Many people here trying pretty hard to convince us that the PS3 is successful

  • 173 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for coltsfan4ever
coltsfan4ever

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 coltsfan4ever
Member since 2006 • 2628 Posts

I find it funny when people compare the PS3 to the PS2, I mean the current price of the PS3 is what the PS2 launched at (i think, i remember buying my ps2 for 400+tax). On top of the fact its only been 2 years. (obviously their not gonna get the same market share as they did last gen, when they basically had no competition). But the PS3 rate of sale since launch has been the same as the 360's even with a $$ premium (albeit so was the xbox's when compared with the ps2) but the ps3 is sustaining it, so I don't see what the big deal is.

At the end of the day, I get to turn on my ps3 and have fun with it, and thats all that matters. navstar29

The ps2 launched at $299.99. At least in North America.

Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#102 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts

[QUOTE="Giancar"]and the game in your avatar?TheNextOrder

sad to have to resort to calling out my avatar

No, sad that you call other people out on being "sad", and look at you...
Avatar image for DonMarkito
DonMarkito

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 DonMarkito
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts
Do you know why they are ALOT of cows aka PS3 Fanboys here? Because they are already bored of their PS3, instinct of trying to get money to buy another console they are there in SW trying to convince everyone to buy one so there would be more people on psn to play with :P
Avatar image for Rza_rectah
Rza_rectah

3959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 Rza_rectah
Member since 2005 • 3959 Posts
[QUOTE="coltsfan4ever"]

[QUOTE="navstar29"]I find it funny when people compare the PS3 to the PS2, I mean the current price of the PS3 is what the PS2 launched at (i think, i remember buying my ps2 for 400+tax). On top of the fact its only been 2 years. (obviously their not gonna get the same market share as they did last gen, when they basically had no competition). But the PS3 rate of sale since launch has been the same as the 360's even with a $$ premium (albeit so was the xbox's when compared with the ps2) but the ps3 is sustaining it, so I don't see what the big deal is.

At the end of the day, I get to turn on my ps3 and have fun with it, and thats all that matters.

The ps2 launched at $299.99. At least in North America.

it was like 399.99 or 349.99 here in Canada i believe.
Avatar image for Ultramarine777
Ultramarine777

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#105 Ultramarine777
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts

Do you know why they are ALOT of cows aka PS3 Fanboys here? Because they are already bored of their PS3, instinct of trying to get money to buy another console they are there in SW trying to convince everyone to buy one so there would be more people on psn to play with :PDonMarkito

Actually http://www.joystiq.com/2009/02/25/sony-psn-accounts-surpass-20-million-worldwide/

Please if your going to post something then atleast try to be right or have some proof.:)

Avatar image for DonMarkito
DonMarkito

455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 DonMarkito
Member since 2008 • 455 Posts

[QUOTE="DonMarkito"]Do you know why they are ALOT of cows aka PS3 Fanboys here? Because they are already bored of their PS3, instinct of trying to get money to buy another console they are there in SW trying to convince everyone to buy one so there would be more people on psn to play with :PUltramarine777

Actually http://www.joystiq.com/2009/02/25/sony-psn-accounts-surpass-20-million-worldwide/

Please if your going to post something then atleast try to be right or have some proof.:)

Don't forget that many people creat multiple PSN accounts and even if people don't, PSN is bored as hell, barely no one use mics, feeling playing with bots -_-
Avatar image for coltsfan4ever
coltsfan4ever

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 coltsfan4ever
Member since 2006 • 2628 Posts

these threads make me :lol:

cmon guys, lets take a break for a minute and look what sony's intention was with the Ps3

they tried to fix the flaws of the Ps2, which was the weakest system, by making the Ps3 a technical powerhouse. they also wanted to make the hardware reliable, unlike the Ps2's hardware, so they did. Doing so, they sacrificed the cheapness of the Ps2 and put out a $600 console. It doesn't really matter that the Ps2 sold 150 million units, because 150 million people aren't going to shell $600 more out for another console. I mean cmon, you guys wanted more shooters on the Ps2 last gen, and now that we have shooters, everyone's complaining that there are TOO MANY shooters. From my perspective, sony catered to the fans this gen. and they're doing a fine job of that. I bought Ps3 for exculsives, and so far they've all been top notch (the ones ive played, so no BUT LAIR!!!), as the hardware has been as well.

you don't think sony knew they had to sacrifice some sales for quality? sure, the sales have been disapointing, sure we didnt need bluray, but we got them. the sales aren't bad, they are good for such an expensive machine, they are DISAPOINTING though.

but who cares? time in and time out, we get quality games from sony, isnt that what matters? now that the Ps3 has games, i guess we have to undermine that with sales right?

Mr_Apple_Soup

Excellent post. Sony absolutely knew they were taking a huge gamble when they released the ps3 at $600 and with an unproven tech like blu ray. I applaud them for having the balls to do something like that. Out of every company I trust Sony's strategy the most with their console. The PS3 may not come out on top this gen but Blu Ray has been established and that was the most important thing for Sony to capitalize on this gen.

Avatar image for whybuyaxbox360
whybuyaxbox360

1774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 whybuyaxbox360
Member since 2006 • 1774 Posts

yet despite all of those sales figues......its the ONLY system getting good games.....:lol: LBP,MGS4,Killzone,resistance 2,etc. while x360 is sstill stuck on gears and halo 3.....and the wii with smash and metroid...

Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts

these threads make me :lol:

cmon guys, lets take a break for a minute and look what sony's intention was with the Ps3

they tried to fix the flaws of the Ps2, which was the weakest system, by making the Ps3 a technical powerhouse. they also wanted to make the hardware reliable, unlike the Ps2's hardware, so they did. Doing so, they sacrificed the cheapness of the Ps2 and put out a $600 console. It doesn't really matter that the Ps2 sold 150 million units, because 150 million people aren't going to shell $600 more out for another console. I mean cmon, you guys wanted more shooters on the Ps2 last gen, and now that we have shooters, everyone's complaining that there are TOO MANY shooters. From my perspective, sony catered to the fans this gen. and they're doing a fine job of that. I bought Ps3 for exculsives, and so far they've all been top notch (the ones ive played, so no BUT LAIR!!!), as the hardware has been as well.

you don't think sony knew they had to sacrifice some sales for quality? sure, the sales have been disapointing, sure we didnt need bluray, but we got them. the sales aren't bad, they are good for such an expensive machine, they are DISAPOINTING though.

but who cares? time in and time out, we get quality games from sony, isnt that what matters? now that the Ps3 has games, i guess we have to undermine that with sales right?

Mr_Apple_Soup
/thread as far as I'm concerned. The fact that lems are scrambling to discredit PS3 these days with more and more flimsy logic is very telling about how much of a shift in PERCEPTION the PS3 has undergone. They had to stop using "the PS3 has no games" so it's "the PS3 has no sales", and you will NEVER find a lemming who will admit that the 360 even had a year head-start, let alone that that head-start could affect overall sales. They damage control that one with "well people EXPECTED it to sell 60 million on day one!" or some other speculative claim that nobody could possibly prove.
Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

tbh i see more people in here trying to convince others the PS3 is a failure, TC is a clear example..

If I was 1 of Sony's directors i wouldnt be happy with the PS3 sales, but i still would be happy knowing Blu-ray which was obviously implemented in the PS3 to help the format gain popularity is now the lead HD format and will be like that for many years to come... If i was a director i would also be happy that now Ps3 is having good sales and has now a strong install base... If i was a Sony's director i'd probably enjoy my extremely HIGH salary and not waiste my time in forums..

However am only a gamer who loves spending a huge part of his free time playing videogames.. thus having owned my PS3 for nearly 2 yrs i definately cannot say its a failure..

- Powerful /Reliable hardware? Check

- Good online service? check

- Free online service? Check

- Great exclusive titles? Check

- Great Multiplats? Check

- Some visually impressive games? Check

- Original/Fun PSN titles? Check

- Blu-ray player? Check

- Many multimedia functions? Check

well if having all the above is considered a Failure.... then i am happy to be a failed gamer owning a failure of a console :)

Avatar image for kendrene
kendrene

464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#112 kendrene
Member since 2008 • 464 Posts

yet despite all of those sales figues......its the ONLY system getting good games.....:lol: LBP,MGS4,Killzone,resistance 2,etc. while x360 is sstill stuck on gears and halo 3.....and the wii with smash and metroid...

whybuyaxbox360

Aside from LBP the others are just "more of the same" kind of games with better graphics. And I am saying it for both ps3 and 360

Avatar image for Ultramarine777
Ultramarine777

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#113 Ultramarine777
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultramarine777"]

[QUOTE="DonMarkito"]Do you know why they are ALOT of cows aka PS3 Fanboys here? Because they are already bored of their PS3, instinct of trying to get money to buy another console they are there in SW trying to convince everyone to buy one so there would be more people on psn to play with :PDonMarkito

Actually http://www.joystiq.com/2009/02/25/sony-psn-accounts-surpass-20-million-worldwide/

Please if your going to post something then atleast try to be right or have some proof.:)

Don't forget that many people creat multiple PSN accounts and even if people don't, PSN is bored as hell, barely no one use mics, feeling playing with bots -_-

Well that could be true but it is not. I have many mates with PS3 and they play it all the time. So if you had proof as I did then maybe I would believe you a little more.

Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"]

No you're wrong. KZ2 doesn't own the whole Wii lineup, especially when you have SMG and Brawl in that list.

SpinoRaptor24



you proved my point by posting 2 mario games...

And those 2 Mario games both outscored and outsold KZ2.

So there.



yeah but if you're gonna argue with me don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in those
that's why gamecube sold so little...

Avatar image for navstar29
navstar29

4036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 navstar29
Member since 2004 • 4036 Posts

[QUOTE="navstar29"]I find it funny when people compare the PS3 to the PS2, I mean the current price of the PS3 is what the PS2 launched at (i think, i remember buying my ps2 for 400+tax). On top of the fact its only been 2 years. (obviously their not gonna get the same market share as they did last gen, when they basically had no competition). But the PS3 rate of sale since launch has been the same as the 360's even with a $$ premium (albeit so was the xbox's when compared with the ps2) but the ps3 is sustaining it, so I don't see what the big deal is.

At the end of the day, I get to turn on my ps3 and have fun with it, and thats all that matters. coltsfan4ever

The ps2 launched at $299.99. At least in North America.

\ Maybe I should have specified Canada, my bad, but in Canada it was 399.99 at launch. Or atleast thats what I payed :S.
Avatar image for kingdre
kingdre

9456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 kingdre
Member since 2005 • 9456 Posts

It meets my gaming needs. It IS a success.

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]yeah but if you're gonna argue with me don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in those that's why gamecube sold so little...

Or why the NES, SNES, N64 sold so great? And yeah Mario and Zelda has sold much more than Killzone, so way more people have interest in those games. I'm not sure where you're going with this, chief.
Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]yeah but if you're gonna argue with me don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in those that's why gamecube sold so little...AlexSays
Or why the NES, SNES, N64 sold so great? And yeah Mario and Zelda has sold much more than Killzone, so way more people have interest in those games. I'm not sure where you're going with this, chief.




I don't remember N64 outselling PSX, you got any proof of that?

Avatar image for whybuyaxbox360
whybuyaxbox360

1774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 whybuyaxbox360
Member since 2006 • 1774 Posts
[QUOTE="kendrene"]

[QUOTE="whybuyaxbox360"]

yet despite all of those sales figues......its the ONLY system getting good games.....:lol: LBP,MGS4,Killzone,resistance 2,etc. while x360 is sstill stuck on gears and halo 3.....and the wii with smash and metroid...

Aside from LBP the others are just "more of the same" kind of games with better graphics. And I am saying it for both ps3 and 360

LOL yes because MGS4 got a 10 cuz its more of the same....i can understand resistance and kill zone but MGS4 is not more of the same....sorry.
Avatar image for jjenkins78x
jjenkins78x

751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 jjenkins78x
Member since 2009 • 751 Posts

[QUOTE="whybuyaxbox360"]

yet despite all of those sales figues......its the ONLY system getting good games.....:lol: LBP,MGS4,Killzone,resistance 2,etc. while x360 is sstill stuck on gears and halo 3.....and the wii with smash and metroid...

kendrene

Aside from LBP the others are just "more of the same" kind of games with better graphics. And I am saying it for both ps3 and 360

There are very few games that can't be called "more of the same" these days so if thats your criteria for writing a game off you are going to miss a ton of greatness.
Avatar image for Warzone876
Warzone876

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Warzone876
Member since 2009 • 171 Posts

LOL , Hey TC ,you want to know whats not a success? Madworld. An overrated Wii game with crappy excuse for graphics and a short lazy single player.

PS3 is a success considering it cost about $600 and still sold a big amount.:lol:

Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts

[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"]

And those 2 Mario games both outscored and outsold KZ2.

So there.

Rhubarb9



yeah but if you're gonna argue with me don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in those
that's why gamecube sold so little...

so what does that make killzone 2?

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts
I don't remember N64 outselling PSX, you got any proof of that?Rhubarb9
Ah, so you quickly realized you weren't going anywhere with the "Killzone more popular than Mario" thing so you jumped ship. Good idea, chief. And a console doesn't have to sell better than the competition to sell great. ;)
Avatar image for whybuyaxbox360
whybuyaxbox360

1774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 whybuyaxbox360
Member since 2006 • 1774 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]I don't remember N64 outselling PSX, you got any proof of that?AlexSays
Ah, so you quickly realized you weren't going anywhere with the "Killzone more popular than Mario" thing so you jumped ship. Good idea, chief. And a console doesn't have to sell better than the competition to sell great. ;)

lol chief
Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]I don't remember N64 outselling PSX, you got any proof of that?AlexSays
Ah, so you quickly realized you weren't going anywhere with the "Killzone more popular than Mario" thing so you jumped ship. Good idea, chief. And a console doesn't have to sell better than the competition to sell great. ;)

I never said killzone 2 was more popular than Mario, where are you pulling stuff from?

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts
I never said killzone 2 was more popular than Mario, where are you pulling stuff from?Rhubarb9
You should read what you type sometime.
don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in thoseRhubarb9
That is where I pulled that from. People don't have interest in Mario, but they do in Killzone? Which is why Mario runs circles around Killzone in sales, popularity, everything? How exactly does that work?
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#127 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]I never said killzone 2 was more popular than Mario, where are you pulling stuff from?AlexSays
You should read what you type sometime.
don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in thoseRhubarb9
That is where I pulled that from. People don't have interest in Mario, but they do in Killzone? Which is why Mario runs circles around Killzone in sales, popularity, everything? How exactly does that work?

All he said was that a lot of people aren't a slightest bit interested in mario or zelda, which is true as I'm one if them. However the same can easily be said for any other game.
Avatar image for stayhigh1
stayhigh1

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 stayhigh1
Member since 2008 • 724 Posts

If the PS3 was actually successful I doubt there would be so many here trying to convince us that it was.

Lets look at the facts:

1. PS3 last place in hardware sales. Went from first place to last place. How sad.

2. PS3 has lost Sony's gaming division billions of dollars

3.PS3 has lost Sony 80% of their marketshare following the almighty PS2last generation

You see... this is the reason why so many have spent this entire generation trying to spin and manufacture reasons why they think PS3 is a success. Because all the facts that matter point to it being a failure. Sorry.

TheNextOrder
Sony is only like 6 million behind and thats a failure..You do know the PS3 still have a big chance to catch up..If the 360 is so cheap and got the right games..Why is it not selling like the PS2? I expect the 360 to be at like the 30 million mark right now..but no ones want faulty hardware and everyone is waiting for another big price drop on the PS3..
Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#129 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

If Sony is making a profit off the PS3 then it can be considered successufl.

Avatar image for Lab392
Lab392

6217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Lab392
Member since 2006 • 6217 Posts

Many people here trying pretty hard to justify their purchases.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#131 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
[QUOTE="TheNextOrder"]

If the PS3 was actually successful I doubt there would be so many here trying to convince us that it was.

Lets look at the facts:

1. PS3 last place in hardware sales. Went from first place to last place. How sad.

2. PS3 has lost Sony's gaming division billions of dollars

3.PS3 has lost Sony 80% of their marketshare following the almighty PS2last generation

You see... this is the reason why so many have spent this entire generation trying to spin and manufacture reasons why they think PS3 is a success. Because all the facts that matter point to it being a failure. Sorry.

stayhigh1
Sony is only like 6 million behind and thats a failure..You do know the PS3 still have a big chance to catch up..If the 360 is so cheap and got the right games..Why is it not selling like the PS2? I expect the 360 to be at like the 30 million mark right now..but no ones want faulty hardware and everyone is waiting for another big price drop on the PS3..

Negative not everyone is waiting for a price drop, change that to a lot.
Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]I never said killzone 2 was more popular than Mario, where are you pulling stuff from?AlexSays
You should read what you type sometime.
don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in thoseRhubarb9
That is where I pulled that from. People don't have interest in Mario, but they do in Killzone? Which is why Mario runs circles around Killzone in sales, popularity, everything? How exactly does that work?

and PSX and PS2 ran circles around N64 and GC in sales, popularity and everything

PS3 lineup completley owns wii lineup and even KZ2 alone pwns it if you're not one of those 8 million hardcore sheep in love with mario/zelda
so I don't understand what you're trying to pull and from where.

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts

and PSX and PS2 ran circles around N64 and GC in sales, popularity and everything

PS3 lineup completley owns wii lineup and even KZ2 alone pwns it if you're not one of those 8 million hardcore sheep in love with mario/zelda
so I don't understand what you're trying to pull and from where.

Rhubarb9

lol

You're turning this into something completely different because you know you weren't going anywhere.

More people are interested in Mario and Zelda, rather than Killzone 2.

That is a fact, and you were wrong.

Can you accept that or are you just going to keep on bringing up articles of discussion not related to the debate at hand?

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#134 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38065 Posts
Well I happen to agree with the TC. It's true, no matter what color you paint it, the PS3 has been a turd for Sony corp. Aside from helping establish Blu ray over HD dvd, it's a money pit. And who says bluray will beat digital ownership in the long run anyway? I love playing good games on my PS3 but, as far as calling it a success, all you have to do is look at the shape of it's maker.
Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#135 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

Many people here trying pretty hard to justify their purchases.

Lab392

Indeed, each one simply jealous of what the other has that they don't. Fanboy wars at it's finest.

Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]

and PSX and PS2 ran circles around N64 and GC in sales, popularity and everything

PS3 lineup completley owns wii lineup and even KZ2 alone pwns it if you're not one of those 8 million hardcore sheep in love with mario/zelda
so I don't understand what you're trying to pull and from where.

AlexSays

lol

You're turning this into something completely different because you know you weren't going anywhere.

More people are interested in Mario and Zelda, rather than Killzone 2.

That is a fact, and you were wrong.

Can you accept that or are you just going to keep on bringing up articles of discussion not related to the debate at hand?


ok lets go on topic

if N64 was succesful selling put trashed against PSX
why can't PS3 be succesfull selling while not being nr1?
care to elaborate this?

I'm also wondering if you know good games can sell bad and bad games can sell well
wii games are a perfect example of this

Avatar image for njean777
njean777

3807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 njean777
Member since 2007 • 3807 Posts



you proved my point by posting 2 mario games...

And those 2 Mario games both outscored and outsold KZ2.

So there.

I hope they outsold Killzone 2 as the wii audience is nearly double the audience of the ps3. .

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts


ok lets go on topic

if N64 was succesful selling put trashed against PSX
why can't PS3 be succesfull selling while not being nr1?
care to elaborate this?

I'm also wondering if you know good games can sell bad and bad games can sell well
wii games are a perfect example of this

Rhubarb9

Killzone was not on the PSX.

You said more people were interested in Killzone than Mario and Zelda.

Provide proof for this, please.

Nothing you just posted has anything to do with the popularity of Killzone, Mario, or Zelda.

Hey, if you have to, just say it was a bad choice of wording on your part and we can let this whole thing go. ;)

Avatar image for sam280992
sam280992

3754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#139 sam280992
Member since 2007 • 3754 Posts
As long as I get my games and God of War 3. I am content. :)
Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]
ok lets go on topic

if N64 was succesful selling put trashed against PSX
why can't PS3 be succesfull selling while not being nr1?
care to elaborate this?

I'm also wondering if you know good games can sell bad and bad games can sell well
wii games are a perfect example of this

AlexSays

Killzone was not on the PSX.

You said more people were interested in Killzone than Mario and Zelda.

Provide proof for this, please.

Nothing you just posted has anything to do with the popularity of Killzone, Mario, or Zelda.

Hey, if you have to, just say it was a bad choice of wording on your part and we can let this whole thing go. ;)



all I said was alot of people aren't intrested in mario/Zelda
getting desperate much?

