M.A.G Offical Thread! (56k) Groundbreaking Ps3 Exclusive!

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts

Note: Everything you read here, Is information i have got so far,Including weapons. If this thread is stickied or stays alive, I will keep updating as much as possible, As there is no point updating a dead thread.

Name: M.A.G ( Massive Action Game)

Genre: First Person Shooter

Platforms: PlayStation 3 Exclusive

Release Date: January 26, 2010

Rating: T For Teenager

Developer: Zipper Interactive

(Source: Gamespot, Wikipedia)

Story: The game begins in 2025. As time passes in our modern world, maintaining a full scale military becomes a burden. In a fully globalized world, the only security threat is from small scale rogue organizations against whom large forces are useless, and the fuel needed to supply increasingly mechanized armies becomes more costly. As a result, most nations armies decrease to the size necessary to defend against a "national emergency". Furthermore, under the "Millennium Accord", no nation's military is permitted to leave its own borders, officially creating world peace. In their place rise PMCs (Private Military Corporations). They have two advantages: first, they compete, lowering their cost, and second, they are allowed to work for anyone, anywhere. In an unregulated global economy, the companies soon compete by less than honest means. After enough mergers, bargains and buy-outs, however, the remaining PMCs decided to use their weapons to full use. The original attacks followed a simple plan; shoot their soldiers, supply goes down causing them to charge more and ultimately, they go out of business. (Source Wikipedia)


  • MAG Features 256 players in a game.
  • MAG Follows an Exp System.(Such as Call of duty 4)
  • MAG has customizible load outs(Load outs which you can customizable and then pick them in combat)
  • MAG Has a Command Level system, each 256 players are divided into 16 squad which is made up of 8 players and each squad is led by a squad leader, Each 4 squads make up a platoon which also has a Platoon leader, and 4 platoons make an Company.And the company has a leader. There is no penalty for no obeying squad leader, But there is an Exp bonus for each kill when obying him(Example: The squad leader tells you to take over a bunker, Any kills you make near the bunker will have a bonus exp)
  • MAG Is tactical, For example Defenders must defend a spawn point, If the attacking team takes over it they will be able to spawn there and advance easier. Or if the attackers destroy the Anti-Aircraft Battery they have the ability to call in a UAV.
  • You are able to drive an APCs, Tanks and (Not confirmed) Airplanes.
  • Everything your faction does even in this game, contributes to something called the shadow war


Shadow war(Note i would like to thank witham from the EU Playstation community for explaining this): "The Shadow War".The big thing to get your mind wrapped around on MAG is that there are no actions that are not caused by a real human player somewhere in the world. All the bullets, air strikes and foot steps are caused by the actions of other human players in the MAG. It is not like other first person shooter games where everyone is an computer controlled AI player with the exception of one or two humans. We are talking about absolutely everything in the battle is the direct result of human actions. If you are looking for a linear shoreline where AI driven characters hold your hand from point A to B you should go play a different game. This is war. It is a game that has been designed to be a real persistent place that does not die when you turn off your console. When you log on to the MAG you are assigned your battle and you do your part but the world will continue after you did your duty in the game that day. They are aiming to have MAG deliver persistent battles and immersive war zones with constantly evolving gameplay. Battles are designed in stages and certain events will change the flow of battle. For example once a bridge is repaired and the anti-aircraft batteries are destroyed it can enable a whole different part of the invasion.


Game Modes:

  • Domination(256 players): One team is the attacker and the other is the defender, Defender must defend objectives (Such as a bunker,Base,Anti-aircraft battery..Etc)for an amount of time, Attackers must destroy/capture the objectives and hold them long enough to win.
  • Acquisition (128 players): Escort type of game requiring attackers to steal two protoype transports from the other team and escape to the extraction point.
  • Sabotage (64 players): Attackers must infiltrate rival communication facilities and hold two control points at the same time - Once achieved, a final demolition objective is revealed and must be destroyed to win
  • Suppression (64 players): Basically a team deathmatch, Only mode that doesn't contribute to the shadow war.


The Private Military Companies.

Which one will you vow your life to?

Valor Company Inc.

Tough, Tactical, And experienced These soldiers are your traditional 21th century Military soldiers, equipped with the basic military gear, and now wage war with the other factions.

Teamwork is there Specialty. Choose this if you like Modern warfare type of feeling.

Valor uniform

(These are not limited but I'm just making a point)



Valor Weapons:

Valor seems to prefer Modern American guns.

  • M4A1:30 rds, Accurate Assault Rifle.
  • FN SCAR LW: 30 rds, currently in use by SEALs as a rugged and accurate assault rifle.
  • M249: 100-200 rds, Accurate LMG with fast fire rate.
  • colt 1911: 7 rds, standard medium power pistol.
  • AT4: single shot standard Rocket Launcher.
  • M14 EBR: 20 rds, Accurate Assault rifle, good stopping power at long range.



Raven

Raven is a highly financed Private military company, They own advance technology. They prefer skill and technology, but are also strictly discipline. Technology is there specialty. Choose this faction if you prefer Sci-fi type of feeling.


Raven uniforms.

Raven weapons

Raven prefers but are not limited to Pototype and new weapons, They are the first to use most weapons on the field.



  • AUGA3: 30 rds, Accurate, decent Assault Rifle.
  • MP7A1: 40 rds, Advanced SMG with high accuracy and low recoil.
  • L96AW: 5 rds, Extremely accurate long-range Sniper Rifle.
  • G3A3: 20 rds, Powerful and accurate Assault Rifle.
  • HK417: 20 rds, Powerful and accurate long-ranged assault rifle.
  • MG4: 100-200 rds, Accurate LMG with a fast fire rate.
  • Panzerfaust 3: Advanced, standard rocket launcher.
  • M870: 8 rds, Standard Pump Shotgun.
  • XM500: 5 rds, Bolt action .50 cal sniper rifle.
  • F2000: 30 rds, advanced assualt rifle with moderate accuracy.

S.V.E.R

(Seryi Volk Executive Response) SVER is a private military company, Formed by war torn countries, Mainly from the Middle east and Russia,They look Rebiliouse are considered an underdog by Raven and Valor. Experience is there Specialty. Choose these if you like Rebellious feeling.

S.V.E.R Soldiers

SVER Weapons.

SVER Seems to prefer but are not limited to Russian weapons of origin.


  • AN-94: 30 rds, long rang Assault Rifle with low recoil and good stopping power.
  • RPG: Rocket Launcher
  • Bizon: 64 rds, Accurate SMG.
  • PKP: 100 rds, Powerful LMG.
  • SVD: 10 rds, Decent semi-auto sniper rifle.
  • AEK-971: Accurate Russian Assault Rifle with VERY low recoil in Full Auto.
  • M870: 8 rds, Standard Pump Shotgun.
  • P90: 50 rds, Advanced SMG with low recoil.
  • AK103: 30 rds, Accurate assault rifle that uses the old Ak47 round.
  • Galil: 35 rds, A rugged assualt Rifle with decent accuracy.
  • RPK: 75 rds, Standard LMG.
  • Kriss Super V: 30 rds, An SMG that fires .45 cal and has low recoil.
  • SV-98: 10 rds, Accurate Russian sniper rifle that can use a silencer.
  • M82A3: 10 rds, Accurate Sniper rifle that is semi-auto and fires .50 cal
  • RG-6: 6 rds, semi-auto grenade launcher
  • F57: 20 rds, accurate pistol with excellent range and penetration.


Screenshots

Multiplayer hands on(gamespot)

Features Interview(gamespot)

Gameplay 1(Gamespot)

Gameplay 2(Gamespot)

Beta Impressions(Gamespot)

Sources: Gamespot,IGN,Wikipedia,Gamer's Guide to life,Google, MAG Forums(Good folks), Playstation 3 Forums, GameInformer.

Hoping for a sticky!(Not only Xbox360 Exclusives deserve one :P)

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

Avatar image for Cait__Sith
Cait__Sith

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Cait__Sith
Member since 2009 • 2326 Posts

Everyone said the beta was bad, I'll give it a shot but I'm not expecting much.

Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

JangoWuzHere
Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

krazy-blazer
Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?

Yes, but that does not make the game better honestly.
Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
[QUOTE="krazy-blazer"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

JangoWuzHere
Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?

Yes, but that does not make the game better honestly.

Which game is that?
Avatar image for Cait__Sith
Cait__Sith

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Cait__Sith
Member since 2009 • 2326 Posts
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="krazy-blazer"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?

Yes, but that does not make the game better honestly.

If done right it can. Take BF2 for example 64 players was a lot back in 2005 for a game as complex as BF2. But like I said if done right, which is not what I've heard about MAG.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

game looks horrifically boring, Ill pass on this game for sure.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="krazy-blazer"] Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?Cait__Sith
Yes, but that does not make the game better honestly.

If done right it can. Take BF2 for example 64 players was a lot back in 2005 for a game as complex as BF2. But like I said if done right, which is not what I've heard about MAG.

I didn't like BF2, Infact I only had BF2 installed because of Project Reality.
Avatar image for BURSTIIIFIRE
BURSTIIIFIRE

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BURSTIIIFIRE
Member since 2007 • 2025 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

krazy-blazer

Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?

lol is that your only argument....the number of players?? Please stop hyping this game your only setting your self up for disappointment (take my word for it i have played the beta)

Avatar image for Cait__Sith
Cait__Sith

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Cait__Sith
Member since 2009 • 2326 Posts

[QUOTE="Cait__Sith"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"] Yes, but that does not make the game better honestly.JangoWuzHere
If done right it can. Take BF2 for example 64 players was a lot back in 2005 for a game as complex as BF2. But like I said if done right, which is not what I've heard about MAG.

I didn't like BF2, Infact I only had BF2 installed because of Project Reality.

Well I don't like you!! :evil:...Wait you like PR?!?, I take that back your good.:)

Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts

[QUOTE="krazy-blazer"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

BURSTIIIFIRE

Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?

lol is that your only argument....the number of players?? Please stop hyping this game your only setting your self up for disappointment (take my word for it i have played the beat)

That isn't the only thing go read my thread then you would know.
Avatar image for HermitQ6600
HermitQ6600

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 HermitQ6600
Member since 2009 • 241 Posts

I see no point for a 100 players unless you know a 100 people

Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#14 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

most likely i would choose MW2 for my primary FPS games.

i played demo, and yeah it was good when i had a good squad leader, but it suced with bad leaders...

it lacks for 1v1v1 or free for all maps, yeah it sounds chaos, but it should be cool with 3 factions in the same game.

Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
And i have personally played the beta, or else i wouldn't have made this thread, Before i played the beta i thought it was a disappointment already.
Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
No not really, You just have to know 7 people to make up a squad. the other 100s of players will be in the other side with another objective.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#17 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50095 Posts
Not excited at all, judging by the beta... the game will be "meh". I'm expecting 6.0 here.
Avatar image for alstevens83
alstevens83

1462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 alstevens83
Member since 2008 • 1462 Posts

The game looks like a rental for myself

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
played the beta awhile back...found it very boring.
Avatar image for fighter91
fighter91

1293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 fighter91
Member since 2005 • 1293 Posts
mark my words guys the game will not get above a 7.5 from here.
Avatar image for Shad0ki11
Shad0ki11

12576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Shad0ki11
Member since 2006 • 12576 Posts

I thought MAG was awful based on my BETA experience. This game won't even be worth renting for me.

Avatar image for ForceFreeze
ForceFreeze

823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ForceFreeze
Member since 2008 • 823 Posts

I have not played the beta, but hey, it IS made by Zipper, so I do have faith that they would be able to pull off a 256-players multiplayer well.

Avatar image for lucky_star
lucky_star

2307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 lucky_star
Member since 2003 • 2307 Posts

I got invited to the beta.

Its not bad, its not superb either IMO, a bit too hectic for me, and i think i will be buying BC2 instead to satisfy my hunger for fps's.

Avatar image for Jake145222
Jake145222

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Jake145222
Member since 2009 • 230 Posts
MAG looks terrible. Even the ps3 owners are bashing it.
Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

JangoWuzHere

I don't know where you got this from. The presentation and visuals aren't that good, but the structure and gameplay feels top notch. This is a very teamwork-based game, and at the chaotic moments the game is a blast to play.

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
i played the beta i really dont see why ppl hype this game...
Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#28 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
[QUOTE="funsohng"]i played the beta i really dont see why ppl hype this game...

This isn't hyping the game This is giving information about the game, there is a difference.
Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
MAG is a Like it/Hate it game.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts
Unfortunately didnt have the chance to play in the Beta expect for a few of times at a friends house.. But the little i played was fun however i heard mixed opinions related to the beta experience, some being positive others not much.. I still plan in getting the game however am waiting for some more in depth previews / reviews while waiting to see how the game does in sales cause such a large scaled title is useless if there arent thousands (like 150k a day) of gamers playing it..
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
[QUOTE="funsohng"]i played the beta i really dont see why ppl hype this game...krazy-blazer
This isn't hyping the game This is giving information about the game, there is a difference.

i wasnt even talking about the OP....
Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#32 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
It looks fun enough. I'll wait for the reviews, though.
Avatar image for krazy-blazer
krazy-blazer

1759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 krazy-blazer
Member since 2009 • 1759 Posts
[QUOTE="krazy-blazer"][QUOTE="funsohng"]i played the beta i really dont see why ppl hype this game...funsohng
This isn't hyping the game This is giving information about the game, there is a difference.

i wasnt even talking about the OP....

Oh.ok.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#34 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I'm going to be honest, the beta wasn't that bad to me, I played several matches before I concluded that the game may get A at least, if not, something is wrong with the Socom developer Zipper.

I like Valor the most though, hope the game does well.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

The game had so many what were they thinking elements that I wonder why I was disappointed.

1. If they wanted to recreate a battlefield like experience why isn't there any flight elements, and why is it impossible to get into land vehicles. The whole point of a huge multiplayer game is to give the game an experience like you are in a big war which I never felt once. Battlefield had all of these features which shouldn't have been disregarded due to upping the player count

2. Why do they make the maps so huge. I wasn't fighting for half the game, I was basically running in which I had no idea where to go

3. THe hud is hideous and ugly. It is intrusive and has no use

I don't trust any person opinion on system wars because I have heard 10 dozen fanboys tell me uncharted 2/killzone 2 multiplayer is mediocre. And I felt like something must be wrong with them.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

I would have included airplanes, helicopters, tanks, transports, among other things.

Avatar image for brennan7777
brennan7777

3253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 brennan7777
Member since 2005 • 3253 Posts

I would have included airplanes, helicopters, tanks, transports, among other things.

nhh18

no vehicles?

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

I would have included airplanes, helicopters, tanks, transports, among other things.

brennan7777

no vehicles?

tanks but you are spawned in them. Can parachute too. But no vehicles besides that.

Avatar image for brennan7777
brennan7777

3253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 brennan7777
Member since 2005 • 3253 Posts

[QUOTE="brennan7777"]

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

I would have included airplanes, helicopters, tanks, transports, among other things.

nhh18

no vehicles?

tanks but you are spawned in them. Can parachute too. But no vehicles besides that.

Ouch that already means insta-fail.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

[QUOTE="nhh18"]

[QUOTE="brennan7777"] no vehicles?

brennan7777

tanks but you are spawned in them. Can parachute too. But no vehicles besides that.

Ouch that already means insta-fail.

Don't listen to some of the people here. It is by no means worse than conduit or haze. Which were 6.0, and 6.5. A 7.5 game if they don't fix alot of the problems in the beta. Probably be AA. And then you will hear cows claim ownage because some people only think black and white in terms of games. At least system wars.

Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

graphics were no worse than Quake wars or Resistance 2. That is also fanboy nonsense.

Avatar image for xsalvioutlawx
xsalvioutlawx

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 xsalvioutlawx
Member since 2007 • 423 Posts

I thought MAG was awful based on my BETA experience. This game won't even be worth renting for me.

Shad0ki11

Bingo!

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
I don't own a PS3 but even if I did I'd find it hard to get excited about any shooter coming out early next year considering the amount of them I've played in the past few months, and the amount of interesting non FPS games coming out in Q1
Avatar image for wehertn
wehertn

1469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 wehertn
Member since 2003 • 1469 Posts

groundbreaking piece of junk

Avatar image for ksko
ksko

509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ksko
Member since 2007 • 509 Posts

iam in all the way,shame that this game doesnt have alot of supporters on gamespot.

to people that liked the beta check out forums.mag.com everybody that supports mag is there.

psn: omez

TC thanks for the thread , will be following :)

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

NO.

I played the beta for quite a bit, and went through many patches. and surfice to say i am not impressed the game just wasn't that good it didn't bring any thing really new to the table, it wasn't really 256 player battles it was 8 person squads againest 8 person squads with very little interaction between other squads with other squads at most it would be 16 on 16.

Zipper interactive needs to get their act together when it comes to patching let alone the fact playstation network totally blows when it comes to this.... *come on it doesn't take long to download a patch and install it but even outside the game the patching often took 30 minutes or longer* the in game patching was stupid with the first couple of patchings taking near 9 hours or longer to finish and then ending of up never finishing...It sucks to get on the game have to download a patch and end up having to wait 9 hours to come back later to see it has frozen at 89% and when you restart it it truely restarts and doesn't resume, this did get better later but the last patch i downloaded still took upwards of 3 hours.

Graphically the game was onpar with halo 2
Gameplay it brought nothing new really

another problem with patching is the game just didn't seem to get better quite alot of stuff just remaind in the game regardless of weither we beta testers complained about it...which makes one think they were so ingrained in the game a total rebuild would be needed to get rid of them.
Surfice to say the game had a long way to go when the beta ended...I don't see it being even remotely complete when the full product is released and its specially not worth 60 dollars for an online fps alone even if it was fixed by release date.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#47 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18103 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I have heard nothing but negative feedback from the beta. Does not sound like a game that deserves hype.

krazy-blazer

Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?

Planetside did 999 players on a single map years ago, had more vehicles than MAG, and even had air vehicles.

Seeing a dozen Galaxy Air Transports with 40 or so Reaver and Mosquito escorts flying alongside make their troop drops over an embattled base surrounded by Vanguard heavy tanks, Lightning light tanks, hundreds of troops running around and ANT vehicles trying to break the blockade to refuel the base before its power was gone was a sight to behold...in 2003.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

I was going to buy it right off the get go but I've heard a lot of negativity surround the game so I'm going to hold off and wait for some reviews and get people's opinions on it before I drop the money for it

Avatar image for Racer850
Racer850

2293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 Racer850
Member since 2009 • 2293 Posts
My friends on PSN, and people on here have done nothing but give negative feedback on the beta.
Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#50 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

7.0 at most