MAG has given my brother and I a lot of play time, well, my brother is still playing the game every few days. And I don't have any grip with the graphics as it is very neat, the gunfights feel very tight and they're plenty play style to approach each of the maps, and I like health and spawning system a lot better than other shooters too, the developer even gives out big upgrades for free. The only problem is not enough people play the game and therefore, you have to wait a while before you can join a game.
I guarantee that if this game were on the PC it would not have gotten the massive backlash that it received. or hell, if it were on the Xbox, it wouldnt have gotten half the scrutiny and nitpicking. it would have garnered far more 8s and 9s if that were the case.Silverbond
No it not it got the score it deserved the game was pretty much still in beta when released in retail taking 6 months for even the most basic problems to be ironed out least of all to say when the largest complaint in the actual 4 or so month beta * which I was apart of for near 3 and a half months* was that all of S.V.E.R's maps were highly biased to them it took them near 6 months to change this Its not hard you dont make the majority of map types where you can funnelpeople attacking you and have atleast 2 HQ gatling guns sitting shooting those choke points.
S.V.E.R when attacking had all sorts of cover. S.V.E.R when being attacked had clear vantage points. I played the beta near 3 and a halfmonths purchased the game at launch promptly returned it within 20 days when I realized not a single one of the problems I reported was fixed alot of people felt that way actuallyWilliamRLBaker
Yeah your right, it wasn't underrated crap like halo is overated by 4 points, fpses are all overrated and this one is better then most of them and just wasn't, 76 is a fair score for it, it is a good game
Log in to comment