Lost Planet - x360 january 2007 vs PS3 october 2007 *PICS*

First of all, let me say those pics are not how the PS3 version will end up id say... there is just work ahead for more engine optimizing etc

However neither goup of pics posted are fake, both are legit

http://www.gamersyde.com/pop_image.html?G=6770&N=1
http://www.psu.com/media/articles/PSU_lost_comp_large_02.jpg

As you can see the psu pics have been downsized, this helps removed jaggies and smooth over texture alignment ;)

These current batch of pics are simply trash imo, however it WILL be fixed/changed/upgraded before release unless they dont see the ps3 version making much money at all (but if they thought that why would they even make it right?)

So expect to see much better pictures soon :)

EDIT: i spell good n stuff

LOL

THAT'S PS3 PIC^

DUDE it looks like total ass compared to 360, because of split system memory have to downgrade the texture detail.

That cant be real.MonacoX

Kinda, Cause there arent any PS3 screenshots of the game... or is there oooohhhh

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]The first pic looks like the PC version on looooooow settings.Pripyat

Wow, total denial :|

Um theres about 20 ohter pics on that websight that look nothing like the crap pic you posted there is no denial to be had you have been owned. Thread over.

[QUOTE="Pripyat"]

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]The first pic looks like the PC version on looooooow settings.Polaris_choice

Wow, total denial :|

Um theres about 20 ohter pics on that websight that look nothing like the crap pic you posted there is no denial to be had you have been owned. Thread over.

pic from

http://www.gamersyde.com/news_5367_en.html

here^

i dont know where he got that pciture from

Real comparison

ff7isnumbaone

wrong, this has been confirmed to be 360 shot from early development. it's also NOT the same screens..and that shouldn't be so hard, it's the SAME GAME....

[QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"]

i dont know where he got that pciture from

Real comparison

Polaris_choice

Wow wonder what the 360 fanboys have to say about that.

[QUOTE="Pripyat"]

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]The first pic looks like the PC version on looooooow settings.Polaris_choice

Wow, total denial :|

Um theres about 20 ohter pics on that websight that look nothing like the crap pic you posted there is no denial to be had you have been owned. Thread over.

Many bitter tears in this thread :cry:, they taste so good :lol:

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Pripyat"]

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]The first pic looks like the PC version on looooooow settings.Pripyat

Wow, total denial :|

Um theres about 20 ohter pics on that websight that look nothing like the crap pic you posted there is no denial to be had you have been owned. Thread over.

Many bitter tears in this thread :cry:, they taste so good :lol:

Um I own LP for the 360. Gamertag "TheSterls" go look up my acheviments. The PS3 version looks everybit as good as the other 30 pics show . Im a gamer you are a fanboy you simply cant win.

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

Could those pics be badly compressed or is that impossible to imagine?

I never take pics at face value, rarely do they represent the true quality at SW.

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

ut3nophysics

Actually, the GPU on the PS3 can access all 512MB of RAM on the PS3. The CPU can only access 256MB, but the CPU needs less RAM than the GPU anyway.

[QUOTE="ut3nophysics"]

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

mjarantilla

Actually, the GPU on the PS3 can access all 512MB of RAM on the PS3. The CPU can only access 256MB, but the CPU needs less RAM than the GPU anyway.

i highly doubt that, it uses nvidia turbocache like cheap pc graphics cards.

not to mention ps3 os uses more ram.

[QUOTE="ut3nophysics"]

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

mjarantilla

Actually, the GPU on the PS3 can access all 512MB of RAM on the PS3. The CPU can only access 256MB, but the CPU needs less RAM than the GPU anyway.

Actually, games like unreal tournament 3 need more main memory cpu ram than video card ram :)

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="ut3nophysics"]

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

ut3nophysics

Actually, the GPU on the PS3 can access all 512MB of RAM on the PS3. The CPU can only access 256MB, but the CPU needs less RAM than the GPU anyway.

i highly doubt that, it uses nvidia turbocache like cheap pc graphics cards.

not to mention ps3 os uses more ram.

Believe it. Go to Beyond3D and read their articles if you don't believe me. The RSX on the PS3 has TWO memory buses, not just one. One goes to the 256MB of GDDR3 RAM, and the other goes to the Cell via a FlexIO bus, and the Cell acts as the memory controller for the RSX in accessing the XDR RAM.

[QUOTE="OgramaticERRORS"]those pics posted first are legit, but the guys at PSU.com which mean playstation universe didnt posted for exactly that reason, Xbox 360 version eats the soul of that PS1 version Ups i meant Ps3 version.mjarantilla

OgramaticERRORS
Level 1
Player
Posts: 2

GTFO.

The first pic looks like the PC version on looooooow settings.

Thats the first thing that came to mind when I saw it...this has been done before.

[QUOTE="ut3nophysics"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="ut3nophysics"]

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

mjarantilla

Actually, the GPU on the PS3 can access all 512MB of RAM on the PS3. The CPU can only access 256MB, but the CPU needs less RAM than the GPU anyway.

i highly doubt that, it uses nvidia turbocache like cheap pc graphics cards.

not to mention ps3 os uses more ram.

Believe it. Go to Beyond3D and read their articles if you don't believe me. The RSX on the PS3 has TWO memory buses, not just one. One goes to the 256MB of GDDR3 RAM, and the other goes to the Cell via a FlexIO bus, and the Cell acts as the memory controller for the RSX in accessing the XDR RAM.

ok explain this?

ps2 has 32 mbcpu ram and 4 mb video gpu ram.

dreamcast had 16 mb cpu and 8 mb video gpu ram

unreal tournament on ps2 had better graphics because of more cpu ram, ut on dc had downgraded textures and geometry and levels taken out, explain that with it having 4 mb more video ram than ps2?

LMAO! That's funny cause the REAL comparison pics I saw today were way better than that. Great job picking out a crappy beta picture,AIH_PSP

wrong. those were early 360 pics.. just keeping things real.. sorry.

I'll go find a bad pic of halo 3 and compare it to a good pic of killzone 2 and laugh....

this thread is pointless...that is the only bad pic that looks jaggy as ****.

Every game has a couple of bad pics released...

sheesh lemmings at an all time low

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="ut3nophysics"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="ut3nophysics"]

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

ut3nophysics

Actually, the GPU on the PS3 can access all 512MB of RAM on the PS3. The CPU can only access 256MB, but the CPU needs less RAM than the GPU anyway.

i highly doubt that, it uses nvidia turbocache like cheap pc graphics cards.

not to mention ps3 os uses more ram.

Believe it. Go to Beyond3D and read their articles if you don't believe me. The RSX on the PS3 has TWO memory buses, not just one. One goes to the 256MB of GDDR3 RAM, and the other goes to the Cell via a FlexIO bus, and the Cell acts as the memory controller for the RSX in accessing the XDR RAM.

ok explain this?

ps2 has 32 mbcpu ram and 4 mb video gpu ram.

dreamcast had 16 mb cpu and 8 mb video gpu ram

unreal tournament on ps2 had better graphics because of more cpu ram, ut on dc had downgraded textures and geometry and levels taken out, explain that with it having 4 mb more video ram than ps2?

There's more to board-level design than how much memory is available. Unless you can tell me how the pathways and buses were laid out between the main RAM, CPU, GPU, and VRAM for both systems, I can't tell you why the PS2 version would look better.

i wish people would understand just having a fast cpu doesnt mean it will be graphically superior, this greatly depends on how much memory avalible and how good the gpu is etc.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one a finsihed product, and one is an early build?

PC version looks the best anyway.

agentfred

uh oh the cows are using the Its still in beta excuse!

Lets see lost planet an old game, being ported to the ps3 with no graphical upgrade at all, no exclusives...ect

lol floporama!!!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't one a finsihed product, and one is an early build?

PC version looks the best anyway.

agentfred

and the biggest lagfest in history, looks worse than bioshock has less effects and runs 5x slower

but so manye nerds said this ??? lol my uncle said this frim the start does every one buy off commericail?

[QUOTE="MonacoX"]That cant be real.trup522

I said that out loud.

Say what you will about console wars between the 360 and PS3, but this all falls on lazy devs. This is embarrassingly bad. At least try. I refuse to believe this is the fault of the PS3.

Ubisoft cant get assassins creed to run correctly due to memory issues...could be just that.

Memory.

:lol: @ fanboy's insulting a WORK IN PROGRESS game, just because there porting it over does not mean its gonna look final the second they start work on it :roll:

Seriously fanboy lemmings need to try harder... Lemm's are loosing all the things they had to complain about the PS3, the lack of games, the price, the lack of rumble all being fixed, and now you have all run out of material, and your jokes are only funny cause they make ya look stupid now :lol:

:lol: @ fanboy's insulting a WORK IN PROGRESS game, just because there porting it over does not mean its gonna look final the second they start work on it :roll:

Seriously fanboy lemmings need to try harder... Lemm's are loosing all the things they had to complain about the PS3, the lack of games, the price, the lack of rumble all being fixed, and now you have all run out of material, and your jokes are only funny cause they make ya look stupid now :lol:

JunkanooPunch

yes because capoms gonna sink money into a game thats all ready finsihed and they could just port over right?

FACT

the original PSU comparison used beta pictures of lostplanet and put them up againest ps3 screenies...and the 360 screenies LOOKED BETTER! the one of the dude look at the fur on his neck in the ps3 pic and look at it on the 360. the 360 fur is MUCH Better, and that picture fighting the ice worm, its a beta build and it looks vastly better then the ps3's version.

Capcom will port it and thats about it they aren't gonna go to large ammounts of trouble to make it look amazingly better on teh ps3.

[QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"]

i dont know where he got that pciture from

Real comparison

Eltroz

WOW ARE PEOPLE NOT VERY BRIGHT ? PLEASE IM NOT BASHING YOU

PS3 HAS 256 FOR CPU AND 256 FOR CPU

XBOX360 HAS 512 MB UNIFIED THE CPU CAN USE 512 MB OR GPU THERORETICALLY.

the reason the game looks ass on ps3 because it doesnt have enough ram avalible for devs to use to achieve same texture resolutions of graphical detail.

ut3nophysics

[QUOTE="trup522"]

[QUOTE="MonacoX"]That cant be real.toxicmog

I said that out loud.

Say what you will about console wars between the 360 and PS3, but this all falls on lazy devs. This is embarrassingly bad. At least try. I refuse to believe this is the fault of the PS3.

Ubisoft cant get assassins creed to run correctly due to memory issues...could be just that.

Memory.

uh oh the cows are using the Its still in beta excuse!

Lets see lost planet an old game, being ported to the ps3 with no graphical upgrade at all, no exclusives...ect

lol floporama!!!

WilliamRLBaker

Halo 3...:|

no way! fake.

i say it's the pc version on veeerrry low settings

nice try tho

omarguy01

The first pic looks like the PC version on looooooow settings.mjarantilla

Not judging you because you'er a good poster, but.........I own the PC version and it looks much better then that on all low.

fake thats, like the pc on low settings, nice trySky_Raptor

omg click on the link. it's a real comparison rofl

The PS3 has the snow effects found in the PC version...except it has crappy ttextures and jaggies galore.turgore

or maybe it IS the PC version with very low settings??

If this is real, PS3 is just screwed on account of....sorry to bring this up, but teh lazy devs.

This just isn't legitimate. This just isn't feasible. I'm sitting here looking at Uncharted and Ratchet on my desktop and I see a tremendous disconnect between those pictures and the supposed PS3 version of Lost Planet.

Either Capcom bent over and shot this game out their buttocks (kings of optimization....yeah, right), or this thing really is just insanely hard to work with. Either way, if the OP is a real, legitimate comparison from a pair of real frame grabs on near-final builds, we need to take this with a grain of salt.

The PC version of Lost Planet, despite what some of you may think, is perhaps the worst optimized PC game ever to hit me in the face. If they're using PC code, no wonder they can't get anything out of this game. They probably are, given the graphical and gameplay features they've added in.....there is some likelihood that they are using terribly optimized code.

At any rate, it's been proven time and again that the Playstation 3 is capable of SO MUCH MORE.

Look at Uncharted: Drake's Fortune for a refresher course.