KZ2 was the perfect example of quality over quantity.

This is just my opinion. Feel free to add yours as well.

After going to KZ2 I couldnt go back to COD games at all. The movements felt unrealistic and cartoonish and the weapons felt less intense. The KZ2 game made everything so well for an fps. Aside from the obvious graphics comparision, if you go to gamespot or any other review, they will tell you about the amazing realism that goes with KZ2. They will also tell you that from a technical aspect, it can even rival MGS4.

So to me, it was just like riding in a 2009 ferrari, and then going back to a 2009 subaru. And modern warfare 2 looks like a 2010 subaru. Yeah, it has new parts and everything, but imma be nuts if I trade a ferrari in for it.

This is what KZ2 is like to me at least. And due to the fact that some people thought that it was overrated, I felt like this was needed to be said.

where does the quantity example fit in to your logic? ...all I see is a comparison of KZ2 to COD..DeadMagazines

well, some people like the jumpy-fraggy, 60fps, un-HDres of the MW series and I respect that...

Killzone 2 is good and still will be good.

Didn't they patch Killzone 2 a few times to mimic Modern Warfare controls?

yeah but, nobody plays it.

well, some people like the jumpy-fraggy, 60fps, un-HDres of the MW series and I respect that...

Killzone 2 is good and still will be good.

samuraiguns

Didn't they patch Killzone 2 a few times to mimic Modern Warfare controls?

gago-gago

i agree fully with the TC.

Killzone 2 has weighted guns , good recoil, and player movement. When u get a kill in kz2, in my opinion its better and more rewarding. Its not like cod where u get a kill, and ok move on right away. Plus, when you die you feel that you've been beat. Cod arite you die and come back right away.

I like cod but it just doesnt have the same feel as kz2.

yeah but, nobody plays it.

LeGoofyGoober

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"]

well, some people like the jumpy-fraggy, 60fps, un-HDres of the MW series and I respect that...

Killzone 2 is good and still will be good.

LeGoofyGoober

Killzone 2 is superior to most shooters out right now. IMO of course.:)

Most of them are too noobish and take no skill to comprehend or adapt to a certain class or weapon to progress.

controlls were different but i wouldnt say they were good or realistic, id call it sluggish

i could whip around a m-16 faster then the kz2 guys lol

I always thought Heavenly Sword was the perfect example of quality over quantity.tagyhag

[QUOTE="LeGoofyGoober"]

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"]

well, some people like the jumpy-fraggy, 60fps, un-HDres of the MW series and I respect that...

Killzone 2 is good and still will be good.

samuraiguns

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_51Y5A0WGU

What are you talking about?

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]I always thought Heavenly Sword was the perfect example of quality over quantity.Chutebox

I'm weally hungwy. :(

[QUOTE="gago-gago"]

Didn't they patch Killzone 2 a few times to mimic Modern Warfare controls?

navyguy21

I think Killzone fans have a bit of an insecurity complex, and constantly feel the need to explain why their game is *really* better than all of the other games people are essentially passing on it to play instead. So, they come in here and share their little theories about how it's like a certain type of car, it's quality over quantity, like a fine wine it does this or that, while the uncultured masses just pass it by for what's really an inferior product.

Keep on truckin' there KZ'ers. We all know you're playing the better game - we're just jealous and ashamed. I'm sure Sony is busy writing GG another blank cheque and unlimited timeline so they can make another crack at a game that makes an impact on the industry that goes beyond its hype train.

controlls were different but i wouldnt say they were good or realistic, id call it sluggish

i could whip around a m-16 faster then the kz2 guys lol

johnnyblazed88

you guys should prolly just boot me outta here since i like BF43 mp better than cod and kz2 put together

Can PS3fanboys get it in ther head that TF2 and L4D are 1000x better than KZ2?

I'm weally hungwy. :(

tagyhag

kz2 was great but cod is better. aiming in kz2 completely sucks, also you talk about realism? well in kz2 you can sprint for a long time and then it takes only few seconds for ur sprint meter to recharge. thats not realistic

Theres a reason KZ2 only gets a few hundred players online every day whereas COD4 gets hundreds of thousands :wink: KZ2 may be pretty, but thats it. The single player is boring, and the multiplayer gets old fast.Nidget

I agree with the TC, I think KZ2 is the best FPS this gen, multiplayer is lag free and I really like how its not easy to just aim at someone from 200 yards, its a good game, and yes a lot of people play it.

