http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/max_payne/
This topic is locked from further discussion.
well it can't get worse than a 0%. What if it gets 10%.Can't be worse than Mario or Street Fighter.
Also, Dragonball Z will probably be worse from that horrible looking trailer. But hey, I can't stand that **** anyways.
Chutebox
This couldve been an amazing film, but they had to screw it up
Marky Mark is on a roll with terrible films...
[QUOTE="Franko_3"]wait until there is more review, even a pos like battlefield earth had 2 goods reviews lol...0bscurity
8 reviews later and it has a 0. Not a 5, not a 10, but a 0. No review will save this garbage.
Still, it's listed as having "no consensus". That means that there's not enough reviews up for the score to be taken seriously. I'm not saying that this is a good movie, I'm just saying that, as a major Hollywood release, it will have a few dozen reviews in the next week. Check back with RT on Wednesday for something approaching a final score.
As good as a couple of its action beats are, Max still suffers from the heartlessness that makes games emotionally inferior to movies. Nobody ever shed a tear over a video-game character's death.
That's quite the ignorant comment..
luisen123
Yup I noticed that to. Apparently he's been watching everyone play every game all the time.... :|
What a nob.
While I wouldn't be surprised if it sucked, everyone has their own opinion. With RT, while a good site, their reviews do ahve the occational "WTF?".Legendaryscmt
Que? They just gather reviews from all the other sources and newspapers.
The Happening and now Max Payne? How far you've fallen Marky Mark...:(BioShockOwnzHey at least Roger Ebert gave that trash a positive review:P
But yeah, it was bad beyond belief, seriously, what is happening:?
As good as a couple of its action beats are, Max still suffers from the heartlessness that makes games emotionally inferior to movies. Nobody ever shed a tear over a video-game character's death.
That's quite the ignorant comment..
luisen123
Agreed.
I was just about to mention that. I guess he's never played a good rpg.
I remember shedding a tear in FFIV when Palom and Porom sacrificed themselves for the party.
[QUOTE="Legendaryscmt"]While I wouldn't be surprised if it sucked, everyone has their own opinion. With RT, while a good site, their reviews do ahve the occational "WTF?".Ninja-Hippo
Que? They just gather reviews from all the other sources and newspapers.
I was talking about the user stuff.
I dont see how hard it could be to make a decent watchable Max Payne movie. It has the most basic premise ever. Someone kills his family, he goes out for revenge.whocares4peaceOffcourse, but Remedy did an excellent job of presenting it
And seriously, once a rapper is in the film, its going to suck, you cant take these guys seriously
As good as a couple of its action beats are, Max still suffers from the heartlessness that makes games emotionally inferior to movies. Nobody ever shed a tear over a video-game character's death.
That's quite the ignorant comment..
luisen123
i shed a tear close to the end on MGS 4
[spoiler] It was soo friggen amazing i shed tears of joy through the tunnel to the very end meet with Boss [/spoiler]
I think the fact that while leaping to the side while firing dual-wielded Desert Eagles may equate to awesomeness in a video game, it is one of the most mocked aspects of action films out there, and is now viewed as a parody in cinema now, rather than an awesome stunt.Verge_6There was still enough to work with. Maybe if the director would have spent more time worrying about the quality of the movie and not the rating it got, it would have come out better. From the way people are talking about this it seemed like the director and writers clearly didn't understand the audience they were making the movie for.
It's a sure path to failure.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]The Happening and now Max Payne? How far you've fallen Marky Mark...:(mo0ksiI'm thinking the exact same thing. After his role in The Departed he pretty much fell off his pedestal.Well, at least he still produces a good TV show.
As good as a couple of its action beats are, Max still suffers from the heartlessness that makes games emotionally inferior to movies. Nobody ever shed a tear over a video-game character's death.
That's quite the ignorant comment..
luisen123
Beat me to it.
I hate comments like that. Blanket generalizations like that just go to show how ignorant people are about gaming.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]The Happening and now Max Payne? How far you've fallen Marky Mark...:(mo0ksiI'm thinking the exact same thing. After his role in The Departed he pretty much fell off his pedestal.Exactly he was praised widely for it, yet he decides to do TWO crappy films in a row?
There was still enough to work with. Maybe if the director would have spent more time worrying about the quality of the movie and not the rating it got, it would have come out better. From the way people are talking about this it seemed like the director and writers clearly didn't understand the audience they were making the movie for.[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I think the fact that while leaping to the side while firing dual-wielded Desert Eagles may equate to awesomeness in a video game, it is one of the most mocked aspects of action films out there, and is now viewed as a parody in cinema now, rather than an awesome stunt.heretrix
It's a sure path to failure.
Oh, I'm just saying that the whole dual-wielding leap thing was only a small part of what is wrong with the film.
[QUOTE="mo0ksi"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]The Happening and now Max Payne? How far you've fallen Marky Mark...:(whocares4peaceI'm thinking the exact same thing. After his role in The Departed he pretty much fell off his pedestal.Well, at least he still produces a good TV show.Entourage right?
Yeah that is a good show.
[QUOTE="heretrix"]There was still enough to work with. Maybe if the director would have spent more time worrying about the quality of the movie and not the rating it got, it would have come out better. From the way people are talking about this it seemed like the director and writers clearly didn't understand the audience they were making the movie for.[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I think the fact that while leaping to the side while firing dual-wielded Desert Eagles may equate to awesomeness in a video game, it is one of the most mocked aspects of action films out there, and is now viewed as a parody in cinema now, rather than an awesome stunt.Verge_6
It's a sure path to failure.
Oh, I'm just saying that the whole dual-wielding leap thing was only a small part of what is wrong with the film.
Sorry if it came out like I was strongly disagreeing with you. I wasn't. I was just thinking about this earlier today and...well, sorry dude.:lol:[QUOTE="no_handlebars"]The PG-13 rating killed it for me.Verge_6
:lol: It's rated PG-13!? Holy hell, that is hilarious! I wonder how many parts of the game they had to cut out to achieve that rating.
That's what I was talking about. The director fought for that rating which is completely idiotic considering the source material.He wanted the lower rating to fill more seats, which is also stupid because if you make a great R rated movie people will go see it. They screwed up the last Die Hard film doing the exact same thing.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="heretrix"]There was still enough to work with. Maybe if the director would have spent more time worrying about the quality of the movie and not the rating it got, it would have come out better. From the way people are talking about this it seemed like the director and writers clearly didn't understand the audience they were making the movie for.[QUOTE="Verge_6"]I think the fact that while leaping to the side while firing dual-wielded Desert Eagles may equate to awesomeness in a video game, it is one of the most mocked aspects of action films out there, and is now viewed as a parody in cinema now, rather than an awesome stunt.heretrix
It's a sure path to failure.
Oh, I'm just saying that the whole dual-wielding leap thing was only a small part of what is wrong with the film.
Sorry if it came out like I was strongly disagreeing with you. I wasn't. I was just thinking about this earlier today and...well, sorry dude.:lol:I never got the impression you were disagreeing with me, just wanted to lay it out there that I thought there were far more things wrong with it than that.
Heh...PG-13...
[QUOTE="no_handlebars"]The PG-13 rating killed it for me.Verge_6
:lol: It's rated PG-13!? Holy hell, that is hilarious! I wonder how many parts of the game they had to cut out to achieve that rating.
Here's the thing.
They wanted that rating. :|
If you're going to make a Max Payne film, at least try to stay true to the source material. I'm not saying I want to see a bunch of bullet time and gun-kata either. Max Payne had a nice storyline to work with and some strong film noir overtones that could've been well portrayed on the silver screen...had the directorial staff had any clue what the hell they were dealing with...
1.Rotten tomatos is not a place to listen to, they aren't good critics they specifically go to films so as to make fun of those films.
2.its pretty much impossible to get a 0% on a 1-10, or 1-100 scale since you cant really COUNT a 0 0 means specifically nothing in most math for the most part.
3. im not defending the film ive not seen it but its just illogical is what im saying.
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="no_handlebars"]The PG-13 rating killed it for me.The_Game21x
:lol: It's rated PG-13!? Holy hell, that is hilarious! I wonder how many parts of the game they had to cut out to achieve that rating.
Here's the thing.
They wanted that rating. :|
If you're going to make a Max Payne film, at least try to stay true to the source material. I'm not saying I want to see a bunch of bullet time and gun-kata either. Max Payne had a nice storyline to work with and some strong film noir overtones that could've been well portrayed on the silver screen...had the directorial staff had any clue what the hell they were dealing with...
I really wonder if the directors of video game-based movies even PLAY the damned games they are making their movies about. It's like this one just saw some old trailers for it, saw the whole slow-mo side-leaping gunplay bits, and thought "Ah, so that's what the game's about...Mike, call 20th Century Fox! I gots an idea!".
"As good as a couple of its action beats are, Max still suffers from the heartlessness that makes games emotionally inferior to movies. Nobody ever shed a tear over a video-game character's death."
As quoted by one of the reviewers. Your thoughts and opinions on such a bold statement?
I think this proves that they are amateur reviewers trying to act like the big boys."As good as a couple of its action beats are, Max still suffers from the heartlessness that makes games emotionally inferior to movies. Nobody ever shed a tear over a video-game character's death."
As quoted by one of the reviewers. Your thoughts and opinions on such a bold statement?
HappyAppe
1.Rotten tomatos is not a place to listen to, they aren't good critics they specifically go to films so as to make fun of those films.
2.its pretty much impossible to get a 0% on a 1-10, or 1-100 scale since you cant really COUNT a 0 0 means specifically nothing in most math for the most part.3. im not defending the film ive not seen it but its just illogical is what im saying.
WilliamRLBaker
RT is the GR from the film industry :|
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment