Let's settle this. What looks better: Crysis 3 (pc) or Killzone 4 (ps4)

OP votes crysis 3.

OP votes crysis 3.

jimmyrussle117

Tomb Raider will always be better :cool:

Cryzone 4 looks better than both

OP votes crysis 3.

jimmyrussle117

I don't give a fuuck. Neon_Noir

Crysis 3 easily, but KZ still looks nice.

[QUOTE="Neon_Noir"]I don't give a fuuck. silversix_

This seems like a strange comparison to me. Crysis 3 is done already and Killzone is still in development. So you're comparing Crysis at its best to an embryonic stage of Killzone. That it's even being discussed right now is a heck of an achievement for Killzone and PS4.

This seems like a strange comparison to me. Crysis 3 is done already and Killzone is still in development. So you're comparing Crysis at its best to an embryonic stage of Killzone. That it's even being discussed right now is a heck of an achievement for Killzone and PS4.

Wickerman777

[QUOTE="silversix_"]

[QUOTE="Neon_Noir"]I don't give a fuuck. Neon_Noir

[QUOTE="Neon_Noir"][QUOTE="silversix_"]Look at this gangsta i think he's cool like that.

silversix_

Both look very good. But i give crysis the edge for simulated grass. 

that KZ4 video didn't even look like realtime gameplay and crysis 3 still looks better so yeah im gonna have to say crysis 3 and when KZ4 actually does launch it probably wont even look as good as what they showed.

that KZ4 video didn't even look like realtime gameplay and crysis 3 still looks better so yeah im gonna have to say crysis 3 and when KZ4 actually does launch it probably wont even look as good as what they showed.

Gen007

lol the KZ SF demo was even played on live TV by noobs, yes it was real gameplay.

anyway KZ SF wins by far.

.

Crysis 3, but Killzone Shadow Fall looks absolutely great for a console game.

Some screens of C3 for consideration:

Rest is in the spoiler:

[spoiler]

[/spoiler]

BattleToads, of course.

I think Crysis 3 dx11 is technically more advanced, but Killzone impressed me the most! Not the gunplay itself, but the visuals, art direction and vistas were simply unbelievable!

From the stills of both (with Crysis 3 maxed out) Crysis 3 wins, but KZ4 isnt very far behind, its an awesome looking game.

Ben-Buja

Game over.

Well considering the fact that I was watching the trailer on a slightly blurry 720p Youtube video and I could STILL tell that it looked every bit as graphically good as Crysis 3 does maxed out on my PC in 1080...  I can only imagine how much it sh*ts on Crysis 3 if I had a PS4 and was actually playing Killzone 4 on my TV in full 1080p. Then there's also the fact that Killzone 2-3 completely DESTROY Crysis in terms of character animation. So I expect KZ4 to be no different. Guerilla Games are the kings of character animation, gun models, and AI in FPS games.

Personally, Crysis 3 isn't enough of a step up over Crysis 1-2 to still be all that impressive. Crysis 1 came out in 2007... it's been 5 and a half years, I expected the new Crysis games graphics to be more of a huge step up, especially when you remember how amazing Crysis 1's graphics were at the time it came out.

Well considering the fact that even watching the trailer on a slightly blurry 720p Youtube video and it STILL looked every bit as graphically good as Crysis 3 maxed out on my PC in 1080pMessiahbolical-

You're not even coming close to maxing out Crysis 3 if you honestly believe that sh!t.

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]Well considering the fact that even watching the trailer on a slightly blurry 720p Youtube video and it STILL looked every bit as graphically good as Crysis 3 maxed out on my PC in 1080pthe_bi99man

You're not even coming close to maxing out Crysis 3 if you honestly believe that sh!t.

KZ isn't even released, we just saw a short presentation trailer that may not even be an accurate representation of the final product. But even if it is, Crysis 3 simply looks better, has higher quality assets, and is a more impressive technical achivement overall (grass and water physics, particles, some enviromental destruction)...

That said, I do consider the KZ trailer very good looking!

Oh hermits when you post crysis 3 shots please do post your framerate and rig spec and state whether it's downsampled or not. Nothing is meaningful when you run it at 12fps up and down.gpuking

Yeah because the jaggie free 4K screenshots of Killzone SF are so much more meaningful.

Here's C3 in motion recorded on my rig: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4KNN2iDk5Q

Watch in original quality.

Oh hermits when you post crysis 3 shots please do post your framerate and rig spec and state whether it's downsampled or not. Nothing is meaningful when you run it at 12fps up and down.gpuking

I'm fine by that, but anything over 25 FPS counts as a win in Crysis favor, since KZ demo ran at some 25 FPS during the most intensive shooting parts, there was a lot of noticeable stutter.

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Oh hermits when you post crysis 3 shots please do post your framerate and rig spec and state whether it's downsampled or not. Nothing is meaningful when you run it at 12fps up and down.Rocker6

I'm fine by that, but anything over 25 FPS counts as a win in Crysis favor, since KZ demo ran at some 25 FPS during the most intensive shooting parts, there was a lot of noticeable stutter.

What in the world you talking about? lol KZ SF has in game slow motion ability to slow down time (yeh lame feature that wont be online). Watching a bad stream or a compressed vid on youtube doesn't show true framerate.

KZSF will be out late this year and nothing on PC can come close to it. Once people play it on a 1080p TV they will know. Specially when they play online (KZ2/KZ3 look better online than SP).

This seems like a strange comparison to me. Crysis 3 is done already and Killzone is still in development. So you're comparing Crysis at its best to an embryonic stage of Killzone. That it's even being discussed right now is a heck of an achievement for Killzone and PS4.

Wickerman777

Totally different art styles.

The important thing is PS4 hardware should easily be able to run Crysis 3 on highest settings.

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]Well considering the fact that even watching the trailer on a slightly blurry 720p Youtube video and it STILL looked every bit as graphically good as Crysis 3 maxed out on my PC in 1080pMessiahbolical-

You're not even coming close to maxing out Crysis 3 if you honestly believe that sh!t.

There are several Crysis 3 shots in this thread, and a video from Ben Buja showing it running at more than playable framerates. They show more detail and better effects than anything seen in the killzone trailer/demo. If you prefer the art style of killzone, whatever. That's your opinion. But technical graphics aren't a matter of opinion, and the new killzone has shown nothing better than Crysis 3.

Why do you want to compare a released game with one thats had a short demo and is 9 months from release.Come on dude,seriously.

REsident Evil.

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Oh hermits when you post crysis 3 shots please do post your framerate and rig spec and state whether it's downsampled or not. Nothing is meaningful when you run it at 12fps up and down.Rocker6

I'm fine by that, but anything over 25 FPS counts as a win in Crysis favor, since KZ demo ran at some 25 FPS during the most intensive shooting parts, there was a lot of noticeable stutter.

[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Oh hermits when you post crysis 3 shots please do post your framerate and rig spec and state whether it's downsampled or not. Nothing is meaningful when you run it at 12fps up and down.gpuking

I'm fine by that, but anything over 25 FPS counts as a win in Crysis favor, since KZ demo ran at some 25 FPS during the most intensive shooting parts, there was a lot of noticeable stutter.

Of course... final comparison will be the only one making sense. Here, we're just wasting time, the trailer is too short, and may not even be the accurate representation of the final product.