MCV: XBOX Next will not have a disc drive

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

If it's the strictest NDA everz then why are we hearing about it?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

There's no way this is true. I'm all for DD but this would be suicide. The key to success next gen is offering both DD and blu-ray options for all games.

PatchMaster
Blu-ray is an inferior technology when compared to SD. SD loads faster, performs better, etc. And you wouldn't even have to load the games to the harddrive. You could read straight off the SD.
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
[QUOTE="PatchMaster"]

There's no way this is true. I'm all for DD but this would be suicide. The key to success next gen is offering both DD and blu-ray options for all games.

KC_Hokie
Blu-ray is an inferior technology when compared to SD. SD loads faster, performs better, etc. And you wouldn't even have to load the games to the harddrive. You could read straight off the SD.

Blu Ray discs costs cents for developers. SD cards?
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#104 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

This could mean two possible things:

1. MS is going for DD as a primiary and isn't going to rely on retail much anymore (thus getting rid of used games)

2. The "no used games" thing might be true if it's these cartriges that can slap a product key on them.

Either way this means that there will be absolutely no backwards compatibilty with the next Xbox system. Let's hope this is just a stupid rumor and it doesn't become true.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="PatchMaster"]

There's no way this is true. I'm all for DD but this would be suicide. The key to success next gen is offering both DD and blu-ray options for all games.

Giancar

Blu-ray is an inferior technology when compared to SD. SD loads faster, performs better, etc. And you wouldn't even have to load the games to the harddrive. You could read straight off the SD.

Blu Ray discs costs cents for developers. SD cards?

There are no royalty fess for SD cards like bluray. SD cards are constantly dropping in price. MS could buy them in bulk and give them to publishers for a reduced cost. On top of that flash technology drop in price 25% every two years.

It would be well worth it for a superior technology. If this is true this is awesome.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

This could mean two possible things:

1. MS is going for DD as a primiary and isn't going to rely on retail much anymore (thus getting rid of used games)

2. The "no used games" thing might be true if it's these cartriges that can slap a product key on them.

Either way this means that there will be absolutely no backwards compatibilty with the next Xbox system. Let's hope this is just a stupid rumor and it doesn't become true.

ShadowMoses900
I would sacrifice backward compatibility in an instant to move to flash technology as the physical medium. You could run games directly off the SD card and they perform significantly better than blu-ray for example.
Avatar image for zekere
zekere

2536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#107 zekere
Member since 2003 • 2536 Posts

That means goodbye xbox for me. I'm buying a PC instead. I want to play Simcity5 anyway. No disc drive is a failure in my opinion. They should have both DD and SDD.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

That means goodbye xbox for me. I'm buying a PC instead. I want to play Simcity5 anyway. No disc drive is a failure in my opinion. They should have both DD and SDD.

zekere
It says they will have SD cards combined with digital downloads. That's exactly what the rumor says.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#109 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

This could mean two possible things:

1. MS is going for DD as a primiary and isn't going to rely on retail much anymore (thus getting rid of used games)

2. The "no used games" thing might be true if it's these cartriges that can slap a product key on them.

Either way this means that there will be absolutely no backwards compatibilty with the next Xbox system. Let's hope this is just a stupid rumor and it doesn't become true.

KC_Hokie

I would sacrifice backward compatibility in an instant to move to flash technology as the physical medium. You could run games directly off the SD card and they perform significantly better than blu-ray for example.

SD technology isn't as good as you think it is, sure it has some pro's, but just as many cons. The main thing will be data and power and SD cartridges can NOT do that, with Blu Ray a dev can use that memory for other things like more graphic detail ect... with cartridges not so much. If this is true then the next Xbox won't be all that powerful of a system.

This also means that MS will most likely be going with the DD route and will push that more and more, which also means no used games.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

This could mean two possible things:

1. MS is going for DD as a primiary and isn't going to rely on retail much anymore (thus getting rid of used games)

2. The "no used games" thing might be true if it's these cartriges that can slap a product key on them.

Either way this means that there will be absolutely no backwards compatibilty with the next Xbox system. Let's hope this is just a stupid rumor and it doesn't become true.

ShadowMoses900

I would sacrifice backward compatibility in an instant to move to flash technology as the physical medium. You could run games directly off the SD card and they perform significantly better than blu-ray for example.

SD technology isn't as good as you think it is, sure it has some pro's, but just as many cons. The main thing will be data and power and SD cartridges can NOT do that, with Blu Ray a dev can use that memory for other things like more graphic detail ect... with cartridges not so much. If this is true then the next Xbox won't be all that powerful of a system.

This also means that MS will most likely be going with the DD route and will push that more and more, which also means no used games.

Flash technology is far superior to blu-ray. On top of that you can always install/download the games if you want.

The flash drive technology combined with digital downloads is exactly where I had hoped MS would move. Fantastic news if true.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#111 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

I think cartridge prices have gone down. The current trend for portable 500gb harddrives retail for less than $70.00. Take into account that games won't be nearly as large, USB keys, SD cards, etc., are retailing relatively cheaply.

ALTHOUGH,

A blank dual-layer DVD or BR doesn't really cost more than a couple of bucks.

I can't imagine Microsoft ditching an optical drive, considering DVD's, BR's are all still sold in the market place.

And not being backwards compatible with 360 games? Hm. That should be interesting.

I call bs on this rumor.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#112 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]I would sacrifice backward compatibility in an instant to move to flash technology as the physical medium. You could run games directly off the SD card and they perform significantly better than blu-ray for example.KC_Hokie

SD technology isn't as good as you think it is, sure it has some pro's, but just as many cons. The main thing will be data and power and SD cartridges can NOT do that, with Blu Ray a dev can use that memory for other things like more graphic detail ect... with cartridges not so much. If this is true then the next Xbox won't be all that powerful of a system.

This also means that MS will most likely be going with the DD route and will push that more and more, which also means no used games.

Flash technology is far superior to blu-ray. On top of that you can always install/download the games if you want.

The flash drive technology combined with digital downloads is exactly where I had hoped MS would move. Fantastic news if true.

Okay then I guess you can be happy with a system that has limited data for it's games and forces you to use more DD stuff then actual games. Which is even worse if your system breaks, and it's MS so you know it probably will, if it's mostly DD what are you going to do? You can't replace your games?

Also take into account this SD format would essentially be a way for MS to kill the used game market, so that means you have no rights to your games. You can't trade them or sell them or take them over to friends house, you can only do what MS let's you do.

You may be excited about this (why? I have no idea) but this news basically makes me worried about next gen. I don't like where it's going, and I don't think most people do either. Also SD means less data for games, which leads to shorter games with less graphic power.

If this is true don't expect the Next Xbox to be much more powerful than the 360.

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

This would almost be a step back IMHO.. Sure data would be accessible faster using some sort of SD card format, however how much could you place on a card? Unless they plan on using some sort of proprietary card that stores 16-32 gigs of data... Then you'd have to ask yourself.. Is that a cheaper venture than say bluray discs? :|

Edit: This is yet another rumor I don't see coming to furition. They would essentially kill off their core market with a move like this..

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

Flash memory is not faster than bluray like some of you are saying, at least not any thats in the market right now. And if it ever comes out it wont come cheap.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

SD technology isn't as good as you think it is, sure it has some pro's, but just as many cons. The main thing will be data and power and SD cartridges can NOT do that, with Blu Ray a dev can use that memory for other things like more graphic detail ect... with cartridges not so much. If this is true then the next Xbox won't be all that powerful of a system.

This also means that MS will most likely be going with the DD route and will push that more and more, which also means no used games.

ShadowMoses900

Flash technology is far superior to blu-ray. On top of that you can always install/download the games if you want.

The flash drive technology combined with digital downloads is exactly where I had hoped MS would move. Fantastic news if true.

Okay then I guess you can be happy with a system that has limited data for it's games and forces you to use more DD stuff then actual games. Which is even worse if your system breaks, and it's MS so you know it probably will, if it's mostly DD what are you going to do? You can't replace your games?

Also take into account this SD format would essentially be a way for MS to kill the used game market, so that means you have no rights to your games. You can't trade them or sell them or take them over to friends house, you can only do what MS let's you do.

You may be excited about this (why? I have no idea) but this news basically makes me worried about next gen. I don't like where it's going, and I don't think most people do either. Also SD means less data for games, which leads to shorter games with less graphic power.

If this is true don't expect the Next Xbox to be much more powerful than the 360.

Switching to SD combined with digital downloads would be an advancement including performance. 16 GB SD cards are very common now.

If this is true I am very excited.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

Flash memory is not faster than bluray like some of you are saying, at least not any thats in the market right now. And if it ever comes out it wont come cheap.

GTSaiyanjin2
Ahh...yea it is. Not even close.
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

if true then they just fu cked up big time

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#118 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
[QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

Flash memory is not faster than bluray like some of you are saying, at least not any thats in the market right now. And if it ever comes out it wont come cheap.

KC_Hokie
Ahh...yea it is. Not even close.

Okay, let's see this cheap, 50GB, 54+MB/s flash memory. Put up.
Avatar image for D1zzyCriminal
D1zzyCriminal

1839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 D1zzyCriminal
Member since 2009 • 1839 Posts

SO...

High price proprietary format.

No backwards compatibility with my 360 games

I cant watch DVD's

Looks like im getting a Wii U this time round.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

Flash memory is not faster than bluray like some of you are saying, at least not any thats in the market right now. And if it ever comes out it wont come cheap.

DerekLoffin
Ahh...yea it is. Not even close.

Okay, let's see this cheap, 50GB, 54+MB/s flash memory. Put up.

He was arguing blu-ray is a faster technology than flash. And he's dead wrong. It's not even close.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

A 16gig Compact Flash @60mb/s costs almost $90.

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#122 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

Flash memory is not faster than bluray like some of you are saying, at least not any thats in the market right now. And if it ever comes out it wont come cheap.

DerekLoffin

Ahh...yea it is. Not even close.

Okay, let's see this cheap, 50GB, 54+MB/s flash memory. Put up.

its what I was going to say :P A 12x Bluray drive is around 4-5 times faster than the current drive on the 360. Current class 10 SD cards top out around 24/22 read and write speeds.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#123 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Flash technology is far superior to blu-ray. On top of that you can always install/download the games if you want.

The flash drive technology combined with digital downloads is exactly where I had hoped MS would move. Fantastic news if true.

KC_Hokie

Okay then I guess you can be happy with a system that has limited data for it's games and forces you to use more DD stuff then actual games. Which is even worse if your system breaks, and it's MS so you know it probably will, if it's mostly DD what are you going to do? You can't replace your games?

Also take into account this SD format would essentially be a way for MS to kill the used game market, so that means you have no rights to your games. You can't trade them or sell them or take them over to friends house, you can only do what MS let's you do.

You may be excited about this (why? I have no idea) but this news basically makes me worried about next gen. I don't like where it's going, and I don't think most people do either. Also SD means less data for games, which leads to shorter games with less graphic power.

If this is true don't expect the Next Xbox to be much more powerful than the 360.

Switching to SD combined with digital downloads would be an advancement including performance. 16 GB SD cards are very common now.

If this is true I am very excited.

If this is true there would be no way the next Xbox could handle big games. What if Bethesda decided to make a new Elder Scrolls (which they will) and they decide to make it REALLY massive? Like in the GB massive? There would be no way an SD cartridge would be able to handle that game, you would be essentially stuck with a system that can't play cutting edge games.

This basically just means it's going to be DD, and that's a whole other problem.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#124 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
[QUOTE="DerekLoffin"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Ahh...yea it is. Not even close. KC_Hokie
Okay, let's see this cheap, 50GB, 54+MB/s flash memory. Put up.

He was arguing blu-ray is a faster technology than flash. And he's dead wrong. It's not even close.

Yah, so show us this fast, cheap, high capacity flash. Don't dodge. You're the one that claimed it is superior, so prove it. You can easily get, for less than a buck per disc, 50 GB and 54 MB/s out of a blu-ray. So, let's see the flash that can at least come close.
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#125 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
If this is true, I think it will be a DD console, where you can buy download codes at retail, and the games are stored in an SD card. Sounds too weird anyway - continuing to sell DVDs would be better :?
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

A 16gig Compact Flash @60mb/s costs almost $90.

Heirren
SDHC is cheaper than SDXC. Both are still considerably faster than blu ray at reading data.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="DerekLoffin"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="DerekLoffin"] Okay, let's see this cheap, 50GB, 54+MB/s flash memory. Put up.

He was arguing blu-ray is a faster technology than flash. And he's dead wrong. It's not even close.

Yah, so show us this fast, cheap, high capacity flash. Don't dodge. You're the one that claimed it is superior, so prove it. You can easily get, for less than a buck per disc, 50 GB and 54 MB/s out of a blu-ray. So, let's see the flash that can at least come close.

They technology certainly is superior. I wasn't arguing price...you brought that up. The poster I was responding to was referring to performance only. And he was dead wrong.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

A 16gig Compact Flash @60mb/s costs almost $90.

KC_Hokie

SDHC is cheaper than SDXC. Both are still considerably faster than blu ray at reading data.

I'm not against ditching the disc drive, but I'm not for some outrageously expensive proprietary MS format flash memory card, either.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Okay then I guess you can be happy with a system that has limited data for it's games and forces you to use more DD stuff then actual games. Which is even worse if your system breaks, and it's MS so you know it probably will, if it's mostly DD what are you going to do? You can't replace your games?

Also take into account this SD format would essentially be a way for MS to kill the used game market, so that means you have no rights to your games. You can't trade them or sell them or take them over to friends house, you can only do what MS let's you do.

You may be excited about this (why? I have no idea) but this news basically makes me worried about next gen. I don't like where it's going, and I don't think most people do either. Also SD means less data for games, which leads to shorter games with less graphic power.

If this is true don't expect the Next Xbox to be much more powerful than the 360.

ShadowMoses900

Switching to SD combined with digital downloads would be an advancement including performance. 16 GB SD cards are very common now.

If this is true I am very excited.

If this is true there would be no way the next Xbox could handle big games. What if Bethesda decided to make a new Elder Scrolls (which they will) and they decide to make it REALLY massive? Like in the GB massive? There would be no way an SD cartridge would be able to handle that game, you would be essentially stuck with a system that can't play cutting edge games.

This basically just means it's going to be DD, and that's a whole other problem.

They already have affordable16 GB and 32 GB SD cards on the market.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#130 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

so where you are guys getting these super fast SD cards from ? Best I could find was thishttp://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/sandisk-unveils-worlds-fastest-128gb-sdxc-card-and-new-inand/And thats still not faster than a bluray drive, just saying.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#131 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
[QUOTE="DerekLoffin"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]He was arguing blu-ray is a faster technology than flash. And he's dead wrong. It's not even close.KC_Hokie
Yah, so show us this fast, cheap, high capacity flash. Don't dodge. You're the one that claimed it is superior, so prove it. You can easily get, for less than a buck per disc, 50 GB and 54 MB/s out of a blu-ray. So, let's see the flash that can at least come close.

They technology certainly is superior. I wasn't arguing price...you brought that up. The poster I was responding to was referring to performance only. And he was dead wrong.

Yeah, I'm sure if you want to spend more money pumping out the units than the entire game's development budget you can get some fast cards, but that's beyond unrealistic. You have to be realistic, that means cheap. If it isn't already sub $10 retail it has 0 chance of being used in production a year from now at any reasonable price for the publishers.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

Okay then I guess you can be happy with a system that has limited data for it's games and forces you to use more DD stuff then actual games. Which is even worse if your system breaks, and it's MS so you know it probably will, if it's mostly DD what are you going to do? You can't replace your games?

Also take into account this SD format would essentially be a way for MS to kill the used game market, so that means you have no rights to your games. You can't trade them or sell them or take them over to friends house, you can only do what MS let's you do.

You may be excited about this (why? I have no idea) but this news basically makes me worried about next gen. I don't like where it's going, and I don't think most people do either. Also SD means less data for games, which leads to shorter games with less graphic power.

If this is true don't expect the Next Xbox to be much more powerful than the 360.

ShadowMoses900

Switching to SD combined with digital downloads would be an advancement including performance. 16 GB SD cards are very common now.

If this is true I am very excited.

If this is true there would be no way the next Xbox could handle big games. What if Bethesda decided to make a new Elder Scrolls (which they will) and they decide to make it REALLY massive? Like in the GB massive? There would be no way an SD cartridge would be able to handle that game, you would be essentially stuck with a system that can't play cutting edge games.

This basically just means it's going to be DD, and that's a whole other problem.

The data and all could be stored on a high capacity SD "cartridge"..(16-32 gig currently) However how much would that "cartridge" cost..??? I thought the reason Ninty got out of that business was because they were simply too expensive.. I'm calling shenanigans on this one.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Heirren"]

A 16gig Compact Flash @60mb/s costs almost $90.

Heirren

SDHC is cheaper than SDXC. Both are still considerably faster than blu ray at reading data.

I'm not against ditching the disc drive, but I'm not for some outrageously expensive proprietary MS format flash memory card, either.

I read all SDXC cards come pre-formatted with MS technology. MS would obviously just wave that licensing fee for themselves and next Xbox games. On top of that the technology drops in price 25% every two years.
Avatar image for Idontremember
Idontremember

965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Idontremember
Member since 2003 • 965 Posts

No DVD drive, well, they'll simply sell an add-on like that HD-DVD drive a few years ago... Problem solved and profit made!!!!


As for the Memory card... If they can assure the SD format will get faster in time, then they have a memory that will most likely get larger and faster as time goes on.. That would be perfect, no card swapping in the future and bye bye install.

Some sort of external SSD card would render installs completly useless and be awsome, but THE COST!!!!

I don't know what to think about that.

A good old DVD or two, or DD and simply install everything on a HDD will still remain the smartest idea and the most efficient... Except for the dinosaures who complain against install time!!!!!!!

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

so where you are guys getting these super fast SD cards from ? Best I could find was thishttp://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/sandisk-unveils-worlds-fastest-128gb-sdxc-card-and-new-inand/And thats still not faster than a bluray drive, just saying.

GTSaiyanjin2
Those are read/write cards. Read only SDXC cards can do 400mb per second.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#136 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Switching to SD combined with digital downloads would be an advancement including performance. 16 GB SD cards are very common now.

If this is true I am very excited.

KC_Hokie

If this is true there would be no way the next Xbox could handle big games. What if Bethesda decided to make a new Elder Scrolls (which they will) and they decide to make it REALLY massive? Like in the GB massive? There would be no way an SD cartridge would be able to handle that game, you would be essentially stuck with a system that can't play cutting edge games.

This basically just means it's going to be DD, and that's a whole other problem.

They already have affordable16 GB and 32 GB SD cards on the market.

Again it's not the same. There is nothing superior about this, accept mabey the data reading speeds (which can be easly taken care of by adding in a faster Blu Ray drive which the PS4 no doubt will).

Games are going to get bigger, they are going to get more powerful. The SD will not work for this, DD will however which is where MS is probably going. It will be essentialy a DD only version of Games For Windows Live. And that's not a good thing, that's very bad for consumers.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#137 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
I'm not paying $80 for an Xbox game.
Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#138 tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

I will laugh my damn ass off for hours if this is true.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]SDHC is cheaper than SDXC. Both are still considerably faster than blu ray at reading data.KC_Hokie

I'm not against ditching the disc drive, but I'm not for some outrageously expensive proprietary MS format flash memory card, either.

I read all SDXC cards come pre-formatted with MS technology. MS would obviously just wave that licensing fee for themselves and next Xbox games. On top of that the technology drops in price 25% every two years.

I don't buy it. Technically it is possible, but when I see $99 20 gig harddrives it says otherwise.

Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#140 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Switching to SD combined with digital downloads would be an advancement including performance. 16 GB SD cards are very common now.

If this is true I am very excited.

OhSnapitz

If this is true there would be no way the next Xbox could handle big games. What if Bethesda decided to make a new Elder Scrolls (which they will) and they decide to make it REALLY massive? Like in the GB massive? There would be no way an SD cartridge would be able to handle that game, you would be essentially stuck with a system that can't play cutting edge games.

This basically just means it's going to be DD, and that's a whole other problem.

The data and all could be stored on a high capacity SD "cartridge"..(16-32 gig currently) However how much would that "cartridge" cost..??? I thought the reason Ninty got out of that business was because they were simply too expensive.. I'm calling shenanigans on this one.

I'm hoping this is just a stupid rumor, if this is true MS has essentilay flipped gamers the bird. Plus as you said, the high capacity SD cartridges would sky rocket the prices, all this basically is saying is that MS will be going DD next gen. And that is the most likely possibility, this basically confirms it. That also means no used games or backwards compatibilty unfortuantely :(

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#141 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

so where you are guys getting these super fast SD cards from ? Best I could find was thishttp://www.engadget.com/2012/01/09/sandisk-unveils-worlds-fastest-128gb-sdxc-card-and-new-inand/And thats still not faster than a bluray drive, just saying.

KC_Hokie

Those are read/write cards. Read only SDXC cards can do 400mb per second.

Can I get a link on that, sounds pretty impressive. Thats close to SSD speeds from 12 months ago. Anyways I would imagine flash memory like that would come at a premium.

Avatar image for TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
TH1Sx1SxSPARTA

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Member since 2011 • 1852 Posts
this sounds horrible. i have 3 friends personally that live too far out in the country so thier internet is incredibly slow maybe MS will release 2 skus. one with a disc drive, and the other DD only?i dunno
Avatar image for Moriarity_
Moriarity_

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Moriarity_
Member since 2011 • 1332 Posts
Sounds cool but the guaranteed lack of backwards compatibility kind of sucks(I don't really mind since I don't have any 360 games). I'm actually slightly interested in the next xbox but I still think M$ will find some way to kill it with kinect 2.0 or some trash like that.
Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts
SSD are expensive
Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

No Bluray?

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

Those are read/write cards. Read only SDXC cards can do 400mb per second.KC_Hokie
Which is 50MB/s, silly advertising, using bits instead of bytes.

this sounds horrible. i have 3 friends personally that live too far out in the country so thier internet is incredibly slow

maybe MS will release 2 skus. one with a disc drive, and the other DD only?i dunnoTH1Sx1SxSPARTA

Read fail! click click click.

SD, not DD only.

"Although the console will not include a disc drive, it will offer compatibility with some sort of interchangeable solid-state card storage, although it is not known whether this will be proprietary or a more standard format such as SD."

↓ -.- annoying

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Those are read/write cards. Read only SDXC cards can do 400mb per second.Inconsistancy

Which is 50MB/s, silly advertising, using bits instead of bytes.

this sounds horrible. i have 3 friends personally that live too far out in the country so thier internet is incredibly slow

maybe MS will release 2 skus. one with a disc drive, and the other DD only?i dunnoTH1Sx1SxSPARTA

Read fail! click click click.

SD, not DD only.

Not SD but some kind of rom, SD is more expensive then read-only memory, why waste money on something writable that will never be writed
Avatar image for Sparky04
Sparky04

3390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Sparky04
Member since 2006 • 3390 Posts
[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="nitekids2004"]

Didn't we move away from cartridges because they are expensive?

dommeus

Perhaps with all the current memory card tech then can mass produce something cheaply. 8gb cards now cost less then £5 retail, wouldnt cost that much to chuck a cartridge casing around it.

You aren't really taking into account the fact that the majority price of the game isn't from manufacturing.

That still dramatically raises the price. 5 bucks is 5 bucks and if a game sells 1 million copies, that is five million extra dollars. Video games are like medicine, they cost a lot to design and finish but then become super cheap to produce, moving away from that model doesn't really make sense which is what they would be doing with solid state drives.
Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

Number 1: How can people be 'happy' and consider to buy this over the PS3/Wii-U just for the fact that it plays on cartridges? Nostalgia much?

Number 2: You should stop making threads everytime you see a different rumor online.

Avatar image for XschlistaX
XschlistaX

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 XschlistaX
Member since 2012 • 117 Posts

So no backwards compat? That's going to hurt.