[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"][QUOTE="I_can_haz"]:? What's so funny? KZ games have better art style than anything Crytek has ever come up with. There's a lot more imagination in GG art style. You may not like the dark gritty look of KZ games but there's no arguing that its more original than Crysis artstyle. Crysis is trying to go for a photorealistic look while KZ goes for the scifi look you'd find in an 80s scifi movie like Aliens or Terminator.I_can_haz
Yup, the hellish look of maps in Shellshock was so great.
Two colors Dark and Gray with heavy blur KZ2 corridors sure rocks.
KZ3 same as KZ3 with an additional color of white for ice.
In KZSF looks like they heard there are more colors than what they were using before. Good.
Have you played Crysis? The lush greenry to Islands to mountains to underground caves to zero gravity environments to all turning to snow etc Yeah Crytek have bad artists. Or what abour Far Cry?
Sure Crysis 2 sucks, so does Crysis 3 but Crysis 3's art direction is way above anything I have seen before, at least none I can think of right now. Not an easy thing to bland the jungle and the city.
I own all the Crysis games on PC and PS3 so save me the boring ass lecture. KZ has better artstyle. :cool: DEAL WITH IT.Crytek kicks GG's a$$ both technically and artistically. DEAL WITH IT.:cool:
Log in to comment