This topic is locked from further discussion.
prime 3 looks noticeably better when you watch the right video (one with decent quality)
the lighting is much better, samus character model has been given some extra shininess and glowy bits, areas are larger and more detailed, explosions and smoke effects look fantastic, there are less jaggies, it animates more smoothly (60 fps)
you will need to play the game in person for these things to become apparent, its not a huge upgrade but it looks about as improved as prime 1 to prime2 (also looks better than halo 2)
Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.numba1234
your opinion, not everyones.
[QUOTE="-LionHeart"]No, he said Zelda: Twilight Princess was arguably the worst in the series. numba1234Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.
Well thats your opinion. I wouldn't say its arguably the worst since it has earned a spot in the Top 25.
Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]No, he said Zelda: Twilight Princess was arguably the worst in the series. -LionHeart
Well thats your opinion. I wouldn't say its arguably the worst since it has earned a spot in the Top 25.
So did zelda OOT, and WW.[QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"]3 looks a little better but definetaly not a ganerational leap better.GundamGuy0
PDZ didn't look a Generation leap ahead of The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay but that didn't stop it either.
I'd say it did.:? And those gamers are not in the same series like these are.Oh well let's do this from another angle then... MP3:C doesn't look like it could have run on the GC at anything more then a Slide Show... That means this game shows at least some of the generational diffrence.
Dude MP3 pretty much looks like the previous two. What are you smoking?
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/23758.html
As if you needed this video to tell you that.
[QUOTE="-LionHeart"]Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]No, he said Zelda: Twilight Princess was arguably the worst in the series. numba1234
Well thats your opinion. I wouldn't say its arguably the worst since it has earned a spot in the Top 25.
So did zelda OOT, and WW.Majoras Mask didn't.
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="Great_Ragnarok"][QUOTE="hazuki87"]the pictures "supposedly" dont do the game justice. Its not up to par with 360 and PS3 of course but its supposed to be better than last gen games.
Also if youre still thinking that bashing Wii graphics is the way to go you should consider the fact that nobody bought it for graphics. They bought it because Nintendo games are so good they dont need great graphics.
emawk
no ones bashing the wii here.simply saying that theres hardly a difference between the two games graphics!! we cant judge gameplay yet coz the game isn't out yet!!
There are clear diffrences with the graphics.
Tell that this previewer:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/23758.html
I suppose this means I have a Trained Eye...
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="MIYAMOTOnext007"]3 looks a little better but definetaly not a ganerational leap better.emawk
PDZ didn't look a Generation leap ahead of The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay but that didn't stop it either.
I'd say it did.:? And those gamers are not in the same series like these are.Oh well let's do this from another angle then... MP3:C doesn't look like it could have run on the GC at anything more then a Slide Show... That means this game shows at least some of the generational diffrence.
Dude MP3 pretty much looks like the previous two. What are you smoking?
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/23758.html
As if you needed this video to tell you that.
Seriously, the lighting system would have crashed the GC. The Draw Distance despayed would have killed the GPU just for starters.
[QUOTE="emawk"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="Great_Ragnarok"][QUOTE="hazuki87"]the pictures "supposedly" dont do the game justice. Its not up to par with 360 and PS3 of course but its supposed to be better than last gen games.
Also if youre still thinking that bashing Wii graphics is the way to go you should consider the fact that nobody bought it for graphics. They bought it because Nintendo games are so good they dont need great graphics.
GundamGuy0
no ones bashing the wii here.simply saying that theres hardly a difference between the two games graphics!! we cant judge gameplay yet coz the game isn't out yet!!
There are clear diffrences with the graphics.
Tell that to this previewer:
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/23758.html
I suppose this means I have a Trained Eye...
You're one in a million then. But the game still doesn't look that much better even to people with trained eyes, according to the video of course. I guess you could say I am proof of that.
You're one in a million then. But the game still doesn't look that much better even to people with trained eyes, according to the video of course. I guess you could say I proof of that.
emawk
It said to the untrained eye it didn't look much better...
IE if you know what your looking for, the improvments are there.
Framerate is noticably smoother... MP2 lagged sometimes during bosses and other actions... Is that a hint of motion blur as Samus turns or is it just poor video quality (or both, since the video quality is mediocre...)
The lighting is noticably better, nice use of bloom, and everything is clearer, more effects(you saw the missle launcher effect in the other trailer, nice smoke trails) and larger... And in widescreen...
Basically, the graphics are better than what I wanted to see every Wii game meet if not exceed... MP2
[QUOTE="emawk"]You're one in a million then. But the game still doesn't look that much better even to people with trained eyes, according to the video of course. I guess you could say I proof of that.
GundamGuy0
It said to the untrained eye it didn't look much better...
IE if you know what your looking for, the improvments are there.
First it said there isn't that much of difference between MP3 and the previous games, and then it said that to the untrained eye, the game looks the same as the old ones. That suggests that to the trained eye, the game doesn't look that much better than the previous ones.
wow i just watched the video and yeah the look pretty much the same but both of them are gorgeous. i don't see how even the biggest graphics whores could think it looks BAD. the artstyle for both is increbidle and the bossess look absolutely epic. all of a sudden im not even jealous of 360/ps3 hardware, that looks more than fine to me
i might be crazy but that footage was more exciting and impressive to me than any halo 3 video out.
anyways i really liked the corruption footage. got me really hyped.
[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]No, he said Zelda: Twilight Princess was arguably the worst in the series. -LionHeart
Well thats your opinion. I wouldn't say its arguably the worst since it has earned a spot in the Top 25.
So did zelda OOT, and WW.Majoras Mask didn't.
MM is awesome and was extremely under apreaciated at the time of its release because it was so different. I think its at least as good as OoT.[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="emawk"]You're one in a million then. But the game still doesn't look that much better even to people with trained eyes, according to the video of course. I guess you could say I proof of that.
emawk
It said to the untrained eye it didn't look much better...
IE if you know what your looking for, the improvments are there.
First it said there isn't that much of difference between MP3 and the previous games, and then it said that to the untrained eye, the game looks the same as the old ones. That suggests that to the trained eye, the game doesn't look that much better than the previous ones.
i really dont care if its improved or not it looks beautiful to me and i just watched a video of the bioshock demo not too long ago.
[QUOTE="-LionHeart"][QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]No, he said Zelda: Twilight Princess was arguably the worst in the series. laughingman42
Well thats your opinion. I wouldn't say its arguably the worst since it has earned a spot in the Top 25.
So did zelda OOT, and WW.Majoras Mask didn't.
MM is awesome and was extremely under apreaciated at the time of its release because it was so different. I think its at least as good as OoT.I agree.
[QUOTE="-LionHeart"][QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]Out of all the 3d zelda games at least. Zelda MM, Zelda OOT, and Zelda WW are better games imo.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="-LionHeart"]No, he said Zelda: Twilight Princess was arguably the worst in the series. laughingman42
Well thats your opinion. I wouldn't say its arguably the worst since it has earned a spot in the Top 25.
So did zelda OOT, and WW.Majoras Mask didn't.
MM is awesome and was extremely under apreaciated at the time of its release because it was so different. I think its at least as good as OoT.I liked Majoras Mask more than Ocarina of Time. That's the beauty of playing games and not worrying about what score it got. (Like most fanboys here on SW)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment