[QUOTE="BeardMaster"]You're correct, I mean that theeffect would be the same as piracy in that people could take one new game and turn it into ten while only making one purchase. Not a chance in hell of Microsoft doing this. And even if that was what Microsoft intended, publishers can opt out. If this was really a system for giving 10 people a game off of one purchase, then don't expect to see any publishers going along with it. The way you're thinking, there would be zero incentive for any of those ten people to go buy the game after sharing it.Â
Its not piracy if its allowed by microsoft policy. And based on the way its worded "You can always play your games, and any one of your family members can be playing from your shared library at a given time." If i can always play my games, then that means if someone is playing forza 5 from my shared library, it sounds like i can load up forza 5 from my personal library at the same time... unless its going to boot my friend in the middle of his game as soon as i load it up which seems a bit silly.
Â
definitely needs clarification, but the way its worded does make it sound like simultaneous play is allowed.
MrGeezer
Â
But only one person from the 10 can be playing from the shared library at a time. So its not much different than passing a game disc around to 10 people. This plan is actually even more limiting... as normally with the disc based sharing model, i can lend out 10 different games to 10 different friends simultaneously. With this i can only share 1 game at any given time.
The area where this model seemingly has a distinct advantage is if the game owner can play the same title at the same time as someone using his shared library.
Log in to comment