
Too high. wayy to demanding. guess my 960 wont be able to handle the game on high yet i play most of games on high. even RE2 demo.
its Crysis 1 all over again..
Holy moly...
lets hope atleast we can play it on medium. after that once price drop i will get new card..
i9 9900k and 2080 Ti. My body and PC are both ready. Lol
I hope I can do the ray tracing at 1440p ultrawide.
wait wait wait . Ghosts complaining about metro exodus ? Indeed these are strange times
Don't know why. Pushing the highest PC tech for graphics is a good thing. Means it's not a console port.
wait wait wait . Ghosts complaining about metro exodus ? Indeed these are strange times
Don't know why. Pushing the highest PC tech for graphics is a good thing. Means it's not a console port.
indeed and the requirements for 1080p 60 are not that high really. And probably those requirements like most other games are probably a bit overkill. In all likelihood something with an Rx580/gtx 1060 would probably provide 60fps at 1080 with mostly high settings
So I go above ultra in GPU, meet their RAM for ultra as well, but don't even reach recommended CPU. I really should upgrade CPU this year.
I'm surprised extreme requires a better CPU than ultra. They are both 60fps limited and extreme is way more GPU bound. Secondly, why only list Intel CPUs?
System requirements from developers are basically never accurate.
So I go above ultra in GPU, meet their RAM for ultra as well, but don't even reach recommended CPU. I really should upgrade CPU this year.
I've got a i5 2500K 3.30Ghz and will probably play this game on high settings, 60 fps just fine.
According to this I can play the game on low settings... I can't believe recommended requires 8GB VRAM.
I think 6GB is enough. RTX2060 only has 6GB.
System requirements from developers are basically never accurate.
So I go above ultra in GPU, meet their RAM for ultra as well, but don't even reach recommended CPU. I really should upgrade CPU this year.
I've got a i5 2500K 3.30Ghz and will probably play this game on high settings, 60 fps just fine.
It depends on thread optimization I guess. Also they can't account for overclocking.
Isn’t this supposed to come out for consoles?? Either this is highly unoptimized or the consoles are in for one hell of a downgrade!
Most console owners are happy with unstable 30 fps. That this game will be unoptimized for consoles is pretty much a given.
Game is gonna be un-optomized confirmed, AAA devs only do this when they are too lazy to optimize, oh well they clearly haven't learned a thing from AC Unity and Arkham Knight so I guess we can let their low sales and high negative feedback do the talking. inb4piracyisthereasonforlowsales.
So basically the majority of PC gamers will not be playing it, my old 1060 would struggle.
well you can either have a game that looks like CSGO or a game that looks like metro exodus.
Metro Exodus seems like a next step in graphics, so of course this isn't meant to run on every PC.
According to this I can play the game on low settings... I can't believe recommended requires 8GB VRAM.
I think 6GB is enough. RTX2060 only has 6GB.
Yeah it won't be the first time requirements are a bit inflated, though the game will undoubtedly be very demanding for the average gamer.
wait wait wait . Ghosts complaining about metro exodus ? Indeed these are strange times
not a game itself but requirements are so damn high. not everyone can afford a supercomputer and not everyone want to play on low/medium. i play 99% of games on high and i can barely play it on medium and 30fps lock.
Game is gonna be un-optomized confirmed, AAA devs only do this when they are too lazy to optimize, oh well they clearly haven't learned a thing from AC Unity and Arkham Knight so I guess we can let their low sales and high negative feedback do the talking. inb4piracyisthereasonforlowsales.
high requirements is not new. back in 2007 barely anyone can run Crysis on max yet it sold millions and was very well optimize.
this is new Crysis. even on 30fps on console. many claims it as best looking game ever.
Nice to see a studio pushing the envelope, I just hope it looks good enough to justify those specs.
Things have seemed to slowed as far as visuals go in the past few years, and people have commented, observed, and otherwise complained about it.
While I prefer a nice design and art direction over technical prowess, I do like to see things moving forward as to better support the former.
wait wait wait . Ghosts complaining about metro exodus ? Indeed these are strange times
not a game itself but requirements are so damn high. not everyone can afford a supercomputer and not everyone want to play on low/medium. i play 99% of games on high and i can barely play it on medium and 30fps lock.
Not really that high for 1080p high. Also is most likely like most other devs do they exaggerate a bit on what it takes for 1080p high and most likely an rx 580/570/gtx 1060 would be able to hit 60fps with mostly high settings and those gpus are all $200 and less gpus
Game is gonna be un-optomized confirmed, AAA devs only do this when they are too lazy to optimize, oh well they clearly haven't learned a thing from AC Unity and Arkham Knight so I guess we can let their low sales and high negative feedback do the talking. inb4piracyisthereasonforlowsales.
high requirements is not new. back in 2007 barely anyone can run Crysis on max yet it sold millions and was very well optimize.
this is new Crysis. even on 30fps on console. many claims it as best looking game ever.
Except that Crysis was a graphics power house. This game doesn't look much better Far Cry 5. I'm telling you dude, this game will be poorly optimized, don't let your love of the franchise cloud your judgement.
We need to wait until benchmarks are out before getting all get discombobulated about the requirements.
I bet if you play at 1080p ultra settings is doable on GTX 1070 or better. and GTX 1080ti on non extreme RTX settings at 1440p.
DEV's tend to do these two things..... they over estimate requirements or only use what they have on hand hardware wise to test each tier.
I never pay attention to system requirements its always overkill, besides you adjust the setting to suit your system. Not only that its supposed to be native 4k on the X. So PC for 1440p needs a 1080ti while peasants on a crap CPU and average GPU can do 4k....
These requirements aren't that bad. Hell the minimum lists the AMD 7870, which the original PS4 has a cut-down version of.
Game is gonna be un-optomized confirmed, AAA devs only do this when they are too lazy to optimize, oh well they clearly haven't learned a thing from AC Unity and Arkham Knight so I guess we can let their low sales and high negative feedback do the talking. inb4piracyisthereasonforlowsales.
high requirements is not new. back in 2007 barely anyone can run Crysis on max yet it sold millions and was very well optimize.
this is new Crysis. even on 30fps on console. many claims it as best looking game ever.
Except that Crysis was a graphics power house. This game doesn't look much better Far Cry 5. I'm telling you dude, this game will be poorly optimized, don't let your love of the franchise cloud your judgement.
Crysis 1 was surpassed by metro 2033 and last light.
yeah looks worse than far cry 5 lol.
I'd like to see how ray tracing performance goes. I'd turn down the settings to high if it means I can get good 1440p ray tracing performance.
Game is gonna be un-optomized confirmed, AAA devs only do this when they are too lazy to optimize, oh well they clearly haven't learned a thing from AC Unity and Arkham Knight so I guess we can let their low sales and high negative feedback do the talking. inb4piracyisthereasonforlowsales.
high requirements is not new. back in 2007 barely anyone can run Crysis on max yet it sold millions and was very well optimize.
this is new Crysis. even on 30fps on console. many claims it as best looking game ever.
Except that Crysis was a graphics power house. This game doesn't look much better Far Cry 5. I'm telling you dude, this game will be poorly optimized, don't let your love of the franchise cloud your judgement.
You kidding? With ray tracing on, this game destroys Far Cry 5 in lighting alone, not even mentioning water reflections.
And if we talk about the water... look at this crap. It was already well below Battlefield 5 water without ray tracing.
Game is gonna be un-optomized confirmed, AAA devs only do this when they are too lazy to optimize, oh well they clearly haven't learned a thing from AC Unity and Arkham Knight so I guess we can let their low sales and high negative feedback do the talking. inb4piracyisthereasonforlowsales.
high requirements is not new. back in 2007 barely anyone can run Crysis on max yet it sold millions and was very well optimize.
this is new Crysis. even on 30fps on console. many claims it as best looking game ever.
Except that Crysis was a graphics power house. This game doesn't look much better Far Cry 5. I'm telling you dude, this game will be poorly optimized, don't let your love of the franchise cloud your judgement.
You kidding? With ray tracing on, this game destroys Far Cry 5 in lighting alone, not even mentioning water reflections.
And if we talk about the water... look at this crap. It was already well below Battlefield 5 water without ray tracing.
as much as i hate battlefield games and think they are even worse than COD but i can say they are some of the best looking games on market.
dang, i'm slightly below the 'high' spec which applies to me since i'm gunning for 1440p 60fps, with my GTX1080 and 6700k. hopefully lots of settings to tweak
as much as i hate battlefield games and think they are even worse than COD but i can say they are some of the best looking games on market.
Yeah they are worse than COD even though they have better graphics, better audio design and better gameplay. Yup, sounds about right.
as much as i hate battlefield games and think they are even worse than COD but i can say they are some of the best looking games on market.
Yeah they are worse than COD even though they have better graphics, better audio design and better gameplay. Yup, sounds about right.
bad version of COD SP which are already bad but but but its primilary MP game. no. its 60 dollar game that tack SP to justify so whole package can judge.
multiplayer is COD with vehicles and destruction ie not very interesting.
thus i consider BF worse franchise than COD. COD has original, 2 and WAW as good games. battlefield has none.
as much as i hate battlefield games and think they are even worse than COD but i can say they are some of the best looking games on market.
Yeah they are worse than COD even though they have better graphics, better audio design and better gameplay. Yup, sounds about right.
bad version of COD SP which are already bad but but but its primilary MP game. no. its 60 dollar game that tack SP to justify so whole package can judge.
multiplayer is COD with vehicles and destruction ie not very interesting.
thus i consider BF worse franchise than COD. COD has original, 2 and WAW as good games. battlefield has none.
CoD with vehicles and destruction... Dude, that's already a HUGE difference in gameplay. You can't say it's just like CoD when it's fundamentally different. You shouldn't really be allowed to judge MP games, as it seems you've literally never played any of them.
CoD with vehicles and destruction... Dude, that's already a HUGE difference in gameplay. You can't say it's just like CoD when it's fundamentally different. You shouldn't really be allowed to judge MP games, as it seems you've literally never played any of them.
i played almost every major MP game and its just that they are bad. its not like i never played them.
Far cry V is a great looking game, but the draw distance and water in that game are an absolute disgrace.
Honestly, I think the DUNIA engine is starting to show its age. But with a new Far Cry releasing every year now, I doubt they'll move away from it anytime soon.
@R4gn4r0k: Far Cry 5 definitely is a good looking game, especially now that they released 4k textures for the PC version, but the lighting and water were both pretty dismal. A lot of the detail is quite basic, too.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment