MAG 7/10 @ iGN

[QUOTE="Panosola"]I am not surprising with the IGN score.....i was expect the 7.A mediocre game for the ps3.racing1750

"Good" don't cut it when you're paying 60 dollars

[QUOTE="punkrocker163"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

I've not seen it said once :?

lundy86_4

I don't really know about his posting habits, however that claim was a little baseless.

Man I hate it when people are just too lazy to link, especially at lvl 25, just so they can post something first.

This doesn't surprise me considering the meta score. Your title is false, just to say. I think the main reason they sort of hated it is because the reviewer was getting pwned by S.V.E.R. and it gave him a sour taste :P

Mag is a hate or love it game, I would buy it if it was bundled with the headphone but apparently no, :(

Edit: oups sorry that was the UK score, 7/10 for US.

[QUOTE="racing1750"][QUOTE="Panosola"]I am not surprising with the IGN score.....i was expect the 7.A mediocre game for the ps3.HermitGTX

"Good" don't cut it when you're paying 60 dollars

[QUOTE="racing1750"][QUOTE="Panosola"]I am not surprising with the IGN score.....i was expect the 7.A mediocre game for the ps3.HermitGTX

"Good" don't cut it when you're paying 60 dollars

It doesn't?

I'm sure people will disagree with you, me included. It's all opinion on what game is worth $60.

[QUOTE="Panosola"]I am not surprising with the IGN score.....i was expect the 7.A mediocre game for the ps3.punkrocker163

Those aren't happening anytime soon :?

At least GS' inevitable AA score will silence some critics.

Technically, a 7 means good. The game itself is still mediocre though.

[QUOTE="punkrocker163"][QUOTE="Panosola"]I am not surprising with the IGN score.....i was expect the 7.A mediocre game for the ps3.SPYDER0416

Those aren't happening anytime soon :?

At least GS' inevitable AA score will silence some critics.

Considering that it's IGN, I expected higher...

Not looking good for the MAG fans

HermitGTX

[QUOTE="HermitGTX"]

Not looking good for the MAG fans

soulitane

Since it's not that good of game at least let the MAG fans have good reviews

[QUOTE="racing1750"]Decent score, wonder what GS will give it? maybe a 7.5/10 ?Fizzman

If you use gamespots history with IGN reviews they tend to rate lower then IGN, but im leaning on it getting a 7-7.5.

How can this game get a 6.5 for the graphics is mindblowing. It is the 3rd best looking multiplayer fps on the ps3 behind Modern warfare 2, and Killzone 2. It is blindness.

Well thats not too bad. I can see GS giving it a score of 6-7 (somewhere in that interval) Dante2710

Add 1 for PS3 game reviews on GS and subtract 1 for the 360 ones

How can this game get a 6.5 for the graphics is mindblowing. It is the 3rd best looking multiplayer fps on the ps3 behind Modern warfare 2, and Killzone 2. It is blindness.

nhh18

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

How can this game get a 6.5 for the graphics is mindblowing. It is the 3rd best looking multiplayer fps on the ps3 behind Modern warfare 2, and Killzone 2. It is blindness.

racing1750

MAG somewhat looks like a PS2 game imo

Expecting an 8 here, the GSreviewer who is in the midst of playing it seems to like it so far.

SPYDER0416

If Kevin Van Ord is reviewing it'll probably be AAA, it's obvious he prefers the PS3

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

How can this game get a 6.5 for the graphics is mindblowing. It is the 3rd best looking multiplayer fps on the ps3 behind Modern warfare 2, and Killzone 2. It is blindness.

racing1750

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Expecting an 8 here, the GSreviewer who is in the midst of playing it seems to like it so far.

Ultra_Combo

If Kevin Van Ord is reviewing it'll probably be AAA, it's obvious he prefers the PS3

Why'd he give ME2 AAA then?

[QUOTE="soulitane"]

[QUOTE="HermitGTX"]

Not looking good for the MAG fans

HermitGTX

Since it's not that good of game at least let the MAG fans have good reviews

\"6.5 graphics"

"9.5 graphics"

:D

[QUOTE="Ultra_Combo"]

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Expecting an 8 here, the GSreviewer who is in the midst of playing it seems to like it so far.

Ziek-AAT

If Kevin Van Ord is reviewing it'll probably be AAA, it's obvious he prefers the PS3

Why'd he give ME2 AAA then?

[QUOTE="Ultra_Combo"]

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

Expecting an 8 here, the GSreviewer who is in the midst of playing it seems to like it so far.

Ziek-AAT

If Kevin Van Ord is reviewing it'll probably be AAA, it's obvious he prefers the PS3

Why'd he give ME2 AAA then?

To hide the fanboy

flop incoming?:P Now before people say "WHO SAID IT WOULD GET AAA". This week and last people have been creating threads about how awesome it is. :|killa4lyfe

\"6.5 graphics"

"9.5 graphics"

:D

nhh18

[QUOTE="Ziek-AAT"]

[QUOTE="Ultra_Combo"]

If Kevin Van Ord is reviewing it'll probably be AAA, it's obvious he prefers the PS3

Stevo_the_gamer

Why'd he give ME2 AAA then?

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

\"6.5 graphics"

"9.5 graphics"

:D

mitu123

[QUOTE="racing1750"][QUOTE="nhh18"]

How can this game get a 6.5 for the graphics is mindblowing. It is the 3rd best looking multiplayer fps on the ps3 behind Modern warfare 2, and Killzone 2. It is blindness.

[QUOTE="Ziek-AAT"]

[QUOTE="Ultra_Combo"]

If Kevin Van Ord is reviewing it'll probably be AAA, it's obvious he prefers the PS3

Stevo_the_gamer

Why'd he give ME2 AAA then?

Along with the other 9 sites that gave it a 9 GASP!

Kevin Vanerd will give this game a 9 or 10

Fair score i guess. Not a bad game, but not a very good one either. The fact that it has 256 players at same time might make it stand out from the crowd of other average and even better shooters and probably grant them many copies sold.Drakes_Fortune

[QUOTE="Drakes_Fortune"]Fair score i guess. Not a bad game, but not a very good one either. The fact that it has 256 players at same time might make it stand out from the crowd of other average and even better shooters and probably grant them many copies sold.nhh18

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="Drakes_Fortune"]Fair score i guess. Not a bad game, but not a very good one either. The fact that it has 256 players at same time might make it stand out from the crowd of other average and even better shooters and probably grant them many copies sold.Drakes_Fortune

Why because it is hyped IGN will give it a good score. I agree ign is going to give it a good score because it is hyped. If mag was hyped my god suddenly that game is worthy of a 9

nhh18

Wow, all of a sudden a 7 is BAD? In a year, 8 will be a 5 and 9 will be a 7, and 10 will be a 9.

Wow, all of a sudden a 7 is BAD? In a year, 8 will be a 5 and 9 will be a 7, and 10 will be a 9.

Cerberus_Legion

[QUOTE="Cerberus_Legion"]

Wow, all of a sudden a 7 is BAD? In a year, 8 will be a 5 and 9 will be a 7, and 10 will be a 9.

Anjunaddict

It wasn't really hugely hyped. It just made an appearance in a lot of exclusive lists (which makes sense).

I believe it's only hyped AA here.

[QUOTE="nhh18"] Why because it is hyped IGN will give it a good score. I agree ign is going to give it a good score because it is hyped. If mag was hyped my god suddenly that game is worthy of a 9

kolkov01

Wow, all of a sudden a 7 is BAD? In a year, 8 will be a 5 and 9 will be a 7, and 10 will be a 9.

I like the game & would give it an 8. I couldn't care less what so guy at IGN or here at Gamespot thinks about it.

I dont get the balanceing flaws he explained. I mean people like playing with that class more who cares. Its mainly cosmetic and I know why someone would pick sver over the rest. They just look cooler then the 2 other teams. Also who is this noob reviewer give me my other reviewers.

[QUOTE="punkrocker163"]Mixed A, AA reviews. Its shaping up to be a good game. rolo107

QFT

Least they tried something different. Now people shouldn't get mad at Rare for trying something new with Banjo & Kazooie.

It's good Zipper tried to make something different, but I think they should have stuck with Socom.