Miyamoto "I could Make Halo"

http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/13409/Shigeru-Miyamoto-I-Could-Make-Halo/

ok sounds like hes not really dissing it. just saying he could develop a Mature rated game like halo. although i honestly think it wouldnt be the same. japanese culture is way to different from american.

So could I. :)

Anyway I like the fact that he says he creates games that he wants to and not what caters to specific audiences.  

dang work site blocks the site. but i bet it was a funny read.

One time, I made Metal Gear Solid. It was awesome.lockjaw333

Then you ****** it up by going way too over the top with MGS2 and MGS3. :evil: 

That wasn't an arrogant statement.karicha9

I agree. I actually like it when he said it. Because the next few lines are good to read. I have more respect for him now. 

He wasn't being arrogant at all.

But tbh he's made better than Halo. 

One time, I made Metal Gear Solid. It was awesome.lockjaw333

That's nothing.  I actually made the perfect game . 

[QUOTE="lockjaw333"]One time, I made Metal Gear Solid. It was awesome.Hoobinator

Then you ****** it up by going way too over the top with MGS2 and MGS3. :evil: 

You obviously don't know Miyamoto, I read the link and what he basically said was he as a game designer could make a game that has little innovation but isa perfected version of something that everyone already likes (Halo), but he prefers to imagine and create new experiences.  That's not arrogance, that's his philosophy on games, keep it fresh instead of rehashing and perfecting the same formula.camzaman

you nailed it buddy

[QUOTE="camzaman"]You obviously don't know Miyamoto, I read the link and what he basically said was he as a game designer could make a game that has little innovation but isa perfected version of something that everyone already likes (Halo), but he prefers to imagine and create new experiences. That's not arrogance, that's his philosophy on games, keep it fresh instead of rehashing and perfecting the same formula.chat2

you nailed it buddy

Yet look at all the Zelda's and Mario's he's a hypocrite. 

seemed his point was that he could make a game that appealed more to americans like halo if he wanted. Ontain

He did. It's called Twilight Princess. They catered the development of that game to Western Audiences (read: whiny nerds that loved Ocarina of Time but hated Wind Waker).

And he wonders why the Japanese aren't buying it. 

[QUOTE="chat2"]

[QUOTE="camzaman"]You obviously don't know Miyamoto, I read the link and what he basically said was he as a game designer could make a game that has little innovation but isa perfected version of something that everyone already likes (Halo), but he prefers to imagine and create new experiences. That's not arrogance, that's his philosophy on games, keep it fresh instead of rehashing and perfecting the same formula.tomarlyn

you nailed it buddy

Yet look at all the Zelda's and Mario's he's a hypocrite. 

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="chat2"]

[QUOTE="camzaman"]You obviously don't know Miyamoto, I read the link and what he basically said was he as a game designer could make a game that has little innovation but isa perfected version of something that everyone already likes (Halo), but he prefers to imagine and create new experiences. That's not arrogance, that's his philosophy on games, keep it fresh instead of rehashing and perfecting the same formula.Nintendo_Ownes7

you nailed it buddy

Yet look at all the Zelda's and Mario's he's a hypocrite.

All he's doing is perfecting the same formulae. Like Bungie is doing with Halo and thats a baby compared to his rehashes.

I'd say he needs to realize that all games are different and just because he rehashes mario 8 times per console, doesn't make him god.SkyRaid

miyamoto is hack

/thread

He could, but he didnt.

I'm sure Master Chief would've been replaced by Princess Peach. She would have shot out flowers from her parasol the convenant would be replaced by turtles and goomba's.

Miyamoto could make anything the best game ever......in the videogame world...he is a god

He could destroy Halo (even though Halo is sweet) because he is amazing like that

You obviously don't know Miyamoto, I read the link and what he basically said was he as a game designer could make a game that has little innovation but isa perfected version of something that everyone already likes (Halo), but he prefers to imagine and create new experiences.  That's not arrogance, that's his philosophy on games, keep it fresh instead of rehashing and perfecting the same formula.camzaman

Keep it fresh? You mean by making another Mario game?

:lol:

Each new Mario (the main adventures) and Zelda have attempted new ways of being unique and fresh. Mario 64 introduced 3-D to much success. Mario Sunshine tried with the Water-pack gameplay element but couldn't escape from the feeling that we had already seen a 3-D Mario. And now Mario Galaxy is introducing new elements with the Wii-mote and new level designs with the planet to planet hopping.

Zelda:OofT was amazing, no explanation necessary. Wind Waker used cel-shading and introduced the sailing elemnt (although too much of it). And Twilight Princesstried tried something new with the wolf transformations, but it really was something for the fans in it's Ocarina of Time roots.

So to sit there and say these series have failed in attempting to strecth and bring something new each time is ignorant. 

Is that so? Why is that Wii games suck so badly then?Oemenia

Actually he talks about Halo being a rehashed series, when there's only 4 in existence (only 2 of which currently out and one being an RTS).

So what about SMB, SMB2, SMB3, SMW, Yoshi's Island and Mario Land. Now he's rehashing in 3D, he really has no room to talk.

