Metal Gear Solid 3 sure flopped. Why would MGS4 be any differrent?bragac200Metal Gear Solid 3 is an amazing game.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I am buying a PS3 just for this game, just like I bought a 360 just for bioshock. I have high expectations of this game, each is of a very high standard and I trust Kojima not to let me down, he has never done so before.PelekotansDream
Â
you shouldnt of bought a 360 for bioshock.. its gonna be on pc and ps3 eventually. bad move
It doesn't matter if we have seen anything new yet. You all know it's gonna be amazing just like all of the Metal Gear games that were on PS2. Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence is still one of the best games ever made. Metal Gear Solid 4 will be one of those games that makes a PS3 worth owning just for it alone. JDW_games
nope. i don't know it's gonna be amazing. it looked nice in a few trailers and looked average at best in some screenshots. but even still, graphics alone don't make a game. i'd rather see a few actually reviews than just what the devs want me to see.Â
1. if u bash the mgs series u fail
2. if u think it will be ported anytime soon u fail
3. if u think it wont sell u fail
..........many have failed :cry:
Great game but not worth $600.Supafly1
Statement: Happy to see you're stoked for it. Nothing beats the first time you start up a game you've been waiting for for year(s).
Addendum Statement:Â But people who don't like MGS will tend to disagree with your topic statement... meatbag.
Hesitant conclusion: MGS4 will definitly be a GOTY contender. Without a doubt.
It doesn't matter if we have seen anything new yet. You all know it's gonna be amazing just like all of the Metal Gear games that were on PS2. Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence is still one of the best games ever made. Metal Gear Solid 4 will be one of those games that makes a PS3 worth owning just for it alone. JDW_games
No it was not ¬_¬
MGS 3 was a waste of development time that could of been put into MGS4 GotP.
MGS 2 and MGS 1 are fine examples of games, MGS 3 was just, blah ¬_¬
[QUOTE="JDW_games"][QUOTE="pundog"]Please don't compare Halo or any of those other games to the Metal Gear series. Halo doesn't come anywhere close to being as good as Metal Gear. But Halo will be out in 2007 and you can't say that about MGS4. Don't get me wrong though I really hope I am wrong on this one. Kojima Productions has it listed for 2007.It'll be a good game, but I don't think it will even be able to compete with Crysis, Spore, Bioshock, MP3, Mass Effect and Halo 3 for best next gen title this year.
Riverwolf007
[QUOTE="JDW_games"]It doesn't matter if we have seen anything new yet. You all know it's gonna be amazing just like all of the Metal Gear games that were on PS2. Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence is still one of the best games ever made. Metal Gear Solid 4 will be one of those games that makes a PS3 worth owning just for it alone. toxicmog
No it was not ¬_¬
MGS 3 was a waste of development time that could of been put into MGS4 GotP.
MGS 2 and MGS 1 are fine examples of games, MGS 3 was just, blah ¬_¬
MGS3 is better than MGS2 in every way except story.MGS3 flopped? It's the stealthiest, more tactical of all. If kojima had removed the motion sensor detector, levaving us with only visual spotting, the game would've been perfect. Camuflage system was awesome.
If MGS4 combines MGS2 and 3, than it will be orgasmic win.
lordxymor
I love MGS3, playing it right now (360 needs repairs)
but it did flop here at SW, it had 9.6+ hype and it didn't even hit 9 so that makes it a flop
but the best flop to ever come out IMOÂ
Great game but not worth $600.Supafly1
Â
What a stupid thing to say. No game is worth $600, $400 OR $250. MGS4 is not worth $600, but you say that like a person is goinbg to buy the PS3, and the only game they'll ever play for it is MGS4. All the games the PS3 has lined up right now is defiantly worth $600 though. Terrible damage control.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment