MGS4 (PS3) Vs Crysis (PC) vs Drakes Fortune (PS3)

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheManOfChoice
TheManOfChoice

4148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 TheManOfChoice
Member since 2003 • 4148 Posts

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI.  The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted.  Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then.  Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons". 

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

lordseer

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="toxicmog"]Uncharted, a week game set in the jungle like Mgs3. Could be an awesome sandbox jungle game.
But will most likely be a linear level design jungle game.TheManOfChoice



if your referring to crysis, then you should know that like PC Farcry, Crysis is dynamic, and situation can be approached in any number of ways.

How you missed the very first word in his sentence which referenced to which game he was talking about, I do not know.

I have no clue lol.
Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts
[QUOTE="ardylicious"]

CGI V RT.

I would rather be playing Crysis than prancing around with effeminate men trying to break into a complex owned by anothery effeminate man with another effeminate man as his sidekick. Or you might get caught by guards who look ominously gay Shock horror!!!

Or you could play Crysis with a super macho super hero kicking some real butt. Flinging people across a map with more polygons on one screen than MGS4 has in its entire game. The flick of a mouse instead of a hundred different combo moves. Blowing helecopters up with a single button instead of menu, direction, aim, then fire. DOH!

Sorry Crysis with a PC at 800-1000 and a ps3 at $500? Hey it costs to buy the game too you know.

Mind you i suppose its different from the same run and jump games you ps3 owners seem to get all the time. I pity you all.

Can't blame you for believing in CGI but i would of thought Motorstorm taught you ps3 owners a lesson???

tegovoltio



CGI? I could say Crisis is CGI too, if I was uninformed like you.

Good lord it is funny how quickly people forget.  That MGS 4 trailer was not gameplay.  There have only been a couple actual gameplay screens released and they were a major downgrade from that trailer.  Despite all the talk of manly men the one point he did make that was correct was that those MGS 4 pics were from the original "target render" trailer.

Avatar image for Jagazaar
Jagazaar

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Jagazaar
Member since 2007 • 1023 Posts
[QUOTE="Jagazaar"]

Dude, the graphics in Crysis 'pwn' the graphics in MGS4 and Drake's Fortune. This must evidently mean that it is a superior game in all regards, and thus must be at the very top of my purchase list, without question.

TheManOfChoice

I'm having trouble sensing if that's actually what you think or sarcasm...if its not sarcasm then :|

Heh, yep, 'tis sarcasm indeed. Maybe I'm just bitter/jaded, but I get bloody sick of all the emphasis put on these graphic comparisons, as if they point towards a superior game. Personally, I couldn't care less how these new games look, I want to see all this 'revolutionary' technology used to add/improve gameplay elements. 

I think I'll just stick with my PS2/SNES for a few years yet, until I see something that REALLY moves me from my apathy :|

Avatar image for ardylicious
ardylicious

1107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 ardylicious
Member since 2004 • 1107 Posts
[QUOTE="ardylicious"]

CGI V RT.

I would rather be playing Crysis than prancing around with effeminate men trying to break into a complex owned by anothery effeminate man with another effeminate man as his sidekick. Or you might get caught by guards who look ominously gay Shock horror!!!

Or you could play Crysis with a super macho super hero kicking some real butt. Flinging people across a map with more polygons on one screen than MGS4 has in its entire game. The flick of a mouse instead of a hundred different combo moves. Blowing helecopters up with a single button instead of menu, direction, aim, then fire. DOH!

Sorry Crysis with a PC at 800-1000 and a ps3 at $500? Hey it costs to buy the game too you know.

Mind you i suppose its different from the same run and jump games you ps3 owners seem to get all the time. I pity you all.

Can't blame you for believing in CGI but i would of thought Motorstorm taught you ps3 owners a lesson???

Timesplitter14

Metal gear is the only Japanese game without efeminate men (except Raiden, who's been modified).... and you're one of those who say PS3 is expensive but you're gonna get Crysis? Killing helicopters with menus? CGI? WTF?

There is enough of Crysis for people to come to an informed opinion on the ingame visuals. You can see hundreds of clips on youtube. MGS4? All we get is endles CGI intros ( and some RT snippets thrown in so we are led to believe) about some boring old fella who is about as interesting as a hole in the sock. Infact my socks are more interesting. I still think the Japanese have a serious problem when it comes to doing male characters. if my dad looked like him i would be convinced he had been were the sun don't shine. Crysis is a revolution in engine and FPS design. Not my fault the playstation has been deprived of a real time world. Run and jump games with hack and slash are more for the console consumer. PS3 is expensive for what you get. I have a PC because i can delve into millions of games aswell as use it as the be all and end all multimedia device. With a ps3 i have a choice of 2 games. And none of them are ground breaking. Crysis will be groundbreaking from an engine point of view. I mean GeoW has already shown the ps3 that MGS4 has no chance of competing with its polygon count. MGS will do it in style and ingenuity. How that interprets on the screen remains to be seen, and sadly like most ps3 games i have seen i have been greatly dissapointed with on release.
Avatar image for Kreean
Kreean

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Kreean
Member since 2006 • 683 Posts

@ ardylicious
"I would rather be playing Crysis than prancing around with effeminate men trying to break into a complex owned by another effeminate man with another effeminate man as his sidekick. Or you might get caught by guards who look ominously gay Shock horror!!!"

Oh boy, you sound pretty homophobic!

Avatar image for coolmonkeykid
coolmonkeykid

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57 coolmonkeykid
Member since 2004 • 3276 Posts
mgs4 looks like its a trailer.
Avatar image for Velocitas8
Velocitas8

10748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Velocitas8
Member since 2006 • 10748 Posts
Heh, yep, 'tis sarcasm indeed. Maybe I'm just bitter/jaded, but I get bloody sick of all the emphasis put on these graphic comparisons, as if they point towards a superior game. Personally, I couldn't care less how these new games look, I want to see all this 'revolutionary' technology used to add/improve gameplay elements.

I think I'll just stick with my PS2/SNES for a few years yet, until I see something that REALLY moves me from my apathy :|

Jagazaar

Like I've said before: The sad truth is that the only things that ever get compared here in System Wars (when it comes to comparing games themselves) are graphics and review scores. Nobody discusses gameplay. Ever.

Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts
[QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI.  The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted.  Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then.  Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons". 

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

TheManOfChoice

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy.  Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3).  Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache.  Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting. 

Gameplay

 

"Target Render"  Trailer

Insert Foot.

Avatar image for Kreean
Kreean

683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Kreean
Member since 2006 • 683 Posts

@ ardylicious
"Or you could play Crysis with a super macho super hero kicking some real butt"
"I still think the Japanese have a serious problem when it comes to doing male characters."
"if my dad looked like him i would be convinced he had been were the sun don't shine."

LOL You are homophobic!

Avatar image for ardylicious
ardylicious

1107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 ardylicious
Member since 2004 • 1107 Posts
[QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI. The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted. Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then. Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons".

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

lordseer

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy. Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3). Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache. Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting.

Gameplay

"Target Render" Trailer

Insert Foot.

WOW look at those textures. Once again the japanese are more interested in character design than actual world dynamics.
Avatar image for Filonus
Filonus

1307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Filonus
Member since 2003 • 1307 Posts

CGI V RT.

I would rather be playing Crysis than prancing around with effeminate men trying to break into a complex owned by anothery effeminate man with another effeminate man as his sidekick. Or you might get caught by guards who look ominously gay Shock horror!!!

Or you could play Crysis with a super macho super hero kicking some real butt. Flinging people across a map with more polygons on one screen than MGS4 has in its entire game. The flick of a mouse instead of a hundred different combo moves. Blowing helecopters up with a single button instead of menu, direction, aim, then fire. DOH!

Sorry Crysis with a PC at 800-1000 and a ps3 at $500? Hey it costs to buy the game too you know.

Mind you i suppose its different from the same run and jump games you ps3 owners seem to get all the time. I pity you all.

Can't blame you for believing in CGI but i would of thought Motorstorm taught you ps3 owners a lesson???

ardylicious

 

this kinda talk is just kinda cringeworthy.  If you look at 9/10 fps/action games on consoles and pc's the main characters are brimming with testorone. I actually liked playing as the androgynous raiden, he wasn't snake; but that was the point entirely. 

I wonder when some of you people will lose your erections for overly masculine men.  

Avatar image for Fusible
Fusible

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 Fusible
Member since 2005 • 2828 Posts


Let's see... $3000 to play Crisis the way it looks in those screens, or, $500 to play MGS4... How does one decide? :roll:

MGS4 FTW!Timstuff
Try more like $1800. I haven't paid that much yet, but I have money still for WHENEVER the R600 comes out. Which will total at around that much.
Avatar image for ardylicious
ardylicious

1107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 ardylicious
Member since 2004 • 1107 Posts
No, just normal men will do as in someone who isin't wearing tight jeans like resident evil. Dear oh dear. I am no trouser bandit and i believe each to their own but the japanese just can't draw macho men. Its alwasy nice to take control of a badass muddafukka and not some fairy.....
Avatar image for TheManOfChoice
TheManOfChoice

4148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 TheManOfChoice
Member since 2003 • 4148 Posts
[QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI.  The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted.  Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then.  Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons". 

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

lordseer

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy.  Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3).  Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache.  Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting. 

Gameplay

 

"Target Render"  Trailer

Insert Foot.

You said that the MGS footage we have seen has been CGI, inferring to all of it. Now, the E3 trailer not CGI, it was from the in-game engine of which they plan on getting to since it is their target render, of which they have until November to get to. Now according to the fact that those gameplay pics, were taken from a gameplay video(released at TGS) which was the most recent trailer (Kojima uses gameplay in a cinematic view to make the video more interesting), this means that you also called the most recent trailer from which you got those gameplay pics from CGI, then you went on to contradict yourself by revealing that you know that those are gameplay shots.

Maybe next time you'll think before you make false claims.

Avatar image for Acenso
Acenso

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Acenso
Member since 2006 • 2355 Posts
[QUOTE="lordseer"][QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI. The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted. Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then. Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons".

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

ardylicious

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy. Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3). Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache. Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting.

Gameplay



 

"Target Render" Trailer


Insert Foot.



WOW look at those textures. Once again the japanese are more interested in character design than actual world dynamics.

As I said earlier...Touched up cutscenes which are questionable. Vs Crysis^^

Best part is...because Kojima said it is realtime. Cows believe it LOL. 

Avatar image for HellsAngel2c
HellsAngel2c

5540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#67 HellsAngel2c
Member since 2004 • 5540 Posts
all 3 look great, but for different reasons. As most people have said, Crysis seriously looks amazing with its realistic lighting and graphics. But mgs4 has an inredible dusty look to it and reeks of atmosphere! Naughty Dog's Uncharted also seems to have a focus on atmosphere, but with a more quirky style- you can tell it is by the folks who brought Crash and Jak to the world!
Avatar image for TheManOfChoice
TheManOfChoice

4148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 TheManOfChoice
Member since 2003 • 4148 Posts
[QUOTE="ardylicious"][QUOTE="lordseer"][QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI. The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted. Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then. Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons".

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

Acenso

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy. Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3). Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache. Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting.

Gameplay



 

"Target Render" Trailer


Insert Foot.



WOW look at those textures. Once again the japanese are more interested in character design than actual world dynamics.

As I said earlier...Touched up cutscenes which are questionable. Vs Crysis^^

Best part is...because Kojima said it is realtime. Cows believe it LOL. 

All the videos, even the very first trailer for MGS4 have been from the in-game engine, despite what you want to believe and never been touched up. Now, everyone, aside from your small group of haters will agree with me(and I mean everyone including Halo fans, Splinter Cell fans and the sheep).

Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts

Well maybe i'm wrong but aren't you comparing in game (crysis) with CGI (mgs4)

Even so crysis wins. That game looks amazing. Mgs4's pics do look nice there. Those are all CGI though arent' they.

Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts
[QUOTE="lordseer"][QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI.  The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted.  Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then.  Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons". 

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

TheManOfChoice

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy.  Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3).  Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache.  Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting. 

Gameplay

 

"Target Render"  Trailer

Insert Foot.

You said that the MGS footage we have seen has been CGI, inferring to all of it. Now, the E3 trailer not CGI, it was from the in-game engine of which they plan on getting to since it is their target render, of which they have until November to get to. Now according to the fact that those gameplay pics, were taken from a gameplay video(released at TGS) which was the most recent trailer (Kojima uses gameplay in a cinematic view to make the video more interesting), this means that you also called the most recent trailer from which you got those gameplay pics from CGI, then you went on to contradict yourself by revealing that you know that those are gameplay shots.

Maybe next time you'll think before you make false claims.

More represenative of gameplay and generally accepted as being what MGS 4 will look like.  I don't know what machine they planned on running that "in game" engine on if it is true, which I doubt.  The Killzone 2 trailer was also from an "in game engine". 

Face it, those pics aren't even close to being represenative of what MGS 4 will look like.  You keep taking that spoon feeding from sony though. 

Avatar image for evilbarbarian
evilbarbarian

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 evilbarbarian
Member since 2005 • 3883 Posts
Watch some videos, then you'll see how much of a difference there is. Not trying to bash either of the PS3 games, because both look good.
Avatar image for Filonus
Filonus

1307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Filonus
Member since 2003 • 1307 Posts

No, just normal men will do as in someone who isin't wearing tight jeans like resident evil. Dear oh dear. I am no trouser bandit and i believe each to their own but the japanese just can't draw macho men. Its alwasy nice to take control of a badass muddafukka and not some fairy.....ardylicious

 

 

lol 

 

i've always preferred the eastern depiction of masculine cool from akira to samonusuke, jubei cloud, squall, raiden, dmc 1 dante  

 

Not really a fan of the homo-erotic western heroes with their ripping biceps. in fact wait, most of marvel characters wear really tight costumes.

 

The dude in cyrsis wears a really tight costume, just like snake; they both seem quite masculine the end? 

Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts
[QUOTE="Acenso"][QUOTE="ardylicious"][QUOTE="lordseer"][QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI. The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted. Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then. Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons".

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

TheManOfChoice

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy. Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3). Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache. Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting.

Gameplay



 

"Target Render" Trailer


Insert Foot.



WOW look at those textures. Once again the japanese are more interested in character design than actual world dynamics.

As I said earlier...Touched up cutscenes which are questionable. Vs Crysis^^

Best part is...because Kojima said it is realtime. Cows believe it LOL. 

All the videos, even the very first trailer for MGS4 have been from the in-game engine, despite what you want to believe and never been touched up. Now, everyone, aside from your small group of haters will agree with me(and I mean everyone including Halo fans, Splinter Cell fans and the sheep).

You've got to be kidding me.  You obviously haven't been here long as the forums exploded after E3 in argument over the legitimacy of that trailer and people called Kojima's BS daily for months after E3. 

Most aren't as gullible as you despite what you'd like to claim here. 

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#74 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

mgs4 and crysis look crazy amazing....:shock:

Avatar image for Filonus
Filonus

1307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Filonus
Member since 2003 • 1307 Posts

errr lord seer, please use some common sense.


You don't need to know that much about the ps3's hardware to know that it's capable of those shots. Here's a clip from the game in engine which is actually better than those screenshots: http://youtube.com/watch?v=oSDudPTOznE

 

If people are seriously questioning which game looks graphically better then wow... of course crysis looks better, its CRYSIS. that game has been built for pc's, insane technology has gone into it's making the end.

But to me in terms of design i'm infinitely more interested in the cinematic metal gear. MGS4 is set in several different locations around the world. THe one we've seen so far is the middle east.  

Avatar image for ardylicious
ardylicious

1107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 ardylicious
Member since 2004 • 1107 Posts

[QUOTE="ardylicious"]No, just normal men will do as in someone who isin't wearing tight jeans like resident evil. Dear oh dear. I am no trouser bandit and i believe each to their own but the japanese just can't draw macho men. Its alwasy nice to take control of a badass muddafukka and not some fairy.....Filonus

lol

i've always preferred the eastern depiction of masculine cool from akira to samonusuke, jubei cloud, squall, raiden, dmc 1 dante

Not really a fan of the homo-erotic western heroes with their ripping biceps. in fact wait, most of marvel characters wear really tight costumes.

The dude in cyrsis wears a really tight costume, just like snake; they both seem quite masculine the end?

True. Point taken but he is more of a cyborg rather than some character showing tight jeans in front of the screen. And i am sure you woulden't want to bum a robot. Mind you i woulden't want to bum a fella in tight jeans either. The problem is Japanese don't do normal walking along the street type of men anyway. They are either eccentric characters or effeminate ones...... My concern with this game will be the ps3 polygon limit. There is no doubt this game graphically will not be able to compete with Crysis or GeoW. Those are revolutionary engines by dedicated engine users. Nevertheless it is about gameplay and no doubt MGS fans won't be dissapointed. But to expect a revolution in engine design you are not going ot get with textures shown. Resistance fell in to the same trap. But it will have style rather than a screen full of polygons. Being a PC owner i will always want to play in a real world environment rather than a limited angle viewed one. But we shall see.
Avatar image for TheManOfChoice
TheManOfChoice

4148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 TheManOfChoice
Member since 2003 • 4148 Posts
[QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="Acenso"][QUOTE="ardylicious"][QUOTE="lordseer"][QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI. The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted. Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then. Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons".

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

lordseer

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy. Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3). Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache. Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting.

Gameplay



 

"Target Render" Trailer


Insert Foot.



WOW look at those textures. Once again the japanese are more interested in character design than actual world dynamics.

As I said earlier...Touched up cutscenes which are questionable. Vs Crysis^^

Best part is...because Kojima said it is realtime. Cows believe it LOL. 

All the videos, even the very first trailer for MGS4 have been from the in-game engine, despite what you want to believe and never been touched up. Now, everyone, aside from your small group of haters will agree with me(and I mean everyone including Halo fans, Splinter Cell fans and the sheep).

You've got to be kidding me.  You obviously haven't been here long as the forums exploded after E3 in argument over the legitimacy of that trailer and people called Kojima's BS daily for months after E3. 

Most aren't as gullible as you despite what you'd like to claim here. 

I've been here before MGS3, and I was here for that "explosion" as you call it. Which is exactly why I'm so dumbfounded as how you can make the statement that any of those MGS videos are CGI. No one called Kojima's BS, it was actually the other way around from your biased point of view. I can recall "Haters owned" threads a week after that argument started. Lemmings believed it was CGI because of the Killzone trailer which was a sped up, in-engine, fraud. And a week after lemmings made the CGI claim, people were shutting them down left and right. Kojima even had a damn press conference about if it was CGI wherein he paused the trailer, and started manipulating the sunlight, the shadows and the colors, proving that it was the in-game engine and not a CGI video running off of a high powered computer. You have your information backwards and I suggest you check back and do some research. That video was all over gamespot when that CGI argument broke, and you will soon find you are just biased and misinformed.

Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts
Crysis will blow both games away. Crysis will blow most games away for awhile. And since MGS is known as being a ton of cut scenes and some game play thrown in here and there so all that is prolly just cut scenes Also the in game fighting scenes have already been shown and look a ton better then MGS. rybe1025
Guess What? MGS has a lot of development time to go and unless Crysis has some amazing, innovative gameplay for a shooter, it won't blow MGS or Drake's Fortune out of the water. As far as I can tell right now, it's a shooter with fantastic graphics, but I haven't seen anything in the way of gameplay innovation. I haven't looked into as much as I have with MGS or Drake's Fortune, so I can't say anything for sure about the gameplay. I'm just saying I haven't seen anything new gameplay wise.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
Crysis wins! Fatality
Avatar image for MC2K8
MC2K8

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 MC2K8
Member since 2007 • 319 Posts
MGS4 looks good, even at its early stage.  I'm quite happy with the direction that MGS4 is going.
Avatar image for carlbot
carlbot

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 carlbot
Member since 2005 • 47 Posts

comparing cut-scene ridden collection of MGS4 (bar 2) and in-game examples of crysis........too me that just doesn't seem fair.....but even still crysis wins, the of detail and quality is still better than mgs4 even with it being cut-scenes.

 

tbh no competition.

 

 

Avatar image for deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc

6249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-5f6dd6241fdcc
Member since 2003 • 6249 Posts
Don't even try to compare anything to Crysis. Oh, and they were using the old Drakes Fortune pics. There has been a big downgrade. But still, Crysis looks 10x better.
Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
How many people on here can even run Crysis at full spec? I expect honesty, not all yes answers just to pull for Crysis. And both games are'nt even out yet so do the comparison when the finished product ships. Even so Crysis has got detail going for it. MGS4 looks great, even at this stage, reguardless.LiquidMetal14
I can, in DX9c, once I voltmod my card and clock it to 700mhz. Crysis is in alpha stage now, and it runs great on proven dx9c hardware, so I don't have to worry about anything now, since they are optimizing the game. Considering how farcry ran on older hardware I say a lot of people will run it decently. Crysis on low=Farcry Max, and farcry max looks like this
Avatar image for blacktorn
blacktorn

8299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#84 blacktorn
Member since 2004 • 8299 Posts
Those mgs4 screens are far from Final,i'll expect quite a revamp of the graphics of mgs4 show at E3 this June.
Avatar image for miss_kitt3n
miss_kitt3n

2717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 miss_kitt3n
Member since 2006 • 2717 Posts

Well maybe i'm wrong but aren't you comparing in game (crysis) with CGI (mgs4)

Even so crysis wins. That game looks amazing. Mgs4's pics do look nice there. Those are all CGI though arent' they.

streetridaz

 

*sigh*

 

I had no idea that there were so many people in the world who cant read. 

 

Kojima does not use CGI!, put that in your Joint and smoke it:|

Avatar image for CR00K
CR00K

2657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#86 CR00K
Member since 2006 • 2657 Posts
[QUOTE="ardylicious"][QUOTE="lordseer"][QUOTE="TheManOfChoice"][QUOTE="lordseer"]

So what I get from this thread is that Crysis looks better than MGS CGI and Uncharted CGI. The only ps3 gameplay pics in that comparison are 2-3 from uncharted. Everything from MGS 4 is from the original trailer which took a bombshell of a downgrade since then. Those shots came from the trailer where snakes mustache had "10,000 polygons".

Crysis is officially > Sony PR trailers.

Acenso

Everytime someone says that, everyone else knows they're an idiot.

Here you go big guy. Here are the actual MGS 4 gameplay screens, not screens from the MGS 4 target render trailer (aka the original CGI trailer from E3). Did you forget about the 10k polygon mustache. Keep throwing insults my way though because you obviously don't know about a game you are promoting.

Gameplay



 

"Target Render" Trailer


Insert Foot.



WOW look at those textures. Once again the japanese are more interested in character design than actual world dynamics.

As I said earlier...Touched up cutscenes which are questionable. Vs Crysis^^

Best part is...because Kojima said it is realtime. Cows believe it LOL. 

  Actually, they were real time.  But you have to know that after AI is put into play and many other things, the quality goes down.  The same thing for LAIR.  There was a trailer a long time ago with 2 dragons fighting each other in VERY high detail.  I mean, it was just unreal.  They proved it was in real time by rotating the camera and messing with the lighting.  (Hideo did it too.)  Now seeing LAIR, it still looks great, but of course, not as good as if there was no AI and the other things they have to add in for you to actually play the game.  If you want me to link videos to both the LAIR crew AND Hideo proving their trailers are real time, just tell me.
Avatar image for tramp
tramp

2110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 tramp
Member since 2003 • 2110 Posts

The character animations in the latest Crysis video are amazing.

Avatar image for 1q3er5
1q3er5

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 1q3er5
Member since 2003 • 759 Posts

LOL all you broke Console gamers crying about how expensive a PC is going to be - not much more than a PS3 !!!I love seeing all the MGS4 fans trying there hardest to point out the good things about their screens. LOL what a joke.Crysis is so far ahead of those games, the comparison gave me a good laugh.  Like the guy said earlier comparing crysis to MSG4 is like comparing a Nuclear bomb to a grenade.

Avatar image for baddog121390
baddog121390

4335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 baddog121390
Member since 2005 • 4335 Posts

[QUOTE="LiquidMetal14"]How many people on here can even run Crysis at full spec? I expect honesty, not all yes answers just to pull for Crysis. And both games are'nt even out yet so do the comparison when the finished product ships. Even so Crysis has got detail going for it. MGS4 looks great, even at this stage, reguardless.muscleserge


I can, in DX9c, once I voltmod my card and clock it to 700mhz. Crysis is in alpha stage now, and it runs great on proven dx9c hardware, so I don't have to worry about anything now, since they are optimizing the game. Considering how farcry ran on older hardware I say a lot of people will run it decently. Crysis on low=Farcry Max, and farcry max looks like this

Nah, that was a bad pic to show off FarCry. The one above is better.

And by the way, that is a horrible comparison of MGS4 and Crysis. These Crysis pics are all from real-time Pre-alpha  builds. They could of picked much better screens. The fact that they used MGS4 screen caps from E3 is pretty sad. Here's a great real-time Crysis screen:

Or this

Avatar image for insomnia37
insomnia37

1442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#90 insomnia37
Member since 2004 • 1442 Posts
All 3 games look amazing!!