Mass Effect 3, Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim & Dragon age 2 Multiplayer?

Well because of Demon Souls and Fable we all know MP can be done well on an RPG and it's really what made me play DS so long. How many would be oposed to MP on ME 3, Dragon age 2 and Skyrim?

MP on Mass effect 3 might be difficult because of the shear mechanics and time slowing abilitys, but I see no reason not to add MP to Skyrim or DA 2 especially Skyrim DAO was meh.... and I might not pick it up.

For Skyrim tho they should definitely have MP they could do somthing like Two Worlds 2 except you know do it good.

As long as it doesn't hurt the SP.

skyrim is a complete open world so if u could have some sort of co-op were u and ur friend r both in the same world and could do quest indiviual or toggether in this worl and buy houses in the same game world it would be awsome

I'd go with 'None of the Above'.

Slashkice

This. There's more than enough great multiplayer games out there these days, why would you want to potentially ruin a few of the remaining single player only games by tacking on a shoddy multiplayer component.

I'd go with 'None of the Above'.

Slashkice

you are spot on i hate online mp that is forced into sp games.

if they want multiplayer let them stick to cod

As long as it doesn't hurt the SP.

freedomfreak

I would vote none of the above, multiplayer based games usually lack great sp, unless it did not feel like an afterthought but only for Elder Scrolls. The other two games incorporate pause play which would be annoying for multiplayer.

I dont want multiplayer in Mass Effect 3 or Skyrim, so I went with DA2 because I don't care about that game:P

I allways harp on about how Multiplayer works well in RPG's but I allways seem to get **** by angry old school PC RPG fanatics :P !

Hell no. I'm sick of developers tacking on multiplayer to what should be single player only experiences. Allicrombie

None

I'd go with 'None of the Above'.

Slashkice

Same.

Don't give a damn about MP in that sort of game; just not interesting.

None of the above.

None

None. RPGs should never have multiplayer.

If you mean multiplayer like in demons souls, integrated into the single player, I don't think I'd like to see other galaxy saviors, Shepards running around me. A total immersion breaker. Only because it works on demons souls doesn't mean it can work in every other game.

Although it may work in Skyrim. Elder scrolls games have always been about you making your own story so playing with others would be kinda fun actually.

None of the above. please don't destroy my precious Skyrim and ME3!

All would suffer from multiplayer.

ME3: Would suffer the least. However the multiplayer would also not be necessary either. Just a waste of resources. Mass Effect 1+2's AI was horrible and having a player play as a companion might make it the experience somewhat. Still, a waste of resources overall.
ESV: At this time, I would rather have them fix everything that worries me right now about Skyrim (and that is a long list), than to tack on some multiplayer that will probably be abandoned after a month, since the PC versions are so heavily modding dephendant that will cause a lot of problems for PC users. Also you are the LAST Dragonborn, there are no other dragonborns on the story. Waste of resources and goes against the design in the series.
DA2: Baldur's Gate series and Neverwinter Nights had multiplayer. I recall DAO was going to have it as well, but the devs scrapped that later on... I wonder why.

I thought the multiplayer components in Demons Souls were horrible and after I while, I plugged off internet connection whenever I would play DS.

None. RPGs should never have multiplayer.

brickdoctor

You do realize that the first (and some of the best) Roleplaying Games were built around playing with other people.

Co-op

I'm gonna go with Option 5 "None of the above".

[QUOTE="Allicrombie"]Hell no. I'm sick of developers tacking on multiplayer to what should be single player only experiences. Shielder7

I think multiplayer in Skyrim would make it more of an mmorpg.

Multiplayer in mass effect would be just like a third person shooter competitive multiplayer I think.

None. RPGs should never have multiplayer.

brickdoctor

No, please no.

I'd go with 'None of the Above'.

Slashkice

Agree wholeheartedly. The better WRPG devs know their core fans do not want MP.

I thought we were talking about competititve MP, in the case of Co-Op i think that all of these games would benefit.

I thought we were talking about competititve MP, in the case of Co-Op i think that all of these games would benefit.

Cheesehead9099

But you already have a ton of online RPGs, so SP people need their games too.

None, adding multiplayer just means the singleplayer gets less attention. That or the release date increases.

I'd go with 'None of the Above'.

Slashkice