MS:" Women Are The New Core" :/

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] Dude you're literally an idiot if you think I said anyhting against that. Sorry but i had nothing to do with how far this thread has been blown out of proportion which is why I said to go back and read. I literally didn't say any of the sexist anti women gamer crap.wasted_wisdom

golly! don't look at him. he dint do nuffin! he dint make a leading topic with a negative connotations towards how bad ms is for including womens.

golly! no!

he dint do it.

leave him be y'all bad people.

Yeah your stupid paranoia doesn't have anything to do with that interpretation of the OP and then people in the first few pages before you and your trolling friends showed up and started arguing with everyone and abandoning your arguments half way have absolutely nothing to do with why this thread is blown out of proportion. Oh and you don't care remember?

my argument is heartbroken because of......

 

th?id=H.5035145701163999&pid=15.1

oh laws! oh lawsy laws now  i'm doing it.

that ms is making me an abandon-er!

Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts

What's wrong with stating women are the new core?  Is the TC sexist?

Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#153 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts

[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="super600"]

Goodbye annyoing troll

A narrative writer for Microsoft Studios has said that "women are the new core" and that creating more diverse stories, including more female characters and ethnicities, will make for better games.

The bolded is talked about throughout that article.

super600

I LITERALLY SAID THIS ON PAGE 2 It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming,THEY'RE INTEGRATING MORE STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS INTO THEIR GAMES, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good.

Their talking about trying to create games that represent women more in terms of story.

Who the hell said they weren't talking about this or that or those or whatever. What the hell does this have to do with me? I posted a link and I said "I can kinda' see where he's going but it can either be good or really really bad and when I say really really bad I mean Kinect and Dancing Family on stage at E3 Bad. And if they actually put a dancing family on stage at E3 I will...I don't know what I'll do." And then I also said:: (Literally IF I HAVE TO REPEAT THIS AGAIN I'M DONE TALKING TO YOU) I LITERALLY SAID THIS ON PAGE 2 It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming,THEY'RE INTEGRATING MORE STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS INTO THEIR GAMES, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good. Oh and FVCK off they'r enot talking about representing women in terms of story they're talking about more games with women lead characters and portraying women as strong and huge part of society as they are today, which is why I said this::(AND FVCKING READ!!!!) But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good.""" You don't understand that the people arguing in this thread are idiots who like to twist things to whatever translation they want to.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts

What's wrong with stating women are the new core?  Is the TC sexist?

jimmypsn
OMFG??? Are you kidding me? YOU SHOULD GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD AND THEN PUNCH YOURSELF IN THE FACE
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#155 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
This whole thread is pretty disgusting. The biggest takeaway from that article, if you actually read it, was the following: "Microsoft studios has said that... creating more diverse stories, including more female characters and ethnicities, will make for better games." What exactly is so wrong about that?
Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#156 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] I LITERALLY SAID THIS ON PAGE 2 It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming,THEY'RE INTEGRATING MORE STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS INTO THEIR GAMES, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good.wasted_wisdom

Their talking about trying to create games that represent women more in terms of story.

Who the hell said they weren't talking about this or that or those or whatever. What the hell does this have to do with me? I posted a link and I said "I can kinda' see where he's going but it can either be good or really really bad and when I say really really bad I mean Kinect and Dancing Family on stage at E3 Bad. And if they actually put a dancing family on stage at E3 I will...I don't know what I'll do." And then I also said:: (Literally IF I HAVE TO REPEAT THIS AGAIN I'M DONE TALKING TO YOU) I LITERALLY SAID THIS ON PAGE 2 It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming,THEY'RE INTEGRATING MORE STRONG FEMALE CHARACTERS INTO THEIR GAMES, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good. Oh and FVCK off they'r enot talking about representing women in terms of story they're talking about more games with women lead characters and portraying women as strong and huge part of society as they are today, which is why I said this::(AND FVCKING READ!!!!) But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good.""" You don't understand that the people arguing in this thread are idiots who like to twist things to whatever translation they want to.

They never mentioned kinect. They were talking about the story in games and how women should be represented more in a game.Please tell me how you intrepreted the article like that.

Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

What's wrong with stating women are the new core?  Is the TC sexist?

wasted_wisdom
OMFG??? Are you kidding me? YOU SHOULD GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD AND THEN PUNCH YOURSELF IN THE FACE

Sorry but it just comes off as a women hating thread. Don't take it personal.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]This whole thread is pretty disgusting. The biggest takeaway from that article, if you actually read it, was the following: "Microsoft studios has said that... creating more diverse stories, including more female characters and ethnicities, will make for better games." What exactly is so wrong about that?

NOTHING!!! I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING IS WRONG. I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE IDIOTS WHO CAME IN AND BLEW EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTION
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="jimmypsn"] Sorry but it just comes off as a women hating thread. Don't take it personal.

[QUOTE="iPage"]

But no one will but the next Xbox then, because most women don't have a TV in their kitchen.

 

555998_407596535942602_1828277627_n.jpg

wasted_wisdom
Reported : ) THAT'S SEXIST DUDE

Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"]
[QUOTE="iPage"]

But no one will but the next Xbox then, because most women don't have a TV in their kitchen.

 

555998_407596535942602_1828277627_n.jpg

wasted_wisdom
Reported : ) THAT'S SEXIST DUDE

If its not a women hating thread, what was the motive behind it. Are you saying its pathetic for MS to go after female gamers or maybe other group of ethnicities?
Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#161 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

What's wrong with stating women are the new core?  Is the TC sexist?

jimmypsn

 

mens-and-womens-bathrooms-you-sexist-bas

 

Lol dem americans and their "political correctness" bullshlt :lol:

Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
I literally reported someone for being sexist. People were going off topic and I even said this::
[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

[QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"]Sexism is not sexy. Don't be one. wasted_wisdom

I know you were not talking to me, but...

How can one be a sexism?

also, who the hell thinks sexism is sexy? I guess I missed that part... lol

I'm not bashing what you posted, I was just wondering, and laughing a little.

Can we stay on the topic please? Geez! Does everyone in this forum have ADD? "Sony announces a new Unchar..." Hey look the TC only capitalized the first letter in Sony. Let's focus on that and ignore the point of the OP!!!

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#163 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]This whole thread is pretty disgusting. The biggest takeaway from that article, if you actually read it, was the following: "Microsoft studios has said that... creating more diverse stories, including more female characters and ethnicities, will make for better games." What exactly is so wrong about that?

NOTHING!!! I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING IS WRONG. I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE IDIOTS WHO CAME IN AND BLEW EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTION

The problem is you and pretty much the entire first two pages. Just flipping through the comments, you and other posters took the article as MS saying they're pandering to casuals by wanting to diversify video games. Why would you even make this thread if you agreed with MS?
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="jimmypsn"] Reported : ) THAT'S SEXIST DUDE

If its not a women hating thread, what was the motive behind it. Are you saying its pathetic for MS to go after female gamers or maybe other group of ethnicities?

No I was posting a freaking link you freaking..... No...I'm sexist. I'M SO FREAKING SEXIST. OH MY GOD I'M SO FREAKING SEXIST.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#165 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

What's wrong with stating women are the new core?  Is the TC sexist?

BlbecekBobecek

Lol dem americans and their "political correctness" bullshlt :lol:

I am no radical feminist, but you misrepresent the original article completely if you actually believe this has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness.
Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts

I have no clue what the TC was going for in this thread.  He's saying one thing but telling others that not what he meant.  lolwut?  I just figured this thread backfired somehow.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#167 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"]wasted_wisdom
If its not a women hating thread, what was the motive behind it. Are you saying its pathetic for MS to go after female gamers or maybe other group of ethnicities?

No I was posting a freaking link you freaking..... No...I'm sexist. I'M SO FREAKING SEXIST. OH MY GOD I'M SO FREAKING SEXIST.

You are really, really annoying and when I read your posts I think I'm reading a 14 year olds' Tumblr. I would really recommend you take a break from System Wars. If you actually are a troll, though... 11/10.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.
Avatar image for jimmypsn
jimmypsn

4425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 jimmypsn
Member since 2010 • 4425 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmypsn"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"]wasted_wisdom
If its not a women hating thread, what was the motive behind it. Are you saying its pathetic for MS to go after female gamers or maybe other group of ethnicities?

No I was posting a freaking link you freaking..... No...I'm sexist. I'M SO FREAKING SEXIST. OH MY GOD I'M SO FREAKING SEXIST.

I think your point was to make MS look bad somehow....I just don't see it.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"]This whole thread is pretty disgusting. The biggest takeaway from that article, if you actually read it, was the following: "Microsoft studios has said that... creating more diverse stories, including more female characters and ethnicities, will make for better games." What exactly is so wrong about that?

NOTHING!!! I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING IS WRONG. I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE IDIOTS WHO CAME IN AND BLEW EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTION

The problem is you and pretty much the entire first two pages. Just flipping through the comments, you and other posters took the article as MS saying they're pandering to casuals by wanting to diversify video games. Why would you even make this thread if you agreed with MS?

THIS IS WHAT I SAID ON PAGE 2:: " Pretty sure I said I see where he's going with it. And are you saying don't be sexism or don't be sexy or don't be a sexy sexism because if sexism isn't sexy then being a sexy sexist is going to take a lot of skill, and between this forum and my ps3 and my guitar and my drums and my job and training and Taylor Swift, I don't know if I can squeeze off enough time to pull this off. But I have been known to be sexy. NOT SEXIST" AND ALSO ON PAGE 3 "It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good."
Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#171 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.freedomfreak

It;s to late for that. The damage has already been done.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#172 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] NOTHING!!! I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING IS WRONG. I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE IDIOTS WHO CAME IN AND BLEW EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTIONwasted_wisdom
The problem is you and pretty much the entire first two pages. Just flipping through the comments, you and other posters took the article as MS saying they're pandering to casuals by wanting to diversify video games. Why would you even make this thread if you agreed with MS?

THIS IS WHAT I SAID ON PAGE 2:: " Pretty sure I said I see where he's going with it. And are you saying don't be sexism or don't be sexy or don't be a sexy sexism because if sexism isn't sexy then being a sexy sexist is going to take a lot of skill, and between this forum and my ps3 and my guitar and my drums and my job and training and Taylor Swift, I don't know if I can squeeze off enough time to pull this off. But I have been known to be sexy. NOT SEXIST" AND ALSO ON PAGE 3 "It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good."

How the hell are you infering that their going for a casual audience based on what they said?:lol:

Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#173 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="jimmypsn"]

What's wrong with stating women are the new core?  Is the TC sexist?

princeofshapeir

Lol dem americans and their "political correctness" bullshlt :lol:

I am no radical feminist, but you misrepresent the original article completely if you actually believe this has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness.

I dont think the original article has to do with hypersensitivity and political corectness, I think the guy I quoted has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness. Thats why I quoted him. :roll:

Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.

lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts

[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] The problem is you and pretty much the entire first two pages. Just flipping through the comments, you and other posters took the article as MS saying they're pandering to casuals by wanting to diversify video games. Why would you even make this thread if you agreed with MS? super600

THIS IS WHAT I SAID ON PAGE 2:: " Pretty sure I said I see where he's going with it. And are you saying don't be sexism or don't be sexy or don't be a sexy sexism because if sexism isn't sexy then being a sexy sexist is going to take a lot of skill, and between this forum and my ps3 and my guitar and my drums and my job and training and Taylor Swift, I don't know if I can squeeze off enough time to pull this off. But I have been known to be sexy. NOT SEXIST" AND ALSO ON PAGE 3 "It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good."

How the hell are you infering that their going for a casual audience based on what they said?:lol:

"It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers." ARE YOU SERIOUS? YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS.
Avatar image for KarateeeChop
KarateeeChop

4666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#176 KarateeeChop
Member since 2010 • 4666 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.wasted_wisdom
lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.

what's that tc? you got something against women?

you should feel bad.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#177 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] NOTHING!!! I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING IS WRONG. I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. I LITERALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE IDIOTS WHO CAME IN AND BLEW EVERYTHING OUT OF PROPORTION

The problem is you and pretty much the entire first two pages. Just flipping through the comments, you and other posters took the article as MS saying they're pandering to casuals by wanting to diversify video games. Why would you even make this thread if you agreed with MS?

THIS IS WHAT I SAID ON PAGE 2:: " Pretty sure I said I see where he's going with it. And are you saying don't be sexism or don't be sexy or don't be a sexy sexism because if sexism isn't sexy then being a sexy sexist is going to take a lot of skill, and between this forum and my ps3 and my guitar and my drums and my job and training and Taylor Swift, I don't know if I can squeeze off enough time to pull this off. But I have been known to be sexy. NOT SEXIST" AND ALSO ON PAGE 3 "It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good."

It is very clear from the article what MS's stance is. Women are becoming more and more attracted to video games; gaming isn't just a "boys club" anymore. Therefore, they want to promote more games with a diverse cast of characters. I guess if you're committed to loathing Microsoft you'll try to spin the headline "MS: "Women are the New Core"" into "MS wants to make games more casual", but taking that away from the article is in itself a sexist line of thought.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.super600

It;s to late for that. The damage has already been done.

LOL damage? fvck you dude. Seriously.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#179 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]Lol dem americans and their "political correctness" bullshlt :lol:

BlbecekBobecek

I am no radical feminist, but you misrepresent the original article completely if you actually believe this has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness.

I dont think the original article has to do with hypersensitivity and political corectness, I think the guy I quoted has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness. Thats why I quoted him. :roll:

It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core."
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.

lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.

I'm not here to argue. You were misleading in both your topic title and OP. You made a mistake. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but I expect you to at least apologize and acknowledge you could've handled it better. If you feel uncomfortable apologizing here, you can PM me instead. Thank you.
Avatar image for ShoulderOfOrion
ShoulderOfOrion

3379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 ShoulderOfOrion
Member since 2013 • 3379 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.

lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.

I'm not here to argue. You were misleading in both your topic title and OP. You made a mistake. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but I expect you to at least apologize and acknowledge you could've handled it better. If you feel uncomfortable apologizing here, you can PM me instead. Thank you.

I'm sorry!
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] The problem is you and pretty much the entire first two pages. Just flipping through the comments, you and other posters took the article as MS saying they're pandering to casuals by wanting to diversify video games. Why would you even make this thread if you agreed with MS?

THIS IS WHAT I SAID ON PAGE 2:: " Pretty sure I said I see where he's going with it. And are you saying don't be sexism or don't be sexy or don't be a sexy sexism because if sexism isn't sexy then being a sexy sexist is going to take a lot of skill, and between this forum and my ps3 and my guitar and my drums and my job and training and Taylor Swift, I don't know if I can squeeze off enough time to pull this off. But I have been known to be sexy. NOT SEXIST" AND ALSO ON PAGE 3 "It doesn't really explain what they mean. Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or they ARE actually saying that women ARE the core gamers. Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest. And It's funny cause with this news Lems at this point who've been defending MS must be thinking "Come on M$ you're killing me here." But I do want to point out that SOny has had a lot of strong female protagonists exclusives. Heavenly Sword, Heavy Rain, That upcoming Quantic Dream Game, Uncharted's Nathan's girlfriends, Meryl from MGS4. So this is something Sony has already been doing. IDK Lems this isn't looking too good."

It is very clear from the article what MS's stance is. Women are becoming more and more attracted to video games; gaming isn't just a "boys club" anymore. Therefore, they want to promote more games with a diverse cast of characters. I guess if you're committed to loathing Microsoft you'll try to spin the headline "MS: "Women are the New Core"" into "MS wants to make games more casual", but taking that away from the article is in itself a sexist line of thought.

OHHHH SO WHEN I FREAKING SAID "Either they're going for a casual audience that involved getting more women into gaming, they're integrating more strong female characters into their games, or THEY ARE ACTUALLY SAYING THAT WOMEN ARE THE CORE GAMERS." ON PAGE THREE, THAT DOESN'T CONNECT WITH THE INTERPRETATION YOU JUST CAME UP WITH RIGHT??? Fvck off. And stop acting like the article actually has a clear message. Your interpretation is different from Super600s or whatever his name is so you guys already cancelled each other out AND IT'S FUNNY CAUSE I COVERED BOTH YOUR FREAKING INTERPRETATIONS ON PAGE FREAKING 3 BUT LIKE I SAID YOU'RE TOO LAZY TO GO BACK AND READ SO LET'S ATTACK THE TC
Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#183 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] I am no radical feminist, but you misrepresent the original article completely if you actually believe this has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness. princeofshapeir

I dont think the original article has to do with hypersensitivity and political corectness, I think the guy I quoted has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness. Thats why I quoted him. :roll:

It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core."

 

Isnt it "hardcorist" claiming that causals are a bad thing? You hardcorist creep! :lol:

 

Omg why is "sexist" even a word? It really shouldnt be and I feel like the fact it is has a lot to do with the crisis of our western society.

Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"]You messed up, TC. Topic title is everything. Clarify next time. Steer the discussion into the right direction. Apologize.

lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.

I'm not here to argue. You were misleading in both your topic title and OP. You made a mistake. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but I expect you to at least apologize and acknowledge you could've handled it better. If you feel uncomfortable apologizing here, you can PM me instead. Thank you.

I'm sorry freedom but literally I tried and even said to stay on topic and I reported someone for trying to drag this into a sexist thing. I clarified plenty of ttimes my views of the topic. People are going to interprete it how they want. I can't be held responsible.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.

I'm not here to argue. You were misleading in both your topic title and OP. You made a mistake. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but I expect you to at least apologize and acknowledge you could've handled it better. If you feel uncomfortable apologizing here, you can PM me instead. Thank you.

I'm sorry!

You have nothing to be sorry about. You tried to discuss the topic at hand and TC bashed you for it. You are the victim here. Not the perpetrator.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

I dont think the original article has to do with hypersensitivity and political corectness, I think the guy I quoted has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness. Thats why I quoted him. :roll:

BlbecekBobecek

It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core."

 

Isnt it "hardcorist" claiming that causals are a bad thing? You hardcorist creep! :lol:

 

Omg why is "sexist" even a word? It really shouldnt be and I feel like the fact it is has a lot to do with the crisis of our western society.

Isn't it hardcorist claiming that casuals are a bad thing? Yes because in first OP it doesn't say that "THIS CAN BE EITHER GOOD OR REALLY BAD" RIGHT THERE ON THE FIRST FREAKING PAGE.
Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] I'm not here to argue. You were misleading in both your topic title and OP. You made a mistake. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but I expect you to at least apologize and acknowledge you could've handled it better. If you feel uncomfortable apologizing here, you can PM me instead. Thank you.

I'm sorry!

You have nothing to be sorry about. You tried to discuss the topic at hand and TC bashed you for it. You are the victim here. Not the perpetrator.

Whoa what? I didn't bash her? What we were joking together earlier in the thread. What??? YOU GUYS ARE LITERALLY KILLING ME
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] lol I didn't do a freaking thing wrong so I won't apologize just because a few self righteous a-holes want to come late into a thread and are too lazy to go back and read what happened in the thread. the title said "MS: Women are the new core" however the hell idiots choose to interpret it even after I go through the effort of clarifying my views and even reporting someone who WAS being sexist, is totally up to them.

I'm not here to argue. You were misleading in both your topic title and OP. You made a mistake. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, but I expect you to at least apologize and acknowledge you could've handled it better. If you feel uncomfortable apologizing here, you can PM me instead. Thank you.

I'm sorry freedom but literally I tried and even said to stay on topic and I reported someone for trying to drag this into a sexist thing. I clarified plenty of ttimes my views of the topic. People are going to interprete it how they want. I can't be held responsible.

That's all I wanted to hear. You tried your best. You can't keep them all in line. I forgive you.
Avatar image for ShoulderOfOrion
ShoulderOfOrion

3379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 ShoulderOfOrion
Member since 2013 • 3379 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"] I'm sorry!

You have nothing to be sorry about. You tried to discuss the topic at hand and TC bashed you for it. You are the victim here. Not the perpetrator.

He didn't bash me! He was really nice and lovely.
Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#190 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core." wasted_wisdom

 

Isnt it "hardcorist" claiming that causals are a bad thing? You hardcorist creep! :lol:

 

Omg why is "sexist" even a word? It really shouldnt be and I feel like the fact it is has a lot to do with the crisis of our western society.

Isn't it hardcorist claiming that casuals are a bad thing? Yes because in first OP it doesn't say that "THIS CAN BE EITHER GOOD OR REALLY BAD" RIGHT THERE ON THE FIRST FREAKING PAGE.

You wont talk yourself out of this, hardcorist filth! Oh I so hate hardcorism!

Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] Pretty sure I said I see where he's going with it. And are you saying don't be sexism or don't be sexy or don't be a sexy sexism because if sexism isn't sexy then being a sexy sexist is going to take a lot of skill, and between this forum and my ps3 and my guitar and my drums and my job and training and Taylor Swift, I don't know if I can squeeze off enough time to pull this off. But I have been known to be sexy. NOT SEXIST

I'm sure you are very sexy!

i'm sooo sexayyyy

:)) See? We were having fun. And thanks
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"] I'm sorry!

You have nothing to be sorry about. You tried to discuss the topic at hand and TC bashed you for it. You are the victim here. Not the perpetrator.

Whoa what? I didn't bash her? What we were joking together earlier in the thread. What??? YOU GUYS ARE LITERALLY KILLING ME

Someone bashed her. Perhaps it wasn't you. That's alright. I'll have a look around and see if I can find the individual that did so.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#193 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

I dont think the original article has to do with hypersensitivity and political corectness, I think the guy I quoted has to do with hypersensitivity and political correctness. Thats why I quoted him. :roll:

BlbecekBobecek

It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core."

 

Isnt it "hardcorist" claiming that causals are a bad thing? You hardcorist creep! :lol:

 

Omg why is "sexist" even a word? It really shouldnt be and I feel like the fact it is has a lot to do with the crisis of our western society.

I wasn't the one who made the thread. I never said casuals were necessarily bad. TC's line of thinking was that MS saying "women are the new core" translated to "casuals are the new core" which in turn translates, in his mind, to "we're going to make more Kinect games." See: "I can kinda' see where he's going but it can either be good or really really bad and when I say really really bad I mean Kinect and Dancing Family on stage at E3 Bad. And if they actually put a dancing family on stage at E3 I will...I don't know what I'll do."
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"] I'm sorry!

You have nothing to be sorry about. You tried to discuss the topic at hand and TC bashed you for it. You are the victim here. Not the perpetrator.

He didn't bash me! He was really nice and lovely.

I can't get much better proof than that of the victim herself. Thank you. You're off the list, TC.
Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#195 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core." wasted_wisdom

 

Isnt it "hardcorist" claiming that causals are a bad thing? You hardcorist creep! :lol:

 

Omg why is "sexist" even a word? It really shouldnt be and I feel like the fact it is has a lot to do with the crisis of our western society.

Isn't it hardcorist claiming that casuals are a bad thing? Yes because in first OP it doesn't say that "THIS CAN BE EITHER GOOD OR REALLY BAD" RIGHT THERE ON THE FIRST FREAKING PAGE.