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts

all I said was alot of people aren't intrested in mario/Zelda

getting desperate much?Rhubarb9

Ah, you implied Killzone was more popular than Mario and Zelda.

And I said that's wrong.

Especially when way more people care about those franchises, instead of your beloved KIllzone.

I'm not sure how I can be desperate when you're the one grasping for straws, chief.

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts

You lack reading comprehension? I said it trashed the whole wii's lineup unless you're a hardcore mario/zelda fanRhubarb9

Ah, see it's hard to argue with someone who doesn't read what they post.

don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in thoseRhubarb9

You brought this up in direct comparisons to Killzone.

You said people have no interest in Mario or Zelda but they do in Killzone.

Now we both know that is wrong, and has been proven, so can we move on with our lives, or are you going to continue denying what you posted?

Avatar image for Rhubarb9
Rhubarb9

2352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Rhubarb9
Member since 2006 • 2352 Posts

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]You lack reading comprehension? I said it trashed the whole wii's lineup unless you're a hardcore mario/zelda fanAlexSays

Ah, see it's hard to argue with someone who doesn't read what they post.

don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in thoseRhubarb9

You brought this up in direct comparisons to Killzone.

You said people have no interest in Mario or Zelda but they do in Killzone.

Now we both know that is wrong, and has been proven, so can we move on with our lives, or are you going to continue denying what you posted?

I never directly compared mario/zelda with KZ2
can you read btw?

Avatar image for AlexSays
AlexSays

6612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 AlexSays
Member since 2008 • 6612 Posts
I never directly compared mario/zelda with KZ2Rhubarb9
Seriously?
[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"]No you're wrong. KZ2 doesn't own the whole Wii lineup, especially when you have SMG and Brawl in that list.Rhubarb9
you proved my point by posting 2 mario games...

You never compared Mario and Killzone? How do you say one game "owns" another without comparing?
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

[QUOTE="Rockman999"]It's no different from Lems considering Halo and GeOW good and sheep with Mario(definition of Shallow).Bigboi500

I strongly disagree with that statement. Mario games are no more shallow than games like Halo and GeoW or GoW. What makes you think Mario is any different?

I mean think about it, in Halo you are trying to save the world from aliens (cliched, over-used and tired scenario), you start at one end of a map and work your way to a destination, you use weapons to destroy an enemy and get upgrades along the way.

Gears of War same thing. You are trying to save the world from aliens (cliched, over-used and tired scenario), you start at one end of a level and work your way to a destination, you use weapons to destroy an enemy and get upgrades along the way.

God of War similar scenario, you are out for revenge against a terrible wrong and betrayal against you (cliched, over-used and tired scenario), you start at one end of...sheesh do you get the picture yet? Mario games have the same basic goals and scenarios, save the princess blah blah blah, kill enemies blah blah blah, get more powerful weapons to destroy enemies in a better way blah blah blah. See the similarities?

Saying one is shallow because you prefer another companies characters, weapons, etc. is just the same old fanboy talk that gets regurgitated over and over again, how very boring.

Ok maybe I was a little hard on Mario but thats because of a personal dislike towards the series I've held since I played the first one not fanboyism.I just always found Mario games boring and tedious.
Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts

I never directly compared mario/zelda with KZ2
can you read btw?

Rhubarb9

yes you did:

yeah but if you're gonna argue with me (about killzone 2)don't bring up mario/zelda cause many people have no interest in those
that's why gamecube sold so little...

Rhubarb9

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

[QUOTE="AlexSays"]

[QUOTE="Rhubarb9"]all I said was alot of people aren't intrested in mario/Zelda

getting desperate much?Rhubarb9

Ah, you implied Killzone was more popular than Mario and Zelda.

And I said that's wrong.

Especially when way more people care about those franchises, instead of your beloved KIllzone.

I'm not sure how I can be desperate when you're the one grasping for straws, chief.



You lack reading comprehension? I said it trashed the whole wii's lineup unless you're a hardcore mario/zelda fan
it seems you're making up stuff and this is really getting pitiful, chief.

Lulz, KZ2 trashes the whole wii line up? That's funny, KZ2 is good but no one game trashes anothers line up. Especially when those Mario and Zelda games out rank it by quite a bit.