KZ2 Gameplay?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pDbOy_26
pDbOy_26

619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 pDbOy_26
Member since 2006 • 619 Posts

I will be the first to admit that yes, the Killzone 2 graphics look amazing, very clean and very realistick. Yet i see everyone comparing it to Gears of War which also looks stunning, but not as good as Killzone 2 i will admit that also. Yet one thing that people seem to ingnore is the gamplay. Now is it just me. Or does the KZ2 gameplay look really boring. Especially compared to Gears, KZ2 seems slow paced, terrilbe AI, and just in general not fun at all. Which is why i feel KZ2 will end up disapointing a lot of gamers out there.

Yet this is just my opinion! What is yours?

Avatar image for humber_matus
humber_matus

2101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 humber_matus
Member since 2007 • 2101 Posts
my oppinion is that ... you should not judge a game before even playing it.
Avatar image for SHuN_G0Ku
SHuN_G0Ku

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 SHuN_G0Ku
Member since 2008 • 480 Posts

I will be the first to admit that yes, the Killzone 2 graphics look amazing, very clean and very realistick. Yet i see everyone comparing it to Gears of War which also looks stunning, but not as good as Killzone 2 i will admit that also. Yet one thing that people seem to ingnore is the gamplay. Now is it just me. Or does the KZ2 gameplay look really boring. Especially compared to Gears, KZ2 seems slow paced, terrilbe AI, and just in general not fun at all. Which is why i feel KZ2 will end up disapointing a lot of gamers out there.

Yet this is just my opinion! What is yours?

pDbOy_26

if that's what you think then i feel really bad for lemmings anticipating on Gears 2 being more boring, slower paced, more terrible AI, and just in general not very funny at all.

contradiction FTL...

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

Gears of War has proven itself to be a quality game, Killzone hasnt.

Yea both games look amazing, but as you said K2 looks pretty linear and boring, while GEars has proven itself to have good gameplay.

Im more hyped for GEOW2

Mkavanaugh77

Gears isn't? I'm more hyped for Killzone 2 personally as the press reviews have said it plays like CoD4 with a few extra advancements and a more deliberate pacing.

I liked Call of Duty 4. Gears? Not so much.

Avatar image for f50p90
f50p90

3767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 f50p90
Member since 2008 • 3767 Posts
The gameplay looks pretty good to me actually, looks very immersive
Avatar image for joker730
joker730

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 joker730
Member since 2007 • 1561 Posts
[QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"]

Gears of War has proven itself to be a quality game, Killzone hasnt.

Yea both games look amazing, but as you said K2 looks pretty linear and boring, while GEars has proven itself to have good gameplay.

Im more hyped for GEOW2

thrones

Gears isn't? I'm more hyped for Killzone 2 personally as the press reviews have said it plays like CoD4 with a few extra advancements and a more deliberate pacing.

I liked Call of Duty 4. Gears? Not so much.

same here

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

I'm not sure, I rather have Gears because I like third person better then first person. But knowing epic I'm going take a wild assumption and say Killzone Single player > Gears single player. But from my preference Gears will have better gameplay over all because I prefer duck and cover for shooting games.

Avatar image for SHuN_G0Ku
SHuN_G0Ku

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 SHuN_G0Ku
Member since 2008 • 480 Posts

I'm not sure, I rather have Gears because I like third person better then first person. But knowing epic I'm going take a wild assumption and say Killzone Single player > Gears single player. But from my preference Gears will have better gameplay over all because I prefer duck and cover for shooting games.

Nerkcon

um.. Killzone 2 will have a duck and cover system ;)

Avatar image for iamright05
iamright05

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 iamright05
Member since 2008 • 230 Posts
[QUOTE="pDbOy_26"]

I will be the first to admit that yes, the Killzone 2 graphics look amazing, very clean and very realistick. Yet i see everyone comparing it to Gears of War which also looks stunning, but not as good as Killzone 2 i will admit that also. Yet one thing that people seem to ingnore is the gamplay. Now is it just me. Or does the KZ2 gameplay look really boring. Especially compared to Gears, KZ2 seems slow paced, terrilbe AI, and just in general not fun at all. Which is why i feel KZ2 will end up disapointing a lot of gamers out there.

Yet this is just my opinion! What is yours?

SHuN_G0Ku

if that's what you think then i feel really bad for lemmings anticipating on Gears 2 being more boring, slower paced, more terrible AI, and just in general not very funny at all.

contradiction FTL...

I dont understand where you got all that about being boring and bad ai and stuff about gears of war from what th is guy said. His original sentence was about the graphics between the two, nothing else. Maybe you just didnt understand him properly.

Killzone 2 does look like your average shooter gameplay wise. Is that a bad thing? To me its not, we've used the same formula in many games and it works good enough.
Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
theres something about killzone that reminds me of cod. maybe the epic firefights in a war taking cover and looking through ironsights. and i loved cod, my favourite fpses
Avatar image for SHuN_G0Ku
SHuN_G0Ku

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 SHuN_G0Ku
Member since 2008 • 480 Posts
[QUOTE="SHuN_G0Ku"][QUOTE="pDbOy_26"]

I will be the first to admit that yes, the Killzone 2 graphics look amazing, very clean and very realistick. Yet i see everyone comparing it to Gears of War which also looks stunning, but not as good as Killzone 2 i will admit that also. Yet one thing that people seem to ingnore is the gamplay. Now is it just me. Or does the KZ2 gameplay look really boring. Especially compared to Gears, KZ2 seems slow paced, terrilbe AI, and just in general not fun at all. Which is why i feel KZ2 will end up disapointing a lot of gamers out there.

