This detail level runs at 120 FPS, as previously promised. If you want to play in CGI graphics, it runs at 3 FPS.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
This detail level runs at 120 FPS, as previously promised. If you want to play in CGI graphics, it runs at 3 FPS.
:lol::lol::lol:
This detail level runs at 120 FPS, as previously promised. If you want to play in CGI graphics, it runs at 3 FPS.
shadow8585
At the least, I made a couple people laugh, including myselfshadow8585
Just don't worry about the kiddies who can't take a joke.
GET A LIFE and stop being a FANBOY.
This detail level runs at 120 FPS, as previously promised. If you want to play in CGI graphics, it runs at 3 FPS.
shadow8585
This detail level runs at 120 FPS, as previously promised. If you want to play in CGI graphics, it runs at 3 FPS.
shadow8585
Golden Eye. Sweet!!! I love that game.
[QUOTE="shadow8585"]
This detail level runs at 120 FPS, as previously promised. If you want to play in CGI graphics, it runs at 3 FPS.
imapieceofwood
Golden Eye. Sweet!!! I love that game.
Goldeneye? Thats Killzone 2 Nub.
[QUOTE="diggyzoom"]This is the real leaked pic
http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=927750&topic=35925286
Choga
:lol: That's a pic of Quake Wars with a Hellghast edited into it.
:lol: yea. "It's like who is they trying to fool?" lolYou guys should be greatful. That game is way better than i thought killzone 2 could eb based of KZ1 and guerillas history with FPS. Educated_GamerKillzone 1 was one of the better looking ps2 games. The framerate was the problem witht the game. The game was a real looker for a ps2 game.
[QUOTE="Educated_Gamer"]You guys should be greatful. That game is way better than i thought killzone 2 could eb based of KZ1 and guerillas history with FPS. nhh12345Killzone 1 was one of the better looking ps2 games. The framerate was the problem witht the game. The game was a real looker for a ps2 game.
im talking gameplay (mainly for the time). Thats Goldeneye I believe?
And face it, KZ1 sucked. It didnt have any good qualities. It was more than tech problems that scewed up the game. It was just boring an bland. (glad i didnt buy it, only rented it)
And KZ wasnt that good looking. Good but not as Riddick, Conker, etc. More so on the GOW level
This topic is considered trolling. Enjoy your moderation.SergeantSnitch
It was a joke thread, trolling is much more annoying.
Killzone 1 was one of the better looking ps2 games. The framerate was the problem witht the game. The game was a real looker for a ps2 game.[QUOTE="nhh12345"][QUOTE="Educated_Gamer"]You guys should be greatful. That game is way better than i thought killzone 2 could eb based of KZ1 and guerillas history with FPS. Educated_Gamer
im talking gameplay (mainly for the time). Thats Goldeneye I believe?
And face it, KZ1 sucked. It didnt have any good qualities. It was more than tech problems that scewed up the game. It was just boring an bland. (glad i didnt buy it, only rented it)
And KZ wasnt that good looking. Good but not as Riddick, Conker, etc. More so on the GOW level
Better then god of war, but had horrible ai, and bad frame rate due to the ps2 having horrible hardware. I have to say killzone could have been much better game if it was on the xbox. Would probably be in the AA-AAA range.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment