I'm just going to use this as an example. I've played both of these games in their entirety and enjoyed them both. So before you start calling me a fanboy or something, just understand that. Also, I'm sure I'm going to be getting a bunch of "if you don't like it, then leave" statements here. I'm not complaining, I'm not bashing any games, I'm just pointing out something and asking if anyone else notices this.
Again, just an example. Mass Effect got an 8.5. It got points deducted for pop ins and framerate problems. I don't necessarily have a huge problem with that. However, the same reviewer turned around and gave No More Heroes a 9.0. That game didn't exactly have great visuals, even by Wii standards. I've honestly seen games that looked better on the PS2, and they ran better as well. NMH had framerate drops regularly. NMH also had fairly severetexture pop ins at times. NMH did have exciting gameplay, don't get me wrong. However, when looking at these two games, it just seems like there are double standards there. I've seen this happen with various other games as well, but I just thought this was a good example.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Log in to comment