Yet this is just my opinion! What is yours?

iamright05

if that's what you think then i feel really bad for lemmings anticipating on Gears 2 being more boring, slower paced, more terrible AI, and just in general not very funny at all.

contradiction FTL...

I dont understand where you got all that about being boring and bad ai and stuff about gears of war from what th is guy said. His original sentence was about the graphics between the two, nothing else. Maybe you just didnt understand him properly.

Killzone 2 does look like your average shooter gameplay wise. Is that a bad thing? To me its not, we've used the same formula in many games and it works good enough.

if that's the case then what FPS game that does not look average..?

Avatar image for jeezers
jeezers

5341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 jeezers
Member since 2007 • 5341 Posts

I will be the first to admit that yes, the Killzone 2 graphics look amazing, very clean and very realistick. Yet i see everyone comparing it to Gears of War which also looks stunning, but not as good as Killzone 2 i will admit that also. Yet one thing that people seem to ingnore is the gamplay. Now is it just me. Or does the KZ2 gameplay look really boring. Especially compared to Gears, KZ2 seems slow paced, terrilbe AI, and just in general not fun at all. Which is why i feel KZ2 will end up disapointing a lot of gamers out there.

Yet this is just my opinion! What is yours?

pDbOy_26

i dont know about the ai thing, but i know what your talking about, by looking at the videos the games looks f***ing badass, but the gameplay looks very linear. nothing i havent done before. nothing new. this game gives me that assasins creed feelin.

Avatar image for -GhostMLD-
-GhostMLD-

3282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 -GhostMLD-
Member since 2008 • 3282 Posts
kz2 looks cookie cutter masked by pretty looks.
Avatar image for ThaGreatness007
ThaGreatness007

535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ThaGreatness007
Member since 2008 • 535 Posts

kz2 looks cookie cutter masked by pretty looks. -GhostMLD-

Lol masked by pretty looks. Hope youu were not serious game looks AMAZING!

Avatar image for SHuN_G0Ku
SHuN_G0Ku

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 SHuN_G0Ku
Member since 2008 • 480 Posts

kz2 looks cookie cutter masked by pretty looks. -GhostMLD-

::looks at avatar::

..:lol: ...no wonder

Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
The gameplay in KZ2 looks very boring.
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
[QUOTE="pDbOy_26"]

I will be the first to admit that yes, the Killzone 2 graphics look amazing, very clean and very realistick. Yet i see everyone comparing it to Gears of War which also looks stunning, but not as good as Killzone 2 i will admit that also. Yet one thing that people seem to ingnore is the gamplay. Now is it just me. Or does the KZ2 gameplay look really boring. Especially compared to Gears, KZ2 seems slow paced, terrilbe AI, and just in general not fun at all. Which is why i feel KZ2 will end up disapointing a lot of gamers out there.

Yet this is just my opinion! What is yours?

jeezers

i dont know about the ai thing, but i know what your talking about, by looking at the videos the games looks f***ing badass, but the gameplay looks very linear. nothing i havent done before. nothing new. this game gives me that assasins creed feelin.

welcome to gamespot and yeah, it looks pretty linear. Despite that, it looks like it could have some cool moments. It doesn't even look very intense, though. The shootouts look so boring(although ragdolls look cool)
Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#19 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts
HOw is it going is it going to dissappoiting a lot of gamers when pretty much all its hype has been towards its graphics?
Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts

There is absolutely nothing you can judge from a very early demo of a training level. What do you think they're going to work on for the next year?

Avatar image for Khanezhyray
Khanezhyray

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 Khanezhyray
Member since 2005 • 901 Posts

Eh, it looks good.

The AI part is COMPLETELY unjudgeable. Gears is undoubtedly using the same AI as the first game. Killzone 2 is building a new one, I bet. AI is extremely hard to build. If you have complaints about what it was like in the demos, that was nothing compared to what the real game will be like.
Slow paced? Maybe in a few areas(ALL FPSes are), but I doubt it will be all around. And especially not in multiplayer. 'Sides, if people want slow paced multiplayer, MGO.
In general not fun? Unjudgeable still. From the early tech demos it looked really fun.

And if you played GeoW at all, you'd know the multiplayer is pretty slow paced if you're good at it...
I loved its multiplayer, but it wasn't exactly the fastest. (Go play UT3 if you want fast multiplayer, I do.)

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

Hell, Gears 1 gameplay looked boring to me before I played it. Now it's one of my favorite games of all time.

My point is that games can look a certain way and play totally differently.

Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

Hell, Gears 1 gameplay looked boring to me before I played it. Now it's one of my favorite games of all time.

My point is that games can look a certain way and play totally differently.

Mkavanaugh77

Looks like the same formula to me

Pretty graphics and boring gameplay, just like the first.

We don't know that yet. We will have to wait and see. The shooting mechanics look visceral and satisfying IMO. It looks fun to shoot enemies in KZ2, but when I play it, it could be boring. I don't know. You never know until you play a game.

We just need more details on the game features and multiplayer. For the record it's been compared to COD4 as far as mechanics go.

Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts

Gears of War has proven itself to be a quality game, Killzone hasnt.

Yea both games look amazing, but as you said K2 looks pretty linear and boring, while GEars has proven itself to have good gameplay.

Im more hyped for GEOW2

Mkavanaugh77

killzone was decent and killzone psp good AA. Gears is made by epic so their chances of success was higher.