Modern Warfare 2 will render at 600p

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]Sub-HD looks terrible. Can't stand it. mitu123

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="KHAndAnime"]Sub-HD looks terrible. Can't stand it. KHAndAnime

Oh well, I play on a 20 inch sd tv so it makes no difference to me. besides lots of games play on sub HD this gen its not that bad.

The funny thing about all of this is all of these people who brag about the PS3's higher video output capabilities and that a 1080p HDTV is "an absolute necessity" to truely enjoy games this generation and yet we have unbelieveable looking games like Gears of War, Uncharted, Halo 3, Mass Effect, CoD 4 and others and none, not one of them runs at a resolution higher than 720p and in fact I believe maybe only uncharted runs at 720.

[QUOTE="porky_ownsu"]

600p + 60fps = perfect.

Brainkiller05

idc, i'd rather have it run smoothly

[QUOTE="SiKh22"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.pyromaniac223

Is Killzone 2 720p native?flamingqueef

Once you get to 600p I prefer focusing on fps anyway.

so? resolution doesnt change the fact that the game looks good

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.SiKh22

Have fun with blurry textures and really low resolution. Good greef I havent played anything under 1024x768 rezsince 2003. CoD 4 looks at 3x better/sharper on Pc then its console version.

Get it on PC, problem solved. 8)

Have fun with blurry textures and really low resolution. Good greef I havent played anything under 1024x768 rezsince 2003. CoD 4 looks at 3x better/sharper on Pc then its console version.

04dcarraher

Just as well resolution dosn't effect the quality of the gameplay at all.

[QUOTE="SiKh22"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.CwlHeddwyn

Have fun with blurry textures and really low resolution. Good greef I havent played anything under 1024x768 rezsince 2003. CoD 4 looks at 3x better/sharper on Pc then its console version.

04dcarraher

I have seen videos on the PC version and doesn't look as good as PC players are hyperboling them to me, IMO. (compared to console)

No it's not, it's 1080p if you do something like have a pc ahahaha :)

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Have fun with blurry textures and really low resolution. Good greef I havent played anything under 1024x768 rezsince 2003. CoD 4 looks at 3x better/sharper on Pc then its console version.

Camer999

I have seen videos on the PC version and doesn't look as good as PC players are hyperboling them to me, IMO. (compared to console)

I have 3 dell s2409w monitors infornt of me, I have my x360 hooked up(on vga port), games look atrocious on it compared to the pc. It's also due to the nature of these lcds wanting a native res, which consoles can't do(without massive lag).

Does this really matter? HD isn't necessary.

aaronmullan

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

Wow..

And i will playing this at 1900x1200?!!

Sometimes i love my PC so much!!

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

Buster_Highman

Wait you're comparing a movie to that of a game lol? You are aware that the PC would run monsters inc better then your 480P TV right?

1. Superior Frame rate
2. Superior resolution
3. Superior Online and dedicated servers
4. Higher Multiplayer Caps
5. More maps
6. Mods
7. Better controls

Not to mention consoles have to pay for additional content and have no access to user generated content. Don't hate. This is PC gaming.

[QUOTE="Snagal123"]

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

Buster_Highman

can some one show me the difference between 30 and 60fps cause i cant tellbayareahusla

[QUOTE="SiKh22"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.pyromaniac223

I played KZ2 and it was awesome, i read your post and the lying annoyed the hell out of me

I wonder when people will start underrating 60fps and start overrating 120fps, just as they do with 30fps vs 60fps nowadays.

It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.pyromaniac223

Meh, don't care. But since it's an Activision published title... this is a load of bull, I tell ya! :evil:

I wonder when people will start underrating 60fps and start overrating 120fps, just as they do with 30fps vs 60fps nowadays.

glez13

Technology isn't there yet, well except if you have a top grade PC. Maybe next gen.

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.12345678ew

There is a huge difference betwween 30fps and 60fps. If you can't see it then thats you.

[QUOTE="12345678ew"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.The__Havoc

There is a huge difference betwween 30fps and 60fps. If you can't see it then thats you.

Yes just use a powerful gaming PC play a game, that lets you limit the fps, at 120fps, then at 90fps, at 60fps, and 30fps. Then start laughing at your post and at the 23 & 1/3 fps. :lol:

[QUOTE="The__Havoc"]

[QUOTE="12345678ew"] that whole claim has always been stupid, the human eye can only see about 23 and a third fps, so anything above that will look the same, except for incredibly small beat frequency, which both 30 and 60 fps will have the same, since they're just perfect doubles.....glez13

There is a huge difference betwween 30fps and 60fps. If you can't see it then thats you.

Yes just use a powerful gaming PC play a game, that lets you limit the fps, at 120fps, then at 90fps, at 60fps, and 30fps. Then start laughing at your post and at the 23 & 1/3 fps. :lol:

Or I could just finish playing Metoid Prime then try to play Halo 3 and notice that Halo 3 feels like I'm walking in mud with its 30fps compared to Metroid Primes 60fps :|

can some one show me the difference between 30 and 60fps cause i cant tellbayareahusla

So on my PC running at 1920x1200 iam almost twice the resolution of the console version.

Thats really quite pathetic.

All console games should be 1280x720, no less.

600p is really low, it would look horrible on a native 1080p screen, glad i am going with pc version, that way i can play it at 1080p on both my monitor and 42inch hdtv, should make a great difference from the 600p resolution

[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]It's 60 fps, so whatever. 30 frames really aggravates me in shooters.12345678ew

600p? Not a problem for me, Im still on 480i lol. I wouldnt even care about it if I did have an HDTV anyways.

600p is really low, it would look horrible on a native 1080p screen, glad i am going with pc version, that way i can play it at 1080p on both my monitor and 42inch hdtv, should make a great difference from the 600p resolution

tgzbdnosic

No it will look fine, just like every other game that has come out for PS3/360 that isnt 1080p.

No it's not, it's 1080p if you do something like have a pc ahahaha :)

[QUOTE="Camer999"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Have fun with blurry textures and really low resolution. Good greef I havent played anything under 1024x768 rezsince 2003. CoD 4 looks at 3x better/sharper on Pc then its console version.

JigglyWiggly_

I have seen videos on the PC version and doesn't look as good as PC players are hyperboling them to me, IMO. (compared to console)

I have 3 dell s2409w monitors infornt of me, I have my x360 hooked up(on vga port), games look atrocious on it compared to the pc. It's also due to the nature of these lcds wanting a native res, which consoles can't do(without massive lag).