MS manages to turn 40$ reductions into 200$ profits.

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"] What world do you live in? How does every company do this? MS is in a league of it's own when it comes to ripping off it's customers, lems need to stop spewing this nonsense that all corporations are the same. Theres a diference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers.micky4889

i live in the wold where i did a BTEC national diploma in business and finance, including marketing and consumer legislation, during my spare time in the army, i am 35 years old and i have seen many company's 'rip off' there customers, the PS1 was 400 quid when it first released here and the dream cast was actually cheaper than the ps1, the PS2 was 400 quid when it first released here, the PS3 was 500 quid when it first released here, the 360 was 280 quid when it first released here, who's ripping off who?, if it wasn't for MS i wouldn't have been able to afford a next gen console, i live in a world where business means to make money, you live in a world where MS is bad because SONY apparently does charity instead of good business, and to quote an old english saying ' you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off' even after reading this, i don't feel ripped off

The PS3 launched at £500?? Because i have a link that saysotherwise. And the PS1 launched at £400 ?? Was it not £299 just like the PS2 ??I'm sorry but i can't take you seriously, someone who has to inflate costs and skew facts in order to make a point, is not a person worth debating with.

Edit: That last part is my opinion on people in general and is not directed at anyone in particular.

maybe my figure's where inflated, but thanks for adding facts to my initial point, every playstation released at a higher price point than the 360, it was 280 quid for the 20gb premium model, the core system was only 200
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"] What world do you live in? How does every company do this? MS is in a league of it's own when it comes to ripping off it's customers, lems need to stop spewing this nonsense that all corporations are the same. Theres a diference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers.Eddie-Vedder

i live in the wold where i did a BTEC national diploma in business and finance, including marketing and consumer legislation, during my spare time in the army, i am 35 years old and i have seen many company's 'rip off' there customers, the PS1 was 400 quid when it first released here and the dream cast was actually cheaper than the ps1, the PS2 was 400 quid when it first released here, the PS3 was 500 quid when it first released here, the 360 was 280 quid when it first released here, who's ripping off who?, if it wasn't for MS i wouldn't have been able to afford a next gen console, i live in a world where business means to make money, you live in a world where MS is bad because SONY apparently does charity instead of good business, and to quote an old english saying ' you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off' even after reading this, i don't feel ripped off

Wtf dude? expensive =/= rip off. The PS3 was launched and sold at a loss, still is, Sony is LOSING MONEY selling these consoles, their basicly paying for a part of the console with us, MS is charging 2500% more for wifi, how is taking a loss and selling something for 2500% profit the same? Ripping off has to do with the actual cost of the item, it's the relation of cost/value not just how expensive it is... Or if there are alternatives, like Sony allowing 3rd party acessories, headsets, HDD's, driving wheels, controllers etc etc vs MS's monopolistic way of doing business. Saying all business are the same is just a black and white view of the world and it's just wrong, it's more complex then that.

so, by your logic, the original xbox wasn't a rip-off because MS sold it at a loss, and you are right, not ALL business are run the same, but a lot of them are run the way MS run's there business, to say that MS are the ONLY company that does business that way is quite frankly naive and misnformed
Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts
[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]i live in the wold where i did a BTEC national diploma in business and finance, including marketing and consumer legislation, during my spare time in the army, i am 35 years old and i have seen many company's 'rip off' there customers, the PS1 was 400 quid when it first released here and the dream cast was actually cheaper than the ps1, the PS2 was 400 quid when it first released here, the PS3 was 500 quid when it first released here, the 360 was 280 quid when it first released here, who's ripping off who?, if it wasn't for MS i wouldn't have been able to afford a next gen console, i live in a world where business means to make money, you live in a world where MS is bad because SONY apparently does charity instead of good business, and to quote an old english saying ' you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off' even after reading this, i don't feel ripped offdelta3074

Wtf dude? expensive =/= rip off. The PS3 was launched and sold at a loss, still is, Sony is LOSING MONEY selling these consoles, their basicly paying for a part of the console with us, MS is charging 2500% more for wifi, how is taking a loss and selling something for 2500% profit the same? Ripping off has to do with the actual cost of the item, it's the relation of cost/value not just how expensive it is... Or if there are alternatives, like Sony allowing 3rd party acessories, headsets, HDD's, driving wheels, controllers etc etc vs MS's monopolistic way of doing business. Saying all business are the same is just a black and white view of the world and it's just wrong, it's more complex then that.

