Lmao @ Lair (56k warning)

u see lemms, sony games aint like x360 games where they have to cut down everything. Im glad my ps3 is not giving me horrible ai, empty arenas cough GEow, etc....

It appears that some people in here dont know what next-gen is really all about, it aint just about lets cut down everything and put as many pretty textures as possible so it looks good from a screenshot point of view.

GermanShepard06

Says the rabbid sony fanboy who has probably not even held a 360 controller.

What is up with xbox 360 fanboys on this board? I go to n4g.com, and ps3 fanboys are by far the worst, but when I come here I see these terrible topics that deserve to get locked? Why is there so much trolling from one group, and why don't they get banned?drsports1980

The Mods seem to agree with them. Mods "salaries" probably don't have a lot of room for PS3s :lol:

Now TC, show us pictures of Halo 3 looking far worse, and tell us again how its in "Alpha". Kthxbai. 

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

u see lemms, sony games aint like x360 games where they have to cut down everything. Im glad my ps3 is not giving me horrible ai, empty arenas cough GEow, etc....

It appears that some people in here dont know what next-gen is really all about, it aint just about lets cut down everything and put as many pretty textures as possible so it looks good from a screenshot point of view.

snyper1982

Says the rabbid sony fanboy who has probably not even held a 360 controller.

Hmm, probably not a good idea to hype the controller. If he hasn't held one, he might actually want a 360. Once he touches that awkward abomination, good luck.  

[QUOTE="duncanvk"]Aww how cute, the sony trolls are posting Forza 2 shots, it'd be a shame if somebody put up some GeOW shots to further emphasize the lack of graphical quality the 360 is capable of. :roll:GermanShepard06

Lmao Geow

Haha. That shot looks better than any shot from lair. 

[QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

[QUOTE="a_ratchet_fan"]Hypocrite. You and every other lemming were defending GeOW's 6 hour campaign, and now you proceed to bash something which is twice as long. And don't bring the Live card. Half of the 360 owners don't even have online.asdasd

6 hours? Lmao. No. I can play Gears' campaign with co-op online, something Lair doesn't have. Plus, Gears has replayability and its Campaign is over 10 hours long. Lair, on the other hand, will have a non-replayable10-hour long campaign with no online or co-op. Sad, isn't it, cow?

It wont be replayable? What? So once you beat the game, the disc explodes right? The devs said they're adding leaderboards, medals for completing certain things, etc to add replayability to Lair.

Kinda like achievements?? The very thing cows bash and call a gimmick. Some go so far as to say acheivements ruin gameplay, you cows are funny. Mooooooo!

wait a minute here, is someone trying to say that Geow's 4vs4 multiplayer is the next best thing?

anyone who purchases a console just for online is confused with about everything there is. I buy consoles for single player games cuz pc's suck in that department, and i got a pc gaming rig for online.

it appears that lemms are admiting that x360 is a small budget pc these days for people who cant afford a really good pc.

GermanShepard06

SO because someone likes something different than you they are wrong? Nice. Haha. You should probably get over yourself. I guess millions of people who play console games online are "confused with about everything there is" then. I seriously can't get over how illogical you are.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]Why are the cows making it seem like the medal system adds tons and tons of replay value to the game :|GermanShepard06

yeah screw online deathmatch and coop

its got teh medal system!!!111

lemms acting like xbox360 created online for games, rofl.

consoles = single player experience

pc = online experience

dont give me that bull...

Dude, seriously. Get over yourself. It is the exact opposite for me. I like the SP on PC's, and the MP on consoles. I guess I am wrong though because you said so.

[QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

[QUOTE="a_ratchet_fan"]Hypocrite. You and every other lemming were defending GeOW's 6 hour campaign, and now you proceed to bash something which is twice as long. And don't bring the Live card. Half of the 360 owners don't even have online.ragrdoll21

6 hours? Lmao. No. I can play Gears' campaign with co-op online, something Lair doesn't have. Plus, Gears has replayability and its Campaign is over 10 hours long. Lair, on the other hand, will have a non-replayable10-hour long campaign with no online or co-op. Sad, isn't it, cow?

no some might beat it in 6-8 hours some 8-10 and some 10-12

u guys are forgetting gears was said to be a 10-12 hour game aswell b4 it came out, and it actually is if u take your time and dont rush through stuff

i bet lair will be the same thing, just like any game if u rush through it, than it might only last u 6-8 so b4 all u morons keep screaming 12>8 u dont even know how long the game is, stop asuming fromt some review

what takes someone to beat in 10-12 might take YOU   6-8 or even 12+

This Will Be The Flop of The Year.

MotorStorm on Dragons WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

This Will Be The Flop of The Year.

MotorStorm on Dragons WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

Nugtoka

Can i borrow your crystal ball, because mine seems to be broken and my prediction skills are off. 

You don't race on the dragons. But i doubt you were trying for something resembling reality with your remark.

This Will Be The Flop of The Year.

MotorStorm on Dragons WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!

Nugtoka

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.elementz28

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]Why are the cows making it seem like the medal system adds tons and tons of replay value to the game :|snyper1982

yeah screw online deathmatch and coop

its got teh medal system!!!111

lemms acting like xbox360 created online for games, rofl.

consoles = single player experience

pc = online experience

dont give me that bull...

Dude, seriously. Get over yourself. It is the exact opposite for me. I like the SP on PC's, and the MP on consoles. I guess I am wrong though because you said so.

depends on the game. i couldnt stand the SP on warcraft 3 while i loved the ladder games online. Same can go for HL2 loved the SP but i didnt like source online. For CS:S they improved CS but still i couldnt get into it cause i over played CS over the years.

[QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]Why are the cows making it seem like the medal system adds tons and tons of replay value to the game :|istreakforfood

yeah screw online deathmatch and coop

its got teh medal system!!!111

lemms acting like xbox360 created online for games, rofl.

consoles = single player experience

pc = online experience

dont give me that bull...

Dude, seriously. Get over yourself. It is the exact opposite for me. I like the SP on PC's, and the MP on consoles. I guess I am wrong though because you said so.

depends on the game. i couldnt stand the SP on warcraft 3 while i loved the ladder games online. Same can go for HL2 loved the SP but i didnt like source online. For CS:S they improved CS but still i couldnt get into it cause i over played CS over the years.

Wait they made CS better with CS:S? They made the hitboxes bigger and made it easier for people with less skill to do well. I tend to find that I enjoy SP more on consoles and MP on PC. However with some games I love both SP and MP, as in the case of WC3 or Resistance. 

[QUOTE="istreakforfood"][QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]Why are the cows making it seem like the medal system adds tons and tons of replay value to the game :|reaperstoll

yeah screw online deathmatch and coop

its got teh medal system!!!111

lemms acting like xbox360 created online for games, rofl.

consoles = single player experience

pc = online experience

dont give me that bull...

Dude, seriously. Get over yourself. It is the exact opposite for me. I like the SP on PC's, and the MP on consoles. I guess I am wrong though because you said so.

depends on the game. i couldnt stand the SP on warcraft 3 while i loved the ladder games online. Same can go for HL2 loved the SP but i didnt like source online. For CS:S they improved CS but still i couldnt get into it cause i over played CS over the years.

Wait they made CS better with CS:S? They made the hitboxes bigger and made it easier for people with less skill to do well. I tend to find that I enjoy SP more on consoles and MP on PC. However with some games I love both SP and MP, as in the case of WC3 or Resistance.

the graphics on cs:s were better and felt more realistic compare to cs(like the effects of getting flashed). dont u think? 

[QUOTE="reaperstoll"][QUOTE="istreakforfood"] 

depends on the game. i couldnt stand the SP on warcraft 3 while i loved the ladder games online. Same can go for HL2 loved the SP but i didnt like source online. For CS:S they improved CS but still i couldnt get into it cause i over played CS over the years.

istreakforfood

Wait they made CS better with CS:S? They made the hitboxes bigger and made it easier for people with less skill to do well. I tend to find that I enjoy SP more on consoles and MP on PC. However with some games I love both SP and MP, as in the case of WC3 or Resistance.

the graphics on cs:s were better and felt more realistic compare to cs(like the effects of getting flashed). dont u think?

Ya, but I felt they dumbed down alot of the skill requirement. I felt they sacrificed gameplay to some degree. I play online with my friends clan from time to time and grit my teeth every time I die from a shot that was aimed at where i was a second ago. If they fixed the hitboxes I would have no problem.

[QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

u see lemms, sony games aint like x360 games where they have to cut down everything. Im glad my ps3 is not giving me horrible ai, empty arenas cough GEow, etc....

It appears that some people in here dont know what next-gen is really all about, it aint just about lets cut down everything and put as many pretty textures as possible so it looks good from a screenshot point of view.

scott_robertson

Says the rabbid sony fanboy who has probably not even held a 360 controller.

Hmm, probably not a good idea to hype the controller. If he hasn't held one, he might actually want a 360. Once he touches that awkward abomination, good luck.

Oh God.... It was a figure of speech first of all, I wasn't hyping the controller. Secondly the 360 controller is one of the best controllers ever designed. The Dpad isn't the best, but that is about it.  Then again, you are entitled your opinion, so feel free to not like it.

[QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="JB730"]

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]Why are the cows making it seem like the medal system adds tons and tons of replay value to the game :|istreakforfood

yeah screw online deathmatch and coop

its got teh medal system!!!111

lemms acting like xbox360 created online for games, rofl.

consoles = single player experience

pc = online experience

dont give me that bull...

Dude, seriously. Get over yourself. It is the exact opposite for me. I like the SP on PC's, and the MP on consoles. I guess I am wrong though because you said so.

depends on the game. i couldnt stand the SP on warcraft 3 while i loved the ladder games online. Same can go for HL2 loved the SP but i didnt like source online. For CS:S they improved CS but still i couldnt get into it cause i over played CS over the years.

Which is exactly my point. Everyone has their own tastes. He thinks EVERYONE should think like he does. If they don't they are confused.

I only have 4 things to say

1. you hate what you fear

2.Go watch the semi-review of lair Xplay posted

    -they've actually played it and liked it.

    -constantly praised what factor 5 has produced

    -loved all the mechanics factor five put in there

3. I liked Gears but go on any other game and talk about gears and what you'll hear is "cool but boring after a while", or "that was fun for a few hours"

4. I hate those sigs that say ps3 eats money

    -ps3+hdmi cable=700

    -360+hd-dvd+online+WARRENTY=more than $700 

Didn't this game just hit it's alpha stage.Also that is a really bad picture of the game.

cronus233

doesnt stop cows bagging out Halo 3..so maybe we will play by their rules. 

I only have 4 things to say

1. you hate what you fear

2.Go watch the semi-review of lair Xplay posted

    -they've actually played it and liked it.

    -constantly praised what factor 5 has produced

    -loved all the mechanics factor five put in there

 

sthbytesN

Can you give me a link?

[QUOTE="sthbytesN"]

I only have 4 things to say

1. you hate what you fear

2.Go watch the semi-review of lair Xplay posted

-they've actually played it and liked it.

-constantly praised what factor 5 has produced

-loved all the mechanics factor five put in there

 

Rip870

Can you give me a link?

www.g4tv.com/xplay/videos

sorry cant link but search for for lair in the search function 

Have you seen the gameplay vids over at GT.....

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=18554&type=mov&pl=game

In game motion is a greater judge than still pics (always)

MikeE21286

Lair has last-gen graphics even in that video. It simply looks horrible. If you want to hype a PS3 game for graphics use MGS4, Drake, and Rachet and Clank as they all kill Lair's graphics. 

[QUOTE="elementz28"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.snyper1982

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

[QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="elementz28"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.MCGSMB

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

[QUOTE="MCGSMB"][QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="elementz28"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.drsports1980

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

hard to prove that statement.  no health bar or anything.  but I do expect the game to look like that personally. 

[QUOTE="drsports1980"][QUOTE="MCGSMB"][QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="elementz28"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.Dreams-Visions

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

hard to prove that statement.  no health bar or anything.  but I do expect the game to look like that personally. 

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="drsports1980"][QUOTE="MCGSMB"][QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="elementz28"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.drsports1980

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

hard to prove that statement. no health bar or anything. but I do expect the game to look like that personally.

You played Lair?  What did you think of it? 

If you hyped this game you need your head examining.

I always though this game would suck and looks like i was right. 

[QUOTE="drsports1980"][QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="drsports1980"][QUOTE="MCGSMB"][QUOTE="snyper1982"][QUOTE="elementz28"]

[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]what's with fanboys digging up this HORRIBLE screenshots to try to prove a point, knowing there are better screenshots to use as an example? First MasterChumly...now you. Disgraces to your respective species.Dreams-Visions

True, TC picked all the bad screen shots and try to claim ownage..lemmings are funny..I can do the same thing for mass effect because there is a lot of horrible pictures of it and i can call the "teh Downgrade" ..lol...but im not goin to do it..

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair07fb7.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/63278124wy2.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/66230635ya6.jpg" alt=" " />

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t286/skyzelementz/lair06gs3.jpg" alt=" " />

No... Instead you post CG pics of lair, proving nothing.

hard to prove that statement. no health bar or anything. but I do expect the game to look like that personally.

You played Lair?  What did you think of it? 

[QUOTE="wildwild"]oh and now that CGI is taken away from this game it looks something that should be played on WiiGermanShepard06

speaking of Forza 2, rofl.

Forza 2 >>>>>>> this game

Cooking Mama  >>>>>>>> this game

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="wildwild"]oh and now that CGI is taken away from this game it looks something that should be played on Wiiwildwild

speaking of Forza 2, rofl.

Forza 2 >>>>>>> this game

Cooking Mama  >>>>>>>> this game

[QUOTE="wildwild"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="wildwild"]oh and now that CGI is taken away from this game it looks something that should be played on Wiidrsports1980

speaking of Forza 2, rofl.

Forza 2 >>>>>>> this game

Cooking Mama  >>>>>>>> this game

stupid remarks? there are PS2 games that have better graphics than those SS's

[QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

No shadows for ANY of the soldiers. Pixelated. Jaggies. Bad colours. Muddy textures. Ew.

Once again, jaggies. Muddy textures. Ugly grass. Horrible fire effects. Pixelated. Ew.

---

Now now, cows, can't you just admit it? Lair is just gonna flop like a pancake. And don't bother posting images that make the game look good- those images are NOT gameplay.

Discuss.

BrutonNYC

How is recovery going with that Coma? seriously, those pics are how old?! I suggest you go take a look at the developer walkthrough vids on gametrailers my friend 

i watched it, and i fell asleep, its still gunna flop

No shadows for ANY of the soldiers. Pixelated models. Blurry graphics. Bad colours. Muddy textures. Ew.

 

---

 

Once again, blurry graphics. Muddy textures. Ugly grass. Horrible fire effects. Pixelated. Even some jaggies here and there. Ew.

---

Lair is just gonna flop like a pancake. And don't bother posting images that make the game look good- those images are NOT gameplay.

Discuss.

HyperMetaDragon

This game never had good graphics, what made it look good was the big maps and lots on enemy's on screen, the games not even close to the detail of gears.

Bleh..its going to be bad.

Not one single dragon flight game has come out on the PS2 or PS1 that was of any good. What will change it now?

Nothing ;)  Wait for Heavenly Sword. 

Bleh..its going to be bad.

Not one single dragon flight game has come out on the PS2 or PS1 that was of any good. What will change it now?toxicmog

But it's the PLAYSTATION 3! You're playing B3YOND.

[QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

 

No shadows for ANY of the soldiers. Pixelated models. Blurry graphics. Bad colours. Muddy textures. Ew.

---

 

Once again, blurry graphics. Muddy textures. Ugly grass. Horrible fire effects. Pixelated. Even some jaggies here and there. Ew.

---

Lair is just gonna flop like a pancake. And don't bother posting images that make the game look good- those images are NOT gameplay.

Discuss.

michael098

This game never had good graphics, what made it look good was the big maps and lots on enemy's on screen, the games not even close to the detail of gears.

Gears of War = Like 8 Characters on screen about a 30M draw Distance

Lair had like 3X times that in enemy's alone, And like 30 Mile Drawdistances

So why Big surprized GeOW had more detailed Environments etc?

[QUOTE="michael098"][QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

 

No shadows for ANY of the soldiers. Pixelated models. Blurry graphics. Bad colours. Muddy textures. Ew.

---

 

Once again, blurry graphics. Muddy textures. Ugly grass. Horrible fire effects. Pixelated. Even some jaggies here and there. Ew.

---

Lair is just gonna flop like a pancake. And don't bother posting images that make the game look good- those images are NOT gameplay.

Discuss.

Blinblingthing

This game never had good graphics, what made it look good was the big maps and lots on enemy's on screen, the games not even close to the detail of gears.

Gears of War = Like 8 Characters on screen about a 30M draw Distance

Lair had like 3X times that in enemy's alone, And like 30 Mile Drawdistances

So why Big surprized GeOW had more detailed Environments etc?

geow has much less characters on screen than 8 in a single player mode.

Not enough processing power to do ai, etc...

[QUOTE="michael098"][QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

 

No shadows for ANY of the soldiers. Pixelated models. Blurry graphics. Bad colours. Muddy textures. Ew.

---

 

Once again, blurry graphics. Muddy textures. Ugly grass. Horrible fire effects. Pixelated. Even some jaggies here and there. Ew.

---

Lair is just gonna flop like a pancake. And don't bother posting images that make the game look good- those images are NOT gameplay.

Discuss.

Blinblingthing

This game never had good graphics, what made it look good was the big maps and lots on enemy's on screen, the games not even close to the detail of gears.

Gears of War = Like 8 Characters on screen about a 30M draw Distance

Lair had like 3X times that in enemy's alone, And like 30 Mile Drawdistances

So why Big surprized GeOW had more detailed Environments etc?

Lol good work, that's exactly my point, basically gears has better GRAPHICS, lair has a longer draw distance and more enemy's on screen, does that mean it has better graphics? NO is doesn't, but lair is more technically advanced than gears.

This is really ****** me off but you make it out that gears has up to 8 enemy's on screen because the 360 cant handle more than that, if you have ever played gears you would realise that any more enemy's would change the game completely. 

[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"][QUOTE="michael098"][QUOTE="HyperMetaDragon"]

 

No shadows for ANY of the soldiers. Pixelated models. Blurry graphics. Bad colours. Muddy textures. Ew.

---

 

Once again, blurry graphics. Muddy textures. Ugly grass. Horrible fire effects. Pixelated. Even some jaggies here and there. Ew.

---

Lair is just gonna flop like a pancake. And don't bother posting images that make the game look good- those images are NOT gameplay.

Discuss.

michael098

This game never had good graphics, what made it look good was the big maps and lots on enemy's on screen, the games not even close to the detail of gears.

Gears of War = Like 8 Characters on screen about a 30M draw Distance

Lair had like 3X times that in enemy's alone, And like 30 Mile Drawdistances

So why Big surprized GeOW had more detailed Environments etc?

Lol good work, that's exactly my point, basically gears has better GRAPHICS, lair has a longer draw distance and more enemy's on screen, does that mean it has better graphics? NO is doesn't, but lair is more technically advanced than gears.

This is really ****** me off but you make it out that gears has up to 8 enemy's on screen because the 360 cant handle more than that, if you have ever played gears you would realise that any more enemy's would change the game completely. 

that is why u cant compare geow with lair, two different type of games. But if you want to say one game is better than another techically then that is acceptable.

Even motorstorm is more technically advanced than any x360 game right now.