Microsoft: XBL wasnt hacked

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

I never knew about this until now, but it is said over 62,000 account details were leaked out. I really have no idea what happened, and microsoft said that it wasnt due to an intrusion.

But.....doesnt this seem .....familiar?

http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/xbox-360/news/microsoft-xbl-hasnt-been-hacked/a-20110620115447337008/g-20060321132945404017/c-1?#comment_10374492282529183209602896669118887

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
It never happened. Totally bogus report from last week.
Avatar image for TruthBToldShow
TruthBToldShow

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TruthBToldShow
Member since 2011 • 352 Posts
Hackers are losers. Period. The do NOT fight for consumers. They hack for their own selfish, ego-filled reasons.
Avatar image for CallOfDutyXxX
CallOfDutyXxX

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 CallOfDutyXxX
Member since 2011 • 152 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

CallOfDutyXxX

Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

CallOfDutyXxX

Hohohoho, never gets old :P

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

CallOfDutyXxX

what in the....

Avatar image for Snakemaster9
Snakemaster9

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Snakemaster9
Member since 2010 • 1420 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

CallOfDutyXxX

You right bro

* bro fist *

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

It was just another example of high quality games journalism. Lulzsec released the information from 62,000 accounts from some other source (IIRC Sony Pictures, but I'm not sure) and due to the general public's inability to use more than one login/password combination, people started using that account information to gain access to other accounts. Somone tweeted lulzsec to say they had used the information to gain access to someone's XBL account, and the Edward R Murrow's over at GameInformer somehow took this to mean XBL had been hacked.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"]

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

KC_Hokie

Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

It's not like Sony loses money on PSN. Also, if PSN were to cost money, Sony probably would have even had a rougher start to this gen, back when the PS3 was worse than the Xbox 360 in every way but blu ray.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"]

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

PurpleMan5000

Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

It's not like Sony loses money on PSN. Also, if PSN were to cost money, Sony probably would have even had a rougher start to this gen, back when the PS3 was worse than the Xbox 360 in every way but blu ray.

Do you have evidence Sony has made money on PSN? The last time I checked they hadn't and that was before losing $171 million on the hacker breach.
Avatar image for Jurassic85
Jurassic85

2191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Jurassic85
Member since 2010 • 2191 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"]

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

KC_Hokie

Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

This is nonsense. Sony makes enough money in other areas that they could easily pour more money into their online security. In fact, considering how much money they just lost, I can guarantee they will.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

CallOfDutyXxX
I was going to come out yelling at how wrong that was, then i read your name and remembered.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

They probably shouldn't be advertising that they've never been hacked. Specially when hackers are on a rampage right now.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"]

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

Jurassic85

Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

This is nonsense. Sony makes enough money in other areas that they could easily pour more money into their online security. In fact, considering how much money they just lost, I can guarantee they will.

If they had the funds they would have done it. Do you know how expensive that kind of security is and the manpower it takes to keep it up 24/7? To just assume Sony could have done but chose not to is a bad assumption.
Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

They probably shouldn't be advertising that they've never been hacked. Specially when hackers are on a rampage right now.

Crossel777
-_- your links made me mad -_-
Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

KC_Hokie

It's not like Sony loses money on PSN. Also, if PSN were to cost money, Sony probably would have even had a rougher start to this gen, back when the PS3 was worse than the Xbox 360 in every way but blu ray.

Do you have evidence Sony has made money on PSN? The last time I checked they hadn't and that was before losing $171 million on the hacker breach.

WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

Avatar image for MarcRecon
MarcRecon

8191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 4

#19 MarcRecon
Member since 2009 • 8191 Posts

XBL is unhackable;

CallOfDutyXxX

lol...the CIA got hacked last week dude, and I'm pretty sure someonesaid the same thing about them.

Avatar image for Jurassic85
Jurassic85

2191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Jurassic85
Member since 2010 • 2191 Posts

[QUOTE="Jurassic85"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Nothing is unhackable but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.

KC_Hokie

This is nonsense. Sony makes enough money in other areas that they could easily pour more money into their online security. In fact, considering how much money they just lost, I can guarantee they will.

If they had the funds they would have done it. Do you know how expensive that kind of security is and the manpower it takes to keep it up 24/7? To just assume Sony could have done but chose not to is a bad assumption.

You are assuming that because Sony doesn't charge for online that they can't afford security. Think about that for a minute. One doesn't have to put all money made in a specifica area back into that area. Companies use money from games for console devlopment, and other things. To imply that Sony (or any company that large) is short on cash is ridiculous, you need to rethink your theory.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"]It's not like Sony loses money on PSN. Also, if PSN were to cost money, Sony probably would have even had a rougher start to this gen, back when the PS3 was worse than the Xbox 360 in every way but blu ray.EdenProxy

Do you have evidence Sony has made money on PSN? The last time I checked they hadn't and that was before losing $171 million on the hacker breach.

WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Jurassic85"] This is nonsense. Sony makes enough money in other areas that they could easily pour more money into their online security. In fact, considering how much money they just lost, I can guarantee they will.

Jurassic85

If they had the funds they would have done it. Do you know how expensive that kind of security is and the manpower it takes to keep it up 24/7? To just assume Sony could have done but chose not to is a bad assumption.

You are assuming that because Sony doesn't charge for online that they can't afford security. Think about that for a minute. One doesn't have to put all money made in a specifica area back into that area. Companies use money from games for console devlopment, and other things. To imply that Sony (or any company that large) is short on cash is ridiculous, you need to rethink your theory.

You're assuming Sony has been doing really well that last few years. Bad assumption. Are you involved in the stock market at all?
Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
[QUOTE="EdenProxy"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Do you have evidence Sony has made money on PSN? The last time I checked they hadn't and that was before losing $171 million on the hacker breach. KC_Hokie

WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.

Im not trying to be smart or anything, but im curious as to where your source is?
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="EdenProxy"] WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

kris9031998

Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.

Im not trying to be smart or anything, but im curious as to where your source is?

Sony's Hirai: Playstation Network not yet profitable statement from just six months ago and, again, prior to the $171 million hack.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="EdenProxy"] WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

kris9031998

Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.

Im not trying to be smart or anything, but im curious as to where your source is?

Even if he comes up with a source, and I don't think he will, there is no way to prove how many people bought PS3's because they don't want to pay for Xbox Live. There are definitely more PS3's sold because of PSN being free than would have been sold otherwise. It is very difficult to quantify the benefits of any free service.

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#26 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts

[QUOTE="kris9031998"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.PurpleMan5000

Im not trying to be smart or anything, but im curious as to where your source is?

Even if he comes up with a source, and I don't think he will, there is no way to prove how many people bought PS3's because they don't want to pay for Xbox Live. There are definitely more PS3's sold because of PSN being free than would have been sold otherwise. It is very difficult to quantify the benefits of any free service.

Well..he did...
Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="EdenProxy"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Do you have evidence Sony has made money on PSN? The last time I checked they hadn't and that was before losing $171 million on the hacker breach. KC_Hokie

WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.

The only cost in running psn is electricity for the content and id servers and bandwidth cost. OFCORSE they made money off psn. They get 30 percent from ever sale. How could you possibly think they lost money on sales.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="EdenProxy"] WTF dude they sell games and movies on it. OF COURSE THEY MAKE MONEY

EdenProxy

Nope. PSN wasn't profitable BEFORE that hacking. It's certainly not $171 million in the hole later.

The only cost in running psn is electricity for the content and id servers and bandwidth cost. OFCORSE they made money off psn. They get 30 percent from ever sale. How could you possibly think they lost money on sales.

See above Sony executive admits it's not profitable. And why you ask if all they have to pay is the electricity bill? The network itself costs billions not millions.
Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts
[QUOTE="EdenProxy"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] Im not trying to be smart or anything, but im curious as to where your source is?AncientDozer

Sony's Hirai: Playstation Network not yet profitable statement from just six months ago and, again, prior to the $171 million hack.

This link right here.

that article is based of a japan translation http://jp.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idJPnTK049554820101222 http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=59223 as many users across the web have pointed out hirais statement was directed at the SNE networks in general and not simply psn. That means services like Qorciy which have just stared up and are therefore still in the red.
Avatar image for Jurassic85
Jurassic85

2191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Jurassic85
Member since 2010 • 2191 Posts

[QUOTE="Jurassic85"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]If they had the funds they would have done it. Do you know how expensive that kind of security is and the manpower it takes to keep it up 24/7? To just assume Sony could have done but chose not to is a bad assumption. KC_Hokie

You are assuming that because Sony doesn't charge for online that they can't afford security. Think about that for a minute. One doesn't have to put all money made in a specifica area back into that area. Companies use money from games for console devlopment, and other things. To imply that Sony (or any company that large) is short on cash is ridiculous, you need to rethink your theory.

You're assuming Sony has been doing really well that last few years. Bad assumption. Are you involved in the stock market at all?

I never commented on how Sony is doing. I said that they don't have to charge for online in order to invest in a substantially protected online service, a point that you are choosing to ignore. Care to address it rather than resorting to straw man arguments?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="AncientDozer"][QUOTE="EdenProxy"]Sony's Hirai: Playstation Network not yet profitable statement from just six months ago and, again, prior to the $171 million hack.

EdenProxy

This link right here.

that article is based of a japan translation http://jp.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idJPnTK049554820101222 http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=59223 as many users across the web have pointed out hirais statement was directed at the SNE networks in general and not simply psn. That means services like Qorciy which have just stared up and are therefore still in the red.

Nice try but he was talking specifically about PSN. He even talked about Playstation Plus and advertising on PSN as way for it to reach profitability.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Jurassic85"]

You are assuming that because Sony doesn't charge for online that they can't afford security. Think about that for a minute. One doesn't have to put all money made in a specifica area back into that area. Companies use money from games for console devlopment, and other things. To imply that Sony (or any company that large) is short on cash is ridiculous, you need to rethink your theory.

Jurassic85

You're assuming Sony has been doing really well that last few years. Bad assumption. Are you involved in the stock market at all?

I never commented on how Sony is doing. I said that they don't have to charge for online in order to invest in a substantially protected online service, a point that you are choosing to ignore. Care to address it rather than resorting to straw man arguments?

You're just assuming Sony has all types of money sitting around. The hacking costs Sony $171 million to 'strengthen' PSN. To put that into perspective Sony only made $110 million in profit in 2008 and lost money in 2009. It was newsworthy in April 2010 when Sony actually posted a profit once again.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60819 Posts

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"]

XBL is unhackable;

MarcRecon

lol...the CIA got hacked last week dude, and I'm pretty sure someonesaid the same thing about them.

And that should close the thread nicely.
Avatar image for Moriarity_
Moriarity_

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Moriarity_
Member since 2011 • 1332 Posts

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

CallOfDutyXxX
XBL is hackable no matter how much MS assures you that it isn't.
Avatar image for Jurassic85
Jurassic85

2191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Jurassic85
Member since 2010 • 2191 Posts

[QUOTE="Jurassic85"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]You're assuming Sony has been doing really well that last few years. Bad assumption. Are you involved in the stock market at all? KC_Hokie

I never commented on how Sony is doing. I said that they don't have to charge for online in order to invest in a substantially protected online service, a point that you are choosing to ignore. Care to address it rather than resorting to straw man arguments?

You're just assuming Sony has all types of money sitting around. The hacking costs Sony $171 million to 'strengthen' PSN. To put that into perspective Sony only made $110 million in profit in 2008 and lost money in 2009. It was newsworthy in April 2010 when Sony actually posted a profit once again.

I'm not assuming anything. You said that Sony can't afford security due to PSN being free, you can't now bring the recent attacks into it. Sony COULD HAVE added security in those past years when they were making money, before the attack. That is the central argument here, that Sony didn't take the necessary precautions. Did the government officials who told Sony to get their act together have sympathy due to Sony's lack of money? No. Did Sony ever say "we would have had security, but we dont have the money"? No. That is clearly not the issue here.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"]

It's already confirmed that it wasn't hacked. XBL is unhackable; one of the reasons it costs money and PSN doesn't.

Moriarity_
XBL is hackable no matter how much MS assures you that it isn't.

Only 1 way to find out... *Goes and challenges anonymous to hack Xbox live if they are elite enough*
Avatar image for enzyme36
enzyme36

5581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 enzyme36
Member since 2007 • 5581 Posts

I love when people think that paying for something makes it better... I payed for my xbox which means its unbreakable right??

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Jurassic85"]

I never commented on how Sony is doing. I said that they don't have to charge for online in order to invest in a substantially protected online service, a point that you are choosing to ignore. Care to address it rather than resorting to straw man arguments?

Jurassic85

You're just assuming Sony has all types of money sitting around. The hacking costs Sony $171 million to 'strengthen' PSN. To put that into perspective Sony only made $110 million in profit in 2008 and lost money in 2009. It was newsworthy in April 2010 when Sony actually posted a profit once again.

I'm not assuming anything. You said that Sony can't afford security due to PSN being free, you can't now bring the recent attacks into it. Sony COULD HAVE added security in those past years when they were making money, before the attack. That is the central argument here, that Sony didn't take the necessary precautions. Did the government officials who told Sony to get their act together have sympathy due to Sony's lack of money? No. Did Sony ever say "we would have had security, but we dont have the money"? No. That is clearly not the issue here.

It sounds like what money Sony did spend on PSN over the years went into expanding the network not security and security personnel. And there is evidence to the contrary they ever put proper money into securing their networks.

So I don't really get your point.

Avatar image for 205212669269561485377169522720
205212669269561485377169522720

14458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#41 205212669269561485377169522720
Member since 2005 • 14458 Posts

I never knew about this until now, but it is said over 62,000 account details were leaked out. I really have no idea what happened, and microsoft said that it wasnt due to an intrusion.

But.....doesnt this seem .....familiar?

http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/xbox-360/news/microsoft-xbl-hasnt-been-hacked/a-20110620115447337008/g-20060321132945404017/c-1?#comment_10374492282529183209602896669118887

kris9031998

That's because apparently this subject isn't a SW matter, well according to the mod who closed that premature topic anyways.:P

As for the news, it's great! The hackers seriously need to calm down though.:?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

I love when people think that paying for something makes it better... I payed for my xbox which means its unbreakable right??

enzyme36

When it comes to security it does. A guy with a fence around his yard, an alarm system and armed guards with dogs is better than just a fence. And the former costs a lot more.

Avatar image for PurpleMan5000
PurpleMan5000

10531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 PurpleMan5000
Member since 2011 • 10531 Posts

[QUOTE="enzyme36"]

I love when people think that paying for something makes it better... I payed for my xbox which means its unbreakable right??

KC_Hokie

When it comes to security it does. A guy with a fence around his yard, an alarm system and armed guards with dogs is better than just a fence. And the former costs a lot more.

Actually, the fence is probably the biggest expense in that scenario. The addition of the dog and alarm system would be negligible compared to the cost of the fence.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="enzyme36"]

I love when people think that paying for something makes it better... I payed for my xbox which means its unbreakable right??

PurpleMan5000

When it comes to security it does. A guy with a fence around his yard, an alarm system and armed guards with dogs is better than just a fence. And the former costs a lot more.

Actually, the fence is probably the biggest expense in that scenario. The addition of the dog and alarm system would be negligible compared to the cost of the fence.

lol...the analogy was the layers and manpower which obviously costs more than just the basic security. WOOSH!
Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts

[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]When it comes to security it does. A guy with a fence around his yard, an alarm system and armed guards with dogs is better than just a fence. And the former costs a lot more.

KC_Hokie

Actually, the fence is probably the biggest expense in that scenario. The addition of the dog and alarm system would be negligible compared to the cost of the fence.

lol...the analogy was the layers and manpower which obviously costs more than just the basic security. WOOSH!

That doesn't compare to Sony though, just because they don't charge for online doesn't mean they couldn't afford their security.

Avatar image for TruthBToldShow
TruthBToldShow

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 TruthBToldShow
Member since 2011 • 352 Posts
Really sad here. We've got people talking here like security only comes with profits. Like security for a network shouldn't be needed when it launches since there's no profit yet. LOL SECURITY SHOULD BE PART OF A NETWORK FROM THE START. IF SECURITY IS NOT AFFORDABLE, NEITHER IS YOUR PLANNED NETWORK.
Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

lol...the CIA got hacked last week dude, and I'm pretty sure someonesaid the same thing about them.

MarcRecon

DDoS isn't the same as hacking.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts

[QUOTE="MarcRecon"]

lol...the CIA got hacked last week dude, and I'm pretty sure someonesaid the same thing about them.

PBSnipes

DDoS isn't the same as hacking.

http://www.gmanews.tv/story/223774/technology/report-cia-site-hacked-defaced

I think you'd have to hack it to change something on the site though?

Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts
but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.KC_Hokie
I hope you got something to back that statement up, otherwise MS could be secured by two maniquins at a keyboard and it's just a coincedence that nobody ever tried to hack them. My statement has as much logical backing as yours currently does. Just because they have not been hacked doesn't mean they are the fort knox of hackerland.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] but MS does use a lot of that Xbox Live money for security and security personnel that Sony, for example, can't afford due to PSN being free.Jynxzor
I hope you got something to back that statement up, otherwise MS could be secured by two maniquins at a keyboard and it's just a coincedence that nobody ever tried to hack them. My statement has as much logical backing as yours currently does. Just because they have not been hacked doesn't mean they are the fort knox of hackerland.

It's no secret the PSN had bare bones security. Even SOE's networks had the same terrible security. And Sony executives have had to go to hearings all over the world explaining why. It's also no secret MS is also a software company that designed Xbox Live with security in mind and employs numerous Xbox Live security personnel that are on guard 24/7.