Name the stupidest criticism aimed at each of the big 3.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#1 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

For Sony, it's:

They make nothing but linear experiences.

This is not only idiotic, but it's not even true. The Infamous series is the obvious example destroying that argument, but what really needs to be said is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with linear experiences. Linear experiences benefit from momentum and focus (tho there is a such thing as too linear). The people that think open world=good and linear=bad are stoopid.

For Microsoft, it's:

Microsoft is evil because they charge for online.

Xbox Live is a service. Microsoft has a right to charge for a service they provide. Deal with it.

For Nintendo, it's:

Nintendo makes games for kids. This is stupid because Mario and Zelda have plenty of adult fans and their core gameplay is no more kiddy than anything else. Then you have games like Metroid, which is obviously not kiddy; Sin and Punishment, Fire Emblem, etc. Even games that look kind of kind friendly are not neccesarily kid friendly, i.e. Pikmin. Anybody who actually uses this criticism has a total of two functioning braincells.

What are the stupidest criticism IYO?

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts
PS3: No games Wii: No games 360: No games at some point all three have had this criticism.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#3 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

PS3: No games Wii: No games 360: No games at some point all three have had this criticism.APiranhaAteMyVa

Yeah, can't really argue with this post.

Avatar image for Inotian
Inotian

274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Inotian
Member since 2012 • 274 Posts

For Sony, it's:

They make nothing but linear experiences.

This is not only idiotic, but it's not even true. The Infamous series is the obvious example destroying that argument, but what really needs to be said is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with linear experiences. Linear experiences benefit from momentum and focus (tho there is a such thing as too linear). The people that think open world=good and linear=bad are stoopid.

For Microsoft, it's:

Microsoft is evil because they charge for online.

Xbox Live is a service. Microsoft has a right to charge for a service they provide. Deal with it.

For Nintendo, it's:

Nintendo makes games for kids. This is stupid because Mario and Zelda have plenty of adult fans and their core gameplay is no more kiddy than anything else. Then you have games like Metroid, which is obviously not kiddy; Sin and Punishment, Fire Emblem, etc. Even games that look kind of kind friendly are not neccesarily kid friendly, i.e. Pikmin. Anybody who actually uses this criticism has a total of two functioning braincells.

What are the stupidest criticism IYO?

GreySeal9

You pretty much have it spot on , though your Nintendo one is arguable.

Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts
One that can be applied for all three as well. "game x doesnt sell" If a game didn't sell it would literally wouldn't sell anything not one single copy.
Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

Revealing way too many games.

Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

One that can be applied for all three as well. "game x doesnt sell" If a game didn't sell it would literally wouldn't sell anything not one single copy.carlisledavid79
Kind of going along with the improper use of words.

The fact that people on here don't know how to use the word dislike. People never dislike anything on here, they just say it sucks or it is bad. There is a huge difference between something being bad and someone just not enjoying the game.

Avatar image for apocalypsehorse
apocalypsehorse

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 apocalypsehorse
Member since 2010 • 417 Posts

The stupidest argument ever on this forum is that one entire console is better than another because of "game y" or "feature x"

no one system can be the best for everyone.

Avatar image for apocalypsehorse
apocalypsehorse

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 apocalypsehorse
Member since 2010 • 417 Posts

[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"]One that can be applied for all three as well. "game x doesnt sell" If a game didn't sell it would literally wouldn't sell anything not one single copy.CajunShooter

Kind of going along with the improper use of words.

The fact that people on here don't know how to use the word dislike. People never dislike anything on here, they just say it sucks or it is bad. There is a huge difference between something being bad and someone just not enjoying the game.

I'll also agree with this as well.

To me improper use of wrods means you don't really know what your talking about and cannot be trusted in its entirety.

Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts

[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"]One that can be applied for all three as well. "game x doesnt sell" If a game didn't sell it would literally wouldn't sell anything not one single copy.CajunShooter

Kind of going along with the improper use of words.

The fact that people on here don't know how to use the word dislike. People never dislike anything on here, they just say it sucks or it is bad. There is a huge difference between something being bad and someone just not enjoying the game.

also Console X is dead No-one plays game Y online
Avatar image for nhh18
nhh18

6538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 nhh18
Member since 2009 • 6538 Posts

Every 3rd person action game is a gears of war uncharted clone. This is the only criticism that gets:question: from me.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
Member since 2006 • 6013 Posts

"OMG, those bastards copy the idea from my system of choice, they have no creativity and copy everything".

While it may be kind of true, it's basically the nature of every industry:

One company is leader, it's mission is to innovate knowing that the other companies will try to come up with something like what they have, with some extra perk.

Other companies are predators, they see what the leader came up with, and try to use it making it better.

Basic stuff for everyone that went to the university and had to study something company-related.