Modern Warfare 2 will render at 600p

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/c/call-duty-modern-warfare-2/modern-warfare-2-render-at-600p-$1314777.htm

Modern Warfare 2 will sport a resolution of 600p like its predecessor.

Infinity Ward once again justifies a sub-HD video game during a high definition console era with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

The resolution, which is 1024 by 600 pixels, has been confirmed by the pixel counters on the Beyond3D technical forums, who recently brought us the resolution of Ghostbusters: The Video Game on the PlayStation 3.

Modern Warfare 2's native rendering resolution will result in 307,200 pixels less than if it was running at the high-definition 720p.

The question is whether this matters for Infinity Ward's upcoming game? Unlike Ghostbusters, Modern Warfare 2 will be an extremely impressive game both graphically and in its framerate; Infinity Ward is again targeting 60 frames-per-second, when most graphically impressive video games struggle to hit 30 frames-per-second.

A sub-HD rendering resolution is surely a compromise worth taking considering the benefits?

Infinity Ward recently released the first Modern Warfare 2 multiplayer gameplay footage, which you can find here.

Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts
It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

When it comes to Modern Warfare, 60FPS>a few extra pixels. However if this were an exclusive game, fanboys would jump all over it.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

Ignoring the fact that I'm dreading this game. Does this really matter? HD isn't necessary.

Avatar image for LiquidShnake
LiquidShnake

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 LiquidShnake
Member since 2009 • 295 Posts

It doesn't really matter unlike bungie IW know how to make a sub HD game look good.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
I just figured that being able to program for both consoles back in 2007, IW's 2nd time around would enable them to tweak a few things to make the game 720 native. Although maybe they made graphical enhancements to the game which didn't allow for a resolution upgrade, so we'll see, in IW we trust.
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
it could be at 1080 p and 60 fps and I would say the same: MEH
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#8 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
I like 60 FPS....in fact I hope Bungie aims for 60 FPS with there next game/games.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Oh well, not like this affects my decision to not buy this game.
Avatar image for SiKh22
SiKh22

4661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SiKh22
Member since 2006 • 4661 Posts
It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.pyromaniac223
if its a solid 30 fps like killzone 2 their is no problem, IW should have at least made it 720p.
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#11 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

Still looks incredible. 60fps is preferable to 720p, imo.

Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

It doesn't really matter unlike bungie IW know how to make a sub HD game look good.

LiquidShnake

halo 3 has better graphics then MW2. its just the artstyle thatmakes halo 3 look mediocre.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c009341336cd
deactivated-5c009341336cd

1855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5c009341336cd
Member since 2004 • 1855 Posts

thats wut you get for gaming on consoles with a severe lack of memory

Avatar image for MikeT072
MikeT072

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 MikeT072
Member since 2009 • 1209 Posts

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

Snagal123
Nobody cares. Seriously. We all know PCs are superior in graphics, so go away. Anyway, I don't really care. A game doesn't need to be in HD to be good. 60 FPS is a much better choice for me.
Avatar image for heybooboo19
heybooboo19

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 heybooboo19
Member since 2009 • 428 Posts

thats wut you get for gaming on consoles with a severe lack of memory

tmgwarrior72

No actually it's what you get when IW develops a console game.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#17 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

MikeT072
Nobody cares. Seriously. We all know PCs are superior in graphics, so go away. .

and yet the console fanboys love having so many graphics king threads
Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

Nobody cares. Seriously. We all know PCs are superior in graphics, so go away. Anyway, I don't really care. A game doesn't need to be in HD to be good. 60 FPS is a much better choice for me.MikeT072

This is surpose to be the HD era and youve got games running in borderline Wii resolutions, its awful, IW should do better.

Most Capcom games are 1280x720 at 60FPS and they look much better.

1024x600 on a 50" screen looks awful, id trade that 60fps for 45fps and 1280x720 anyday.

Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts
[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.SiKh22
if its a solid 30 fps like killzone 2 their is no problem, IW should have at least made it 720p.

I played KZ2, and it annoyed the hell out of me.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Well if I ever do end up getting it (new gameplay footage sparked my intrest), it will be on the PC and after the game drops $30 or if I can somehow get $30 off.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#21 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
[QUOTE="MikeT072"][QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

jg4xchamp
Nobody cares. Seriously. We all know PCs are superior in graphics, so go away. .

and yet the console fanboys love having so many graphics king threads

LOL, so true. You know who you are...
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts

[QUOTE="tmgwarrior72"]

thats wut you get for gaming on consoles with a severe lack of memory

heybooboo19

No actually it's what you get when IW develops a console game.

not really, the problem is the lack of memory on consoles.
Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#23 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
I like 60 FPS....in fact I hope Bungie aims for 60 FPS with there next game/games. jg4xchamp
I thought 60 FPS was only needed in Arena shooters like Quake.
Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts

Well if I ever do end up getting it (new gameplay footage sparked my intrest), it will be on the PC and after the game drops $30 or if I can somehow get $30 off.

Wasdie
I just want it to get a steam sale, even though I know it never will. CoD4 hasn't, and it's still almost full price.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

[QUOTE="SiKh22"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.pyromaniac223
if its a solid 30 fps like killzone 2 their is no problem, IW should have at least made it 720p.

I played KZ2, and it annoyed the hell out of me.

damn how do you guys notice difference between 30 and 60FPS

Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="SiKh22"] if its a solid 30 fps like killzone 2 their is no problem, IW should have at least made it 720p.sikanderahmed

I played KZ2, and it annoyed the hell out of me.

damn how do you guys notice difference between 30 and 60FPS

It's really easy to tell.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
Sub-HD looks terrible. Can't stand it.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] I played KZ2, and it annoyed the hell out of me.pyromaniac223

damn how do you guys notice difference between 30 and 60FPS

It's really easy to tell.

well i can only tell if there is a huge frame drop but cant tell difference between 30 and 60FPS

Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts
I don't care i thought Modern warfare looked great so im not bothered if the sequel is the same.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#30 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Sub-HD looks terrible. Can't stand it. KHAndAnime
Half the games this gen on 360 and PS3 are sub HD, I wish for 1280x720(720p), but they'll have to sacrifice the framerate and graphical features for that depending on the game.

Avatar image for aero250
aero250

3613

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 aero250
Member since 2009 • 3613 Posts
[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] I played KZ2, and it annoyed the hell out of me.pyromaniac223

damn how do you guys notice difference between 30 and 60FPS

It's really easy to tell.

Yep.
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
Still not sure If I'm getting it or not but being Sub HD will not factor in my decision one bit. As long as it looks good enough.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#33 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]I like 60 FPS....in fact I hope Bungie aims for 60 FPS with there next game/games. SparkyProtocol
I thought 60 FPS was only needed in Arena shooters like Quake.

60 FPS>30 FPS no matter what genre. Any shooter/Any game will benefit from having a higher framerate count...so long as its a consistant framerate. Bungie's new engine should be strong enough to pull it off. The Halo 2 engine is just far too dated to pull off everything they want.
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26715 Posts
[QUOTE="MikeT072"][QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

jg4xchamp
Nobody cares. Seriously. We all know PCs are superior in graphics, so go away. .

and yet the console fanboys love having so many graphics king threads

It's just that green eyed monster revealing it's ugly head.
Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

If I buy it, it will be on PC so whatever.

Avatar image for hyperboy152000
hyperboy152000

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 hyperboy152000
Member since 2003 • 4815 Posts

It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.pyromaniac223

honestly i dont have a problem playing a 30 fps game but it just is sooo much easier and more responsive imo when you dont have to deal with the frame-rate dips that occur in 30 fps games

Avatar image for r_gam3
r_gam3

1185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 r_gam3
Member since 2008 • 1185 Posts
hd = overrated when compared to how important gameplay is
Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts

It doesn't really matter to me

Avatar image for porky_ownsu
porky_ownsu

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 porky_ownsu
Member since 2008 • 1287 Posts

600p + 60fps = perfect.

Avatar image for xbox360isgr8t
xbox360isgr8t

6600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 xbox360isgr8t
Member since 2006 • 6600 Posts
imo if its singleplayer than the graphics need to be pushed to the max. but when it comes to online than frames are much more important.
Avatar image for lhughey
lhughey

4890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 lhughey
Member since 2006 • 4890 Posts
as long as it looks good, i could give a rats tail what the resolution is.
Avatar image for Pancakespank
Pancakespank

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Pancakespank
Member since 2009 • 196 Posts
Halo 3:ODST Isnt 720p either. 640p why so cheap? damn it
Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#43 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
Half the people who get it on console prolly won't even have HDTVs and 60fps makes a big difference compared to 30 so it's propably smart.
Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

Snagal123
Isn't it more than three times the resolution?
Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts

600p + 60fps = perfect.

porky_ownsu
what would 1280x720p + 60fps = super perfect?
Avatar image for deactivated-635525971e920
deactivated-635525971e920

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-635525971e920
Member since 2009 • 429 Posts
[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

agentfred
Isn't it more than three times the resolution?

Almost four times the total amount of pixels. :)
Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#47 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts

[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

the_delta

Isn't it more than three times the resolution?

The amount of pixels are. :)

3.75 to be exact.

1 024 * 600 = 614 400
1 280 * 720 = 921 600
1 680 * 1 050 = 1 764 000
1 920 * 1 080 = 2 073 600
1 920 * 1 200 = 2 304 000

In my experience doubling the pixels pretty much halves the framerate.

Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts
ohh noes!! obviously this game will now be horrible, will fail in all possible aspects of gameplay and will go down in history as one of the greatest flops since Mrs. Pac Man.... well that or no one will really give a ****
Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts
I don't really understand why people get so worked up about this kind of stuff. The game already looks great at 60 frames per second, and the gameplay looks exceptional. Just play the damn game.
Avatar image for Next-Gen-Tec
Next-Gen-Tec

4623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Next-Gen-Tec
Member since 2009 • 4623 Posts
Really? I heard it was 601p. :roll: I don't care anyway, I'll be playing in SD lol.