Killzone is alot better then people say it is

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#1 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

I recently started playing Killzone 3 again and I can say hands down that it is the best FPS I have played this year, and it stands right up there with the top FPS gamesin my eyes(Halo and COD) . Sure it's not as popular as those two games, but it's community is growing constantly and the multiplayer in the series gives these other two games a run for it's money, let alone the game is so advanced that it makes other FPS games feel outdated. The storyline isn't very good but neither is COD or Halo either (sorry Halo fanboys, but it's true), but those games don't get hate because of the storyline and Killzone is no exception.

I noticed that alot of people doing the bashing never played Killzone before, which isn't surprising. If more people gave Killzone a chance I know they would like it, and the controls arn't a problem in Killzone 3. Killzone is a great series and I hope that GG keeps making them, the hate for the series doesn't make much sense, that's their opinion. The Kilzone games are easlily the best FPS for PS3, not in popularity but in terms of gameplay and graphics. No other game on consoles can beat it in that category.

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts
I didn't like the changes made to the multiplayer. The single player campaign was pretty cool. The multiplayer was frustrating coming from Killzone 2. Who care about the player motion. Its a game, its not COD, get used to it. What pissed me off (and a lot of other KZ2 fans) is the changes to the class system and maps. No spawn grenades for a Tactician is awful...completely ruined the class. The Infiltrator and Marskman got serious buffs in the game, so now you get spawn camped by them constantly. Even bots can't detect them anymore when fully leveled up which is absurd. The maps are much smaller and less creative than in KZ2. Overall, its about what you would expect for a company rushing a game out only two years after the last one. They should have waited a third year and spent more time on map design and class balancing.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Eh, it was ok. But aside from the graphics it didn't do anything for me.

Avatar image for Dr-fanboy
Dr-fanboy

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dr-fanboy
Member since 2011 • 105 Posts

I recently started playing Killzone 3 again and I can say hands down that it is the best FPS I have played this year, and it stands right up there with the top FPS gamesin my eyes(Halo and COD) . Sure it's not as popular as those two games, but it's community is growing constantly and the multiplayer in the series gives these other two games a run for it's money, let alone the game is so advanced that it makes other FPS games feel outdated. The storyline isn't very good but neither is COD or Halo either (sorry Halo fanboys, but it's true), but those games don't get hate because of the storyline and Killzone is no exception.

I noticed that alot of people doing the bashing never played Killzone before, which isn't surprising. If more people gave Killzone a chance I know they would like it, and the controls arn't a problem in Killzone 3. Killzone is a great series and I hope that GG keeps making them, the hate for the series doesn't make much sense, that's their opinion. The Kilzone games are easlily the best FPS for PS3, not in popularity but in terms of gameplay and graphics. No other game on consoles can beat it in that category.

ShadowMoses900
B-b-but all F{S os teh inferior yo COD. like dat Halo and Resisitance trash! Remember? you said all SW agree that all but COD was teh failure! TEH FAILURE!!!
Avatar image for ScottMescudi
ScottMescudi

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 ScottMescudi
Member since 2011 • 1550 Posts

than*

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
Killzone 2 was good Killzone 3 was mediocore.
Avatar image for NYrockinlegend
NYrockinlegend

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 NYrockinlegend
Member since 2008 • 2025 Posts
I like the Killzone franchise. I haven't played 3 yet but I really liked KZ2. It's one of my favorite shooters this gen. And while I find COD fun, I feel KZ has more advanced gameplay.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
Meh...felt like Killzone 2.5
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52551 Posts

Good for you,man.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
Killzone 2 was pretty mediocre. I doubt Killzone 3 is any better.
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#11 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
Killzone was something fresh and out of the typical fps zone. Probably why I think it needs a bigger fanbase.
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#12 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts
Killzone 2 was pretty mediocre. I doubt Killzone 3 is any better.DragonfireXZ95
I see you've been playing rage rage Are you saying Rage>Killzone 2? No.
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#14 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

parkurtommo
aren't worth or are?
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]Killzone 2 was pretty mediocre. I doubt Killzone 3 is any better.parkurtommo
I see you've been playing rage rage Are you saying Rage>Killzone 2? No.

Actually yes. Single player Rage >>> Killzone 2.
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#16 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

shadowchronicle
aren't worth or are?

are!
Avatar image for BibiMaghoo
BibiMaghoo

4018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 BibiMaghoo
Member since 2009 • 4018 Posts

than*

ScottMescudi
lol :P
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#18 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
[QUOTE="shadowchronicle"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"]

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

parkurtommo
aren't worth or are?

are!

Oh I see, I just like the game then its a 9.
Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

Still haven't finished KZ2 and don't plan on going back anytime soon.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts
[QUOTE="ScottMescudi"]

than*

BibiMaghoo
lol :P

Although cheap, I also thought it was a clever move =P
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

Killzone 3 was the second best game this year (behind portal 2). The rest was pretty ****

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#22 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

Killzone 3 was the second best game this year (behind portal 2). The rest was pretty ****

themajormayor
Did you just call Arkham City and Dark Souls sh*t? :x
Avatar image for shadowchronicle
Shadowchronicle

26969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 66

User Lists: 0

#23 Shadowchronicle
Member since 2008 • 26969 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

Killzone 3 was the second best game this year (behind portal 2). The rest was pretty ****

parkurtommo
Did you just call Arkham City and Dark Souls sh*t? :x

Yeah someone go get the rocket launcher.:x
Avatar image for DireOwl
DireOwl

3352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 DireOwl
Member since 2007 • 3352 Posts

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

parkurtommo

Graphics whore on the PS3? You're doing it wrong. PC is were they true superior graphics are.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#25 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

DireOwl

Graphics whore on the PS3? You're doing it wrong. PC is were they true superior graphics are.

That's why I'm going to build one next year.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

Killzone 3 was the second best game this year (behind portal 2). The rest was pretty ****

parkurtommo

Did you just call Arkham City and Dark Souls sh*t? :x

I haven't played Arkham City. I'm not interested in superheroes but I acknowledge alot of people seems to like it so I shouldn't dismiss it. Still haven't played it so can't bring it into MY equation. Dark Souls was **** though. My 3rd favorite game this year. Still **** Massive disappointment.

Avatar image for DireOwl
DireOwl

3352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 DireOwl
Member since 2007 • 3352 Posts

[QUOTE="DireOwl"]

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

parkurtommo

Graphics whore on the PS3? You're doing it wrong. PC is were they true superior graphics are.

That's why I'm going to build one next year.

Excellent choice, sir.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"]

Well I liked the demo, that's all I can say :P

Just those graphics are worth a score of 9.0+ IMO (I guess I'm a graphics whore though)

DireOwl

Graphics whore on the PS3? You're doing it wrong. PC is were they true superior graphics are.

Killzone 3 has really good graphics though. It can easily be confused with a PC game. Not the best looking of course but to some.
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#29 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

Killzone 3 was the second best game this year (behind portal 2). The rest was pretty ****

themajormayor

Did you just call Arkham City and Dark Souls sh*t? :x

I haven't played Arkham City. I'm not interested in superheroes but I acknowledge alot of people seems to like it so I shouldn't dismiss it. Still haven't played it so can't bring it into MY equation. Dark Souls was **** though. My 3rd favorite game this year. Still **** Massive disappointment.

Arkham City is hardly a superhero game, sure batman is a superhero but he's not always happy and invincible etc etc and he relies on gadgets for his capabilities, so a good comparison would be assasin's creed or something else with both stealth and action mechanics. As for Dark Souls, I ended up putting in even more gameplay into it than Demon's Souls, and it's one of my favourite games this gen. Demon's Souls- 250 hours (also have the platinum btw :cool: ) Dark Souls- 350 hours and growing, still trying to get the platinum, two trophies to go.
Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#30 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

I recently started playing Killzone 3 again and I can say hands down that it is the best FPS I have played this year, and it stands right up there with the top FPS gamesin my eyes(Halo and COD) . Sure it's not as popular as those two games, but it's community is growing constantly and the multiplayer in the series gives these other two games a run for it's money, let alone the game is so advanced that it makes other FPS games feel outdated. The storyline isn't very good but neither is COD or Halo either (sorry Halo fanboys, but it's true), but those games don't get hate because of the storyline and Killzone is no exception.

