[QUOTE="dhjohns"]Blog it. Also, you have no idea what MGS is going to be like. It isn't out for at least another year. Jacobistheman
Were you saying the same about halo 3
Excuse me? What was I saying? Link to my topic please. Thanks.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="AzatiS"]Just to know about MGS score...
Thru 31 reviews back at 98 from top sites,GS and other 2 out of 31 gave the worst SCORE of the game.
Most of sites gave 9,5/10 4.5/5. Overall score from 31 total = 9.3!! Thats AAA.
Now for MGS3 its kinda the same with 95 reviews (including GS) it got 9.1 overall. Thats AAA also. This time Reviews were more than 90+.Thats x3 the number of MGSone.This time GSs score was better. Total score via 91 reviews 9.1!! Thats AAA
Wanderer5
But he said all the MGS games are AAA on GS, and since both MGS and MGS3 wreren't AAA that is false. Also for Gamerankings MGS: PO is not AAA.
As GS gave less than 9, other sites gave a 10/10.So if you make an overall score out of 91 different reviews from the best sites worlwide,that score >>> 1 site's score. Now if the guy meant GS,nop GS gave 8.7.
Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Did you bother to read my posts? Or are you MGS hater?Means you are not PS3 owner and maybe Sony hater too
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
AzatiS
Did you bother to read my posts? Or are you MGS hater?Means you are not PS3 owner and maybe Sony hater too
....Where did he say he was to you? Quick to lash out, aren't you? :|
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
AzatiS
Did you bother to read my posts? Or are you MGS hater?Means you are not PS3 owner and maybe Sony hater too
Did I say ALL MGS fanboys ? I said stuck up ones like the TC calling SC garbage when compared to MGS Did you bother understanding what I typed ? :roll:I dont like MGS I tried out the 1st one on the GC hated it and tired out the 2nd one on a ps2 and also hated it because of the story, gimmicky clunky gameplay, annoying characters, the fact that they called it "stealth espionage" was a joke because hiding in lockers and covering yourself it a cardboard box to escape the enemies "cone" vison sure as hell isnt stealth.
I come up with valid reason to why I dont enjoy MGS something SC haters usually dont come up with they just say MGS >>>> SC end of story.
Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
what about the PSP versions? splinter cell is just as good as metal gear and in some ways better. even kojima said that when splinter cell was shown at E3 for the first time. MGS is a....solid series. but splinter cell has been also.prodiqy32
MGS Portable Ops. I don't think the offshoot card games scored that high though.
It absolutely is a AAA franchise. It is why MGS4 is such a big deal. Kojima is an excellent game developer/game writer. For some, the big draw of MGS is its incredible story. That alone allowed people to easily look past its gameplay flaws throughout the 3 earlier versions. Splinter Cell on the other hand, is a fine series as well. It puts a greater emphasize on stealth combat and an even less emphasize on story progression. Yes, there is a story there but thats not what most people will remember about Splinter Cell.
In the end, it all comes down to taste. As gamers, you shouldn't allow your fanboy-ism to get in the way and cloud your judgement over which of these incredible game series you prefer. Try them both if you can, they are excellent games and have earned the acclaim they have received by excellent developers who have stood behind them.
Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
Gh0st_Of_0nyx
SC series isnt as good as MGS - that is pretty obvius
but the SC series is also quite good.
However they are very different styles of game
Though its gameplay is not realistic, and acessable is arguable.
It absolutely is a AAA franchise. It is why MGS4 is such a big deal. Kojima is an excellent game developer/game writer. For some, the big draw of MGS is its incredible story. That alone allowed people to easily look past its gameplay flaws throughout the 3 earlier versions. Splinter Cell on the other hand, is a fine series as well. It puts a greater emphasize on stealth combat and an even less emphasize on story progression. Yes, there is a story there but thats not what most people will remember about Splinter Cell.
In the end, it all comes down to taste. As gamers, you shouldn't allow your fanboy-ism to get in the way and cloud your judgement over which of these incredible game series you prefer. Try them both if you can, they are excellent games and have earned the acclaim they have received by excellent developers who have stood behind them.
Shensolidus
Now there's an argument I can get behind. I completely agree with you.
Its the same both ways honestly.Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
The_Game21x
Qutie frankly I think that you cant even properly compare SC to MGS - they are very different games.
If anything people should be comparing SC to Thief - as SC is pretty much a modern era version of Thief - though it really isnt anyhwhere as good as the thief series tbh (not saying SC isnt good though)
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Its the same both ways honestly.Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
skrat_01
Qutie frankly I think that you cant even properly compare SC to MGS - they are very different games.
If anything people should be comparing SC to Thief - as SC is pretty much a modern era version of Thief - though it really isnt anyhwhere as good as the thief series tbh (not saying SC isnt good though)
Pretty much my precise thoughts. The MGS series is more action-oriented than the SC series. That fact alone makes it difficult to compare with the SC series.
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
skrat_01
SC series isnt as good as MGS - that is pretty obvius
but the SC series is also quite good.
Though its gameplay is not realistic, and acessable is arguable.
Why isnt it as go as MGS im asking ?Fans say MGS >>> SC but dont give any reason as to why.
And its a fact that MGS gameplay isnt focused on the realism factor like SC is. Adult magazines to distract enemies ? there cone vision ? When you alert them they have a exclamation point over their head and all you have to do is hide in a box, under a desk or in a locker and then they magically forget you.
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Its the same both ways honestly.Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
Verge_6
Qutie frankly I think that you cant even properly compare SC to MGS - they are very different games.
If anything people should be comparing SC to Thief - as SC is pretty much a modern era version of Thief - though it really isnt anyhwhere as good as the thief series tbh (not saying SC isnt good though)
Pretty much my precise thoughts. The MGS series is more action-oriented than the SC series. That fact alone makes it difficult to compare with the SC series.
Looking forward and as I'm sure you both know, SCC is a huge departure from what the SC series has done up to this point.To me, the SCC info so far revealed leaves me to believe, action parts will not be in short supply as the usual stealthy, hidden in the dark parts seem to be a thing of the past for the SC series and I applaud that ! :)
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
Gh0st_Of_0nyx
SC series isnt as good as MGS - that is pretty obvius
but the SC series is also quite good.
Though its gameplay is not realistic, and acessable is arguable.
Why isnt it as go as MGS im asking ?Fans say MGS >>> SC but dont give any reason as to why.
And its a fact that MGS gameplay isnt focused on the realism factor like SC is. Adult magazines to distract enemies ? there cone vision ? When you alert them they have a exclamation point over their head and all you have to do is hide in a box, under a desk or in a locker and then they magically forget you.
The MGS series has never been about realism. Its really more of an action adventure game with sneaking.The game has personality and its own humor and quirks.
If you think SC is remotely realistic though you should rethink your opinion. Enemies walking along poorly lit corridors in maximum security facilites, not even noticing the player who is half a meter away from them, crawling by.
And yes I have every MGS game, and SC game, and use to say SC was superiour until I actually played through the MGS games.
If you want a stealth game that is better than SC play the Thief series games. MGS isnt a stealth game like SC or Thief is.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Its the same both ways honestly.Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
skrat_01
Qutie frankly I think that you cant even properly compare SC to MGS - they are very different games.
If anything people should be comparing SC to Thief - as SC is pretty much a modern era version of Thief - though it really isnt anyhwhere as good as the thief series tbh (not saying SC isnt good though)
Oh yes, I realize that it does indeed go both ways, I just don't see it as often as I do SC bashing.
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Its the same both ways honestly.Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
The_Game21x
Qutie frankly I think that you cant even properly compare SC to MGS - they are very different games.
If anything people should be comparing SC to Thief - as SC is pretty much a modern era version of Thief - though it really isnt anyhwhere as good as the thief series tbh (not saying SC isnt good though)
Oh yes, I realize that it does indeed go both ways, I just don't see it as often as I do SC bashing.
True , though it seems to be mainly because of the ignorance of both parts.There are always SC>>>>MGS comments, and MGS>>>>>SC - or *insert either game* is trash.
I guess because of MGSs status and fanbase you get more SC bashing.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]Its the same both ways honestly.Why is it that MGS fans always feel the need to bash the crap out of Splinter Cell to make the MGS series look good?
If it's really as good as you say, it should speak for itself, you shouldn't need to make comparisons.
skrat_01
Qutie frankly I think that you cant even properly compare SC to MGS - they are very different games.
If anything people should be comparing SC to Thief - as SC is pretty much a modern era version of Thief - though it really isnt anyhwhere as good as the thief series tbh (not saying SC isnt good though)
Oh yes, I realize that it does indeed go both ways, I just don't see it as often as I do SC bashing.
True , though it seems to be mainly because of the ignorance of both parts.There are always SC>>>>MGS comments, and MGS>>>>>SC - or *insert either game* is trash.
I guess because of MGSs status and fanbase you get more SC bashing.
That's pretty much it in a nutshell, I believe.
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Stuck up MGS fanboys say " Dont even compare trash like SC to the GREATNESS of MGS" :roll:
W/o realizing that the SC series has been a AA- AAA series consistantly. Plus the gameplay is FAR superior in terms of realism and and accesibility.
Gh0st_Of_0nyx
SC series isnt as good as MGS - that is pretty obvius
but the SC series is also quite good.
Though its gameplay is not realistic, and acessable is arguable.
Why isnt it as go as MGS im asking ?Fans say MGS >>> SC but dont give any reason as to why.
And its a fact that MGS gameplay isnt focused on the realism factor like SC is. Adult magazines to distract enemies ? there cone vision ? When you alert them they have a exclamation point over their head and all you have to do is hide in a box, under a desk or in a locker and then they magically forget you.
just to clear something up, hiding in a box or in a locker won't do anything if the enemy sees you. they immediatly home in on your hiding spot and find you if they saw you enter it.
enough with the exxagerations. it doens't help the arguement.
[QUOTE="prodiqy32"]what about the PSP versions? splinter cell is just as good as metal gear and in some ways better. even kojima said that when splinter cell was shown at E3 for the first time. MGS is a....solid series. but splinter cell has been also.the_h_bomb
The only area in which Splinter Cell beats MGS is the multiplayer, the rest of it is PURE GARBAGE
Well it's a better stealth game too because it actually is a true stealth game rather than a stealth-action game.
[QUOTE="prodiqy32"][QUOTE="the_h_bomb"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"]what about the PSP versions? splinter cell is just as good as metal gear and in some ways better. even kojima said that when splinter cell was shown at E3 for the first time. MGS is a....solid series. but splinter cell has been also.AzatiS
The only area in which Splinter Cell beats MGS is the multiplayer, the rest of it is PURE GARBAGE
no. nope. it has better gun play, weopons and gadgets, and story. the metal gear story is stupid. i like the games pretty equel but your being fanboyish.lol...the funniest thing i heard today :D MGS story is stupid?? Maybe its to deep for you,to understand it,doesnt make it stupid at all :D Its the other way. Brilliant at least. And thats one of the huge differences with SCs series also. Story-director-soundtrack-sounds-depth > > SC by far. If you like more SC its ok,your taste.But MGS as a game is better overall,you like it or not :D
hmm. no. the story is stupid. sorry. still like the game though. i just do something elsa when i cant skip a cutscene cause im cool like that.[QUOTE="AzatiS"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"][QUOTE="the_h_bomb"][QUOTE="prodiqy32"]what about the PSP versions? splinter cell is just as good as metal gear and in some ways better. even kojima said that when splinter cell was shown at E3 for the first time. MGS is a....solid series. but splinter cell has been also.prodiqy32
The only area in which Splinter Cell beats MGS is the multiplayer, the rest of it is PURE GARBAGE
no. nope. it has better gun play, weopons and gadgets, and story. the metal gear story is stupid. i like the games pretty equel but your being fanboyish.lol...the funniest thing i heard today :D MGS story is stupid?? Maybe its to deep for you,to understand it,doesnt make it stupid at all :D Its the other way. Brilliant at least. And thats one of the huge differences with SCs series also. Story-director-soundtrack-sounds-depth > > SC by far. If you like more SC its ok,your taste.But MGS as a game is better overall,you like it or not :D
hmm. no. the story is stupid. sorry. still like the game though. i just do something elsa when i cant skip a cutscene cause im cool like that.Comparing a stealth action game where I shoot terrorists to a stealth action game where I shoot psionic flying guys, cowboys with magic riccochet pistols, invisible robot ninjas, and mechs with rocket arms and frikkin lazer eyes. Sorry, I don't see the connection.
Riverwolf007
The only connection is that Splinter Cell ripped off it's avstly superior predecessor. I find it laughable that you lemmings are so concerned with realism. Leaving aside that games are a form of escapism and if you wanted realism you'd be playing something like Operation Flashpoint. Your favourite game is an FPS with a plot that rips off starcraft starring a guy in a motorycycle helmet battling multicoloured muppets with pink laser beams
You're sounding more and more like a typical Sony fanatic by the day. If the rest is 'PURE GARBAGE', then explain the scores the series has recieved?
Verge_6
Only one of the titles was AAA and that was because of the multiplayer, no-one wants to play that boring garbage for the single player or the stock Tom Clancy terrorists plot.
Spliner Cell 1-90.5
Pandora Tomorrow-92.2
Chaos Theory-94
Double Agent-84.6Phew, those are some horrible games. Truly garbage.
whocares4peace
Only 1 Splinter cell game ever got AAA on Gamespot. But that doesn't matter!! Splinter Cell is DA BEST becoz it got 97% in XBox world magazine !!!!!111111ELEVEN
MGS 3 Subsistence = AAA
- MGS = AA
- MGS2 = AAA
- MGS3= AABlackbond
[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]Comparing a stealth action game where I shoot terrorists to a stealth action game where I shoot psionic flying guys, cowboys with magic riccochet pistols, invisible robot ninjas, and mechs with rocket arms and frikkin lazer eyes. Sorry, I don't see the connection.
the_h_bomb
The only connection is that Splinter Cell ripped off it's avstly superior predecessor. I find it laughable that you lemmings are so concerned with realism. Leaving aside that games are a form of escapism and if you wanted realism you'd be playing something like Operation Flashpoint. Your favourite game is an FPS with a plot that rips off starcraft starring a guy in a motorycycle helmet battling multicoloured muppets with pink laser beams
You're sounding more and more like a typical Sony fanatic by the day. If the rest is 'PURE GARBAGE', then explain the scores the series has recieved?
Verge_6
Only one of the titles was AAA and that was because of the multiplayer, no-one wants to play that boring garbage for the single player or the stock Tom Clancy terrorists plot.
Spliner Cell 1-90.5
Pandora Tomorrow-92.2
Chaos Theory-94
Double Agent-84.6Phew, those are some horrible games. Truly garbage.
whocares4peace
Only 1 Splinter cell game ever got AAA on Gamerspot. But that doesn't matter!! Splinter Cell is DA BEST becoz it got 97% in XBox world magazine !!!!!111111ELEVEN
MGS 3 Subsistence = AAA
- MGS = AA
- MGS2 = AAA
- MGS3= AABlackbond
I am revolted. There is no other word for it. I can't beleive some people are SO convinced that their opinions are law. :|
SC is good but I think it's going downhill eg:SC DA. MGS is getting better with age and rating wise, it is an AAA series.
[QUOTE="Wanderer5"][QUOTE="AzatiS"]Just to know about MGS score...
Thru 31 reviews back at 98 from top sites,GS and other 2 out of 31 gave the worst SCORE of the game.
Most of sites gave 9,5/10 4.5/5. Overall score from 31 total = 9.3!! Thats AAA.
Now for MGS3 its kinda the same with 95 reviews (including GS) it got 9.1 overall. Thats AAA also. This time Reviews were more than 90+.Thats x3 the number of MGSone.This time GSs score was better. Total score via 91 reviews 9.1!! Thats AAA
AzatiS
But he said all the MGS games are AAA on GS, and since both MGS and MGS3 wreren't AAA that is false. Also for Gamerankings MGS: PO is not AAA.
As GS gave less than 9, other sites gave a 10/10.So if you make an overall score out of 91 different reviews from the best sites worlwide,that score >>> 1 site's score. Now if the guy meant GS,nop GS gave 8.7.
He said that all of the PS MGS games got AAA on GS. That what I was talking about.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment