Microsoft on why Xbox One X is not $399

  • 140 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for mcreloaded
mcreloaded

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#101 mcreloaded
Member since 2017 • 48 Posts

@Pedro: Yes sir I do

Avatar image for EG101
EG101

2091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102  Edited By EG101
Member since 2007 • 2091 Posts

@gordonfreeman said:
@EG101 said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@gordonfreeman said:

What rules? You mean the kind that have always existed in resolution, a resolution is set, it always conforms to what it is set at and can therefore be disclaimed as what it is...

Shadow of Mordor cannot maintain its resolution, it falls to sub-native rendering resolutions. So if this game operates at 80% of 4K to 4K, should we average that? Should the average be its resolution?

You can't seriously sit there and consider something with a dynamic frame buffer as a native 4K render, you're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaching....

It's a 4K game that drops in one particular part of the map for less than 1% of the game. I think it's safe to call it a 4K native game.

But about this? Is Halo 5 a 1080p/60 game?

Yea, if the Game is holding 4K for 85% of the time I would consider it 4K.

Nobody cares what you consider something, something either is or it isn't.

You're right in my hypothetical example the game would be 4K 85% of the time so yea it's 4K and apparently the industry agrees with me.

Avatar image for gordonfreeman
GordonFreeman

588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#103 GordonFreeman
Member since 2017 • 588 Posts

@EG101 said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@EG101 said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@gordonfreeman said:

What rules? You mean the kind that have always existed in resolution, a resolution is set, it always conforms to what it is set at and can therefore be disclaimed as what it is...

Shadow of Mordor cannot maintain its resolution, it falls to sub-native rendering resolutions. So if this game operates at 80% of 4K to 4K, should we average that? Should the average be its resolution?

You can't seriously sit there and consider something with a dynamic frame buffer as a native 4K render, you're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaching....

It's a 4K game that drops in one particular part of the map for less than 1% of the game. I think it's safe to call it a 4K native game.

But about this? Is Halo 5 a 1080p/60 game?

Yea, if the Game is holding 4K for 85% of the time I would consider it 4K.

Nobody cares what you consider something, something either is or it isn't.

You're right in my hypothetical example the game would be 4K 85% of the time so yea it's 4K.

It's not a native 4K title, it's a game with a dynamic frame buffer targeting native 4K.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#104 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74090 Posts

@mcreloaded said:

@Pedro: Yes sir I do

Then go for it. :) I will be honest though I was underwhelmed with 4k and HDR for the games that I have seen. The best 4k with HDR was Planet Earth 2. Games has been more along the lines of "ehhh".

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#105 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@Zero_epyon: The price is fine for me. Especially after i paid $500 for the OG XBox One/w Kinect. I think the Xbox One X is a much better value then the OG XBox One. Microsoft is probably going to have some bundles or trade in program at the end of the year , which would be great.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#106 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@quadknight said:

XboneX is a joke. Costs more than my GTX 1070 and still runs games at 30fps and can't do Native 4K in every game.

You're clueless as usually. The games can all be done in native 4K. Not every developer wants to do that. You can't blame Microsoft for what other developers do. Microsoft never said every game would run at 30fps or 60fps. They said all the 1st party games would be native 4K. So far, that appears to be the case. They said 3rd party developers can us whatever resolution and fps they wish to use. Some may want their games in native 4K, some may not. So the JOKE is on you.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Jebus213 said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@aroxx_ab said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@Syferonik said:

Do you buy a $500 gpu to play in 30fps? No one does. Their premium experience is probably compared to their laughably speced Xbone, not a true premium experience.

So you buy a $500 GPU to run at sub 60 FPS? Because at 4K that's the reality you're looking at in most games even with a GTX 1080, roughly 45 FPS.

Logic evades this board.

At least he can play Destiny 2 in 1080p at 60fps on that $500 GPU...

Yeah, with $600 or more encompassing the rest of the PC attached to it.

It's worth it. 1440p 144Hz>>>>>>>4k 30-60fps.

Useless for most HDTVs with 60 hz limit.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22701 Posts

Lol, man cows are too obsessed with XB1 X... its kinda weird. And sad.

Avatar image for Syferonik
Syferonik

3060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By Syferonik
Member since 2006 • 3060 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@Jebus213 said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@aroxx_ab said:
@gordonfreeman said:

So you buy a $500 GPU to run at sub 60 FPS? Because at 4K that's the reality you're looking at in most games even with a GTX 1080, roughly 45 FPS.

Logic evades this board.

At least he can play Destiny 2 in 1080p at 60fps on that $500 GPU...

Yeah, with $600 or more encompassing the rest of the PC attached to it.

It's worth it. 1440p 144Hz>>>>>>>4k 30-60fps.

Useless for most HDTVs with 60 hz limit.

Do you know of many 1440p tv's? He's obviously talking about monitors duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110  Edited By Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@Jebus213 said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@aroxx_ab said:

At least he can play Destiny 2 in 1080p at 60fps on that $500 GPU...

Yeah, with $600 or more encompassing the rest of the PC attached to it.

It's worth it. 1440p 144Hz>>>>>>>4k 30-60fps.

Useless for most HDTVs with 60 hz limit.

hurr durr

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#111 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58801 Posts

People said $399 because MS had an exclusivity drought and a competitive price point would put the ball back in Sony's court. It's not $399 and MS still didn't sway that exclusivity stigma. Between this and paying an extra couple hundred for an upgraded PC with the potential to kit it out in the future, it's a tough sell IMO. Having said that, I still don't like this whole mid-gen upgrade consoles and this is just an excuse to keep on continuing this gen and not trying to go next-gen sooner.

@i_p_daily said:

Is $499 really a big deal?

Are people really that poor in the US? I just say the US because most of these $499 posters are from the US.

I'm more concerned about the price of a 4K telly as the one I have now is about 8yrs old, then the price of the console, oh and the Scorpio will be $650 in my country.

  • I'll just say it's a big deal for those who already own a Xbox One already and depending if you have a 4KTV or not, one should ask, do you really need this thing at all?
  • As a U.S citizen, I can tell you know the U.S isn't all that great, some people can be poor or just have a crappy job like working at a fast food joint but at the same time, some people are kinda rich in there own ways. $500 is a lot of money to the U.S citizen and not everyone has that disposable income. I have a good career as a Nurse Practitioner, my income is great and I can go out and buy X if I was in the mood but why would I? Not when I have an Xbox One already and like QuadKnight, I too have a GTX 1070 that can run games easily in 1440p and as well in 4K.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:

When we looked at the overall design, we could do less memory. We could do under-clocked components so we don’t have to have the cooling system that we have in here. There’s any number of things you could think of.

This is designed for the premium gamer that wants the absolute best experience. And so compromising any of those then makes that message much harder to communicate to them. We showed them the smallest Xbox we’ve ever created, the most power, the best price per performance you can get anywhere, in this box. That’s what we’re delivering.

I think if you start taking away some of those items, people will say, ‘Well, what were your goals?’ And that’s an area that we don’t want that confusion to exist.

[at $399] we wouldn’t have been able to usher in 4K to the living room, and that was a design pillar for this box. There’s lots of goals in the program, from compatibility to everything. But one, let’s really usher in true 4K where developers don’t have to think about, ‘Wow, how do we stretch this and make it really work?’ We needed to deliver that to consumers. They asked us for uncompromised true 4K in the living room. And so we leveraged a lot of PC technology, from the cooling, the power management system that’s in this, to get it this small — while managing acoustics. That was the goal.

http://wccftech.com/microsoft-wouldnt-usher-xbox-one-x-399/

What do you guys think? As far as specs go, the Xbox One X seems to be priced accordingly. But should they have made a better effort to get the costs down to $399 to allow more people to buy it?

http://www.tweaktown.com/news/58011/ark-dev-xbox-one-pc-gtx-1070-16gb-ram/index.html

ARK dev:

As for the comparisons between the PC and Xbox One X, he said: "If you think about it, it's kind of equivalent to a GTX 1070

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#113 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@Syferonik said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@Syferonik said:
@gordonfreeman said:
@Syferonik said:

Do you buy a $500 gpu to play in 30fps? No one does. Their premium experience is probably compared to their laughably speced Xbone, not a true premium experience.

So you buy a $500 GPU to run at sub 60 FPS? Because at 4K that's the reality you're looking at in most games even with a GTX 1080, roughly 45 FPS.

Logic evades this board.

4k? And why are you talking about 4k? What other game than Forza that ran at native 4k? No true 4k. No 60fps. $500USD. Great stuff.

Why am I talking about 4K? Is that inconvenient for you now since you realize in almost all instances a $500 GPU is not up to the task at 60 FPS and instead averages about 45 FPS across a breadth of games?

Forza Motorsport 7, Shadow of War, Crackdown 3 & Minecraft are confirmed native 4K, you can expect that from Forza Horizon 3,Halo Wars 2, Gears of War 4, & Killer Instinct, plus there are over 30 previously released third party titles getting upgraded currently which many will no doubt be native 4K as well.

Also, Phil Said he went to 343i and they were tinkering around with the Xbox One X doing some neat things so undoubtedly Halo 5 is going to be overhauled as well as I hope The Master Chief Collection.

When this system launches there's likely to be at least 20 AAA native 4K titles to play, PS4 Pro has 0.

Last time i checked, the only confirmed 4k title (by DF) is Forza. At release, you may get your 20 AAA titles in checkerboarding 4k, forget native. Unable to offer native 4k nor 1080p/60fps. So what's the point of spending $500USD when you can spend $300 and get easy 1080p/60fps with higher assets?

The X is pointless, Nya. No need to cry.

X1X's Shadow of War has 4K resolution.

X1X's Gears of War 4 campaign mode has 4K resolution.

Avatar image for pinkanimal
PinkAnimal

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#114 PinkAnimal
Member since 2017 • 2380 Posts

$100 more for a console that will run 90% of the games so similar to the Pro that there won't be a perceivable difference for the majority of people. The hardware may be worth $100 more but the experience definitely not. Microsoft screwed up with this one yet again.

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52568 Posts

It's what I expected the price to be, and I'm ready for it to release.

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
Alucard_Prime

10107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#116  Edited By Alucard_Prime
Member since 2008 • 10107 Posts

TC you seem very interested in the XOneX, nice to see such passion.

Price doesn't bother me, they say it's 40% more powerful than any other console(which would be the Pro I assume) so it must cost more to manufacture. Seems like I'm getting good value for my money, so I'm good with the price tag.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#117 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18283 Posts

the console itself is fine. looking at it in isolation its a good console and the price is fair. the specs are very nice for the price. its in a small box. nice controller. developer friendly. no messing. its a good console at a fair price. if i was upgrading from the PS3 or 360 then the X1X would be a tempting box.

but its not in isolation. the PS4 pro is 100 quid less expensive. the X1X does have more umph but will people outside digital foundry really notice? its not a massive jump going from the pro to the X1X. so how are MS going to justify the price premium? as sony already know all to well 4K and HDR are hard to sell over the internet.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#119 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@getyeryayasout: If a PS5 came out in 2018 with 8TF and a Ryzen CPU with 16GB GDDR5 Ram it would probably cost about $700 or more. If Sony priced it at $500, they would easily lose a couple $100 on every unit sold. So I don't expect they will do a PS5 until 2019 or 2020. By then the costs will have dropped enough to get the console's price to $500.

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

13634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#120 Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 13634 Posts

I think it's just them being butthurt for using a 4k bluray player, which they pay Sony to use, so they jacked up the price.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

74090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#122 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 74090 Posts

@osan0: The jump is from Xbox One to One X, not Pro to OneX. That's the comparison potential Xbox buyers will be considering.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@blackace said:

@getyeryayasout: If a PS5 came out in 2018 with 8TF and a Ryzen CPU with 16GB GDDR5 Ram it would probably cost about $700 or more. If Sony priced it at $500, they would easily lose a couple $100 on every unit sold. So I don't expect they will do a PS5 until 2019 or 2020. By then the costs will have dropped enough to get the console's price to $500.

What's the setup for 16 GB GDDR5? 512 bit bus equipped PCB with current GDDR5 storage densities?

Each GDDR5 chip has 32 bit bus.

X1X dev kit already has 24 GB of GDDR5 which is 2X the storage over the retail X1X's 12 GB.

The left side = standard GDDR5 configuration. Retail X1X has 12 of these connections and each chip has 1 GB storage.

The right side = clamshell mode GDDR5 configuration. High chance for X1X dev kit has 12 of these connections. Yields 2X storage.

Avatar image for Legend002
Legend002

13405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

#124 Legend002
Member since 2007 • 13405 Posts

They offer great value hardware wise and yet people still complain. Even I'm impressed. You want a cheap box then go for the S which is $250.

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6890 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:

also

"They asked us for uncompromised true 4K in the living room...."

Lol, so funny! But seriously, who asked?

OT: It's a pretty beastly machine -- but that $499 is terrible. Everyone swore it was launching at $399!

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

The price is not the problem. It's not all MS' fault, there aren't many interesting 3rd party projects coming out to make the purchase of an XboneX worthy for me at the moment. XboneX was supposed to be my 3rd party machine after all, it's the most powerful machine for the job (PC excluded).

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 4749 Posts

@hrt_rulz01 said:

Lol, man cows are too obsessed with XB1 X... its kinda weird. And sad.

Well they are just upset because they no longer have the most powerful console on the planet. The PS4 Pro is an awesome machine, but it is nothing compared against the Xbox One X. They should be thankful for the Xbox One X because it will make more developers develop for both platforms more. Right now the PS4 Pro is not getting the best support! My Xbox One X will be for nonexclusive games and my PS4 Pro will be for Sony exclusives. It really is an awesome combo of machines!

Avatar image for atomolog
Atomolog

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Atomolog
Member since 2016 • 195 Posts

I think they should have left 4k uhd player out even if it meant the console to be only 50 less at 450€.

Or even better. Make the cpu better and console costing 500 without 4k disk player for movies.

For 4k hdr movies disk player there would be the x1s

Avatar image for pinkanimal
PinkAnimal

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#129 PinkAnimal
Member since 2017 • 2380 Posts

@Xabiss: "Right now the PS4 Pro is not getting the best support!"

That won't matter much since the PS4 is actually getting the best third party support by far. Take, for example, those 2 Housemarque games coming to PS4 and none to Xbox. The same with big games like Nier, Yakuza, Nioh or Persona 5. More and more third party developers are ignoring the Xbox because it isn't worth to invest resources for a console that sells relatively low and has an install base that doesn't buy many games other than Halo and Gears. So yeah, with the X1X this will continue to be the case, maybe even worse.

Avatar image for Xabiss
Xabiss

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Xabiss
Member since 2012 • 4749 Posts

@pinkanimal said:

@Xabiss: "Right now the PS4 Pro is not getting the best support!"

That won't matter much since the PS4 is actually getting the best third party support by far. Take, for example, those 2 Housemarque games coming to PS4 and none to Xbox. The same with big games like Nier, Yakuza, Nioh or Persona 5. More and more third party developers are ignoring the Xbox because it isn't worth to invest resources for a console that sells relatively low and has an install base that doesn't buy many games other than Halo and Gears. So yeah, with the X1X this will continue to be the case, maybe even worse.

Is that why Microsoft showed off 40+ titles at E3 and Sony only showed off like 15. I think Microsoft is getting plenty of 3rd party support so knock it off with that BS.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33798 Posts

But one, let’s really usher in true 4K where developers don’t have to think about, ‘Wow, how do we stretch this and make it really work?’ We needed to deliver that to consumers.

Hahahhahahaa Is official the PS4 Pro is a true 4k machine since 4k means native,dynamic and checkerboard.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@i_p_daily said:
@quadknight said:

XboneX is a joke. Costs more than my GTX 1070 and still runs games at 30fps and can't do Native 4K in every game.

So you're a PC guy now hairy lol.

All cows are PC guys.....when it suits them. Quack is one of the biggest offenders of this

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33798 Posts

@SinjinSmythe said:

Cows acting like the Pro can hold its own with the One X. Lol.

The damn thing isn't even out yet and is getting the quick cow label of fake 4K. The Pro isn't wowing anyone and has had plenty of time to do so.

One X is coming. Dream now in your lies.

Just like the xbox one could not hold its own against the PS4?

But you have not care for 3+ years and still don't you just care about the XBO X...lol

Dynamic and checkerboard is not native 4k so MS claiming they are delivering and uncompromised true 4k experience is a lie.

Avatar image for SinjinSmythe
SinjinSmythe

1049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 SinjinSmythe
Member since 2008 • 1049 Posts

@tormentos: couldn't hold its own as in 900p vs. 1080p? Brain dead fanboys and biased media help drive that home.

The true 4K is here and only going to get more numerous. Enjoy your worst versions.

FoxBatAlpha was right about you.

Avatar image for pinkanimal
PinkAnimal

2380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#135 PinkAnimal
Member since 2017 • 2380 Posts

@Xabiss: 40+ titles of which 38+ are also on PS4. The fact is that the PS4 is getting much more support from third party developers and of higher quality and the amount of games shown on E3 have nothing to do with that. I'm sorry but Xbox will have to do much better than Fifa legends if they want gamers to notice them and even that is coming to PS4

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33798

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33798 Posts

@SinjinSmythe said:

@quadknight: The two games you mention will be worse on Teh Pro. Have fun with the inferior version on outdated hardware.

Hahahahahahaa HYPOCRITE....

The PS4 and xbox one says high and you did not care 2 shits...hahaha

@ronvalencia said:

3rd party developers are free to use X1X's power for their own creative vision.

Pathetic excuse developers can use power as the want on xbox one and PS4 and PS4 pro that doesn't mean that when a game is not native in resolution that is the fault of the developer Doom has dynamic resolution on both xbox one and PS4 because non of the 2 can hold 1080p 60FPS on the game,so yeah it drops which is a compromise they sacrifice pixels for frames is a trade off and show lack of power to run the game in question all the time locked,on xbox one X is exactly the same using checkerboard and dynamic resolution is the results of the xbox one X not having enough resources to run the game 100% of the time locked.

It is call a trade off and yes it is implemented because of the lack of power,developers having the option to chose mean shit,because if the developer wanted to keep resolution lock and frames it would have to give up quality to do so which again is another trade off.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@quadknight said:
@mowgly1 said:

@gordonfreeman: @SinjinSmythe:

Quote :

Sony is scared. Exclusives you ask? How did the PS4 survive the first 2 1/2 years?

.....

With more exclusive games, that's for sure. Cheers!

XBone fans are such a senile beings.

Getting rekt for the past 3+ years has made them unhinged. So many angry and upset lems that refuse to accept facts and just cry and damage control the whole time they are here. It's almost no fun owning them because they make it too easy.

The only person that's been rekt more than you is el tormented. Posting a gif and saying someone is having a meltdown is not reking anyone quack.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#138 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

Perhaps if they had showed off some good reasons to invest in a Scorpio then the price wouldn't seem so terrible

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#139 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

@metalslimenite: and Nintendo will leap frog all of them

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22701 Posts

@tormentos: Trying to think who would win in a shit-talking contest between you, a politician and a used car salesman? Photo finish.

Avatar image for deactivated-63d2876fd4204
deactivated-63d2876fd4204

9129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141  Edited By deactivated-63d2876fd4204
Member since 2016 • 9129 Posts

Add me to the camp that paid $499 for Xbox One Day One Edition with Kinect. So you know I'm in for Xbox One X day one! I made it a point to own all three (4) (PS4, Xbox One, Wii U, Switch) day one. A 2nd place to 1st place console is right up my alley. I love to see powershifts in System Wars.