Let's settle this. What looks better: Crysis 3 (pc) or Killzone 4 (ps4)

We only have seen a small bit,but it's definitely is a challenger if not on art alone :D

Btw,Killzone is still early and according to a dev at beyond3d ,he hints that until recently the dev kits only had 1.5gb usable for graphics.

http://beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1712366&postcount=111

No matter how many DX11 shader effects it has, at its core Crysis 3 is a PS360 game. Even though Crysis 3 will win this poll being bolstered by hermits trying to justify their gaming rigs, I'd be willing to bet that the new Killzone has double the poly count. Guess we'll see when it comes out.   

It's hard to say. 

Crysis 3 runs in real time in front me right now. And it looks amazing on a high end PC. Even on a mid-range PC it looks better than anything out on current consoles.

Killzone 3 on the other hand is an alpha - meaning they haven't optimized their assets for final production yet, so we probably saw the ultra high resolution assets the artists work with, and not necessarily the end product.  Finally, it was a choreographed tech demo with prototype hardware. Even if it was running in real time, it's still not an accurate look at the final product.

Going purely by what we saw, with all of those caveats, I'd say it looks about on par with Crysis 3 on a mid range machine, and not quite as good as Crysis 3 on a high end machine.

In other words - just exactly what I would expect, given the specs annoucned.

No matter how many DX11 shader effects it has, at its core Crysis 3 is a PS360 game. Even though Crysis 3 will win this poll being bolstered by hermits trying to justify their gaming rigs, I'd be willing to bet that the new Killzone has double the poly count. Guess we'll see when it comes out.   

Pray_to_me

No matter how many DX11 shader effects it has, at its core Crysis 3 is a PS360 game. Even though Crysis 3 will win this poll being bolstered by hermits trying to justify their gaming rigs, I'd be willing to bet that the new Killzone has double the poly count. Guess we'll see when it comes out.   

Pray_to_me

Lighting and physics and texture effects are entirely PC centric on Crysis 3. They don't exist in the rendering pipeline on the old consoles. 

Crytek has gone out of it's way saying how both Cryengine 3 and Cryises 3 is gheared toward PC and next generaiton consoles - NOT PS3Xbox.

[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

No matter how many DX11 shader effects it has, at its core Crysis 3 is a PS360 game. Even though Crysis 3 will win this poll being bolstered by hermits trying to justify their gaming rigs, I'd be willing to bet that the new Killzone has double the poly count. Guess we'll see when it comes out.   

Jebus213

I don't think the polygon count is particularly high on that model. 

It's that the model using high definition textures, high resolution textures, and those textures feature modern lighting effect.  Stuff that's been happening on PC for a while now, finally being shown on a console.

Crysis 3, but Killzone Shadow Fall looks absolutely great for a console game.

Some screens of C3 for consideration:

 

Ben-Buja

The fact that killzone isn't even properly been released yet makes me wonder why we should have this comparison in the first place. freedomfreak

Sh*t, Let alone the console :lol::P

Totally different art styles.

The important thing is PS4 hardware should easily be able to run Crysis 3 on highest settings.

BlbecekBobecek

I'm not so sure about that.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/crysis_3_graphics_performance_review_benchmark,7.html

A GTX 680 gets almost 50 FPs at 1920x1200 maxing out the game. That's with an i7 CPU.

I would guess the PS4 can do High at 30 FPS at 1080p or Very High at 720p 30-40 FPS.

Or what msot likely will end up happening when the game is ported ot the PS4 - since consoles dont' have video settings is that they'll turn down soem fo the lighting effects a bit, and run it at 1080p 30 FPS solid, or 720p 60 FPs solid.

Buncha idiots, Battletoads looks much better than both.

[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

This seems like a strange comparison to me. Crysis 3 is done already and Killzone is still in development. So you're comparing Crysis at its best to an embryonic stage of Killzone. That it's even being discussed right now is a heck of an achievement for Killzone and PS4.

MBirdy88

killzone isnt event out.

[QUOTE="MBirdy88"][QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

This seems like a strange comparison to me. Crysis 3 is done already and Killzone is still in development. So you're comparing Crysis at its best to an embryonic stage of Killzone. That it's even being discussed right now is a heck of an achievement for Killzone and PS4.

handssss

Crysis 3, it already looks better than the Killzone Shadow Fall tech demo. Once the actual Killzone comes out, it will look worse than its own tech demo considering that its demo is obviously running on pc hardware. Crysis 3 will look significantly better than Killzone Shadow Fall.

Don't get me wrong I voted for Crysis 3 too, but the graphics doesn't scream amazing, and I absolutely hate the FOV and the HUD's color .

I don't give a fuuck. Neon_Noir

... plus both look phenomenal.

I don't give a fuuck. Neon_Noir

Sweet Jesus. I've encountered some worthless trolls, spammers, bigots and fanboys on Gamespot but none of them were as bad as posters, you redefined what a lamer should aspire to be, explored new grounds of lousy forum posting and brought a new distasteful experience to the screens of gamespot users, you're the next generation lamer.

fire eblem x   lol @ corridor shooters 

[QUOTE="Neon_Noir"]I don't give a fuuck. AgentA-Mi6

Sweet Jesus. I've encountered some worthless trolls, spammers, bigots and fanboys on Gamespot but none of them were as bad as posters, you redefined what a lamer should aspire to be, explored new grounds of lousy forum posting and brought a new distasteful experience to the screens of gamespot users, you're the next generation lamer.

[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]

[QUOTE="Neon_Noir"]I don't give a fuuck. Neon_Noir

Sweet Jesus. I've encountered some worthless trolls, spammers, bigots and fanboys on Gamespot but none of them were as bad as posters, you redefined what a lamer should aspire to be, explored new grounds of lousy forum posting and brought a new distasteful experience to the screens of gamespot users, you're the next generation lamer.

You are waltefmoney, byitch.

Correction.

How about we settle this after the PS4 is released?

Are you guys kidding me?? It's clearly battletoads. At the end of the level when you are throwing rocks at the screen, you can actually see the glass break where the rock hit it. Can't match the graphics in that game

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

Totally different art styles.

The important thing is PS4 hardware should easily be able to run Crysis 3 on highest settings.

Kinthalis

I'm not so sure about that.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/crysis_3_graphics_performance_review_benchmark,7.html

A GTX 680 gets almost 50 FPs at 1920x1200 maxing out the game. That's with an i7 CPU.

I would guess the PS4 can do High at 30 FPS at 1080p or Very High at 720p 30-40 FPS.

Or what msot likely will end up happening when the game is ported ot the PS4 - since consoles dont' have video settings is that they'll turn down soem fo the lighting effects a bit, and run it at 1080p 30 FPS solid, or 720p 60 FPs solid.

Agreed. According to your link Radeon HD 7870 can run it maxed out with FXAA enabled and 1600x1200 @ 35 FPS average. If devs put a bit of effort into it Im sure it will be no problem to make it run 1080p @ 30 FPS fixed with a bit of tweaking of some settings on PS4.

Doesnt that fact happen to make this thread irrelevant?

Hes a MS fanboy, They have nothing else to back on.WiiMan21

And I'm not even a fanboy as lemmings claim. Apparently lemming logic dictates that "If you disagree with our claims and don't bash Sony, then you're a sony fanboy"WiiMan21

it's interesting that you're quick to get upset when someone calls you a sony fanboy, yet you jump at the chance to call me a "ms fanboy" even though i've never said anything positive about that company. :lol:

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

Totally different art styles.

The important thing is PS4 hardware should easily be able to run Crysis 3 on highest settings.

BlbecekBobecek

I'm not so sure about that.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/crysis_3_graphics_performance_review_benchmark,7.html

A GTX 680 gets almost 50 FPs at 1920x1200 maxing out the game. That's with an i7 CPU.

I would guess the PS4 can do High at 30 FPS at 1080p or Very High at 720p 30-40 FPS.

Or what msot likely will end up happening when the game is ported ot the PS4 - since consoles dont' have video settings is that they'll turn down soem fo the lighting effects a bit, and run it at 1080p 30 FPS solid, or 720p 60 FPs solid.

Agreed. According to your link Radeon HD 7870 can run it maxed out with FXAA enabled and 1600x1200 @ 35 FPS average. If devs put a bit of effort into it Im sure it will be no problem to make it run 1080p @ 30 FPS fixed with a bit of tweaking of some settings on PS4.

Doesnt that fact happen to make this thread irrelevant?

There should be no reason why the PS4 couldnt run Crysis 3 on max settings as long as it stays around 1080p and 30 to 60fps.  

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="Kinthalis"]

 

I'm not so sure about that.

 

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/crysis_3_graphics_performance_review_benchmark,7.html

 

A GTX 680 gets almost 50 FPs at 1920x1200 maxing out the game. That's with an i7 CPU.

 

I would guess the PS4 can do High at 30 FPS at 1080p or Very High at 720p 30-40 FPS.

 

Or what msot likely will end up happening when the game is ported ot the PS4 - since consoles dont' have video settings is that they'll turn down soem fo the lighting effects a bit, and run it at 1080p 30 FPS solid, or 720p 60 FPs solid.

AM-Gamer

Agreed. According to your link Radeon HD 7870 can run it maxed out with FXAA enabled and 1600x1200 @ 35 FPS average. If devs put a bit of effort into it Im sure it will be no problem to make it run 1080p @ 30 FPS fixed with a bit of tweaking of some settings on PS4.

Doesnt that fact happen to make this thread irrelevant?

There should be no reason why the PS4 couldnt run Crysis 3 on max settings as long as it stays around 1080p and 30 to 60fps.  

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

Agreed. According to your link Radeon HD 7870 can run it maxed out with FXAA enabled and 1600x1200 @ 35 FPS average. If devs put a bit of effort into it Im sure it will be no problem to make it run 1080p @ 30 FPS fixed with a bit of tweaking of some settings on PS4.

Doesnt that fact happen to make this thread irrelevant?

faizan_faizan

There should be no reason why the PS4 couldnt run Crysis 3 on max settings as long as it stays around 1080p and 30 to 60fps.  

There should be no reason why the PS4 couldnt run Crysis 3 on max settings as long as it stays around 1080p and 30 to 60fps.  

AM-Gamer

[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

There should be no reason why the PS4 couldnt run Crysis 3 on max settings as long as it stays around 1080p and 30 to 60fps.  

delta3074

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

KarateeeChop

More like

Agreed, there is no way that the Ps4 couls even Come close to running Crysis 3 at the insane level that some of the Hermits are running it at, there are already rigs that are more powerful than the Ps4.delta3074

[QUOTE="jimmyrussle117"]

OP votes crysis 3.

TheWalkingGhost

Agreed.

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

happyduds77

More like

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

happyduds77

More like

you guys love your bullshots. :(

before

after

[QUOTE="happyduds77"]

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

KarateeeChop

More like

you guys love your bullshots. :(

before

after

Sorry bro, but that's what happens when you actually play the game.

[QUOTE="happyduds77"]

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

kzsf looks disappointing enough as it is, but it's more disheartening to think that, going by sony's track record, it'll look even worse upon release. :(

More like

you guys love your bullshots. :(

before

after

[QUOTE="delta3074"] Agreed, there is no way that the Ps4 couls even Come close to running Crysis 3 at the insane level that some of the Hermits are running it at, there are already rigs that are more powerful than the Ps4.Messiahbolical-

and heres the real deal starting at 44 mins before the dust kicks up, without photoshop pic, and showing the rest. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSBOBymYGBc&feature=youtu.be&t=45m15sMstaPrimeMnista

The inside of the bus didn't look too bad in the beginning while it was under shadow. 

there are already rigs that are more powerful than the Ps4.delta3074