Kinect is working its magic - Lionhead Studios layoffs

It seems that 360's flagship this year - Fable: The Journey

KiZZo1

Dat Fable

lol lemmings and their fake games.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="lx_theo"] Sure looks like delusions (or a grasping at straws last resort) from an objective point of view, yeah. Though by your ideas, I could laugh at an orphanage and everyone in it and say I was laughing about old construction methods. Sure sounds legit.lx_theo

Yes I did what I did. I laughed at a picture, not what it represents and no amount of projection on your part to attempt to change the reality of what I did will change that. :)

[QUOTE="lx_theo"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"] Oh wow. How dumb are you? If you laughed at the orphanage and everyone in it and said you were laughing at the construction, you'd be a liar. Because YOU JUST SAID YOU WERE LAUGHING AT THE ORPHANAGE AND EVERYONE IN IT. How dense are you? To use your own analogy I laughed at the construction, not the occupants. Talk about being delusional.The_Game21x

Yes I did what I did. I laughed at a picture, not what it represents and no amount of projection on your part to attempt to change the reality of what I did will change that. :)

Lion Heads Studios answer to the already failing fable series was an on-rails kinect version of the game. it's all their undoing

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lx_theo"] Thank you for proving my point, given you laugh at the picture of people losing their job and many others with their's on the line. Get the **** over yourself on your moral high horse. You did what you did. lx_theo

Yes I did what I did. I laughed at a picture, not what it represents and no amount of projection on your part to attempt to change the reality of what I did will change that. :)

I knew exactly what the picture stood for. I acknowledged as much earlier. Is your memory that bad?

But what you can't get through your thick skull for some reason is that I wasn't laughing at what it represented, I was laughing at the image itself, which depicts no one losing their jobs or anything of the sort. Why? Because it's satire. Satire is meant to be funny.

I'll say it again in case you didn't understand it the first time (I know you're a bit slow in that regard).

Satire is meant to be funny.

You ever laughed at a political cartoon? How about an episode of the Daily Show or the Colbert report? If so, congratulations, you're just as morally bankrupt a person as you're trying to accuse me of being. If not, you must be a horribly sheltered and humorless person and I pity you. Either way, the lunacy of your argument is apparent.

So whatever. you'll probably continue to project your skewed projection of reality upon me. Good luck with that. :D

[QUOTE="lx_theo"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Yes I did what I did. I laughed at a picture, not what it represents and no amount of projection on your part to attempt to change the reality of what I did will change that. :)

The_Game21x

I knew exactly what the picture stood for. I acknowledged as much earlier. Is your memory that bad?

But what you can't get through your thick skull for some reason is that I wasn't laughing at what it represented, I was laughing at the image itself, which depicts no one losing their jobs or anything of the sort. Why? Because it's satire. Satire is meant to be funny.

I'll say it again in case you didn't understand it the first time (I know you're a bit slow in that regard).

Satire is meant to be funny.

You ever laughed at a political cartoon? How about an episode of the Daily Show or the Colbert report? If so, congratulations, you're just as morally bankrupt a person as you're trying to accuse me of being. If not, you must be a horribly sheltered and humorless person and I pity you. Either way, the lunacy of your argument is apparent.

So whatever. you'll probably continue to project your skewed projection of reality upon me. Good luck with that. :D

I wouldn't say I've never laughed at satire. I can say I don't find satire attacking a bunch of innocent people funny. Or do you think all satire is equal and the same? If it was satire making fun of the bad decisions that led to it, it may be funny to me. Instead, its a picture representing in its entirety the failing and potential total failure of a company and all the people who go down with it.

Then again, for all intents and purposes, you did just admit to laughing at what the satire was making fun of. Which was the potential failure of a huge company that employs man, many people.

Didnt Sony fire 30.000 emploees recently ?

30.000 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 fired by MS i suppose

It is 1000x more people fired by Sony

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lx_theo"] You laughed at picture with no idea what it stood for? You do realize that you have to account for what it represents (Sony not fairing well) when you see humor in there? Or are you really saying you are laughing at 100% visual parts of it and none of the context, words in it, or any idea associated with Sony or a boat sinking... ? God, you're stupid.lx_theo

I knew exactly what the picture stood for. I acknowledged as much earlier. Is your memory that bad?

But what you can't get through your thick skull for some reason is that I wasn't laughing at what it represented, I was laughing at the image itself, which depicts no one losing their jobs or anything of the sort. Why? Because it's satire. Satire is meant to be funny.

I'll say it again in case you didn't understand it the first time (I know you're a bit slow in that regard).

Satire is meant to be funny.

You ever laughed at a political cartoon? How about an episode of the Daily Show or the Colbert report? If so, congratulations, you're just as morally bankrupt a person as you're trying to accuse me of being. If not, you must be a horribly sheltered and humorless person and I pity you. Either way, the lunacy of your argument is apparent.

So whatever. you'll probably continue to project your skewed projection of reality upon me. Good luck with that. :D

I wouldn't say I've never laughed at satire. I can say I don't find satire attacking a bunch of innocent people funny. Or do you think all satire is equal and the same? If it was satire making fun of the bad decisions that led to it, it may be funny to me. Instead, its a picture representing in its entirety the failing and potential total failure of a company and all the people who go down with it.

Then again, for all intents and purposes, you did just admit to laughing at what the satire was making fun of. Which was the potential failure of a huge company that employs man, many people.

And just like I predicted, you continue to project your version of reality onto me because you simply cannot accept that I laughed at a funny picture and would rather paint me as some horrible, twisted person that derives pleasure from people losing their jobs. Cute. Expected, but still cute.

And I admitted no such thing. I laughed at a satirical picture that I found funny, not at what it was satirizing and not the notion of people losing their jobs. How many times do I have to say this before you get it? Or are you just so unbelievably dense that you're completely incapable of understanding the words I'm saying?

Or, you're just willfully blind to what I'm saying purely so you can continue to project your idiotic version of reality on to me simply because that's what you want people to believe.

I think the last option is what's really happening here. :wink:

But whatever, this has been a collossal waste of my time and I'm finished with it. Continue to spin what I did into what you want to think I did and paint me in whatever way you like. I've said more than what I've needed to say and quite frankly, if you still want to continue with your projecting, fine. I can't force you to not be stupid and make actual arguments rather than projecting what you want to think upon reality.

[QUOTE="lx_theo"]

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

I knew exactly what the picture stood for. I acknowledged as much earlier. Is your memory that bad?

But what you can't get through your thick skull for some reason is that I wasn't laughing at what it represented, I was laughing at the image itself, which depicts no one losing their jobs or anything of the sort. Why? Because it's satire. Satire is meant to be funny.

I'll say it again in case you didn't understand it the first time (I know you're a bit slow in that regard).

Satire is meant to be funny.

You ever laughed at a political cartoon? How about an episode of the Daily Show or the Colbert report? If so, congratulations, you're just as morally bankrupt a person as you're trying to accuse me of being. If not, you must be a horribly sheltered and humorless person and I pity you. Either way, the lunacy of your argument is apparent.

So whatever. you'll probably continue to project your skewed projection of reality upon me. Good luck with that. :D

The_Game21x

I wouldn't say I've never laughed at satire. I can say I don't find satire attacking a bunch of innocent people funny. Or do you think all satire is equal and the same? If it was satire making fun of the bad decisions that led to it, it may be funny to me. Instead, its a picture representing in its entirety the failing and potential total failure of a company and all the people who go down with it.

Then again, for all intents and purposes, you did just admit to laughing at what the satire was making fun of. Which was the potential failure of a huge company that employs man, many people.

And just like I predicted, you continue to project your version of reality onto me because you simply cannot accept that I laughed at a funny picture and would rather paint me as some horrible, twisted person that derives pleasure from people losing their jobs. Cute. Expected, but still cute.

And I admitted no such thing. I laughed at a satirical picture that I found funny, not at what it was satirizing and not the notion of people losing their jobs. How many times do I have to say this before you get it? Or are you just so unbelievably dense that you're completely incapable of understanding the words I'm saying?

Or, you're just willfully blind to what I'm saying purely so you can continue to project your idiotic version of reality on to me simply because that's what you want people to believe.

I think the last option is what's really happening here. :wink:

But whatever, this has been a collossal waste of my time and I'm finished with it. Continue to spin what I did into what you want to think I did and paint me in whatever way you like. I've said more than what I've needed to say and quite frankly, if you still want to continue with your projecting, fine. I can't force you to not be stupid and make actual arguments rather than projecting what you want to think upon reality.

I guess Kinect and Job security do not go hand in hand.

as i already said, you claimed it first, unfortunately your evidence was rejected because it was not a thread about a studio closing or people losing their jobs.sts106mat

I guess Kinect and Job security do not go hand in hand.

ReadingRainbow4

Yeah, not until lems start buying their Kinect games.

So now instead of: Halo, Gears, Forza, Fable, Halo, Gears, Forza, Fable, Halo, Gears, Forza, Fable Lems have to look forward to, Halo, Forza, Halo, Forza, Halo, Forza, Halo, Forza2Chalupas

A series of great games? Sounds good to me. :)

say what you want , nintendo's trap is working to perfection , ms and sony bit on the play action and lost

It seems that 360's flagship this year - Fable: The Journey failed to help folks at Lionhead keep their jobs. Analogies with Rare and the consequences of their proximity to Kinect development are inevitable.

Other questions arise too - do lems buy their highly rated exclusives?

The story: The Microsoft Lays Off Undisclosed Number of Lionhead Studios Employees

KiZZo1

Obviously, lems hyped this game up all year, guess they forgot to buy it, doubt anyone brought this game infact just another flop to add to 360's list

It joins forza horizon.

Meeeper282

All lems got duped into buying Kinect but non use it. M$ sold them the ultimate dust collecting device.kuraimen

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]All lems got duped into buying Kinect but non use it. M$ sold them the ultimate dust collecting device.blackace

Kinect is still a huge waste of money

Everything is better with Kinect after all even at laying people off.

Wow, trying to claim "ownage" from people losing their jobs. Tasteless AND petty. :roll:FireSpirit117

Everything is better with Kinect after all even at laying people off.

HaloPimp978

i dunno about that one

[QUOTE="FireSpirit117"]Wow, trying to claim "ownage" from people losing their jobs. Tasteless AND petty. :roll:OhSnapitz