so, by your logic, the original xbox wasn't a rip-off because MS sold it at a loss, and you are right, not ALL business are run the same, but a lot of them are run the way MS run's there business, to say that MS are the ONLY company that does business that way is quite frankly naive and misnformed

That I agree with.
Avatar image for EmpCom
EmpCom

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 EmpCom
Member since 2005 • 3451 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"] What world do you live in? How does every company do this? MS is in a league of it's own when it comes to ripping off it's customers, lems need to stop spewing this nonsense that all corporations are the same. Theres a diference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers.Eddie-Vedder

i live in the wold where i did a BTEC national diploma in business and finance, including marketing and consumer legislation, during my spare time in the army, i am 35 years old and i have seen many company's 'rip off' there customers, the PS1 was 400 quid when it first released here and the dream cast was actually cheaper than the ps1, the PS2 was 400 quid when it first released here, the PS3 was 500 quid when it first released here, the 360 was 280 quid when it first released here, who's ripping off who?, if it wasn't for MS i wouldn't have been able to afford a next gen console, i live in a world where business means to make money, you live in a world where MS is bad because SONY apparently does charity instead of good business, and to quote an old english saying ' you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off' even after reading this, i don't feel ripped off

Wtf dude? expensive =/= rip off. The PS3 was launched and sold at a loss, still is, Sony is LOSING MONEY selling these consoles, their basicly paying for a part of the console with us, MS is charging 2500% more for wifi, how is taking a loss and selling something for 2500% profit the same? Ripping off has to do with the actual cost of the item, it's the relation of cost/value not just how expensive it is... Or if there are alternatives, like Sony allowing 3rd party acessories, headsets, HDD's, driving wheels, controllers etc etc vs MS's monopolistic way of doing business. Saying all business are the same is just a black and white view of the world and it's just wrong, it's more complex then that.

The other guy is right so stop being so niave, sony sells at a loss because they have to keep up with the competitiion. Sony sold memory cards last gen for how much? now what do you think it cost them to make. Companies produce at lowest price and sell for highest they can so get over it. Do you really think that can of coke costs anywhere near what you pay for it or those nike trainers that cost $5 to produce that sell for $100 . Grow up
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7059 Posts

All businesses operate on the same principles. What a product sells for has nothing to do with the cost of making it. The only exceptions to this are regulated monopolies where the price is set by the regulator. If you don't understand this, you don't understand the world you live in.

Avatar image for hot114
hot114

4489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 hot114
Member since 2003 • 4489 Posts
Sony sold memory cards last gen for how much? EmpCom
last gen indeed was when a 265MB flash card for your digital camera could run you up to 40$ ontop of that sony has always allowed 3d partys to make memorycards and HDD etc unlike microsoft who enforces a monopoly hence the heavily inflated pricing.
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="Gxgear"]

That's how M$ gets you, with the hidden costs.

Odrec
Please be specific. Where does MS hide the price of anything that they sell?

Bluetooth/WLAN = $3.92 M$ Wifi = $100 They are hidding the real ~$4 cost with a $96 extra :)

How do you guys survive. Concepts such as profit (selling something for more than what it cost you to make/get it) seem like real deal mind blowers to you guys and some hidden agenda that nobody else on the planet subscribes to.
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7059 Posts

[QUOTE="EmpCom"]Sony sold memory cards last gen for how much? hot114
last gen indeed was when a 265MB flash card for your digital camera could run you up to 40$ ontop of that sony has always allowed 3d partys to make memorycards and HDD etc unlike microsoft who enforces a monopoly hence the heavily inflated pricing.

Unlike Sony and the monopoly standard that is BD, amirite? LMAO.

Avatar image for hot114
hot114

4489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 hot114
Member since 2003 • 4489 Posts

Unlike Sony and the monopoly standard that is BD, amirite? LMAO.

SUD123456

There is so much wrong with this statement i dont even know where to start :S For your own good please visit wikipedia once in a while. When was the last time you were in a tv store? off brand BD's actually outnumber the sony ones. Any company is free to employ BD technology in exchange for royaltys. Hell there even was some talk about a 360 expansion for a BD drive.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="hot114"][QUOTE="EmpCom"]Sony sold memory cards last gen for how much? SUD123456

last gen indeed was when a 265MB flash card for your digital camera could run you up to 40$ ontop of that sony has always allowed 3d partys to make memorycards and HDD etc unlike microsoft who enforces a monopoly hence the heavily inflated pricing.

Unlike Sony and the monopoly standard that is BD, amirite? LMAO.

SONY doesn't have a monopoly on blu-ray, blu-ray is owned by a consortium of companys, including Toshiba who technically went into competition against there own investment with HD-DVD
Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
[QUOTE="Flipyap28"]Glad to be a Jasper 360 owner ;) At the end of the day, its all about money and if MS is doing this then good for them. I dont feel like I have been exploited yet, I had a wireless adapter before buying a 360 (you dont need to use the official thing) and so far consoles bought in 2009 apperently have a 4% failure rate (jasper ftw), XBL gold is good, no lag in most games.

Xbox LIVE Gold has nothign to do with lag...
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7059 Posts

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]Unlike Sony and the monopoly standard that is BD, amirite? LMAO.

hot114

There is so much wrong with this statement i dont even know where to start :S For your own good please visit wikipedia once in a while. When was the last time you were in a tv store? off brand BD's actually outnumber the sony ones. Any company is free to employ BD technology in exchange for royalties. Hell there even was some talk about a 360 expansion for a BD drive.

So what your saying is that Sony had no interest in ensuring that the monopoly standard that is BluRay defeated HD-DVD? So Sony just sat on the sidelines and didn't lift a finger to help its own standard win? And they don't get any BD royalties, amirite?

So let me get this right. MS is teh evil because if you manufacture add-on products for the 360 without being licensed by MS you get the lawyer letter.

But Sony is teh angel because you can manufacture products without license by the BDA and without paying them royalties.....ugh....wait....where was I going with that.....damn sounds like the same principle.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7059 Posts

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

[QUOTE="hot114"]last gen indeed was when a 265MB flash card for your digital camera could run you up to 40$ ontop of that sony has always allowed 3d partys to make memorycards and HDD etc unlike microsoft who enforces a monopoly hence the heavily inflated pricing.delta3074

Unlike Sony and the monopoly standard that is BD, amirite? LMAO.

SONY doesn't have a monopoly on blu-ray, blu-ray is owned by a consortium of companys, including Toshiba who technically went into competition against there own investment with HD-DVD

I didn't say they did. I implied that they have an interest in the monopoly standard that is BD succeeding, for the obvious reason that they gain financially because of it.

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#64 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

Total gain 240$, so every console is worth 2 now?
Thats awesome for just wifi and a HDD, playing theyr consumers like marionettes
While sony is losing on every PS3 sold every 360 gets to count for 2 XDXDXD.

hot114

So you're trying to show MS numbers with the PS3 costs... wth are you talking about.

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]i live in the wold where i did a BTEC national diploma in business and finance, including marketing and consumer legislation, during my spare time in the army, i am 35 years old and i have seen many company's 'rip off' there customers, the PS1 was 400 quid when it first released here and the dream cast was actually cheaper than the ps1, the PS2 was 400 quid when it first released here, the PS3 was 500 quid when it first released here, the 360 was 280 quid when it first released here, who's ripping off who?, if it wasn't for MS i wouldn't have been able to afford a next gen console, i live in a world where business means to make money, you live in a world where MS is bad because SONY apparently does charity instead of good business, and to quote an old english saying ' you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off' even after reading this, i don't feel ripped offdelta3074

The PS3 launched at £500?? Because i have a link that saysotherwise. And the PS1 launched at £400 ?? Was it not £299 just like the PS2 ??I'm sorry but i can't take you seriously, someone who has to inflate costs and skew facts in order to make a point, is not a person worth debating with.

Edit: That last part is my opinion on people in general and is not directed at anyone in particular.

maybe my figure's where inflated, but thanks for adding facts to my initial point, every playstation released at a higher price point than the 360, it was 280 quid for the 20gb premium model, the core system was only 200

You were replying to this "There's a difference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers." with made up PS launch prices and then comparing them to the factual 360 price, there is no "maybe"

All PS consoles to date were sold at a loss (correct me if I'm wrong) and came with the 'next best thing' storage wise. PS1 has CD, which was cutting edge at the time, PS2 had DVD and the PS3 came with Blu Ray. The 360 came out when DVD which was already well established so of course it is going to cost less, and i fail to see what this has to do with a $99 WiFi adapter that probable costs Microsoft $20 tops to make.

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to spend $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

Avatar image for Flipyap28
Flipyap28

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#66 Flipyap28
Member since 2008 • 3865 Posts
[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Flipyap28"]Glad to be a Jasper 360 owner ;) At the end of the day, its all about money and if MS is doing this then good for them. I dont feel like I have been exploited yet, I had a wireless adapter before buying a 360 (you dont need to use the official thing) and so far consoles bought in 2009 apperently have a 4% failure rate (jasper ftw), XBL gold is good, no lag in most games.

Xbox LIVE Gold has nothign to do with lag...

Sorry? Paying for XBL which gives me a bettwe online service with good servers....
Avatar image for hot114
hot114

4489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 hot114
Member since 2003 • 4489 Posts
[QUOTE="Flipyap28"][QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Flipyap28"]Glad to be a Jasper 360 owner ;) At the end of the day, its all about money and if MS is doing this then good for them. I dont feel like I have been exploited yet, I had a wireless adapter before buying a 360 (you dont need to use the official thing) and so far consoles bought in 2009 apperently have a 4% failure rate (jasper ftw), XBL gold is good, no lag in most games.

Xbox LIVE Gold has nothign to do with lag...

Sorry? Paying for XBL which gives me a bettwe online service with good servers....

xbl gets you dedicated servers now? :D All you are getting for that money is moderation and store content.
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts
[QUOTE="Flipyap28"][QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="Flipyap28"]Glad to be a Jasper 360 owner ;) At the end of the day, its all about money and if MS is doing this then good for them. I dont feel like I have been exploited yet, I had a wireless adapter before buying a 360 (you dont need to use the official thing) and so far consoles bought in 2009 apperently have a 4% failure rate (jasper ftw), XBL gold is good, no lag in most games.

Xbox LIVE Gold has nothign to do with lag...

Sorry? Paying for XBL which gives me a bettwe online service with good servers....

Those "good servers" are only there to hold game stats, achievements and your friends list, they don't affect lag. The majority of games on Live use client to peer, same as PSN.
Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7059 Posts

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to speed $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

micky4889

It costs about 20 cents to make a tube of lipstick.Many retail easily over $10. Some retail over $25. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs about half a cent a pill to make most pharaceutical products in large quantities. They can retail any where from 10 cents to $10 per pill. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs $5-$10 to make a pair of jeans. Some retail for $25. Many retail easily for $100+. There is no material difference between the manufacturing costs.

Tell a person how much ANYTHING costs vs what they are paying for it and the vast majority of people will feel ripped off. This is because the vast majority of people don't think the rules of capitalism should apply to them.

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to speed $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

SUD123456

It costs about 20 cents to make a tube of lipstick.Many retail easily over $10. Some retail over $25. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs about half a cent a pill to make most pharaceutical products in large quantities. They can retail any where from 10 cents to $10 per pill. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs $5-$10 to make a pair of jeans. Some retail for $25. Many retail easily for $100+. There is no material difference between the manufacturing costs.

Tell a person how much ANYTHING costs vs what they are paying for it and the vast majority of people will feel ripped off. This is because the vast majority of people don't think the rules of capitalism should apply to them.

Ya that a good point but there is competition in those markets you listed, so if the consumer doesn't like the price, they have plenty of alternatives. Whats the alternative to Microsofts HDDs? There is none, because Microsoft know no one would touch their HDD/Wifi at that price if there was a more reasonably priced option.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

The PS3 launched at £500?? Because i have a link that saysotherwise. And the PS1 launched at £400 ?? Was it not £299 just like the PS2 ??I'm sorry but i can't take you seriously, someone who has to inflate costs and skew facts in order to make a point, is not a person worth debating with.

Edit: That last part is my opinion on people in general and is not directed at anyone in particular.

micky4889

maybe my figure's where inflated, but thanks for adding facts to my initial point, every playstation released at a higher price point than the 360, it was 280 quid for the 20gb premium model, the core system was only 200

You were replying to this "There's a difference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers." with made up PS launch prices and then comparing them to the factual 360 price, there is no "maybe"

All PS consoles to date were sold at a loss (correct me if I'm wrong) and came with the 'next best thing' storage wise. PS1 has CD, which was cutting edge at the time, PS2 had DVD and the PS3 came with Blu Ray. The 360 came out when DVD which was already well established so of course it is going to cost less, and i fail to see what this has to do with a $99 WiFi adapter that probable costs Microsoft $20 tops to make.

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to spend $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

firstly, the original xbox was sold at a loss during it's entire lifespan, the ps2 and the ps1 eventually mad SONY a lot of money secondly it has nothing to do with people being misinformed, it's common sense that things are going to cost us a hell of a lot more than they cost to make,anyone that thinks otherwise is off with the fairies, it's the same with everything, how much do you think a DVD costs to mass produce? how much do you think a 100 quid pair of trainers costs to produce, and yopur point about the wireless adapter is completely lost ion me, because there are plenty of cheaper third party wireless adapters that work very well with the 360, and Pc's had CD rom drives ages before the ps1, to call the ps1's cd rom drive 'cutting edge' is just mind boggling, even the megadrive had an add on CD rom drive, and DVD rom drives where around before the Ps2, the dreamcast had one and was released well before the ps2
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

[QUOTE="micky4889"]

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to speed $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

micky4889

It costs about 20 cents to make a tube of lipstick.Many retail easily over $10. Some retail over $25. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs about half a cent a pill to make most pharaceutical products in large quantities. They can retail any where from 10 cents to $10 per pill. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs $5-$10 to make a pair of jeans. Some retail for $25. Many retail easily for $100+. There is no material difference between the manufacturing costs.

Tell a person how much ANYTHING costs vs what they are paying for it and the vast majority of people will feel ripped off. This is because the vast majority of people don't think the rules of capitalism should apply to them.

Ya that a good point but there is competition in those markets you listed, so if the consumer doesn't like the price, they have plenty of alternatives. Whats the alternative to Microsofts HDDs? There is none, because Microsoft know no one would touch their HDD/Wifi at that price if there was a more reasonably priced option.

of course theres an alternative, buy a different console,simples
Avatar image for Odrec
Odrec

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Odrec
Member since 2009 • 1897 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"][QUOTE="Odrec"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] Please be specific. Where does MS hide the price of anything that they sell?

Bluetooth/WLAN = $3.92 M$ Wifi = $100 They are hidding the real ~$4 cost with a $96 extra :)

How do you guys survive. Concepts such as profit (selling something for more than what it cost you to make/get it) seem like real deal mind blowers to you guys and some hidden agenda that nobody else on the planet subscribes to.

:roll: Don't you understand the difference between charging what's a fair amount to make a profit and ripping off people? By your view selling a glass of milk for $1000 is the idea of good business and should be desired. Gosh you would think people could grasp simple concepts like this easily but it's minblowing to the lenghts they go to justify their purchase.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#74 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
You mean companies sell stuff for a profit? Who do we call to complain about this incredibly unfair practice? :roll:
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#75 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

:roll: Don't you understand the difference between charging what's a fair amount to make a profit and ripping off people? By your view selling a glass of milk for $1000 is the idea of good business and should be desired. Gosh you would think people could grasp simple concepts like this easily but it's minblowing to the lenghts they go to justify their purchase.Odrec
And MS was losing money on the 360 at the begining as well. They would have been losing more in that case. Don't fault MS because they made a better business decision than Sony did in what to include in their system to make a profit. The burden of value lies with the consumer, and if the consumer is too lazy to think, they are not doing their part.

Do you buy every product you see an infomercial for? If not, you made a decision with your money, showing the roll consumers are supposed to play in capitalism.

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#76 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]maybe my figure's where inflated, but thanks for adding facts to my initial point, every playstation released at a higher price point than the 360, it was 280 quid for the 20gb premium model, the core system was only 200delta3074

You were replying to this "There's a difference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers." with made up PS launch prices and then comparing them to the factual 360 price, there is no "maybe"

All PS consoles to date were sold at a loss (correct me if I'm wrong) and came with the 'next best thing' storage wise. PS1 has CD, which was cutting edge at the time, PS2 had DVD and the PS3 came with Blu Ray. The 360 came out when DVD which was already well established so of course it is going to cost less, and i fail to see what this has to do with a $99 WiFi adapter that probable costs Microsoft $20 tops to make.

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to spend $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

firstly, the original xbox was sold at a loss during it's entire lifespan, the ps2 and the ps1 eventually mad SONY a lot of money secondly it has nothing to do with people being misinformed, it's common sense that things are going to cost us a hell of a lot more than they cost to make,anyone that thinks otherwise is off with the fairies, it's the same with everything, how much do you think a DVD costs to mass produce? how much do you think a 100 quid pair of trainers costs to produce, and yopur point about the wireless adapter is completely lost ion me, because there are plenty of cheaper third party wireless adapters that work very well with the 360, and Pc's had CD rom drives ages before the ps1, to call the ps1's cd rom drive 'cutting edge' is just mind boggling, even the megadrive had an add on CD rom drive, and DVD rom drives where around before the Ps2, the dreamcast had one and was released well before the ps2

You were the one who brought up the price of a console at launch, not me. And ya "cutting edge" wasn't the words i should have used, but none the less CD was pretty new back in the PS1 days and thus the price, also i never said DVD wasn't around before the PS2. The technology was relatively new back then so it cost far, far more to put a DVD in the PS2(Don't recall the stand alone £200 DVD players?) then it was for the 360, given the time they released in. Also i'm pretty sure the Dreamcast didn't use DVDs it used some other disc based media (?)

And your point about trainers doesn't apply here, you're comparing an open market to a closed one.

Is there trainers that cost £100? yea i'm pretty there is.

Is there trainers that cost £10? yup

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

It costs about 20 cents to make a tube of lipstick.Many retail easily over $10. Some retail over $25. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs about half a cent a pill to make most pharaceutical products in large quantities. They can retail any where from 10 cents to $10 per pill. There is no material difference between the manufacturing cost.

It costs $5-$10 to make a pair of jeans. Some retail for $25. Many retail easily for $100+. There is no material difference between the manufacturing costs.

Tell a person how much ANYTHING costs vs what they are paying for it and the vast majority of people will feel ripped off. This is because the vast majority of people don't think the rules of capitalism should apply to them.

delta3074

Ya that a good point but there is competition in those markets you listed, so if the consumer doesn't like the price, they have plenty of alternatives. Whats the alternative to Microsofts HDDs? There is none, because Microsoft know no one would touch their HDD/Wifi at that price if there was a more reasonably priced option.

of course theres an alternative, buy a different console,simples

What if you already have a 360? Are you meant to sell it along with all your games? Lose all the friends you've made on live, etc. Just because you don't agree with the price of Microsofts add-ons ?

Sorry but the old "so don't buy it" argument is weak. imo

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#78 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

What if you already have a 360? Are you meant to sell it along with all your games? Lose all the friends you've made on live, etc. Just because you don't agree with the price of Microsofts add-ons ?

Sorry but the old "so don't buy it" argument is weak. imo

micky4889

What if you buy a 360 without knowing enough about it to accurately judge it's value? I would say that is still completely your fault, making the "just don't buy it if you don't wan what it offers" stronger.

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#79 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]What if you already have a 360? Are you meant to sell it along with all your games? Lose all the friends you've made on live, etc. Just because you don't agree with the price of Microsofts add-ons ?

Sorry but the old "so don't buy it" argument is weak. imo

SpruceCaboose

What if you buy a 360 without knowing enough about it to accurately judge it's value? I would say that is still completely your fault, making the "just don't buy it if you don't wan what it offers" stronger.

So you would blame all the mums that bought a 360 for their children, all the grand parents who bought a 360 for their loved ones for birthdays, Christmas etc. for not breaking out a laptop and researching every little detail about the product before they purchase it? You wouldn't blame Microsoft at all?

Nobody would mind if they made $10-$20 profit, every company has to profit in some way, but we're talking about buying in a 3rd party HDD slapping an MS sticker on it, and selling it for over 3-4 times it's worth. If it was an open market, it wouldn't matter but it's the fact that the consumers who own a 360 don't have a choice, it's either spend that absurd amount of money on an MS HDD, or you can't have one at all.

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

You were replying to this "There's a difference between looking for a fair/smart profit and ripping your customers off. All companies do not rip off their customers." with made up PS launch prices and then comparing them to the factual 360 price, there is no "maybe"

All PS consoles to date were sold at a loss (correct me if I'm wrong) and came with the 'next best thing' storage wise. PS1 has CD, which was cutting edge at the time, PS2 had DVD and the PS3 came with Blu Ray. The 360 came out when DVD which was already well established so of course it is going to cost less, and i fail to see what this has to do with a $99 WiFi adapter that probable costs Microsoft $20 tops to make.

"you have only been ripped off if you feel you have been ripped off"

Yup there's a lot of misinformed people out there, try doing this this. Tell said person that the HDD they are about to spend $120 on really only cost $40~.

Will they feel ripped off now?

firstly, the original xbox was sold at a loss during it's entire lifespan, the ps2 and the ps1 eventually mad SONY a lot of money secondly it has nothing to do with people being misinformed, it's common sense that things are going to cost us a hell of a lot more than they cost to make,anyone that thinks otherwise is off with the fairies, it's the same with everything, how much do you think a DVD costs to mass produce? how much do you think a 100 quid pair of trainers costs to produce, and yopur point about the wireless adapter is completely lost ion me, because there are plenty of cheaper third party wireless adapters that work very well with the 360, and Pc's had CD rom drives ages before the ps1, to call the ps1's cd rom drive 'cutting edge' is just mind boggling, even the megadrive had an add on CD rom drive, and DVD rom drives where around before the Ps2, the dreamcast had one and was released well before the ps2

You were the one who brought up the price of a console at launch, not me. And ya "cutting edge" wasn't the words i should have used, but none the less CD was pretty new back in the PS1 days and thus the price, also i never said DVD wasn't around before the PS2. The technology was relatively new back then so it cost far, far more to put a DVD in the PS2(Don't recall the stand alone £200 DVD players?) then it was for the 360, given the time they released in. Also i'm pretty sure the Dreamcast didn't use DVDs it used some other disc based media (?)

And your point about trainers doesn't apply here, you're comparing an open market to a closed one.

Is there trainers that cost £100? yea i'm pretty there is.

Is there trainers that cost £10? yup

I don't get how people think sony is so great in this respect. In addition to adhering to the exact same practices the two prior gens, you can simply look at the price difference between varying SKU's of the PS3 compared to the difference in manufacturing costs. The 60 gig added maybe 10-15 bucks of manufacturing cost and netted a 100 dollar price difference to the consumer. Where is you outrage for that? MS set Sony up big time and put them in a lose lose situation. Sony was either going to have to sell high to be profitable and be far behind in pricepoint, or lose their shirt to remain competitive on pricepoint. Keeping the price high and they lose marketshare...keeping the price low and you lose too much money to ever make a profit. MS set sony up for pain the minute they went with a normal DVD drive.
Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

[QUOTE="micky4889"]What if you already have a 360? Are you meant to sell it along with all your games? Lose all the friends you've made on live, etc. Just because you don't agree with the price of Microsofts add-ons ?

Sorry but the old "so don't buy it" argument is weak. imo

micky4889

What if you buy a 360 without knowing enough about it to accurately judge it's value? I would say that is still completely your fault, making the "just don't buy it if you don't wan what it offers" stronger.

So you would blame all the mums that bought a 360 for their children, all the grand parents who bought a 360 for their loved ones for birthdays, Christmas etc. for not breaking out a laptop and researching every little detail about the product before they purchase it? You wouldn't blame Microsoft at all?

Nobody would mind if they made $10-$20 profit, every company has to profit in some way, but we're talking about buying in a 3rd party HDD slapping an MS sticker on it, and selling it for over 3-4 times it's worth. If it was an open market, it wouldn't matter but it's the fact that the consumers who own a 360 don't have a choice, it's either spend that absurd amount of money on an MS HDD, or you can't have one at all.

You're looking at things through too narrow of a scope. You lose on the machine, you make it back on higher margins on accessories and games. It's like the razor razorblade reltionship or printer/printer cartridge model. The cost of entry is cheap but the consumables over the lifespan make the venture as a whole profitable.