Lets Assume in th next 2 years a new Xbox is presented.

Late 09 early 2010 next X box. If trends continue as they are, why would MS wait for Sony to play catch up, when it can dominate or try to? 3 year warantee could make MS think that they should keep their system out at least five years.

And inflation.

[QUOTE="Mavrickkal"]Considering the required hardware improvements, would you be willing to shell out 600-650 for a new Xbox system with only minor graphical improvements over the PS3?AnnoyedDragon

if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOkillzowned24

ok. and cows who bought a ps3 in 2006 would have paid $600 for just mgs4. what's your point?

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOkillzowned24

It still a bill that shouldnt even be there,thats a extra game every year for PS3 users:)

when both ps4 and new xbox come out their not going to be over $500 dollars

p.s 360 not even outdated

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOcowgriller

ok. and cows who bought a ps3 in 2006 would have paid $600 for just mgs4. what's your point?

You fanboys seriously believe that MGS4 is the only good game:?

The same could be said for 360 and Halo or MP3 for Wii if I was a fanboy.

[EDIT] Saw the name, never mind:roll:

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="qman101"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

qman101

Every single area?

Yes

Head to head the PS3 can't snag a single victory

I mean the only place Sony can claim is that the PS3 has more Sony made first party games and with the way franchises like Ratchet and Clank have been performing that's slowing looking grim as well.

The only place that I see the Xbox 360 beating the PS3 on is games.

Yeah, but since they're both gaming consoles, that's not really a bad place to claim victory. That's like insulting New York by saying that the only place the Giants actually beat the Patriots was the Super Bowl.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOcowgriller

ok. and cows who bought a ps3 in 2006 would have paid $600 for just mgs4. what's your point?

LMAO, one of the funniest things Ive heard in a while.

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

Jaysonguy

yet PS3 has an AAAAE game, and sales-wise PS3 has beaten it many times and continues to do so..while having many great games currently.

[QUOTE="qman101"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"][QUOTE="qman101"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

romans828_2002

Every single area?

Yes

Head to head the PS3 can't snag a single victory

I mean the only place Sony can claim is that the PS3 has more Sony made first party games and with the way franchises like Ratchet and Clank have been performing that's slowing looking grim as well.

The only place that I see the Xbox 360 beating the PS3 on is games.

Yeah, but since they're both gaming consoles, that's not really a bad place to claim victory. That's like insulting New York by saying that the only place the Giants actually beat the Patriots was the Super Bowl.

since when does more games = quality games? thats opinion. 360 had a year head start, without it...the 360 wouldn't have been in the place it is now.

New Xbox in 2011, which would be long enough, seeing that it was released Holiday 2005. Also, it won't be more than $400, believe it.BioShockOwnz

Truth is right here. No, I wouldn't shell out that kind of money.

since when does more games = quality games? thats opinion. 360 had a year head start, without it...the 360 wouldn't have been in the place it is now.

SonysHomy

And the head start must be working if they can draw the level of mass-market appeal it's getting (to the point that many more devs than before are paying attention to the 360). Whether or not it had the head start is irrelevant. The fact is the 360 has the head start and because of it has a notable edge. Or perhaps you're willing to argue that the PS2's head start last gen didn't play a significant role in its overall victory?

[QUOTE="SonysHomy"]

since when does more games = quality games? thats opinion. 360 had a year head start, without it...the 360 wouldn't have been in the place it is now.

HuusAsking

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="SonysHomy"]

since when does more games = quality games? thats opinion. 360 had a year head start, without it...the 360 wouldn't have been in the place it is now.

skektek

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

[QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAODanteSuikoden

ok. and cows who bought a ps3 in 2006 would have paid $600 for just mgs4. what's your point?

You fanboys seriously believe that MGS4 is the only good game:?

The same could be said for 360 and Halo or MP3 for Wii if I was a fanboy.

EDIT Saw the name, never mind:roll:

wow. you casual gamers don't understand jokes. killzowned said that lems paid $300 just to play online, where as i said that cows paid $600 for mgs4. is that all that there is to either console? no. but these are the huge selling points/most popular things about the console. the xbox 360 provides the best online solution for consoles where as the ps3 has the highest rated exclusive this gen (so far). as for the wii...what's the point of bringing that up in this thread? it's not a next gen console in the traditional sense. it's merely a gamecube in a new case and a new control.

looked at your name, couldn't understand it.

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

Jaysonguy

Ps3 has more quality games, 360 has half assed ones.

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

gta0004

Ps3 has more quality games, 360 has half assed ones.

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

ChocolateCake10

epic fail

They've sold more units and they sell more games and the library is bigger. So epic fail how?

[QUOTE="skektek"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="SonysHomy"]

since when does more games = quality games? thats opinion. 360 had a year head start, without it...the 360 wouldn't have been in the place it is now.

HuusAsking

That would never happen so why are we talking pretend?

The 360 is beating the PS3 in every single area so there's no reason to stop what's working.

Jaysonguy

I highly doubt your statement is correct, although fanboys will agree with you, that doesn't mean much.

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOlawlessx

nobody takes him seriously..

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOEuroMafia

nobody takes him seriously..

Considering the required hardware improvements, would you be willing to shell out 600-650 for a new Xbox system with only minor graphical improvements over the PS3?Mavrickkal

[QUOTE="EuroMafia"][QUOTE="lawlessx"]

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]if it came in 2010 lemms who had it since 2005 would have spent $300 just for online play..LMAOvaderhater

nobody takes him seriously..

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="Mavrickkal"]Considering the required hardware improvements, would you be willing to shell out 600-650 for a new Xbox system with only minor graphical improvements over the PS3?Mavrickkal

And that's giving the benefit of the doubt that the PS3 really is better at gfx than the 360 is. Sure I think it has an edge but there are plenty of people here that don't.

To whom? No one off sites like this knows anything of its limitations ... or cares for that matter.