[QUOTE="Nidget"]Theres a reason KZ2 only gets a few hundred players online every day whereas COD4 gets hundreds of thousands :wink: KZ2 may be pretty, but thats it. The single player is boring, and the multiplayer gets old fast.bunchofpixels

wii did outsell other consoles but alot of wii owners barely play on the wii. cod is superior to kz2 thats why people still play cod. btw kz2 sp was far from boring. it was simply amazing

Can PS3fanboys get it in ther head that TF2 and L4D are 1000x better than KZ2?

xXTalismanXx

tf2, yeah pretty much... but not left for dead. Its just too lacking in content, not too much variety on the levels, they all look exactly the same. And it gets old pretty fast. Id say its on the same level as killzone 2

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"]

[QUOTE="LeGoofyGoober"]

"jumpy, fraggy"? if you bunny hop in MW, you die.

Arjdagr8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_51Y5A0WGU

What are you talking about?

I think Killzone fans have a bit of an insecurity complex, and constantly feel the need to explain why their game is *really* better than all of the other games people are essentially passing on it to play instead. So, they come in here and share their little theories about how it's like a certain type of car, it's quality over quantity, like a fine wine it does this or that, while the uncultured masses just pass it by for what's really an inferior product.

Keep on truckin' there KZ'ers. We all know you're playing the better game - we're just jealous and ashamed. I'm sure Sony is busy writing GG another blank cheque and unlimited timeline so they can make another crack at a game that makes an impact on the industry that goes beyond its hype train.

Shafftehr

An industry complex? lol

and @AlfredCapone, wha???

[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"] Not when I play...console version.

samuraiguns

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_51Y5A0WGU

What are you talking about?

Can PS3fanboys get it in ther head that TF2 and L4D are 1000x better than KZ2?

xXTalismanXx

Hasn't SW made it a habit of telling me its possible to have both?

I thought the game sucked. It had nothing good but graphics. Controls were abysmal, story was terrible, multiplayer was very generic.

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"]

I think Killzone fans have a bit of an insecurity complex, and constantly feel the need to explain why their game is *really* better than all of the other games people are essentially passing on it to play instead. So, they come in here and share their little theories about how it's like a certain type of car, it's quality over quantity, like a fine wine it does this or that, while the uncultured masses just pass it by for what's really an inferior product.

Keep on truckin' there KZ'ers. We all know you're playing the better game - we're just jealous and ashamed. I'm sure Sony is busy writing GG another blank cheque and unlimited timeline so they can make another crack at a game that makes an impact on the industry that goes beyond its hype train.

MJ4040

An industry complex? lol

and @AlfredCapone, wha???

Hooray for reading.

INSECURITY complex.

[QUOTE="Nidget"]Theres a reason KZ2 only gets a few hundred players online every day whereas COD4 gets hundreds of thousands :wink: KZ2 may be pretty, but thats it. The single player is boring, and the multiplayer gets old fast.bunchofpixels

I thought the game sucked. It had nothing good but graphics. Controls were abysmal, story was terrible, multiplayer was very generic.

Hanass

we have the same game taste

[QUOTE="samuraiguns"]

[QUOTE="Arjdagr8"]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_51Y5A0WGU

What are you talking about?

Arjdagr8

It takes quite a bit of skill to play so I can see how a lot of people would be turned off by it.

I thought the game sucked. It had nothing good but graphics. Controls were abysmal, story was terrible, multiplayer was very generic.

Hanass

[QUOTE="Hanass"]

I thought the game sucked. It had nothing good but graphics. Controls were abysmal, story was terrible, multiplayer was very generic.

MJ4040

Mostly the weapons were generic. There was the generic assault rifle, the generic shotgun, and the generic pistol.

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"]

I think Killzone fans have a bit of an insecurity complex, and constantly feel the need to explain why their game is *really* better than all of the other games people are essentially passing on it to play instead. So, they come in here and share their little theories about how it's like a certain type of car, it's quality over quantity, like a fine wine it does this or that, while the uncultured masses just pass it by for what's really an inferior product.

Keep on truckin' there KZ'ers. We all know you're playing the better game - we're just jealous and ashamed. I'm sure Sony is busy writing GG another blank cheque and unlimited timeline so they can make another crack at a game that makes an impact on the industry that goes beyond its hype train.

MJ4040

An industry complex? lol

and @AlfredCapone, wha???

I'm actually with you on that, Killzone 2 kept all its focus on single player and multiplayer perfection, as well as the movements and graphics. This made the game one of themost polished games out there, although unfortunately it took away time to add more stuff like co-op or extra maps/single player length.

Still, it is insanely polished and perfected.