XXXXXX

111 results
1
2
3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

2513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 2513 Posts

[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

That doesn't mean Miyamoto didn't save the gaming industry.

I never said he didn't, but to call him the God of "modern" video games is a bit of a stretch. If you consider the 80's and 90's modern then maybe so, but in 2007 the best selling games and highest rated games have blood, beeitches, guns, guts, hoes, and headshots. All things Miyamoto would never be linked to.

17 years ago

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.web966

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

17 years ago

Mikazukinoyaiba

733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Mikazukinoyaiba

Member since 2007 • 733 Posts

[QUOTE="Synchro456"]If I met Miyamoto I would just praise him for inventing Mario! If I met Kutargi I would say congrats on having such a succesful two generations of gaming generations with the PS brand If I met Moore will err I would say that you have been doing a great job :D. Overall Miyamote influenced the gaming industry the most ny bringing such famous franchises and bringing innovative games like Super Mario 64. Kutargi kind of perfected the gaming market with the ps2 with such high sales. And well Moore we have to wait and see...Trading_Zoner

No, Moore has already shown what he can do.

He was the head man at sega when dreamcast was literally crushed by PS2.

I just know he can do it again.

Funny, I don't see the 360 following the lead of the Dreamcast in anyway.

17 years ago

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts

[QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.falconclan

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

Games sell a console. What else would?

17 years ago

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="Trading_Zoner"]
[QUOTE="Synchro456"]If I met Miyamoto I would just praise him for inventing Mario! If I met Kutargi I would say congrats on having such a succesful two generations of gaming generations with the PS brand If I met Moore will err I would say that you have been doing a great job :D. Overall Miyamote influenced the gaming industry the most ny bringing such famous franchises and bringing innovative games like Super Mario 64. Kutargi kind of perfected the gaming market with the ps2 with such high sales. And well Moore we have to wait and see...Mikazukinoyaiba

No, Moore has already shown what he can do.

He was the head man at sega when dreamcast was literally crushed by PS2.

I just know he can do it again.

Funny, I don't see the 360 following the lead of the Dreamcast in anyway.

You people obviously don't understand the history before the dreamcast if you really think he can do it again, the ps2 didn't kill the dreamcast, Saturn did.

17 years ago

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.web966

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

Games sell a console. What else would?

Im talking about the good games. Do you really think casuals look on the internet day and night to find the best games? No, they bought the ps2 because it was out a year before the others, it was cheaper then the others, and it had all the sports games they wanted.

17 years ago

4100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#57 Trading_Zoner

Member since 2007 • 4100 Posts

[QUOTE="Trading_Zoner"]
[QUOTE="Synchro456"]If I met Miyamoto I would just praise him for inventing Mario! If I met Kutargi I would say congrats on having such a succesful two generations of gaming generations with the PS brand If I met Moore will err I would say that you have been doing a great job :D. Overall Miyamote influenced the gaming industry the most ny bringing such famous franchises and bringing innovative games like Super Mario 64. Kutargi kind of perfected the gaming market with the ps2 with such high sales. And well Moore we have to wait and see...Mikazukinoyaiba

No, Moore has already shown what he can do.

He was the head man at sega when dreamcast was literally crushed by PS2.

I just know he can do it again.

Funny, I don't see the 360 following the lead of the Dreamcast in anyway.

Moore needs get on the ball then, and do what he does best.

More add ons Moore! That's what you need!

17 years ago

11654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 11654 Posts

[QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.falconclan

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

Games sell a console. What else would?

Im talking about the good games. Do you really think casuals look on the internet day and night to find the best games? No, they bought the ps2 because it was out a year before the others, it was cheaper then the others, and it had all the sports games they wanted.

I see what your saying. I should of said the more "popular" games.

17 years ago

2513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 2513 Posts

[QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.web966

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

Games sell a console. What else would?

See Nintendo Wii.

17 years ago

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"][QUOTE="Trading_Zoner"]
[QUOTE="Synchro456"]If I met Miyamoto I would just praise him for inventing Mario! If I met Kutargi I would say congrats on having such a succesful two generations of gaming generations with the PS brand If I met Moore will err I would say that you have been doing a great job :D. Overall Miyamote influenced the gaming industry the most ny bringing such famous franchises and bringing innovative games like Super Mario 64. Kutargi kind of perfected the gaming market with the ps2 with such high sales. And well Moore we have to wait and see...Trading_Zoner

No, Moore has already shown what he can do.

He was the head man at sega when dreamcast was literally crushed by PS2.

I just know he can do it again.

Funny, I don't see the 360 following the lead of the Dreamcast in anyway.

Moore needs get on the ball then, and do what he does best.

More add ons Moore! That's what you need!

Another foolish statement by you, yet not as foolish as your last, as the 32x and cd did tarnish sega's reputation, but you really must realise that the final nails in the coffin were mainly due to Sega's financial issues and saturn, which were connected.

17 years ago

15885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 15885 Posts

[QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.web966

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

Games sell a console. What else would?

Im talking about the good games. Do you really think casuals look on the internet day and night to find the best games? No, they bought the ps2 because it was out a year before the others, it was cheaper then the others, and it had all the sports games they wanted.

I see what your saying. I should of said the more "popular" games.

Exactly, thats why 50 cent bullet proof sold over a million copies, because most casuals (Roughly 95%) are idiots.

17 years ago

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 laughingman42

Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

I would give miyamoto a very deep bow, tell him he is a gaming god, and ask for a picture with him. Then I would ask him if he had time to talk and hopefully have a conversation with him.

I would bow to kutaragi tell him the PS2 is cool and go about my way.

I would shake moores hand and tell him my 360 still works and its awesome.

17 years ago

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 laughingman42

Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

[QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.DisPimpin

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

the wii and 360;). gaming would have gone on without the PS1 and PS2. It verywell might have died without miyamoto and nintndo. therefore miyamoto wins.

17 years ago

MIYAMOTOnext007

3061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 MIYAMOTOnext007

Member since 2006 • 3061 Posts

I would tell Miyamoto that I like him. :oops:

17 years ago

Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 Runningflame570

Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts

1) Kutaragi takes the hyperbole crown. 2) Miyamoto takes the development crown. 3) Peter Moore takes the publicity stunt crown.

17 years ago

princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#66 princeofshapeir

Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.Magical_Guy

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

we would also still be on cartridges and have no online play.

Sigh... You don't get it. People eventually built up off of Miyamoto's vision for gaming. They built off of the concept of freely moving around and beating enemies, and made it to evolve into more complex games. Gears of War, Half-Life 2, Metal Gear Solid, and Halo; these games would never had existed if it were not for Nintendo and Miyamoto. Peter Moore, Ken Kutagari, David Jaffee, Hideo Kojima, Nobuo Uematsu; these people would be unemployed or have totally different careers if Miyamoto never made Super Mario Bros. He made an action game more complex; he provided an example to future video-game makers. We all owe him for what he did.

17 years ago

princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#67 princeofshapeir

Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.falconclan

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

The Games are more important than the hardware.

Spoken like a true sheep. Games and hardware go hand in hand.

Yes they do, but what is more important? The xbox hardware was better than the PS2's, but the PS2 had better games so it sold more. Games make the hardware.

Selling more has nothing to do with the games. If you truly believe that then you are a fool to the highest degree.

Games sell a console. What else would?

Im talking about the good games. Do you really think casuals look on the internet day and night to find the best games? No, they bought the ps2 because it was out a year before the others, it was cheaper then the others, and it had all the sports games they wanted.

I see what your saying. I should of said the more "popular" games.

Exactly, thats why 50 cent bullet proof sold over a million copies, because most casuals (Roughly 95%) are idiots.

Or they are wangstas like Chad Warden. :P

17 years ago

2513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 2513 Posts

[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.laughingman42

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

the wii and 360;). gaming would have gone on without the PS1 and PS2. It verywell might have died without miyamoto and nintndo. therefore miyamoto wins.

Really? Gaming may have very well died at the rate Ninty was going with the N64. I'm not sure how old you are but the industry was a mess around the time the PS1 came out. Several companies trying to cash in, overcrowding, and not really putting quality product out, just like in the early 80's. Devs were pissed at Nintendo for their shady business practices and still using cartridges, hence they went to Sony. PS1 saved gaming as much as the NES did, or did you forget about those Panasonic Zelda games? Dig a little deeper before sucking Miyamoto so hard next time.

17 years ago

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 laughingman42

Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

[QUOTE="laughingman42"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.DisPimpin

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

the wii and 360;). gaming would have gone on without the PS1 and PS2. It verywell might have died without miyamoto and nintndo. therefore miyamoto wins.

Really? Gaming may have very well died at the rate Ninty was going with the N64. I'm not sure how old you are but the industry was a mess around the time the PS1 came out. Several companies trying to cash in, overcrowding, and not really putting quality product out, just like in the early 80's. Devs were pissed at Nintendo for their shady business practices and still using cartridges, hence they went to Sony. PS1 saved gaming as much as the NES did, or did you forget about those Panasonic Zelda games? Dig a little deeper before sucking Miyamoto so hard next time.

Wasnt nintendo trying to go to CD? Wasnt sony trying to essentially screw nintendo by taking all of the rights of the games made for the CD attachment?

edit. No one ever bought the Panasonic system. And if the gaming industry was doing so badly ad about to crash why didnt the N64 fail? Would you call the 5th best selling console ever a failure? not only that the saturn went to CDs and still bombed.

17 years ago

3949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 3949 Posts

I dont know man, i dont think you can compare those two to miyamoto.......in all honesty, not to sound like a fanboy, but the guy is on a whole other level when it comes to what he is bringing to the table in terms of talent, content and innovation (among other things).

17 years ago

3949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 3949 Posts

[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.Magical_Guy

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

we would also still be on cartridges and have no online play.

Sorry to bust up the party kids but Miyamoto's vision is not to deny the creation of M rated video games, online play and something as futile and idiotic as the medium on which games are essentially printed. Miyamoto does not like M rated games as a PREFERENCE, he prefers not to make them. He doesnt need to exploit as something as simple minded as visceral violence to make his games entertaining; he has creativity, innovation and intelligence on his side. And it works. Mario and Pokemon are the most profitable intellectual properties in the industry despite their "kiddy" appearance. If miyamoto had his way the industry would be a Gameplay >>>>> Presentation/Graphics oriented one. Now dont say, 'So he thinks t3h graphics dont matt3r?!" because thats not what im saying at all. Miyamoto believes that gameplay is what makes a game a game and to have fun gameplay is to have a fun game; no matter what the connect connecting the dynamics may be....be it mario, pokemon or a (insert average and uncreative franchise which revolves around visceral violence for all content) Now get off my lawn you nutty kids.

17 years ago

princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#72 princeofshapeir

Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="Magical_Guy"]
[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.MaTT2011

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

we would also still be on cartridges and have no online play.

Sorry to bust up the party kids but Miyamoto's vision is not to deny the creation of M rated video games, online play and something as futile and idiotic as the medium on which games are essentially printed. Miyamoto does not like M rated games as a PREFERENCE, he prefers not to make them. He doesnt need to exploit as something as simple minded as visceral violence to make his games entertaining; he has creativity, innovation and intelligence on his side. And it works. Mario and Pokemon are the most profitable intellectual properties in the industry despite their "kiddy" appearance. If miyamoto had his way the industry would be a Gameplay >>>>> Presentation/Graphics oriented one. Now dont say, 'So he thinks t3h graphics dont matt3r?!" because thats not what im saying at all. Miyamoto believes that gameplay is what makes a game a game and to have fun gameplay is to have a fun game; no matter what the connect connecting the dynamics may be....be it mario, pokemon or a (insert average and uncreative franchise which revolves around visceral violence for all content) Now get off my lawn you nutty kids.

Thank you for educating them. :)

17 years ago

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="laughingman42"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"][QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="web966"]Miyamoto is way more important than kutaragi or moore will ever be.DisPimpin

Really? Way more important than the man behind the best selling consoles in gaming history? Miyamoto and Kutaragi are equally important to the game industry.

People who make the games are more important. Kutaragi might have been behind some great hardware, but he has never designed an amazing, influencial game.

So that means he's not as important? What do you play games on?

the wii and 360;). gaming would have gone on without the PS1 and PS2. It verywell might have died without miyamoto and nintndo. therefore miyamoto wins.

Really? Gaming may have very well died at the rate Ninty was going with the N64. I'm not sure how old you are but the industry was a mess around the time the PS1 came out. Several companies trying to cash in, overcrowding, and not really putting quality product out, just like in the early 80's. Devs were pissed at Nintendo for their shady business practices and still using cartridges, hence they went to Sony. PS1 saved gaming as much as the NES did, or did you forget about those Panasonic Zelda games? Dig a little deeper before sucking Miyamoto so hard next time.

I like Playstation, but no, just no :lol:

17 years ago

Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 Runningflame570

Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Sigh... You don't get it. People eventually built up off of Miyamoto's vision for gaming. They built off of the concept of freely moving around and beating enemies, and made it to evolve into more complex games. Gears of War, Half-Life 2, Metal Gear Solid, and Halo; these games would never had existed if it were not for Nintendo and Miyamoto. Peter Moore, Ken Kutagari, David Jaffee, Hideo Kojima, Nobuo Uematsu; these people would be unemployed or have totally different careers if Miyamoto never made Super Mario Bros. He made an action game more complex; he provided an example to future video-game makers. We all owe him for what he did.

Oh nonsense, he didn't "make" that he just popularized it. Such games existed well prior in the form of Pitfall II for instance. Miyamoto built off of priorly existing concepts as much as anyone else did.

17 years ago

2513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 2513 Posts

[QUOTE="Magical_Guy"]
[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.MaTT2011

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

we would also still be on cartridges and have no online play.

Sorry to bust up the party kids but Miyamoto's vision is not to deny the creation of M rated video games, online play and something as futile and idiotic as the medium on which games are essentially printed. Miyamoto does not like M rated games as a PREFERENCE, he prefers not to make them. He doesnt need to exploit as something as simple minded as visceral violence to make his games entertaining; he has creativity, innovation and intelligence on his side. And it works. Mario and Pokemon are the most profitable intellectual properties in the industry despite their "kiddy" appearance. If miyamoto had his way the industry would be a Gameplay >>>>> Presentation/Graphics oriented one. Now dont say, 'So he thinks t3h graphics dont matt3r?!" because thats not what im saying at all. Miyamoto believes that gameplay is what makes a game a game and to have fun gameplay is to have a fun game; no matter what the connect connecting the dynamics may be....be it mario, pokemon or a (insert average and uncreative franchise which revolves around visceral violence for all content) Now get off my lawn you nutty kids.

Oh no, it's the disgruntled sheep who gets beat up, so he doesn't like violence. We live in a violent world, why would that not translate into the games we play? Why can't a violent game be "fun" for sheep? Is it because you don't have any?

17 years ago

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 laughingman42

Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

[QUOTE="MaTT2011"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"]
[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.DisPimpin

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

we would also still be on cartridges and have no online play.

Sorry to bust up the party kids but Miyamoto's vision is not to deny the creation of M rated video games, online play and something as futile and idiotic as the medium on which games are essentially printed. Miyamoto does not like M rated games as a PREFERENCE, he prefers not to make them. He doesnt need to exploit as something as simple minded as visceral violence to make his games entertaining; he has creativity, innovation and intelligence on his side. And it works. Mario and Pokemon are the most profitable intellectual properties in the industry despite their "kiddy" appearance. If miyamoto had his way the industry would be a Gameplay >>>>> Presentation/Graphics oriented one. Now dont say, 'So he thinks t3h graphics dont matt3r?!" because thats not what im saying at all. Miyamoto believes that gameplay is what makes a game a game and to have fun gameplay is to have a fun game; no matter what the connect connecting the dynamics may be....be it mario, pokemon or a (insert average and uncreative franchise which revolves around visceral violence for all content) Now get off my lawn you nutty kids.

Oh no, it's the disgruntled sheep who gets beat up, so he doesn't like violence. We live in a violent world, why would that not translate into the games we play? Why can't a violent game be "fun" for sheep? Is it because you don't have any?

your grabing a straws. no one ever said that.

17 years ago

machitocaliente

832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 machitocaliente

Member since 2007 • 832 Posts

MIYAMOTO? GAMING LEGEND

kutaragi ? tech head gone mad

moore ? suit

17 years ago

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 938 Posts

Miyamoto - "Nice. Now start making mature games for the many mature gamers out there."

Kutaragi - "$600?? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FREAKING MIND????"

Moore - "Quit making crappy hardware and give us a price drop."

17 years ago

4100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#79 Trading_Zoner

Member since 2007 • 4100 Posts

I like Playstation, but no, just no :lol:

Blackbond

Playstation didn't "save" the industry. The industry didn't need to be saved at the time it was released. But it sure as hell grew it A LOT. It turned gaming from something mostly kids did, into a mainstream product that ALL types of people enjoyed.

17 years ago

12671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 12671 Posts

In a fight Moore could take out Miyamoto and Kutaragi,

17 years ago

princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#81 princeofshapeir

Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="MaTT2011"][QUOTE="Magical_Guy"]
[QUOTE="DisPimpin"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]Simply put, without Miyamoto's vision in the gaming industry, we would not have a PS3 or Xbox 360. Gaming would be changed forever. The next time you make fun of Shigeru Miyamoto, remember that you are making fun of the god of modern video games.DisPimpin

Objection!!!!! If all we has was Miyamoto's vision, there would be no such thing as M rated games.

we would also still be on cartridges and have no online play.

Sorry to bust up the party kids but Miyamoto's vision is not to deny the creation of M rated video games, online play and something as futile and idiotic as the medium on which games are essentially printed. Miyamoto does not like M rated games as a PREFERENCE, he prefers not to make them. He doesnt need to exploit as something as simple minded as visceral violence to make his games entertaining; he has creativity, innovation and intelligence on his side. And it works. Mario and Pokemon are the most profitable intellectual properties in the industry despite their "kiddy" appearance. If miyamoto had his way the industry would be a Gameplay >>>>> Presentation/Graphics oriented one. Now dont say, 'So he thinks t3h graphics dont matt3r?!" because thats not what im saying at all. Miyamoto believes that gameplay is what makes a game a game and to have fun gameplay is to have a fun game; no matter what the connect connecting the dynamics may be....be it mario, pokemon or a (insert average and uncreative franchise which revolves around visceral violence for all content) Now get off my lawn you nutty kids.

Oh no, it's the disgruntled sheep who gets beat up, so he doesn't like violence. We live in a violent world, why would that not translate into the games we play? Why can't a violent game be "fun" for sheep? Is it because you don't have any?

Last time I checked, Killer 7, Resident Evil 4, MGS: Twin Snakes, and Eternal Darkness were all rated M.

17 years ago

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 laughingman42

Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

In a fight Moore could take out Miyamoto and Kutaragi,kage_53

no way! they would bust out their mad karate skills that every Japanese person is automatically ingrained with at birth.

for the slower ones out there that was a joke.

17 years ago

princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#83 princeofshapeir

Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="Runningflame570"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Sigh... You don't get it. People eventually built up off of Miyamoto's vision for gaming. They built off of the concept of freely moving around and beating enemies, and made it to evolve into more complex games. Gears of War, Half-Life 2, Metal Gear Solid, and Halo; these games would never had existed if it were not for Nintendo and Miyamoto. Peter Moore, Ken Kutagari, David Jaffee, Hideo Kojima, Nobuo Uematsu; these people would be unemployed or have totally different careers if Miyamoto never made Super Mario Bros. He made an action game more complex; he provided an example to future video-game makers. We all owe him for what he did.

Oh nonsense, he didn't "make" that he just popularized it. Such games existed well prior in the form of Pitfall II for instance. Miyamoto built off of priorly existing concepts as much as anyone else did.

Ok, you try telling me who would have bought an NES if Super Mario Bros. was not a launch title. Exactly. It's the most successful game ever, period.

17 years ago

princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#84 princeofshapeir

Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="kage_53"]In a fight Moore could take out Miyamoto and Kutaragi,laughingman42

no way! they would bust out their mad karate skills that every Japanese person is automatically ingrained with at birth.

for the slower ones out there that was a joke.

Miyamoto would summon Charizard and toast Moore into burnt Sushi.

17 years ago

12671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 12671 Posts

[QUOTE="kage_53"]In a fight Moore could take out Miyamoto and Kutaragi,laughingman42

no way! they would bust out their mad karate skills that every Japanese person is automatically ingrained with at birth.

for the slower ones out there that was a joke.

Kutaragi and Miyomoto look fragile. Moore is stronger than both.

17 years ago

Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Runningflame570

Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] Ok, you try telling me who would have bought an NES if Super Mario Bros. was not a launch title. Exactly. It's the most successful game ever, period.

Still fits into the "popularized" bit. Who would have bought a Playstation if uhmm...well, stuff wasn't a launch title. Irrelevant in the grand scheme of things just as launches for the most part are irrelevant. While we're at it pack-ins do not equal sales. Anybody who thinks Wii Play has actually "sold" those multiple millions is full of it.

17 years ago

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 938 Posts

[QUOTE="laughingman42"]
[QUOTE="kage_53"]In a fight Moore could take out Miyamoto and Kutaragi,kage_53

no way! they would bust out their mad karate skills that every Japanese person is automatically ingrained with at birth.

for the slower ones out there that was a joke.

Kutaragi and Miyomoto look fragile. Moore is stronger than both.

But Moore is also bald. It's his weakness. Miyamoto and Kutaragi can sneak in then BLAM show their awesome hair to Moore. He would cower at that amazing hair sight.

17 years ago

853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 853 Posts

Ken ! I mean look at him, hes so cute and cuddly. Holding his little PS3 as high as his little wee arms can hold it... smiling...

17 years ago

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

Is it me, or Ken the only normal looking one?shungokustasu

LOL

17 years ago

16734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 16734 Posts

To Miyamoto : " Nintendo is not kiddy at all dont worry"

To Kutaragy : "600$ isnt that expensive for almost everybody dont worry"

To Moore : The 360´ll never be outsold by the ps3 , the wii or both relax"

:lol:

17 years ago

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#91 cakeorrdeath

Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts

Both Miyamoto and Kutaragi have had huge creative effects on the industry, Moore is just an exec. He wasn't even at Microsoft when all the major decisions conserning the direction of the original Xbox were meade.

This basically comes down to which you see as being more influential. Myamoto's games or Kutaragi's Hardware.

If you were going to have a Microsft exec it should be J. Alllard as he is the man who convinced MS to enter the race for themselves (and not just buy someone else). He is the lead designer of the Xbox, Xbox 360, Live and All of MS development tools.

17 years ago

17374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#92 fuzzysquash

Member since 2004 • 17374 Posts

If you were going to have a Microsft exec it should be J. Alllard as he is the man who convinced MS to enter the race for themselves (and not just buy someone else). He is the lead designer of the Xbox, Xbox 360, Live and All of MS development tools.cakeorrdeath

He is also a wuss because he lost a bet to N'Gai Croal about the PSP selling 10 million within 12 months (give or take 3 months). He was supposed to wear a dreadlock wig for the month of May (including E3), but he never showed up. http://ncroal.talk.newsweek.com/default.asp?item=327322

17 years ago

1838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 1838 Posts

1. What would you do/say if you met Shigeru Miyamato? You are brilliant 2. What would you do/say if you met Ken Kutaragi? What were u thinking? RIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDGGGGEEEE RRRRAAAAAAACCCCCCCCEEEEEERRRRR??? 3. What would you do/say if you met Peter Moore? Nice job on the 360, i expected a flop.

Wow, this thread's going to have a lot of kutaragi bashing and a lot of Miyamoto/Moore idolizing munu9

Theres a reason for it

17 years ago

16012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 16012 Posts

miyamoto is the most important to gaming out of them three by far if i saw kuturagi, i'd probably just punch him moore is ok .. he's going in the right direction with gaming IMO, but miyamoto is just untouchable a better comparison would be between miyamoto, kojima and someone else .. miyamoto would still win though IMO

17 years ago

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 LucasDigital

Member since 2007 • 112 Posts

Is it me, or Ken the only normal looking one?shungokustasu

LOL "only normal looking one" i can guess what race you are :roll: the way Ken looks makes me wana punch his face..... just look at him! Arrg

17 years ago

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 4753 Posts

To Miyamoto: "Sir, I thank you from the bottom from my heart for the countless hours of entertainment that your games provided me" or something equally lame. :P

To Moore: Fake Tattoos are so passé. O_o

And to Ken : I don't know exactly, but i'll be like all over his ass.

17 years ago

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 LucasDigital

Member since 2007 • 112 Posts

To Miyamoto : " Nintendo is not kiddy at all dont worry"
To Kutaragy : "600$ isnt that expensive for almost everybody dont worry"
To Moore : The 360´ll never be outsold by the ps3 , the wii or both relax"
:lol:
AgentA-Mi6

"600$ isnt that expensive for almost everybody dont worry" YEH :roll: tell that to the millions of starving kids in the world!!! ………………Not ones in Africa, ones that bought a ps3 and now have no money :lol:

17 years ago

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 -CheeseEater-

Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts

If I met Shiggy himself, I'd shake his hand and say, "Well done mate"

17 years ago

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 SergeantSnitch

Member since 2007 • 3692 Posts

Holy crap. Until just now, I though Kutaragi was the dude that says "RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDGE RACEEER."

17 years ago

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#100 trasherhead

Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts

The top dude looks like a perv, the second one lookslike he is a candy seller and the last one looks like a mob thug. I realy don't like mr.moore, hes an a** who did the finishing blows to Sega.

17 years ago

111 results
1
2
3

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment