M.A.G Offical Thread! (56k) Groundbreaking Ps3 Exclusive!

Had it preordered, played the beta, canceled my preorder.

Not looking forward to MAG at all.

is just don't see it taking off. the PS3 is more of a single player console. the online numbers for uncharted 2 back that up.

also the name MAG has to rank up with the worst names ever. MAG

Game looked terrible. Tried the BETA, was not good (not horrible, not there are definitely better shooters). Bad Company 2 BETA was much better. This coming from me should say I a lot.

I'm the same person who said there was OBVIOUSLY going to be a PS3 Slim (like 100% certain ) and I was right about that.

I looked my first 5 minutes of Uncharted 2 gameplay (warzone demo) and called it to be the best game of the year, that's all I needed.

I said that AC II will probably be amazing and it I've been hearing it is (huge improvement they made over the first, which I wasn't a fun game IMO).

Conclusion: I know my s*** and I can recognize great games or bad games. Just take my word.

is just don't see it taking off. the PS3 is more of a single player console. the online numbers for uncharted 2 back that up.

also the name MAG has to rank up with the worst names ever. MAG

wayne_kar

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"]

is just don't see it taking off. the PS3 is more of a single player console. the online numbers for uncharted 2 back that up.

also the name MAG has to rank up with the worst names ever. MAG

mD-

"groundbreaking".... lulz

What would be awesome is if they made the battles regional; Like NA vs. EU or SE USA vs. NE USA. That might would add a more competitive spirit to the game. Idk, I haven't played the beta, but it seems to be getting bashed for all sorts of reasons. :?

Ill wait for some reviews, not really hyped about this one yet.. If its anything like warhawk Ill love it. But I cant help thinking its going to be a grenade frag fest all the time.

[QUOTE="mD-"][QUOTE="wayne_kar"]

is just don't see it taking off. the PS3 is more of a single player console. the online numbers for uncharted 2 back that up.

also the name MAG has to rank up with the worst names ever. MAG

wayne_kar

Yes it's going to be revolutionary :lol:

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"][QUOTE="mD-"] Ok, you don't know the online numbers for Uncharted 2. The amount of players you see online represent the amount in a server.mitu123

When it was first announce, I was really excited, first day purchase guranteed. Then I started hearing more, which decreased my interest. Unless something amazing is announced, this will not be a first day purchase (unless it's 39.99 like online only games Warhawk and Socom).

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"][QUOTE="mD-"] Ok, you don't know the online numbers for Uncharted 2. The amount of players you see online represent the amount in a server.mitu123

well considering the number of people who use PSN is in the same ballpark as XBL AND there are a bunch of games that have 32 player online or more doesnt really mean one game can speak for the whole comunity

Holy crap @ the poll. Man, if this is any indication, this game will absolutely bomb in sales. I remember when this was a shining beacon for all the "bigger is better" repeaters.

It looks ****, cows are hyping this because of the number of players. That's it, and it isn't enough.

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="krazy-blazer"] Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?Cait__Sith

It's not the number of players that holds MAG back. It's the underwhelming gameplay.

Unless they work on balancing and fix up some minor issues, this game could be great. Worth paying $60 for? Hell no. Now PS3 fanboy should be allowed to list this game as part of their 2010 lineup. After all the bashing of ODST for being an overpriced expansion, MAG is so much worse. $60 for a multiplayer only game? It'll be dead when Zipper's next game comes out, and if it's SOCOM 4 as rumored, MAG would be useless.

I would replace the word groundbreaking with lackluster. I wish Zipper would just stick to making SOCOM.

I imagine every round of this game will be like one of those horrible rounds in BF2 or 2142 where no one really gives a ****. But I could be wrong.....

While 256 players sounds like it would be awesome, I'm guessing that stumbling upon a full match would be a very rare occurrence (although I haven't played the beta so feel free to prove me wrong).

sitting right next to quantum on the list of games there is literally no reason to care about

i got the beta and i was hyped for this game... untill i played it. its just sooo bad.

I would replace the word groundbreaking with lackluster. I wish Zipper would just stick to making SOCOM.

tbone802

True. The beta was very bad imo. I first though that it was going to be great, tons of stuff to unlock, cool leveling system. But all the fun wears off 1 shot at a time.

Its not graphics, its not the massive update of over 2 gigs, its not the bad game finding option.

Its the gameplay. That can't be fixed in such a short time.

MAG sucks. i want SOCOM 4

It looks ****, cows are hyping this because of the number of players. That's it, and it isn't enough.

dommeus

It was a good try, thats all I have to say.

It was a good try, thats all I have to say.

destro123

i will agree.

not a bad idea but the game just sucks

looks like they got so concerned with the technical aspects of the game on how to make the game run with 256, and how to make the gameplay organized they forgot to insert the fun

wont the game fall apart without mics?

I don't see anything groundbreaking about it, unless you consider the fact that it's really, really, MASSIVE to be groundbreaking. It just seems like a bunch of moronic **** waving to me.

Besides, I would feel like an idiot playing something with a name as blatantly stupid as "Massive Action Game".