Im going to say ocarina of time... I mean its great for its time... But people are still saying its better the the games today.... I dont know about that...
Halo 2, Loved Halo for its single player campaign, i love nothing more than a well told single player story, but Halo 2 just left that all behind and people still talk as if its the better of the two.
Halo2. Not halo1. Loved halo1. Not so much of halo2 though. It didnt have a SP. In all honesty. I would have to say Gears of War. I loved it for about 3 months. Then it didnt appeal to me as much as it did in the beginning. I would still say its AAA but not a 9.6 AAA.
does it matter if a game is overrated, as long as its great game, i dont care
Mfals
Yes it does. I hate when people think some of the games coming out are the second coming of christ. Or first coming.??? Dun dun duunnnnn.
Halo 3 lemmings...:(
They suck.
Exactly. Like the other day some kid made a thread about expressing his love about heavenly sword. It was kind of disturbing. You can hype it but dont try to make me hype it. I will defend why I hype some games. But i wont try to change your view on it. Actually I try not to hype games because then ill just hype it so much that in the end ill be dissapointed. EX. Gears of War.
I say Gears of War. It has great graphics but it had a 4-6 hour story and IMO graphics mean nothing without a good story and vice versa.theycallmeryan
Please 4-6 hours. Yeah if you played it on casual. No i take that back it would still take you atleast 10 hours to beat it on casual. Try playing it on insane. Its insane.
Twilight Princess. I'm sure that all of its GOTYs were based entirely on the nostalgia people had for every other game in the otherwise perfect series. Also, the only reason it's in my sig is because those were my most anticipated games circa fall 2006. I'll change it one of these days.
Twilight Princess. I'm sure that all of its GOTYs were based entirely on the nostalgia people had for every other game in the otherwise perfect series. got_systems
Since when are games rated or given awards based on past games?
[QUOTE="theycallmeryan"]I say Gears of War. It has great graphics but it had a 4-6 hour story and IMO graphics mean nothing without a good story and vice versa.Killfox
Please 4-6 hours. Yeah if you played it on casual. No i take that back it would still take you atleast 10 hours to beat it on casual. Try playing it on insane. Its insane.
[QUOTE="got_systems"]Twilight Princess. I'm sure that all of its GOTYs were based entirely on the nostalgia people had for every other game in the otherwise perfect series. -The-G-Man-
Since when are games rated or given awards based on past games?
The game, in my opinion, felt more like it was trying to draw the great feelings I had from past games forward than to create a new experience.
everquest 1. everyone i knew loved this game. they would spend hours on these raids n stuff. most of the time they were sitting around to recharge. i couldnt stand the flippin game. twice i tried to play it. once going by my own steam (hard work/ nice reward and all that). nothing....i was so bored hitting rats and spiders. a few weeks later (after much pestering from my mates) i tried again and they gave me loads of cool items n stuff so i could slaughter everything. still nothing. kill a few monsters...sit down for 5 mins. what a flippin waste of time imho. i much preferred diablo 2 online. that was great fun :D.
[QUOTE="theycallmeryan"]I say Gears of War. It has great graphics but it had a 4-6 hour story and IMO graphics mean nothing without a good story and vice versa.Killfox
Please 4-6 hours. Yeah if you played it on casual. No i take that back it would still take you atleast 10 hours to beat it on casual. Try playing it on insane. Its insane.
on insane maybe 10 hours but me and my boy beat it one night just screwing around and it took us right around 5 and a half hours.
Log in to comment