You did a very good job of only illustrating the possible "bad" consequences, and your little ":/" at the end of the thread title makes it seem like you think it's a bad thing.
Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 freedomfreak  Online
Member since 2004 • 52546 Posts
[QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="wasted_wisdom"] I'm sure you are very sexy!

i'm sooo sexayyyy

:)) See? We were having fun. And thanks

I'm very insecure about my looks and now you're toying with them? I'm trying to be nice here, but you just flatout insult me with those comments.
Avatar image for ShoulderOfOrion
ShoulderOfOrion

3379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 ShoulderOfOrion
Member since 2013 • 3379 Posts
So everyone is happy? That's great! No one should be upset, everyone should be enjoying themselves.
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#198 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core." princeofshapeir

The guy quoted in the article reeks of both political correctness and naivety, considering he's trying to speak collectively by admitting a fault that noone actually committed. I can't think of many pieces of media that have greatly improved, or improved at all, because of diversity in the somatic traits of their characters, and we've been going on for centuries considering literacy, poetry and compositions made for theatre representations; in fact I believe that notion is in huge disharmony with the fundamental objectives pc people want to push, equality. It's a poisonous mindset.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#199 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core." N30F3N1X

The guy quoted in the article reeks of both political correctness and naivety, considering he's trying to speak collectively by admitting a fault that noone actually committed. I can't think of many pieces of media that have greatly improved, or improved at all, because of diversity in the somatic traits of their characters, and we've been going on for centuries considering literacy, poetry and compositions made for theatre representations; in fact I believe that notion is in huge disharmony with the fundamental objectives pc people want to push, equality. It's a poisonous mindset.

You seriously don't consider film or literature to have been enhanced as a result of gender and ethnic diversity? 

Avatar image for wasted_wisdom
wasted_wisdom

1767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 wasted_wisdom
Member since 2008 • 1767 Posts
[QUOTE="BlbecekBobecek"]

[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"] It is pretty sexist to make a thread claiming this as a bad thing. TC essentially stated that "women are the new core" implies "casuals are the new core." princeofshapeir

 

Isnt it "hardcorist" claiming that causals are a bad thing? You hardcorist creep! :lol:

 

Omg why is "sexist" even a word? It really shouldnt be and I feel like the fact it is has a lot to do with the crisis of our western society.

I wasn't the one who made the thread. I never said casuals were necessarily bad. TC's line of thinking was that MS saying "women are the new core" translated to "casuals are the new core" which in turn translates, in his mind, to "we're going to make more Kinect games." See: "I can kinda' see where he's going but it can either be good or really really bad and when I say really really bad I mean Kinect and Dancing Family on stage at E3 Bad. And if they actually put a dancing family on stage at E3 I will...I don't know what I'll do."

Yeah and the further explanation on page three that I've already posted doesn't clarify that at all. You and I have an argument history in another thread so you're interpretation of what I'm trying to say in this thread was already skewed and you're pretty much taking the OP as you want to take it because that's definitely not what I meant as I explained on Page 3 which I've already quoted for you. You have nothing to say dude. fvck off. I don't owe you an explanation and you know what??? so what??? You're saying the article might mean MS means to put more strong female lead characters in their games in order to connect with more girls, which like i said on PAGE FREAKING THREE that maybe this is what they mean to which I also said that Sony is already doing that with games like heavenly sword, heavy rain, Meryl from MGS4, Nathan Drake's girls in Uncharted. I also said the article can mean that they're trying to attract women gamers into gaming which is where my Kinect concept came from because in all honesty who's freaking fault is that? What kinect ad have you seen with someone playing a core game and not some family dancing in the living room? And then I said or maybe the article means that women ARE THE CORE GAMERS, to which I called bullshtt and also said "Ok first of all, half the girls who claim to be gamers are fakers who only say that to attract guys because they know most guys find girls who play video games attractive and every guy wants a girlfriend he can play co op with once a while. Not being sexist but being realistic and honest." And if you want to argue that let's go at it. OH maybe you're saying I think that they're saying women are the core gamers and automatically assumed that women=casual and maybe you're saying I'm sexist for that? In which case not true but honestly even if it was true and if that's what I WAS SAYING then IT IS TRUE. Because in how many chance in hell do you think in that fantasy denial self-righteous world you live in that you're going to go to your buddy's house and find Mrs. Taskir playing core games like Gears and COD?