Microsoft has given up on exclusives...

  • 98 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cowgriller
cowgriller

3153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 cowgriller
Member since 2008 • 3153 Posts

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

I think it is the cows 'getting back' at the lems after the Lems bashed the PS3 for having no exclusives for a year. I'm sure it will swing back and smack the cows in the face, like it did with the Lems.

bokiloki

not true. the ps3 launched with exclusives and always had exclusives. lems, like myself, bashed the cows for not having anything worth buying/playing until mgs 4 came out. that's two years of ----- games, not one.

what a lie, the ps3 had alot of solid exclusives before mgs4, uncharted, ratchet and clank, warhawk, heavenly sword, ninja gaiden sigma, resistance, motorstorm, these were not AAA here but alot of those were AAA on other sites, not to mention all the multiplats that were out. which is what 360 owners will be saying this year, i have all 3 consoles so it doesnt matter to me who has the best exclusives, just pointing out your biased lie.

first off, ninja gaiden sigma is not an exclusive, it was a port/remake of an xbox game. mgs4 came out two years after the ps3 launched not with it. the other games you listed were flops and not worth buying. sure resistence and motorstorm sold over a million each but that's because there were no other options available. the fact is for the first two years of the ps3's life, until mgs4 came out, not a single game was worth buying. it is not a biased lie, it is a fact. a fact most cows hate to bring up but they know it's true. secondly, you can't throw in multiplats because i was referring to exclusives. anyway, all of those multiplats were better and sold better on the 360. it wasn't until the second half of 2008 (once again 2 years) that multiplats for the ps3 started to look on par with the 360 version.

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#52 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

...Wow these threads are really getting out of hand.

SynisterGamer
Agreed. I thought fad topics were not allowed anymore. :?
Avatar image for cool_beans1
cool_beans1

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 cool_beans1
Member since 2009 • 458 Posts
[QUOTE="immortality20"]

Hmm, let's look at Teh_Cell's last 4 threads:

"Microsoft has given up on exclusives", "How did Microsoft mange to screw up 2009 so badly?", "Has Microsoft give up" and "Xbox in big trouble" (found through posting history). Now, I'm no genius, but you are just pushing to be noticed with ill concieved threads, opinions and variety. Just stop, before you lose any respect PS3FanAddict might have for you.

lol if anything, I'm sure both of them will still plot to make useless "Xbox bashing" threads over and over again.
Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts
[QUOTE="DrinkDuff"]No, and no. 1. Microsoft has not given up on exclusives just because they haven't announced new ones in a while. 2. Sony will not drop the price of the PS3 because they are hurting financially, and their assets couldn't take another hit from a price drop.

you may want to bite your tongue about sony not dropping its price..... also M$ dropped its price most likely out of intimidation of sony, i dont know tho actually :p , but i guess people get what they pay for
Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

not true. the ps3 launched with exclusives and always had exclusives. lems, like myself, bashed the cows for not having anything worth buying/playing until mgs 4 came out. that's two years of ----- games, not one.

cowgriller

what a lie, the ps3 had alot of solid exclusives before mgs4, uncharted, ratchet and clank, warhawk, heavenly sword, ninja gaiden sigma, resistance, motorstorm, these were not AAA here but alot of those were AAA on other sites, not to mention all the multiplats that were out. which is what 360 owners will be saying this year, i have all 3 consoles so it doesnt matter to me who has the best exclusives, just pointing out your biased lie.

first off, ninja gaiden sigma is not an exclusive, it was a port/remake of an xbox game. mgs4 came out two years after the ps3 launched not with it. the other games you listed were flops and not worth buying. sure resistence and motorstorm sold over a million each but that's because there were no other options available. the fact is for the first two years of the ps3's life, until mgs4 came out, not a single game was worth buying. it is not a biased lie, it is a fact. a fact most cows hate to bring up but they know it's true. secondly, you can't throw in multiplats because i was referring to exclusives. anyway, all of those multiplats were better and sold better on the 360. it wasn't until the second half of 2008 (once again 2 years) that multiplats for the ps3 started to look on par with the 360 version.

you really cant say any of those are woth buying because you havent tried them, Ratchet and clank, and uncharted are two great games, i do agree aboput warhawk though i did not like it, and those games would have sold a lot if, the price was low and it came out at the same time as 360, but its all speculation..
Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts

Yeah just like the PS3 has given up on beating the 360 in sales.;)CYB3R_N1GHTMARE

It's more like Americans giving up on Sony.

Really now, you can't say that if you compare world wide sales... especially 360 having its year advance :|

Avatar image for bokiloki
bokiloki

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 bokiloki
Member since 2008 • 1452 Posts

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

not true. the ps3 launched with exclusives and always had exclusives. lems, like myself, bashed the cows for not having anything worth buying/playing until mgs 4 came out. that's two years of ----- games, not one.

cowgriller

what a lie, the ps3 had alot of solid exclusives before mgs4, uncharted, ratchet and clank, warhawk, heavenly sword, ninja gaiden sigma, resistance, motorstorm, these were not AAA here but alot of those were AAA on other sites, not to mention all the multiplats that were out. which is what 360 owners will be saying this year, i have all 3 consoles so it doesnt matter to me who has the best exclusives, just pointing out your biased lie.

first off, ninja gaiden sigma is not an exclusive, it was a port/remake of an xbox game. mgs4 came out two years after the ps3 launched not with it. the other games you listed were flops and not worth buying. sure resistence and motorstorm sold over a million each but that's because there were no other options available. the fact is for the first two years of the ps3's life, until mgs4 came out, not a single game was worth buying. it is not a biased lie, it is a fact. a fact most cows hate to bring up but they know it's true. secondly, you can't throw in multiplats because i was referring to exclusives. anyway, all of those multiplats were better and sold better on the 360. it wasn't until the second half of 2008 (once again 2 years) that multiplats for the ps3 started to look on par with the 360 version.

yea because we know that an 8.5 is a flop when it comes to uncharted and i believe warhawk. and i bought all those games and enjoyed them, i bet you never played any of them yet you say none of them are worth buying. i guess the only games worth buying for you are games that only get 9 and above from one site, what a shame man.

Avatar image for AlexSheep
AlexSheep

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 AlexSheep
Member since 2005 • 316 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]cows seem to be on a rampage about the 360's 2009 lineup. you'd think lemmings would actually be more worried about thishopesfall2own
lemmings have common sense and rationale..cows jump the gun on ..everything...

Quote-worthy. You made my day.

Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

ok. i'll give you the fact that the xbox never one a gen. that's indisputable. but it's actually worse to go from being number one, selling over 100 million units in one generation, to being in last place with an over priced console in the next generation.

how can you say that lems praise AAA games that don't translate to sales? halo 3, and gears 1 &2 would like to say hello. as would few others like ME and gta 4 which sold more on the 360 than the ps3.

cows and sheep bash others. true. i'll give you that. but cows this gen have become so delusional that they would hype anything and everything ranging from firmware upgrades, the standard features that should've been in place since the beginning but were left out because sony refused to pay the company they stole the invention from despite the fact a judge ruled them to (read: left out rumble because sony didn't want to pay immersion for it), to over hyping games that are clearly going to be failures (lair, heavenly sword, motorstorm, etc.) the sheep can't hype anything or be proud of anything because nintendo took their money and told them to wait in the rain for a hardcore oriented title only just to give them abysmal shovelware. when the sheep ask where's mario and zelda, nintendo's response is "well we have wii music. that has mario in it. who was the other guy you mentioned?"

the xbox 360 may not come out in first place this gen. in fact, it's pretty much guaranteed nintendo will to everyone's dismay. but at least they won't be in last place like sony.

cowgriller

Lemming hyped everything too. As a matter of fact, lemmings hyped the most games during the PS2 era. it's funny that what you see cows nowadays are the same action and reaction XBox was, and XBox was in 2nd place.

One of the most lame post the lemmings did, which by all standards, the lowest ever from any post from other fanboys like cows and sheeps, is to say that buying XBox and X360, are patriotic, or don't buy Japanese.

Another low for lemmings, which was not done by either cows or sheeps, is the games vs sales threads. The thread was created (even endorsed by some moderator) to discredit Wii's success and to limit lemmings insecurities. It's so low that lemmings forgot the difference between subjective and objective. You can throw some of the worst tantrums of cows and sheeps, but remember, it is neither of these fanboy who started the havoc thread about games vs sales. It is lemmings who created that thread that almost change the rules in the forum on how we judge a console (with the help of a moderator). Fortunately, with the help of other voice of majority of gamers, on the second voting, the rule that games>sales was overturned. Ironically, that voting thread happened when Wii outsold X360 worldwide. We all bashed here and there, but cows and sheep never, ever, change the rules like the lemmings attempted (which almost succeed).

i wasn't around for the highlighted.

if i remember correctly, it was the cows that tried to changed the rules about what scores to use regarding games. they were the ones that introduced the idea of using meta critc and game ranking to try to say that their hyped games that flopped on gs are not flops at all, but that overall they were doing well and fell within their hype. also, cows tried to change the rule by creating polls saying that ign scores should be used and not gs scores because "teh lemmspot iz teh biazed".

as for the patriotic thing, let's not forget the petitions that were created by cows after dmc4, ff13 and re5 were announced for the 360. the cows even went so far as to say they want people to boycott capcom and not buy dmc4 because they weren't being loyal to the sony franchise. fact is all fanboys say and do incredibly stupid things. this gen, the cows win by far in most outrages fanboyisms.

Actually, it was the lems who introduced the idea of games>sales, not cows. It's simple, during the time when Wii outsold the X360, PS3 does not have much high rated games to brag about, X360, due to it's one year start, has the most AAA, exclusive or non-exclusive, and use that as an advantage to discredit Wii success and damage control X360 being outsold despite a year headstart. So you don't remember it correctly my friend. Lems started the thread because they have most to gain from it, not the cows.

Also, sure, boycotting Capcom due to DMC 4 exclusivity can be low. Nonetheless, its "just a company" compare to lemmings whosaid that whoever does not buy X360 are unpatriotic and do not buy Japanese, or Japan should support X360 because US saved them. There are even some lems, during those time, banned for a while for racial slur on the japanese (using the name J*P in a racial tense) to despise Japanese companies like Sony and Nintendo.

So, no matter how much arguement you put on cows, and sheeps, at least, these fanboysnever rant or hint of racial bias, and DID not try to change the rule of gamespot in judging who wins the console war (Games>Sales) to their advantage.

Again, let me tell you, it was lems who posted the thread about Games>Sales within the moment when Wii outsold X360 worldwide.

Sony did use Meta-Critic or Gamerankings to brag their scores, but Lems went beyond low when they propose a voting for Games>Sales in the forums (with the moderator who is clearly for X360 supporting it). Lems almost succeeded since a moderator sided with them, only that other members of the gamespot forum, fanboy and non-fanboycomplained that the voting is biased, to the point that second voting is require. There was a creditbility crisis in Gamespot at the time when Greg K. was still around as chief editor. I think it happened in mid-end 2007 just several month after Wii beats X360 in worldwide sales.

So no, lems since 2001, are the lowest overall in terms of offense and fanboyism. Hopefully, you are not a lem or gamer elitist, but rather ahardcore gamer who embraces gaming whether PS3, Wii, or X360.

I like X360, it has the best game for my taste, but I hate the lems the most since I knew their attitude during 2001, and still is.

Avatar image for marcuskickass
marcuskickass

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 marcuskickass
Member since 2007 • 839 Posts

This is just getting pathetic...Giving up on exclusives means giving up the reason to buy your console and is extremely stupid ,and MS is anything but...And they have said many times before that E3 is where they will announce their exclusive lineup for the mid - end year...and they have released more exclusives that Sony so far this year.(GTAIV TLAD/Halo Wars/Star Ocean TLH/Stoked/Race pro ) and with Ninja blade coming out soon...which all suggest that they have definitely not given up on exclusives

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

[QUOTE="cowgriller"]

not true. the ps3 launched with exclusives and always had exclusives. lems, like myself, bashed the cows for not having anything worth buying/playing until mgs 4 came out. that's two years of ----- games, not one.

cowgriller

what a lie, the ps3 had alot of solid exclusives before mgs4, uncharted, ratchet and clank, warhawk, heavenly sword, ninja gaiden sigma, resistance, motorstorm, these were not AAA here but alot of those were AAA on other sites, not to mention all the multiplats that were out. which is what 360 owners will be saying this year, i have all 3 consoles so it doesnt matter to me who has the best exclusives, just pointing out your biased lie.

first off, ninja gaiden sigma is not an exclusive, it was a port/remake of an xbox game. mgs4 came out two years after the ps3 launched not with it. the other games you listed were flops and not worth buying. sure resistence and motorstorm sold over a million each but that's because there were no other options available. the fact is for the first two years of the ps3's life, until mgs4 came out, not a single game was worth buying. it is not a biased lie, it is a fact. a fact most cows hate to bring up but they know it's true. secondly, you can't throw in multiplats because i was referring to exclusives. anyway, all of those multiplats were better and sold better on the 360. it wasn't until the second half of 2008 (once again 2 years) that multiplats for the ps3 started to look on par with the 360 version.

Oblivion was a multiplatform released on the PS3 in 2007 that looked much better than its 360 counterpart. LOL how is Uncharted a flop, all of the games on that list have sold over a million copies, not just Resistance and Motorstorm. If you don't think any of those games are worth buying that's your opinion, it is far from a fact.
Avatar image for glenn2709
glenn2709

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 glenn2709
Member since 2005 • 1719 Posts
Its like a trend to create these kind of threads these days.
Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts
lol honestly the lemming whining is quite hilarious. For 2 years cows were made fun of because of NOGAMES and now that the 360 has basically nothing in sight the lemmings cry out "bu bu exclusives don't matter it's all about the multiplats!" and "these threads are getting out of hand just wait until E3 you guys you'll see". Oh how the tables are turned.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#64 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="DrinkDuff"]No, and no. 1. Microsoft has not given up on exclusives just because they haven't announced new ones in a while. 2. Sony will not drop the price of the PS3 because they are hurting financially, and their assets couldn't take another hit from a price drop.

I expect a drop for the PS3 around E3, but yes, Sony has said they want to get the most out of every price point, so people expecting major drops or more than maybe one a year are being overly optimistic IMO.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#65 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"]lol honestly the lemming whining is quite hilarious. For 2 years cows were made fun of because of NOGAMES and now that the 360 has basically nothing in sight the lemmings cry out "bu bu exclusives don't matter it's all about the multiplats!" and "these threads are getting out of hand just wait until E3 you guys you'll see". Oh how the tables are turned.

I found games on both systems and the Wii throughout their life spans. Still do. My how the fanboys like to use bad hyperbole.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

Oh how the tables are turned.STRETCH-E

The last 360 AAAe was 5 months ago, that's nowhere close to the almost two years the PS3 needed for getting its FIRST one >_>

Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"]lol honestly the lemming whining is quite hilarious. For 2 years cows were made fun of because of NOGAMES and now that the 360 has basically nothing in sight the lemmings cry out "bu bu exclusives don't matter it's all about the multiplats!" and "these threads are getting out of hand just wait until E3 you guys you'll see". Oh how the tables are turned.

I found games on both systems and the Wii throughout their life spans. Still do. My how the fanboys like to use bad hyperbole.

Doesn't change the fact that cows had it hard for 2 years and now lemmings are using the same excuses. It's just the SW cycle and it's great to see it at work.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#69 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"]lol honestly the lemming whining is quite hilarious. For 2 years cows were made fun of because of NOGAMES and now that the 360 has basically nothing in sight the lemmings cry out "bu bu exclusives don't matter it's all about the multiplats!" and "these threads are getting out of hand just wait until E3 you guys you'll see". Oh how the tables are turned.

I found games on both systems and the Wii throughout their life spans. Still do. My how the fanboys like to use bad hyperbole.

Doesn't change the fact that cows had it hard for 2 years and now lemmings are using the same excuses. It's just the SW cycle and it's great to see it at work.

Like IronBass said, I think you are stretching a bit at best.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"][QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Oh how the tables are turned.

The last 360 AAA was 5 months ago, that's nowhere close to the almost two years the PS3 needed for getting its FIRST one >_>

lol talk some more about how mutliplats are what matter and Halo Wars being AA on GR. I'll have some cheese with your whine.

What has one thing to do with the other? Yes, being the biggest games this gen multiplats, I don't understand all about this obsession with exclusivity. Yes, Halo Wars is AA on GR. I don't see how that change the fact that on GS scores (which are irrelevant btw) the last 360 AAA was only four months ago.
Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

[QUOTE="SynisterGamer"]

...Wow these threads are really getting out of hand.

Chaos_HL21

I think it is the cows 'getting back' at the lems after the Lems bashed the PS3 for having no exclusives for a year. I'm sure it will swing back and smack the cows in the face, like it did with the Lems.

they should have had their fill by now.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Halo Wars is AA on GR!!! But the GS score is irrevelant!!

Yup. That's my view.
The last AAA was 5 months ago, now it's 4? STRETCH-E
From Nov. 14 to this day, it is four months and 10 days, rounded, 4. [QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] lol keep'em coming

Something the matter?
Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Oh how the tables are turned.

The last 360 AAA was 5 months ago, that's nowhere close to the almost two years the PS3 needed for getting its FIRST one >_>

PS3 took almost two years to get Oblivion? I remember it coming out a lot sooner than that....
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#75 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"][QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] lol talk some more about how mutliplats are what matter and Halo Wars being AA on GR. I'll have some cheese with your whine.

What has one thing to do with the other? Yes, being the biggest games this gen multiplats, I don't understand all about this obsession with exclusivity. Yes, Halo Wars is AA on GR. I don't see how that change the fact that on GS scores (which are irrelevant btw) the last 360 AAA was only four months ago.

Halo Wars is AA on GR!!! But the GS score is irrevelant!! The last AAA was 5 months ago, now it's 4? lol keep'em coming

I think he meant scores in general are irrelevant, and they are (or at least should be to people who like to think for themselves), and you could click that review link up top and see for yourself when the last 360 AAA was if you need to fact check.
Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts
[QUOTE="Tyrant156"][QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Oh how the tables are turned.

The last 360 AAA was 5 months ago, that's nowhere close to the almost two years the PS3 needed for getting its FIRST one >_>

PS3 took almost two years to get Oblivion? I remember it coming out a lot sooner than that....

No but you see back then multiplats were laughed at because that's what the PS3 had. And now exclusives don't matter anymore. It all makes sense.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="Tyrant156"][QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Oh how the tables are turned.

The last 360 AAA was 5 months ago, that's nowhere close to the almost two years the PS3 needed for getting its FIRST one >_>

PS3 took almost two years to get Oblivion? I remember it coming out a lot sooner than that....

My fault. We were talking about exclusives. I should have specified.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
And now exclusives don't matter anymore.STRETCH-E
Not "now". Exclusivity have never been something important. The title of "exclusivity" onĺy matters to fanboys who can't wait to say "lol I have I game you don't lol", just like scores. Gamers with some common sense and who like to think for themselves will simply play games they want and enjoy them, without thinking if it is exclusive or not, without thinking if some reviewer gave it AAA or not.
Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"]And now exclusives don't matter anymore.IronBass
Not "now". Exclusivity have never been something important. The title of "exclusivity" onĺy matters to fanboys who can't wait to say "lol I have I game you don't lol", just like scores. Gamers with some common sense and who like to think for themselves will simply play games they want and enjoy them, without thinking if it is exclusive or not, without thinking if some reviewer gave it AAA or not.

Exclusives were very important last generation, it's why the PS2 sold so well. Exclusives don't matter now because the majority of them went multiplatform, but if they hadn't the 360 probably wouldn't be doing as well as it is now.

Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"]And now exclusives don't matter anymore.IronBass
Not "now". Exclusivity have never been something important. The title of "exclusivity" onĺy matters to fanboys who can't wait to say "lol I have I game you don't lol", just like scores. Gamers with some common sense and who like to think for themselves will simply play games they want and enjoy them, without thinking if it is exclusive or not, without thinking if some reviewer gave it AAA or not.

lol ok exclusives never mattered. Whatever makes you sleep at night. You can always tell someone is losing an argument in SW when they start to bash the nature of SW.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] lol ok exclusives never mattered. Whatever makes you sleep at night..

Fair enough. You keep coming with annoying comments instead of answering my arguments. Now it's your chance: Why are exclusives so important?
Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] lol ok exclusives never mattered. Whatever makes you sleep at night..IronBass
Fair enough. You keep coming with annoying comments instead of answering my arguments. Now it's your chance: Why are exclusives so important?

You kidding me?!!

Its like Halo 3 never happened.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
You kidding me?!! Its like Halo 3 never happened.stvee101
What with it?
Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] lol ok exclusives never mattered. Whatever makes you sleep at night..

Fair enough. You keep coming with annoying comments instead of answering my arguments. Now it's your chance: Why are exclusives so important?

Because they sell consoles. Because a console's game library's quality has always been determined by its exclusives. You can deny that AAAEs have meant more than AAAs all you want, the fact of the matter is, the very second the 360 gets an AAAE or even an AAE, you'll see threads upon threads declaring it's greatness and exclusivity.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Because they sell consoles.

Specification: some of them sell consoles. GTAIV boosted both the 360 and PS3 sales a lot more than Valkyria Chronicles and Tales of Vesperia, for example.
Because a console's game library's quality has always been determined by its exclusives.STRETCH-E
Wrong again. A console's game library's quality has always been determined by its whole game line-up, exclusive or not.
You can deny that AAAEs have meant more than AAAs all you want, the fact of the matter is, the very second the 360 gets an AAAE or even an AAE, you'll see threads upon threads declaring it's greatness and exclusivity.STRETCH-E
Sorry if I can't see the relevance on fanboys' threads.
Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] lol ok exclusives never mattered. Whatever makes you sleep at night..STRETCH-E
Fair enough. You keep coming with annoying comments instead of answering my arguments. Now it's your chance: Why are exclusives so important?

Because they sell consoles. Because a console's game library's quality has always been determined by its exclusives. You can deny that AAAEs have meant more than AAAs all you want, the fact of the matter is, the very second the 360 gets an AAAE or even an AAE, you'll see threads upon threads declaring it's greatness and exclusivity.

Yeah pretty much this.I think its hilarious some people trying to deny the importance of exclusives.The fact that the console exclusive is almost extinct makes them even more important than ever imo.

How many 360s did Halo 3 shift? Hundreds of thousands,if not over a million. Now if Halo 3 wasn't exclusive then how many 360s would have been sold because of the game? Probably half the amount.

Avatar image for STRETCH-E
STRETCH-E

631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 STRETCH-E
Member since 2009 • 631 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Specification: some of them sell consoles. GTAIV boosted both the 360 and PS3 sales a lot more than Valkyria Chronicles and Tales of Vesperia, for example.
Because a console's game library's quality has always been determined by its exclusives.STRETCH-E
Wrong again. A console's game library's quality has always been determined by its whole game line-up, exclusive or not.
You can deny that AAAEs have meant more than AAAs all you want, the fact of the matter is, the very second the 360 gets an AAAE or even an AAE, you'll see threads upon threads declaring it's greatness and exclusivity.STRETCH-E
Sorry if I can't see the relevance on fanboys' threads.

Ok friend. I can see that you're going to put your hands over your ears and start saying NU-HUH to everything I say even though you know I'm right. Ironbass: "Exclusives never mattered."
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

Ironbass: "Exclusives never mattered."STRETCH-E

Well, I should correct that.

This, gen, when 90% of big games are multiplats, they don't matter.

Do you like it more that way?

And, btw, this is the fourth time you've decided to troll me instead of answering my arguments.

What an attitude you have there ;)

Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

[QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Ironbass: "Exclusives never mattered."IronBass
Well, I should correct that. This, gen, when 90% of big games are multiplats, they don't matter. Do you like it more that way?

Lol,you miss the point completely.Because 90% of big games are multiplat,thats the exact reason exclusives matter more than ever.Its just like any other commodity,as they become rarer they become more valuable.Otherwise what would be the point in buying a PS3 over a 360 or vce-versa?

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="STRETCH-E"] Ironbass: "Exclusives never mattered."stvee101

Well, I should correct that. This, gen, when 90% of big games are multiplats, they don't matter. Do you like it more that way?

Lol,you miss the point completely.Because 90% of big games are multiplat,thats the exact reason exclusives matter more than ever.Its just like any other commodity,as they become rarer they become more valuable.Otherwise what would be the point in buying a PS3 over a 360 or vce-versa?

You buy a 360 or a PS3 because of the different features each system has, as exclusives become less and less they become less important. If one system had all the top 3rd party exclusives then it would matter, but when you're talking 4 or 5 games a year that are exclusive for each system then it really doesn't matter because you're going to play most of the good games anyway, no matter which system you own.
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

Also, sure, boycotting Capcom due to DMC 4 exclusivity can be low. Nonetheless, its "just a company" compare to lemmings whosaid that whoever does not buy X360 are unpatriotic and do not buy Japanese, or Japan should support X360 because US saved them. There are even some lems, during those time, banned for a while for racial slur on the japanese (using the name J*P in a racial tense) to despise Japanese companies like Sony and Nintendo.

So, no matter how much arguement you put on cows, and sheeps, at least, these fanboysnever rant or hint of racial bias, and DID not try to change the rule of gamespot in judging who wins the console war (Games>Sales) to their advantage.

Again, let me tell you, it was lems who posted the thread about Games>Sales within the moment when Wii outsold X360 worldwide.

Zaistev_basic

I would also add the lemmings were the group who originally imposed the "GS ONLY" rule when comparing game scores. Before, people looked at any and all game scores. GS scores were only used when the "flop committee" was trying to set rules for what was determined a flop or not. But lemmings didn't like that Metroid Prime was rated higher than Halo according to Gamerankings. And they didn't like the sheep constantly throwing Metroid in their faces, so they kept shouting "GS ONLY if you are on GS forums. If you don't like GS then go somewhere else" until it became an unofficial rule of the forums. And then the second one of their games did well elsewhere, they would post those scores and GS was biased.

Also, last gen there were tons of lemmings claiming to have switched to Xbox because their PS2 had DRE, and selling such poor hardware is a betrayal to your fans, and Sony sucks, etc. Faultry hardware was totally and completely unacceptable and reason to hate a company forever. But then when RROD came out they denied it, even going so far as to totally swallowing MS's "only 3% failure rate" BS, and claiming that it only sounds like a big problem because COWS are pretending to have RROD 360s to make MS look bad.

I've always had the theory that while Sony fanboys are the most arrogant of fanboys, Xbox fanboys are the most militant. They are like the Bush supporters of videogames...no amount of hypocrisy is bad as long as it favours their side, but the second somebody else does something they don't like the forums explode with faux outrage and condemnation.

Avatar image for coltsfan4ever
coltsfan4ever

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 coltsfan4ever
Member since 2006 • 2628 Posts

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]cows seem to be on a rampage about the 360's 2009 lineup. you'd think lemmings would actually be more worried about thishopesfall2own
lemmings have common sense and rationale..cows jump the gun on ..everything...

Please tell me you joking with that comment?lol

Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="stvee101"]

[QUOTE="IronBass"] Well, I should correct that. This, gen, when 90% of big games are multiplats, they don't matter. Do you like it more that way?Tyrant156

Lol,you miss the point completely.Because 90% of big games are multiplat,thats the exact reason exclusives matter more than ever.Its just like any other commodity,as they become rarer they become more valuable.Otherwise what would be the point in buying a PS3 over a 360 or vce-versa?

You buy a 360 or a PS3 because of the different features each system has, as exclusives become less and less they become less important. If one system had all the top 3rd party exclusives then it would matter, but when you're talking 4 or 5 games a year that are exclusive for each system then it really doesn't matter because you're going to play most of the good games anyway, no matter which system you own.

No, consoles are still primarily about the games...and nobody bases their console buying decision based on what games ALL consoles have. They look at features and price, sure, but ultimately the choice always boils down to "What games do I want the most, which console offers them, and what games will I miss the most if I buy the other console." I doubt anybody on earth went to chose between a 360 and PS3 and said, "Well, I really want to play Halo 3, Bioshock and Mass Effect...But PS3 has more features. I'll get the PS3!"

Sorry, but I don't buy it. I think features only play a role if the customer is evenly split on which games he/she wants.

Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"]

Also, sure, boycotting Capcom due to DMC 4 exclusivity can be low. Nonetheless, its "just a company" compare to lemmings whosaid that whoever does not buy X360 are unpatriotic and do not buy Japanese, or Japan should support X360 because US saved them. There are even some lems, during those time, banned for a while for racial slur on the japanese (using the name J*P in a racial tense) to despise Japanese companies like Sony and Nintendo.

So, no matter how much arguement you put on cows, and sheeps, at least, these fanboysnever rant or hint of racial bias, and DID not try to change the rule of gamespot in judging who wins the console war (Games>Sales) to their advantage.

Again, let me tell you, it was lems who posted the thread about Games>Sales within the moment when Wii outsold X360 worldwide.

ZIMdoom

I would also add the lemmings were the group who originally imposed the "GS ONLY" rule when comparing game scores. Before, people looked at any and all game scores. GS scores were only used when the "flop committee" was trying to set rules for what was determined a flop or not. But lemmings didn't like that Metroid Prime was rated higher than Halo according to Gamerankings. And they didn't like the sheep constantly throwing Metroid in their faces, so they kept shouting "GS ONLY if you are on GS forums. If you don't like GS then go somewhere else" until it became an unofficial rule of the forums. And then the second one of their games did well elsewhere, they would post those scores and GS was biased.

Also, last gen there were tons of lemmings claiming to have switched to Xbox because their PS2 had DRE, and selling such poor hardware is a betrayal to your fans, and Sony sucks, etc. Faultry hardware was totally and completely unacceptable and reason to hate a company forever. But then when RROD came out they denied it, even going so far as to totally swallowing MS's "only 3% failure rate" BS, and claiming that it only sounds like a big problem because COWS are pretending to have RROD 360s to make MS look bad.

I've always had the theory that while Sony fanboys are the most arrogant of fanboys, Xbox fanboys are the most militant. They are like the Bush supporters of videogames...no amount of hypocrisy is bad as long as it favours their side, but the second somebody else does something they don't like the forums explode with faux outrage and condemnation.

I Agree with you 100%, since 2001, no other fanboys did everything from bigotry, racial slurs, backstabbing, and most hypocrite, than the lemmings. It's either you're a gamer elitists (like lemmings, and some fanboys) or a hardcore gamer who embraces every console.

Avatar image for shoeman12
shoeman12

8744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 shoeman12
Member since 2005 • 8744 Posts
because games never get announced at E3...
Avatar image for Bazfrag
Bazfrag

2217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Bazfrag
Member since 2004 • 2217 Posts

Has ANY console EVER gone a whole year without a single exclusive? Apart from when its succesor is established. Getting stupid has reached a whole new level.

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="Tyrant156"][QUOTE="stvee101"]

Lol,you miss the point completely.Because 90% of big games are multiplat,thats the exact reason exclusives matter more than ever.Its just like any other commodity,as they become rarer they become more valuable.Otherwise what would be the point in buying a PS3 over a 360 or vce-versa?

ZIMdoom

You buy a 360 or a PS3 because of the different features each system has, as exclusives become less and less they become less important. If one system had all the top 3rd party exclusives then it would matter, but when you're talking 4 or 5 games a year that are exclusive for each system then it really doesn't matter because you're going to play most of the good games anyway, no matter which system you own.

No, consoles are still primarily about the games...and nobody bases their console buying decision based on what games ALL consoles have. They look at features and price, sure, but ultimately the choice always boils down to "What games do I want the most, which console offers them, and what games will I miss the most if I buy the other console." I doubt anybody on earth went to chose between a 360 and PS3 and said, "Well, I really want to play Halo 3, Bioshock and Mass Effect...But PS3 has more features. I'll get the PS3!"

Sorry, but I don't buy it. I think features only play a role if the customer is evenly split on which games he/she wants.

Uh Bioshock is also on the PS3 and I wouldn't be surprised if Mass Effect ends up on the PS3 as well. If someone is a die hard Halo fan then there wouldnt be any real decision to make would there? But if a person is just looking to play FPS, well then both consoles have plenty of FPS to choose from and the decision is less clear. And I never said the PS3 has more features, each systems capabilities can be a deciding factor when it comes to choosing a console.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#98 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

Has ANY console EVER gone a whole year without a single exclusive? Apart from when its succesor is established. Getting stupid has reached a whole new level.

Bazfrag
And the 360 has already had plenty of exclusives this year as it is (GTA IV: TLAD, Race Pro, Star Ocean: TLH and Halo Wars).