Each new Mario (the main adventures) and Zelda have attempted new ways of being unique and fresh. Mario 64 introduced 3-D to much success. Mario Sunshine tried with the Water-pack gameplay element but couldn't escape from the feeling that we had already seen a 3-D Mario. And now Mario Galaxy is introducing new elements with the Wii-mote and new level designs with the planet to planet hopping.

Zelda:OofT was amazing, no explanation necessary. Wind Waker used cel-shading and introduced the sailing elemnt (although too much of it). And Twilight Princesstried tried something new with the wolf transformations, but it really was something for the fans in it's Ocarina of Time roots.

So to sit there and say these series have failed in attempting to strecth and bring something new each time is ignorant. 

-Despacio-

What you say is true.

But sometimes they over look the importance  of creating different characters, worlds, and story lines into these new gameplay elements to make it feel like a fresh new games. Okami does nothing we haven't seen in a Zelda game. Why did it outscore Twilight Princess? Because it wasn't link, hyrule, and Gannon thats why. I think this is what most people are talking about.  Nintendo fanboys may never tire of seeing mario, link, and samus. But some of us do.

Each new Mario (the main adventures) and Zelda have attempted new ways of being unique and fresh. Mario 64 introduced 3-D to much success. Mario Sunshine tried with the Water-pack gameplay element but couldn't escape from the feeling that we had already seen a 3-D Mario. And now Mario Galaxy is introducing new elements with the Wii-mote and new level designs with the planet to planet hopping.

Zelda:OofT was amazing, no explanation necessary. Wind Waker used cel-shading and introduced the sailing elemnt (although too much of it). And Twilight Princesstried tried something new with the wolf transformations, but it really was something for the fans in it's Ocarina of Time roots.

So to sit there and say these series have failed in attempting to strecth and bring something new each time is ignorant. 

 

 

-Despacio-

[QUOTE="Ontain"]seemed his point was that he could make a game that appealed more to americans like halo if he wanted. bryehngeocef

He did. It's called Twilight Princess. They catered the development of that game to Western Audiences (read: whiny nerds that loved Ocarina of Time but hated Wind Waker).

And he wonders why the Japanese aren't buying it.

but the Japanese like OOT better also. I think he didn't mention appealing to Japanese. He does it for himself. 

the 3 day Timeline with the Moon about to crash into Termina Nintendo_Ownes7

Which sucked. 

I hate time limits in adventure games...

Bottom line: Halo sucks. Get over it.ShmenonPie

Of course :roll: 

[QUOTE="Nintendo_Ownes7"]the 3 day Timeline with the Moon about to crash into Termina Felous1

Which sucked. 

I hate time limits in adventure games...

Time limits are great. They create a greater sense of urgency. Their were certain parts of Dead Rising that had me almost falling out of my seat. I loved it.

[QUOTE="-Despacio-"]

Each new Mario (the main adventures) and Zelda have attempted new ways of being unique and fresh. Mario 64 introduced 3-D to much success. Mario Sunshine tried with the Water-pack gameplay element but couldn't escape from the feeling that we had already seen a 3-D Mario. And now Mario Galaxy is introducing new elements with the Wii-mote and new level designs with the planet to planet hopping.

Zelda:OofT was amazing, no explanation necessary. Wind Waker used cel-shading and introduced the sailing elemnt (although too much of it). And Twilight Princesstried tried something new with the wolf transformations, but it really was something for the fans in it's Ocarina of Time roots.

So to sit there and say these series have failed in attempting to strecth and bring something new each time is ignorant.

 

 

Nintendo_Ownes7

Oh yeah, good call, I think I forgot it b/c I never got around to playing it. I think I had moved on to the Dreamcast at that point. I can't wait until it's available on the VC. But Majoras Mask definitely adds to the argument and is arguably the most unique Zelda game in the series.  

[QUOTE="Ontain"]seemed his point was that he could make a game that appealed more to americans like halo if he wanted. bryehngeocef

He did. It's called Twilight Princess. They catered the development of that game to Western Audiences (read: whiny nerds that loved Ocarina of Time but hated Wind Waker).

And he wonders why the Japanese aren't buying it. 

Bottom line: Halo sucks. Get over it.ShmenonPie

[QUOTE="chat2"]

[QUOTE="camzaman"]You obviously don't know Miyamoto, I read the link and what he basically said was he as a game designer could make a game that has little innovation but isa perfected version of something that everyone already likes (Halo), but he prefers to imagine and create new experiences. That's not arrogance, that's his philosophy on games, keep it fresh instead of rehashing and perfecting the same formula.tomarlyn

you nailed it buddy

Yet look at all the Zelda's and Mario's he's a hypocrite.

Pikmin 1 and 2 ring a bell? Half of Marios are made by other people. Camelot, Int. Software, and SE all have made a mario game. His last one was on DS, that is it. He has made 8 Mario games total, and working on the 9th one.  Also, portable Zeldas has been mostly made by Capcom, Miyamoto only made 8 Zeldas.

Insomniac and Naughty Dog both have about 6-8 games under belt, how is Miyamoto more of a hypocrit than them?