Link:
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/mirrorsedge/review.html
This topic is locked from further discussion.
So a few things are missing in this thread.
1. Link to review
2. what to discuss
3. empty first post that just says "topic"
:|
Edit:
You fixed the OP. Good score, but I was expecting more.. time to read the review...
No one saw this coming. An A only? :? Everyone thought AA or AAA for sure. Man, that's a flop. Floppity flop, flop.
Owned, including myself.
No one saw this coming. An A only? :? Everyone thought AA or AAA for sure. Man, that's a flop. Floppity flop, flop.
Owned, including myself.
Hoobinator
buh..buh.. the demo was so awesome! :cry:
Typical gamespot. They like easy games with guns and online multiplayer.Cyberfairy
stop.....just cause they rated a game that you havent played yet and you think its the cream of the crop you feelthe need to discredit them
[QUOTE="Cyberfairy"]Typical gamespot. They like easy games with guns and online multiplayer.BillGates_Money
stop.....just cause they rated a game that you havent played yet and you think its the cream of the crop you feelthe need to discredit them
no you stop. Ihave played the demo thousands of times, read every review that's out and read forums. IGN and gamespot have underrated this game. i have a feeling they, just as cliffyb, dont understand it. it's about running more then gunning, but they took of one whole point for that. the game is a solid 8.no you stop. Ihave played the demo thousands of times, read every review that's out and read forums. IGN and gamespot have underrated this game. i have a feeling they, just as cliffyb, dont understand it. it's about running more then gunning, but they took of one whole point for that. the game is a solid 8.Cyberfairy
You're complaining about one point deviation of what you'd expect the game to score? :| Really now. Who's to say Kevin's 7 doesn't equal a 9 in your book? Come on, it's all personal preference. Someone who enjoys the game just as mush as you do can still give it a lower, or higher, score. There is'nt some kind of mathematical law that converts the amount of fun to be had into a numerical value, and does it so equally every time for everyone.
why is it that if a game isn't a 9.0 its a flop by the people in SW!?!?!?! the fact that one site didn't give it a almost perfect rating must mean the game is horrible, no fun and all but unplayable. :roll: personally after reading the review im a bit more interested in it than i was, sounds somewhat like a first person assassins creed. z4twennyIt didn't even meet AA score standards. Some (like me) were hyping for.
It's a flop score wise. Yeah, boo hoo. That word doesn't even affect me though, a game can be a flop on a sight for all I care, but it doesn't reflect anything about how I will enjoy the game.
Still, I want this game! :cry: I will indeed buy it. From the sounds of the review, he just had a hard time with it, it seems. I could understand trial and error being frustrating, but it doesn't seem the game design is really to blame either if you asked me. It's just a different experience altogether. I can't wait for this game personally, I just wanna run fast and feel good. :D I have a few quirks to point ou about the review, but I don't care enough to do so, because it's their opinion. I'll formulate my own when I buy the game. :D
why is it that if a game isn't a 9.0 its a flop by the people in SW!?!?!?! the fact that one site didn't give it a almost perfect rating must mean the game is horrible, no fun and all but unplayable. :roll: personally after reading the review im a bit more interested in it than i was, sounds somewhat like a first person assassins creed. z4twennyBecause 7 is considered mediocre, in the games world, anything below 6 isnt worth playing, or just downright bad.
Also plenty of competition from other AA/AAA games this holiday. The game shouldve got AA though, Kevin was too harsh
Yep, the disappointment continues it seems. Like many others, I was extremely hyped for this one after playing the demo. However, as soon as I heard that it was only a 6-7 hour game with a weak story, it was a deal breaker for me.
The gameplay and ideas at work here are indeed very innovative and catchy. As a stand alone game for 60.00 though, it just does not seem worth it. Now, if it came as part of a package deal, sort of like Portal in the Orange Box, then I would be all over it like white on rice. I bet it would have gotten a much better reception as well.
Did anyone ever read the letter below the score? It this case it says "good". So a 7 means good.
Anyways, it's a GOOD score, was expecting more. But meh I will buy it anyways.
rogerjak
In SW (or any individual fanboy-mentality), a 7 is the equivalent of horrible.
I didn't bash Cliffy for that, but what has to do his comments with the score...
Giancar
Gamespot noted its combat and gunplay for apparently being "weak". I know that the game deliberately forces you to melee, disarms, throws and whatnots, and Gamespot must be perfectly aware of it, and they must have seen through it, and demerited the game for a reason. And I can perfectly understand trial and error gameplay since when you turn off help in the game, the key elements and waypoints are no longer highlighted red.
It dosn't matter, the game is original which is more important than quality now a days. besides, they were put down by the difficulty which in my eyes is a good thing, should give it more length.
But still, the review is kind of shortkentaro22
We all know what happened here. Kevin was too busy playing the L4D demo to care about writing a descent review of good length, so he just slapped some quotes from earlier reviews together and called it a day. Seven is a good score guys, will buy as soon as it hits the budget bin.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment