look all that convincing :)

Ah, sorry; I thought you were talking on a technical side. Technically, as I said before, I have no doubt that Halo Reach's models are better than KZ2's, but the explosions and such are technically superior in Killzone 2. Halo Reach, however, does have extremely beautiful explosions. The shock wave that goes out when you fire a rocket launcher is pretty awesome.

they are not technically superior. KZ2 did a nice job of mixing their post processing and particle effects, but I can assure you the explosions in halo reach art style aside (think this is where confusion is) are highly technically impressive. We are talking not one but several layers of alpha at full resolution. The amount of bandwidth that takes is insane. I don't want to take away from killzone as an impressive title, but I don't think people realize just how awesome Reach really is underneath it's skin. The SSAO effects are VERY well done(The UV mapping is infinitaly better then in Halo 3) in collaboration with the global illumination and shadowing. This engine can throw hundreds of independent light sources around without breaking a sweat. The textures are also very well done given the limitations of console ram. Either way. All these games that people are trying to compare in here. KZ2/3, Gears 3, Reach, UC2, etc are very impressive games on consoles.

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

Well, its just sexier than before so I can dig it 8). Going by the update from alpha-to-final in KZ2, KZ3 should have a slight graphical upgrade by the time its released.

This is a multiplayer vid too. Multiplayer modes this gen usually don't look as good as their single player counterpart. KZ2 came very close to matching the single player graphics-wise. I'm thinking KZ3's single player will still look better than the MP, but the technical mastery going on here is impressive (3D and 720p as well).

I was happy to hear that the game looks better on an HDTV as Youtube obviously compresses the video's quality (stated by the Invidious guy). I'm looking forward to seeing just how much better it will look, because the 720p video in the OP was awesome. I'm a graphics hoe, so I pay attention to small stuff like that lol.

A graphical thing I would like to see updated are expressions on the Inflitrator's and Engineer's face. Right now they are a bit lifeless expression-wise. It would be nice to see them squirm as they get hit with a brutal melee.

---

More demanding of my attention is the smoothness of the gameplay and framerate. Responsive and slick. There are some new gameplay updates I've noticed in recent beta videos as well. Players earn ribbons doing various things on the battlefield, which are objective/kill related from the looks of it. For example, there was a Faster Aiming ribbon a player earned in one video by killing multiple enemies while aiming down the sight/scope. Once you earn a specific ribbon, it's attribute lasts for the rest of the match, even if you die. I think that's a neat addition. It's a streak reward of sorts, but noob players who work hard for it get to keep it for the rest of the match (as does everyone else).

The point system looks very satisfying. I know many people who despise Call of Duty will automatically bash this addition in KZ3. I have to side with GG on this one though. You are rewarded for everything that benefits your team such as Territory Neutralized; Speaker Pick Up; Sentry Kill etc. It gives you a feeling of helping your team, while feeling like the top dog on your team, even if you're at the bottom. Like you've accomplished something at least. This will help keep a more players happy, possibly making the community bigger than in KZ2 (which is a somewhat decent size right now).

I'm very pleased from what I'm seeing so far. Some cool weapons are returning like the Battle Pistol and Luger's SMG. Some weapons have slight upgrades. Overall, the weapon list still feels a bit bare in MP. I'm sure they are saving some cool weapons for single player. They may even add them in map packs as power pick ups similar to KZ2.