I noticed that alot of people doing the bashing never played Killzone before, which isn't surprising. If more people gave Killzone a chance I know they would like it, and the controls arn't a problem in Killzone 3. Killzone is a great series and I hope that GG keeps making them, the hate for the series doesn't make much sense, that's their opinion. The Kilzone games are easlily the best FPS for PS3, not in popularity but in terms of gameplay and graphics. No other game on consoles can beat it in that category.

ShadowMoses900

It is my favorite FPS this generation hands down. Infiltrator is the sh*t. Graphics out classes every other console game. I don't even need to play MW3 because it's the same as every other MW game, or BF3 because theyr are trying to copy MW (besides vehicles which I don't care for) KZ3 beats both MW3 and BF3. The only reason I can see anyone not liking the multiplayer is because it is harder than CoD. It isnt a CoD clone like everyone says. If anything BF3 is.

Campaign is split screen, online is fun (warzone is very addicting)....botzone is ok, but needs to be splitscreen so bad. It really serves no purpose being a sinlge player mode.

Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts

I didn't like the changes made to the multiplayer. The single player campaign was pretty cool. The multiplayer was frustrating coming from Killzone 2. Who care about the player motion. Its a game, its not COD, get used to it. What pissed me off (and a lot of other KZ2 fans) is the changes to the class system and maps. No spawn grenades for a Tactician is awful...completely ruined the class. The Infiltrator and Marskman got serious buffs in the game, so now you get spawn camped by them constantly. Even bots can't detect them anymore when fully leveled up which is absurd. The maps are much smaller and less creative than in KZ2. Overall, its about what you would expect for a company rushing a game out only two years after the last one. They should have waited a third year and spent more time on map design and class balancing.-ArchAngeL-777-

No offense but why would they when Killzone 2's online was somewhat of a ghost town?

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts
Exaggeration in SWs isn't anything new ha ... You kinda start getting use to it.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"] Did you just call Arkham City and Dark Souls sh*t? :x parkurtommo

I haven't played Arkham City. I'm not interested in superheroes but I acknowledge alot of people seems to like it so I shouldn't dismiss it. Still haven't played it so can't bring it into MY equation. Dark Souls was **** though. My 3rd favorite game this year. Still **** Massive disappointment.

Arkham City is hardly a superhero game, sure batman is a superhero but he's not always happy and invincible etc etc and he relies on gadgets for his capabilities, so a good comparison would be assasin's creed or something else with both stealth and action mechanics. As for Dark Souls, I ended up putting in even more gameplay into it than Demon's Souls, and it's one of my favourite games this gen. Demon's Souls- 250 hours (also have the platinum btw :cool: ) Dark Souls- 350 hours and growing, still trying to get the platinum, two trophies to go.

But assassin's creed sucks. so... Didn't stop it from sucking. Bleh game. Yes it's a bigger game so you can put more time into it. Still much worse game.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#34 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

I don't think its community is getting bigger. Lately I've struggled just to find a decent sized lobby.

But other than that I agree with you, Killzone 3 got a ridiculous amount of hate.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#35 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] I haven't played Arkham City. I'm not interested in superheroes but I acknowledge alot of people seems to like it so I shouldn't dismiss it. Still haven't played it so can't bring it into MY equation. Dark Souls was **** though. My 3rd favorite game this year. Still **** Massive disappointment.

themajormayor

Arkham City is hardly a superhero game, sure batman is a superhero but he's not always happy and invincible etc etc and he relies on gadgets for his capabilities, so a good comparison would be assasin's creed or something else with both stealth and action mechanics. As for Dark Souls, I ended up putting in even more gameplay into it than Demon's Souls, and it's one of my favourite games this gen. Demon's Souls- 250 hours (also have the platinum btw :cool: ) Dark Souls- 350 hours and growing, still trying to get the platinum, two trophies to go.

But assassin's creed sucks. so... Didn't stop it from sucking. Bleh game. Yes it's a bigger game so you can put more time into it. Still much worse game.

That's either blinding nostalgia or complete fanboyism, Dark Souls is superior in almost everything apart from a few technical issues like the framerate. It's a larger world, more detailed, better level design (well... blighttown not so much), A LOT more variation (in DeS everything was brown and grey, in DkS everything is more colourful and varied), at least twice the amount of weapons, armor, and items in general, and the list goes on.

Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
Lol, I forgot KZ3 was released this year.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#37 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

I didn't like the changes made to the multiplayer. The single player campaign was pretty cool. The multiplayer was frustrating coming from Killzone 2. Who care about the player motion. Its a game, its not COD, get used to it. What pissed me off (and a lot of other KZ2 fans) is the changes to the class system and maps. No spawn grenades for a Tactician is awful...completely ruined the class. The Infiltrator and Marskman got serious buffs in the game, so now you get spawn camped by them constantly. Even bots can't detect them anymore when fully leveled up which is absurd. The maps are much smaller and less creative than in KZ2. Overall, its about what you would expect for a company rushing a game out only two years after the last one. They should have waited a third year and spent more time on map design and class balancing.-ArchAngeL-777-

At first I was upset that the spawn grenade had been taken out but the tacticle spawn points have their advantages over the spawn grenades. First off too much of the community on KZ2 was stupid with them and would place them in awful locations. I still get flashbacks to this day of me getting spawn camped while playing offense on Search and Destroy at Corinth Rising because some idiots kepts throwing spawn grenades right next to the objective which was very close to the main spawn camp of the enemy. Unfortunately a team could only have so many on the map which would prevent me (a experienced Tactician) from placing a spawn grenade in a smart area.

At first I thought the Inflitrator class was broken because they removed the cleardisctinctions they had from allies in KZ2 but I soon learned that most people who play as the Inflitrator class aren't smart about staying incognito. They'll rush you to get a brutal melee kill for lulz and to stay disguised, they always come from the direction other enemy players come from, and they're aggressive so you'll know someone is an Infiltrator is you seem them running in your direction just by pure instinct. Then again I'm a Tactician very often and my recon ability allows me to see Inflitrators even when they're disguised.

Marksmens on the other hand are OP. Very much. Why the Hell they gave them mid-ranged assault rifles is beyond logic and even worse the VC32 was massively buffed and so it now kills in one shot every time even it they shoot your foot or your hand even. Not to mention the cool-down time for the cloak has been sped up. I wish the Tactician could counter their cloak but for some reason GG thought the Marksmen class hadn't been buffed up enough so they threw in a radar jammer so I can't weed them out with recon.

I haven't had a problem with the maps, actually I'd say they're better than KZ2's.Some of the maps on KZ2 very much favored ISA due to their design.

Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#38 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

[QUOTE="-ArchAngeL-777-"]I didn't like the changes made to the multiplayer. The single player campaign was pretty cool. The multiplayer was frustrating coming from Killzone 2. Who care about the player motion. Its a game, its not COD, get used to it. What pissed me off (and a lot of other KZ2 fans) is the changes to the class system and maps. No spawn grenades for a Tactician is awful...completely ruined the class. The Infiltrator and Marskman got serious buffs in the game, so now you get spawn camped by them constantly. Even bots can't detect them anymore when fully leveled up which is absurd. The maps are much smaller and less creative than in KZ2. Overall, its about what you would expect for a company rushing a game out only two years after the last one. They should have waited a third year and spent more time on map design and class balancing.Banjo_Kongfooie

No offense but why would they when Killzone 2's online was somewhat of a ghost town?

I played that a game for about a year, never once had a problem finding a full or at least nearly full game.

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts
Its a PS3 Exclusive FPS, so it cant be any good. Its all just Cow Hype.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#40 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
Killzone 2 was good Killzone 3 was mediocore.FlamesOfGrey
No, both were bad but Killzone 3 was even worst.
Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#41 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

Its a PS3 Exclusive FPS, so it cant be any good. Its all just Cow Hype.Nengo_Flow
You do know you have a Resistance 3 pic right?

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"] Arkham City is hardly a superhero game, sure batman is a superhero but he's not always happy and invincible etc etc and he relies on gadgets for his capabilities, so a good comparison would be assasin's creed or something else with both stealth and action mechanics. As for Dark Souls, I ended up putting in even more gameplay into it than Demon's Souls, and it's one of my favourite games this gen. Demon's Souls- 250 hours (also have the platinum btw :cool: ) Dark Souls- 350 hours and growing, still trying to get the platinum, two trophies to go.parkurtommo

But assassin's creed sucks. so... Didn't stop it from sucking. Bleh game. Yes it's a bigger game so you can put more time into it. Still much worse game.

That's either blinding nostalgia or complete fanboyism, Dark Souls is superior in almost everything apart from a few technical issues like the framerate. It's a larger world, more detailed, better level design (well... blighttown not so much), A LOT more variation (in DeS everything was brown and grey, in DkS everything is more colourful and varied), at least twice the amount of weapons, armor, and items in general, and the list goes on.

nonononono. It's bigger that's it. That's the only "improvement". First of all, much less atmospheric. Demon's Souls was smaller but it did have variation, but most of all it had atmosphere. The color ruins the atmosphere, it's suppose to be dark and gloomy. In 3-1. Dark Souls hardly had any ambient sounds either. Totally lame. Also it was much cheaper. They totally lost the focus of the game. All they did all the time was trying to come up with hard stuff all the time to throw in your face. I mean seriously the whole motto was prepare to die. Was that why you played these games? Cause it was hard? No I don't care about the difficulty as long as it's somewhat challenging. It's obvious they totally lost focus cause everyone was hyping the difficulty of Demon's Souls. Now despite being cheaper it was much easier. Cause cheap=/=hard. I mean seriously the bosses was just hacknslash all the time. And 1 try and he's dead. Also I agree the level design is impressive cause everything is interconnected. But the world kinda doesn't make sense cause everything is so close to one another and everything is there like in the middle of nothing?? In demon's souls you got the feeling it was a vast land. Here it's just a big cluster on a small space. Still impressive but ruins the atmosphere slightly. Also the bonfire placements were sometimes the stupidest thing I've ever seen. And finally. Totally unbalanced. One guy dying in one hit and doing no damage gives me like 200 souls but those guys in the duke's archives only gives me 150?? What the f***??

Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts

[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="themajormayor"]

Killzone 3 was the second best game this year (behind portal 2). The rest was pretty ****

shadowchronicle

Did you just call Arkham City and Dark Souls sh*t? :x

Yeah someone go get the rocket launcher.:x

Where should I hit'em in the face or legs?:P

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
Eh, didn't like it myself, but whatever you lIke.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#46 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

No. It's a pretty corridor shooter and nothing more.

Stringerboy

What about the MP?

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]Its a PS3 Exclusive FPS, so it cant be any good. Its all just Cow Hype.ristactionjakso

You do know you have a Resistance 3 pic right?

lol most of my post comments are just to have fun and lighten up this place. Im technically a cow BTW

I think R3 KZ2 and KZ3 were great games. I only said that comment cuz thats what all of the of the PS3 haters think about an FPS on the PS3.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#48 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

I've only played Killzone 2 and while it was a solid FPS, that's about all it was.

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts
killzone 2 was better then killzone 3. They dug them selves in a ditch on that one. But i wonder if it's true that they fired the killzone 2 MP director, because it was a complete step back.