Most people havn't had a chance to truly experience KZ3. FACT!

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="Doolz2024"]Actually, I didn't give an opinion ofeither game.

LucidJubilation

any fool knows Reach is a better game than KZ3...question if ur not one of those fool how much of an idiot are you lol. just joking of course(but of course i expect to be reported(cows:roll: )

just from the shear fact of all that comes with Reach and all that isnt in KZ3 there isnt room for argument. ur just giving the guy a hard time because it's a ps3 exclusive he's talking about. KZ3 is trash but in a nice box....if anything, thats been proven. its looks nice, very pretty, but the game is essentially generic **** they threw together for pawns to eat up...which they actually arent(14th on the Sony top selling list KZ2 was 5th. Thanks Tinted Eyes). it's a linear, lame, same ole ****, first person shooter. there's nothing to it at all...Reach pisses on its mother's leg. Theatre mode, 4 player co-op offline and online, firefight, forge world, very deep multiplayer, decent legth campaign with a story way better than KZ3's...it's nothing but obvious that Reach is better than KZ3. you don't even need to look at the scores. so why are u giving the guy a hard time? i mean u own all systems rght? why be so biased and petty over a ps3 game friend?

All the features in the world doesn't make Reach's multiplayer more interesting for me, you can scream about how everyone should agree that Reach is the better game but I enjoy Killzone 3 more. If you don't feel the same way cool, doesn't change my opinion.

It's campaign is fun, it's multiplayer is a blast to play though admittedly not as good as Killzone 2s MP.

As for why I'm giving him a hard time, it's fun calling people out when they talk about games they had no experience with.

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Yeah, you did, right when you said one game isn't better than the other.FIipMode

any fool knows Reach is a better game than KZ3...question if ur not one of those fool how much of an idiot are you lol. just joking of course(but of course i expect to be reported(cows:roll: )

just from the shear fact of all that comes with Reach and all that isnt in KZ3 there isnt room for argument. ur just giving the guy a hard time because it's a ps3 exclusive he's talking about. KZ3 is trash but in a nice box....if anything, thats been proven. its looks nice, very pretty, but the game is essentially generic **** they threw together for pawns to eat up...which they actually arent(14th on the Sony top selling list KZ2 was 5th. Thanks Tinted Eyes). it's a linear, lame, same ole ****, first person shooter. there's nothing to it at all...Reach pisses on its mother's leg. Theatre mode, 4 player co-op offline and online, firefight, forge world, very deep multiplayer, decent legth campaign with a story way better than KZ3's...it's nothing but obvious that Reach is better than KZ3. you don't even need to look at the scores. so why are u giving the guy a hard time? i mean u own all systems rght? why be so biased and petty over a ps3 game friend?

All the features in the world doesn't make Reach's multiplayer more interesting for me, you can scream about how everyone should agree that Reach is the better game but I enjoy Killzone 3 more. If you don't feel the same way cool, doesn't change my opinion.

It's campaign is fun, it's multiplayer is a blast to play though admittedly not as good as Killzone 2s MP.

As for why I'm giving him a hard time, it's fun calling people out when they talk about games they had no experience with.

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Yeah, you did, right when you said one game isn't better than the other.FIipMode

any fool knows Reach is a better game than KZ3...question if ur not one of those fool how much of an idiot are you lol. just joking of course(but of course i expect to be reported(cows:roll: )

just from the shear fact of all that comes with Reach and all that isnt in KZ3 there isnt room for argument. ur just giving the guy a hard time because it's a ps3 exclusive he's talking about. KZ3 is trash but in a nice box....if anything, thats been proven. its looks nice, very pretty, but the game is essentially generic **** they threw together for pawns to eat up...which they actually arent(14th on the Sony top selling list KZ2 was 5th. Thanks Tinted Eyes). it's a linear, lame, same ole ****, first person shooter. there's nothing to it at all...Reach pisses on its mother's leg. Theatre mode, 4 player co-op offline and online, firefight, forge world, very deep multiplayer, decent legth campaign with a story way better than KZ3's...it's nothing but obvious that Reach is better than KZ3. you don't even need to look at the scores. so why are u giving the guy a hard time? i mean u own all systems rght? why be so biased and petty over a ps3 game friend?

All the features in the world doesn't make Reach's multiplayer more interesting for me, you can scream about how everyone should agree that Reach is the better game but I enjoy Killzone 3 more. If you don't feel the same way cool, doesn't change my opinion.

It's campaign is fun, it's multiplayer is a blast to play though admittedly not as good as Killzone 2s MP.

As for why I'm giving him a hard time, it's fun calling people out when they talk about games they had no experience with.

yes, but i'm not focusing on just two aspects of the games...i'm focusing on them all. the thing is KZ3 only has two aspects to it where Reach has a chunky list to its. what, all those other features that Reach has should be ignored since KZ3 has NOTHING like them. its not like those extra features on Reach don't work...they great parts to the game. KZ3 might work for you but you have an obvious bias(not going by just this thread). who knows, maybe Reach didn't do it for you...but give credit where it's due. 60 dollars for a generic fps with a shallow multiplayer or a nice beefy game with option after option of things to do in it.

i mean even the single player campaign is technically better than KZ3's...what would most people rather do....run down a narrow limited strip and shoot the same generic enemies or strategize a big open area and figure out if you want to take the grunts out first or the big boys? is it more fun deciding whether u should use human weapons or the alien's juiced up plasma gunnery...better yet, should i take the warthog or mongoose or jump in this freaked out alien dealy? there's nothing special or new to KZ3 at all because there choice is get this new but same ole gun and shoot whoever comes, they all go down the same and then have so much fun taking pot shotz at enemies while you ride on rails:roll: you don't even need the scores to see which is the better game, like i said. there go those details you were asking for.

yea, and thanks. you were right...this was fun.

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

any fool knows Reach is a better game than KZ3...question if ur not one of those fool how much of an idiot are you lol. just joking of course(but of course i expect to be reported(cows:roll: )

just from the shear fact of all that comes with Reach and all that isnt in KZ3 there isnt room for argument. ur just giving the guy a hard time because it's a ps3 exclusive he's talking about. KZ3 is trash but in a nice box....if anything, thats been proven. its looks nice, very pretty, but the game is essentially generic **** they threw together for pawns to eat up...which they actually arent(14th on the Sony top selling list KZ2 was 5th. Thanks Tinted Eyes). it's a linear, lame, same ole ****, first person shooter. there's nothing to it at all...Reach pisses on its mother's leg. Theatre mode, 4 player co-op offline and online, firefight, forge world, very deep multiplayer, decent legth campaign with a story way better than KZ3's...it's nothing but obvious that Reach is better than KZ3. you don't even need to look at the scores. so why are u giving the guy a hard time? i mean u own all systems rght? why be so biased and petty over a ps3 game friend?

Doolz2024

All the features in the world doesn't make Reach's multiplayer more interesting for me, you can scream about how everyone should agree that Reach is the better game but I enjoy Killzone 3 more. If you don't feel the same way cool, doesn't change my opinion.

It's campaign is fun, it's multiplayer is a blast to play though admittedly not as good as Killzone 2s MP.

As for why I'm giving him a hard time, it's fun calling people out when they talk about games they had no experience with.

If you decided it's not worth is based on a beta that's cool, but still, saying it's better or not better than a game without even touching the game is a problem.

I could use that money to buy the game off ebay/amazon with that price.

yes, but i'm not focusing on just two aspects of the games...i'm focusing on them all. the thing is KZ3 only has two aspects to it where Reach has a chunky list to its. what, all those other features that Reach has should be ignored since KZ3 has NOTHING like them. its not like those extra features on Reach don't work...they great parts to the game. KZ3 might work for you but you have an obvious bias(not going by just this thread). who knows, maybe Reach didn't do it for you...but give credit where it's due. 60 dollars for a generic fps with a shallow multiplayer or a nice beefy game with option after option of things to do in it.

i mean even the single player campaign is technically better than KZ3's...what would most people rather do....run down a narrow limited strip and shoot the same generic enemies or strategize a big open area and figure out if you want to take the grunts out first or the big boys? is it more fun deciding whether u should use human weapons or the alien's juiced up plasma gunnery...better yet, should i take the warthog or mongoose or jump in this freaked out alien dealy? there's nothing special or new to KZ3 at all because there choice is get this new but same ole gun and shoot whoever comes, they all go down the same and then have so much fun taking pot shotz at enemies while you ride on rails:roll: you don't even need the scores to see which is the better game, like i said. there go those details you were asking for.

yea, and thanks. you were right...this was fun.

LucidJubilation

These are YOUR problems with the game, how does this affect how I feel about both games?

And an obvious bias to what? This is the first I'm hearing of this.

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

yes, but i'm not focusing on just two aspects of the games...i'm focusing on them all. the thing is KZ3 only has two aspects to it where Reach has a chunky list to its. what, all those other features that Reach has should be ignored since KZ3 has NOTHING like them. its not like those extra features on Reach don't work...they great parts to the game. KZ3 might work for you but you have an obvious bias(not going by just this thread). who knows, maybe Reach didn't do it for you...but give credit where it's due. 60 dollars for a generic fps with a shallow multiplayer or a nice beefy game with option after option of things to do in it.

i mean even the single player campaign is technically better than KZ3's...what would most people rather do....run down a narrow limited strip and shoot the same generic enemies or strategize a big open area and figure out if you want to take the grunts out first or the big boys? is it more fun deciding whether u should use human weapons or the alien's juiced up plasma gunnery...better yet, should i take the warthog or mongoose or jump in this freaked out alien dealy? there's nothing special or new to KZ3 at all because there choice is get this new but same ole gun and shoot whoever comes, they all go down the same and then have so much fun taking pot shotz at enemies while you ride on rails:roll: you don't even need the scores to see which is the better game, like i said. there go those details you were asking for.

yea, and thanks. you were right...this was fun.

FIipMode

These are YOUR problems with the game, how does this affect how I feel about both games?

And an obvious bias to what? This is the first I'm hearing of this.

:|

lol smh, nevermind fam, don't even worry about it. have a good day....goodbye.

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]

[QUOTE="LucidJubilation"]

yes, but i'm not focusing on just two aspects of the games...i'm focusing on them all. the thing is KZ3 only has two aspects to it where Reach has a chunky list to its. what, all those other features that Reach has should be ignored since KZ3 has NOTHING like them. its not like those extra features on Reach don't work...they great parts to the game. KZ3 might work for you but you have an obvious bias(not going by just this thread). who knows, maybe Reach didn't do it for you...but give credit where it's due. 60 dollars for a generic fps with a shallow multiplayer or a nice beefy game with option after option of things to do in it.

i mean even the single player campaign is technically better than KZ3's...what would most people rather do....run down a narrow limited strip and shoot the same generic enemies or strategize a big open area and figure out if you want to take the grunts out first or the big boys? is it more fun deciding whether u should use human weapons or the alien's juiced up plasma gunnery...better yet, should i take the warthog or mongoose or jump in this freaked out alien dealy? there's nothing special or new to KZ3 at all because there choice is get this new but same ole gun and shoot whoever comes, they all go down the same and then have so much fun taking pot shotz at enemies while you ride on rails:roll: you don't even need the scores to see which is the better game, like i said. there go those details you were asking for.

yea, and thanks. you were right...this was fun.

LucidJubilation

These are YOUR problems with the game, how does this affect how I feel about both games?

And an obvious bias to what? This is the first I'm hearing of this.

:|

lol smh, nevermind fam, don't even worry about it. have a good day....goodbye.

If I use it, will it get rid of Rico??

GreenGoblin2099

welcome to2007 and the wii zapper.

Not doubting it's greatness, but is it really worth $140? Personally I say no.i5750at4Ghz

It's not a true Ps3 thread without William Baker bashing it with baseless "facts".

Anyways, I absolutely love the game, I have a move, but I have yet to buy the sharpshooter.